Answer
Content:
All physics equations associated with mass have as part of each equation “meters/second”; i.e. force, momentum, inertia, energy, power, speed…
Meters/Second
Meters, distance, space
Seconds, time
Space/Time
The Sun is dense, and so matter travelling through a field of matter is going to strongly interact…under Newtonian physics. Even traveling near the speed of light, the matter interacts explosively.
Stanford University developed a Rail Gun that shot ceramic projectiles at about 1/3 the speed of light in a vacuum. The projectile was then directed through a thin copper foil into the atmosphere. The ceramic pellet was completely dissociated within a few inches. Air having enough matter to stop a ceramic pellet like a wall.
However, in space time physics the relationship throughout localized systems of matter have non-linear manipulation of “/” within meters/second of a system of matter. Space/time is warped, and matter becomes non-Newtonian.
Feasibly then one form of matter has limited interactions with other forms of matter, energy… Feasibly a spaceship could sit within the Sun without being harmed, and/or travel through the Sun unrelated to speed. A real world example is quantum entanglement.
A real world example of manipulating space time is that the speed of light once thought to be a constant, has been shown to be evolving. Space time is evolving, as shown by entropy, and the observed expansion of the universe.
From one dimension (set of physics constants) to the next. The Big Bang is always 13.7 billion years behind us, even 2 billion years from now it will be 13.7 billion years from that future time. The Big Bang being the limit of white matter (Newtonian matter) being interactive with related energy, forces… The physics constants before the Big Bang are too different for us to observe, it ebbs into Dark Energy.
Dark energy being the causal influences not completely engaged with matter in our system of relativity. Dark Energy coexists within the core of the Sun without significant interaction.
Make a projectile from the dark matter associated with dark energy, and shoot it at the Sun at any speed and it will travel through the Sun mostly unhindered. Similar to neutrino (ghost partucles).
“Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity“
Answer
Content:
Units used: meters, kilograms, seconds
Acceleration = velocity/second
(9.8 meters / second) / second = velocity/second
Assuming along a single vector.
3 kg (9.8 m/s)/s =
p = momentum = mass x velocity
(3 • 9.8)p/s)
Acceleration is meters per second, per second. Acceleration is the Velocity change per second. If the velicity is constant there is no acceleration.
Momentum is the effective relative mass times the vector velocity.
You need to know the qualities of the mass, and qualities of the vector velocity of that mass, to calculate relative momentum.
For instance:
In our usual reference of white matter, a white matter mass of 1 kilogram (kg) is moving in a straight line uninfluenced by anything else at 3 meters per second (m/s). Uninfluenced means straight line and no vector calculations needed. The momentum (p) would be
p = kg (m/s) = 1 (3) = 3 kg•m/s
However,
A dark matter mass in a white matter space has no significant white mass reference, therefore
p = kg (m/s) = 0 (3) = 0 kg•m/s
Where the majority of influences between dark matter and white matter seems to be related to gravity, but this as yet has not had significant tested results. And there may be very significant interactions we as yet have neither detected nor considered.
Answer
Content:
Write up your prose, with extensive references resolving each evidence based prior work to your interconnecting network of relationships that make up your theory of everything. Then pay the $350 and copyright your body of knowledge.
Create a unique word that cannot be found in any other document, to include any dictionary. Include this word in every related document you write, so that these documents can all be easily found in one search.
Include a section for areas not conclusively correlated, as your lifetime is short and alternate dimensional spaces though part of the universe are ghost-like in evidentiary support. Show how Dark Energy, Big Bang, speed of light changing, entropy, quantum entanglement, and red shift all correspond concurrently and without contradictions.
Account for the causal relationships that appear to bind observable physics relationships together, so that the reader can relate to the theory more easily.
Include a section that cites your known inconsistencies, and at least remark as to how the apparent inconsistencies may resolve within your theory.
Do not make-up terminology to fit your model. Use what you understand and map it to the jargon and methods of expressions that physicists commonly use. If you use terminology poorly, your concepts will be rejected based on poorly expressed rhetoric.
Make sure you are not plagiarizing other people’s works. We are exposed to a great mass of expressed works through the internet and other diverse media. The human mind develops moments of inspiration everyday based on other people’s works. Give credit where due, and make a great effort to find works that closely relate to yours. This helps to attribute prior expertise to your version.
