Skip to content

Metaphysics Explored

Metaphysics Explored is a participatory investigation of physical relationships that our present descriptions may omit, merge, or leave unresolved. It brings together diverse metaphysical communities, physical experiments, and shared observation records. Its ambition is a population of hundreds or thousands of experiments whose relationships may reveal more than any experiment considered alone.

Let physical interactions expose consequential relationships before requiring a complete theory of what those relationships are.

Research status: This is an exploratory programme and a set of proposed experiments. No findings from this programme are reported here. A shared quantum consciousness, intention-induced changes in radioactive decay, and new fundamental dimensions remain hypotheses to investigate rather than established mechanisms.

Physical interactions and human representations

Scientific language, mathematical operators, units, and models represent selected relationships. A useful prediction does not establish that its representation contains every involvement contributing to the outcome. An instrument can respond to a physical influence even when that influence is absent from the explanation used by its designer.

James Dunn’s Substrate Cosmology perspective treats matter, time, energy, and other scientific categories as human descriptions rather than assumed final foundations of reality. It proposes that familiar states and central tendencies may condense much richer physical involvement. This philosophical starting point motivates the investigation; it is not presented as an experimentally demonstrated replacement for existing physics.

The initial objective is to bring physical embodiments into different combinations: materials, geometries, preparations, environments, instruments, and human activities. “Orthogonal” describes the search for arrangements that expose distinguishable aspects of an interaction. Independence is something to investigate, not something guaranteed by giving arrangements different names.

Measurements in seconds, frequencies, or counts remain useful ways to record observations. Their use does not require treating these descriptors as an exhaustive account of what physically occurs.

Exploring the negative space of a frame

Negative space names what a particular representation leaves out or cannot distinguish. It is relative to that representation; it is not empty space and is not a measured inventory of all unknown physics.

A gap need not appear as a dramatic failure of a prediction. Different physical involvements might produce readings that an existing summary groups together. New arrangements could make those previously merged differences consequentially distinguishable. Agreement within one frame therefore does not establish completeness.

The search includes nonlinear relationships, unusual timing, changes in distributions, dependencies among channels, order effects, and patterns that appear only in combinations. Neither conformity to a predicted average nor departure from it is a requirement for an observation to deserve attention.

Why involve metaphysical communities?

Metaphysical and contemplative communities explore diverse practices involving attention, intention, meditation, prayer, chanting, ritual objects, crystals, wands, amulets, and shared gatherings. These offer a broad population of activities and interpretations around which physical observations can be documented.

Participation does not establish that these practices already act through an unknown force or quantum connection. It creates opportunities to observe what occurs in their presence. Communities can describe their practices in their own terms while contributing clear records of the physical arrangements and activities involved.

Participants’ experiences belong in the record as experiences. Sensor observations belong in the record as measurements. Proposed explanations connect these records only to the extent supported by further investigation. The project accommodates disagreement and publishes null, adverse, and unresolved outcomes alongside interesting patterns.

Discovery across hundreds or thousands of experiments

The central hypothesis is that an unrecognized involvement could affect several experiments, with different expressions in different arrangements. A relationship might appear in crystal vibration in one setting, photon-event timing in another, and radiation-count relationships in a third. Those examples describe possibilities, not findings.

Experiment diversity is part of the proposal. The network does not require every organization to enact an identical ritual or test a single predetermined theory. Common records make it possible to compare otherwise different experiments: what was present, how it was arranged, what the instruments could register, what happened, and what processing was applied.

  1. Observe broadly: retain the original instrument records and descriptions of the circumstances.
  2. Explore relationships: examine individual records and recurring relationships across experiments without requiring an established explanation.
  3. Describe candidate dimensions: develop variables or relational descriptions that organize recurring responses.
  4. Return to physical experiments: investigate whether the emerging descriptions anticipate responses in fresh sessions, changed arrangements, or independently operated equipment.

A large number of experiments expands both opportunities for discovery and opportunities for coincidence. Experiments can share weather, electronics, clocks, software, and interpretive habits. Those connections are part of the investigation rather than automatic evidence for one particular hidden mechanism.

Raw observations do not have to fit expectations

Preserve what the instruments record. Raw observations need not follow an expected distribution or produce an expected response. Retain the readings, timestamps, missing intervals, calibration information, instrument settings, and descriptions of the surrounding conditions.

Humidity, temperature, pressure, vibration, and electromagnetic activity can be subjects of discovery themselves. A relationship associated with humidity does not exhaust humidity’s possible interactions with materials and other conditions. Nonlinear environmental relationships are not automatically uninteresting merely because one variable has a familiar name.

Correction, filtering, averaging, and modelling create additional views. Their assumptions and changes must be visible, and they must not overwrite the original record. An apparent effect removed by a correction remains traceable for examination.

“Raw” still means an instrument’s output: its sensitivity, sampling, and electronics already select what can be recorded. The programme therefore values diverse sensing arrangements as well as diverse practices. Exploratory searches remain identifiable as exploration; later tests can freeze a newly discovered relationship and examine whether it persists in fresh observations.

Quartz, diverse sensors, and radioactive-decay observations

One proposed family places a quartz specimen at the centre of a documented arrangement, with radiation counters, optical detectors, instrumented piezoelectric elements or quartz resonators, and environmental sensors nearby. Organizations can investigate different practices, orientations, materials, and combinations while retaining the context of each record.

Similar dimensions do not make crystals physically equivalent. Composition, crystallographic orientation, cut, defects, and mounting can matter. A quantitative resonance measurement requires suitable excitation or readout; the presence of a crystal alone does not demonstrate an amplifying mechanism.

Detected radiation counts and intrinsic nuclear decay rates are different quantities. Geometry, attenuation, background, detector response, and electronics can affect the count record. Public participation starts with ambient background measurements. Isotope-specific work is a separate branch for qualified institutional partners using appropriate sources, handling arrangements, and calibrated detection.

Experiment directory

Each experiment has its own page describing its purpose, physical arrangement, observations, exploratory questions, practical limits, and any available results or data. Experiment pages link back to this hub, and the directory expands as additional experiments are developed.

Each experiment has a direct shareable address and stands on its own. These pages describe proposed investigations; no experimental results are reported. Additional experiments can join this directory with their own identifiers and pages.

From recurring relationships to a dimensional model

A candidate dimension first serves as a description that organizes relationships across observations. It might describe a combination, a dependency, a response history, or another recurring distinction. It is not automatically an additional spatial dimension, a new particle, or a new force.

The longer-term ambition is a model that may augment present physical understanding, potentially including the Standard Model. The first achievement could instead be a useful empirical account of overlooked relationships within familiar physics. A proposed extension of the Standard Model would need a specified physical relationship, distinguishable predictions, and evidence that existing interactions and instrument behaviour do not adequately explain the findings.

The programme begins with discovery. It leaves the underlying explanation open while retaining enough information for emerging interpretations to be challenged, compared, and developed.

Measurement references

These references inform instrument behaviour and the interpretation of measurements. They do not establish the proposed metaphysical mechanisms.

Return to Underpinnings of Relativity