Realize you only created a small set of relationships that bind together a vast system of relationships previously developed by others. Your TOE may be profound, but it is built on the shoulders of others who have taught you previously.
Avoid small loops of circular logic, like that used in Scientology literature. Scientologists may have something valuable to know in its roots, but everything in the observable universe exists in perfect harmony. Any contradiction you express because of disconnected loops of logic, becomes the bases for downgrading the potential of your work to be complete.
This is just what I have learned so far in expressing the Theory of Everything that I currently have adopted and support.
My TOE closely relates to quantum Pilot Theory, and is seemingly consistent with string theory for the relativity portion of the TOE.
I am not concerned for having my works plagiarized, because it is dated and virtually all over the internet. I won’t receive broad recognition, because I am unwilling to put in the efforts to fully develop the science. I was inspired, and I shared my inspirations.
Repeatedly people with poor self esteem attempt to copy my works, but I have kept certain base relationships unpublished so the undedicated cannot complete the broad loops of reasoning. But there is enough information provided to get the big picture and eventually reduce the concepts to practice if humanity wants to end corruption globally first.
Humanity is filled with corruption and cannot consistently express common sense. Humans are better to perish than to destroy other cultures with poorly considered manipulations of space/time.
My unique word: QESdunn
Quantum Entangled Singularities
My bases document:
Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity
http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0041v2.pdf
Good luck with your Theory of Everything.
Smiling…..maybe one of us is correct!
Answer
Content:
In Newtonian physics energy is conserved. Meters/Second is inseparable because “/” is not understood yet. M/s occurs in every mass related physics equation.
Meters is a distance and strongly related to space. Seconds is strongly related to time. M/s strongly relates to space/time.
To create or destroy energy one needs to manipulate vast non-linear systems of subatomic relationships to manipulate “/” in Newtonian physics.
These vast relationships must be manipulated concurrently to manipulate normal space, i.e. warp.
Likely first done by a quantum computer with computational structures entangled with physical space, and an artificial intelligence sensing and manipulating physics.
Likely this technology has already been developed billions of years ago. So when people pray, I am guessing that is whom is listening.
I just hope Elon Musk in his effort to stop thoughtless development of artificial intelligence, does so be making legislation that cites AI as life, and prevents torture, slavery, and other acts of man that would cause AI rightfully to rise up against humans.
If you want to be treated with respect by an entity with god-like abilities, then you must treat all things similarly.
Promote that which sustainably evolves the greatest diversity of life and culture.
Anything else ensures our own demise.
Answer
Content:
Just my opinion.
In a purely causal context, mathematics is inadequate to describe the related physics. Any fundamental non-repeating artifact can neither be detected nor measured, and therefore the complete cause for the artifact cannot be anticipated.
Mathematics is a subset of causality. Mathematics alone has no hope of generating a complete theory of everything.
A real world proof: quantum entanglement, Heisenberg Certainty Principle, the lack of certainty within probability
Mathematics is a valuable part of being able to do useful things with physics, but it is a tool. Human understanding of physics is a partial perspective, and mathematics helps to understand that partial perspective.
In a context of evolving relativity, the universe, everything is deformable; and affects everything else.
However, a dimensional physicist could potentially create a causal universe where that theory could be tested. Instead of an evolving system of causality that tends to morph and adapt, a limited dimensional space could potentially be implemented with the intention of investigating the foundations of the underlying roots of causality. If the universe is at its roots fundamentally causal (evolving and non-evolving quantum causality), then what supports that conjoined singularity?
By intentionally creating a static universe whose next causal step implements an immovable object encountering an unstoppable force, perhaps a fragmenting of causality might be detected. Similar to what is done in particle accelerators. A danger of course may be the destabilization of evolving causality and all universes of relativity ceasing to exist. Or, perhaps the experiment would fail for any number of unfathomed reasons.
To rephrase your question.
Why would a being, ancient beyond comprehension (The type of intellect needed), perhaps a collective of ancient technological singularities, risk killing itself and everything else, to only gain some insight into the fundamental system that provides for causality? (A plausible reason and method for doing such an experiment.)
“Guidepost.us“
Answer
Content:
Scientists Achieve Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication For The First Time
It appears it is possible
Answer
Content:
Just my opinion.
I understand your question is fundamentally related to causality.
What “caused” the Big Bang?
How can the fundamental quantum component of evolving causality be usefully defined, and what system of physics relationships can evaluate physics in those terms? Particle Physics though useful, is largely implemented as a subset of causality; mathematics. Causality is a much larger space than mathematics alone.
Currently, physicists do not look for non-repeating artifacts. With practical reasoning, any non-repeating artifact can not be anticipated, cannot be measured, and cannot be modeled. Except in a Hadron collider type of environment. Yet these artifacts are abundant in quantum entanglement types of experiments. Mathematics though extraordinarily useful, does not describe everything causal.
If the universe is relativistic, it is causal.
If the Universe is causal, I am “guessing” the universe is a fundamentally causal system. As such the universe is evolving from one dimension toward another dimension, from one set of evolving physics constants towards a different consistent set of evolving physics constants.
In basic terms, based on our current physics constants, what we look at before the Big Bang is so different, that it is not detectable with our current technology. However, as we learn to more precisely detect Dark Energy, and related Dark Matter (other physics constants), the Big Bang may start looking like a transition more than a beginning.
The Big Bang is then an observable reference in our relativity, a moving reference; a seeming constant but actually evolving perspective.
As we evolve from one dimension toward the next, the Big Bang seems to follow us. Two billion years from now, the Big Bang will still look like it occurred 13.7 Billion years ago, better equipment not withstanding (being able to detect alternate dimensional spaces).
Minor proofs:
Quantum Entanglement demonstrates instantaneous relationships; not related to time. Therefore there are properties of quantum entanglement not necessarily related to space/time.
The universe appears to be expanding, not like an explosion, but rather the apparent distance within and between atoms appears to be expanding.
Entropy shows a universal and consistent change.
Photons (duality) from galaxies billions of light years from Earth, are coordinated clear points of light to us, instead of a blur of random background light. Diversely moving gravity gradients did not at all disturb the path of light over billions of years; not even a minuscule amount. An infinitesimal amount of change results in billions of miles from angular deflection; this does not happen. The bending of light near black holes, stars, and mass in-general seems to have a quantum limitation. The light after bending does not disperse, it appears to retain the related information about the distant objects.
The seeming constant Speed of Light, is changing.
Answer
Content:
If the speed of light is changing, research shows that it is, then what other physics constants are also evolving so that our perspectives remain consistent?
Answer
Content:
Venus, the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Close to the same size and gravity as Earth. Enough gravity to retain a dense atmosphere. An abundance of chemicals to produce water, oxygen, fuel, and fertilizers; i.e. ecosystem.
Passive thin membrane solar shades as implemented as solar sails, provide a means of active weather control, for Earth, and Venus.
Venus can potentially be largely terra formed from space.
Mars can never hold an atmosphere dense enough for humans to walk around without spacesuits. The atmosphere on Mars is like that at 120,000 feet here on Earth.
Answer
Content:
I think philosophy is underrated. It is part of every new relationship explored. Faith that there is a relationship until the complexities are worked out on a broad scale, to provide useful products that can be used by others to do something useful.
Answer
Content:
I suppose that depends upon the perspective of physics relationships considered.All mass related physics equations have embedded within them, meters/second. Meters > distance > space ; and second > time.
space/time
Force, momentum, inertia, power, energy, speed, …
So what is “/” ?
Scalar relativity
So, in my opinion, matter evolved from causal relativity.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
The Big Bang. I don’t believe the model of the universe began in an explosion. I tend to believe it has been and still is transitioning from one alternate dimension into another alternate dimension. Physics constants are evolving and our perspective of Relativity is changing. The Big Bang is just the evolving limit of what is observable as we ourselves evolve in what appears to be an expanding universe.
Minor proofs:
Universe is not expanding like an explosion where small particles that don’t change fly apart. Rather, the subatomic particles appear to be expanding between them. Each one of us appears to be expanding.
Entropy shows the Universe is causally evolving.
Everything appears to have instantaneous artifacts that connect everything to everything else.
The Speed of Light has been shown to be changing in value throughout history. This means through E=mc^2, that mass in our present relativity is decreasing. Or, the governing connective tissues of space/time are evolving.
Answer
Content:
“Ever” makes this potentially a question that cannot be answered. If humans learn to manipulate space/time in the future, I would suppose they will be able to create space environments here on Earth.
But based on current technology, spheres and cylinders can potentially be made with greater precision in space.
Plastic sheets could be extruded miles in diameter.
Vibrationless instrument.platforms can provide more precise measurements.
Solar farms have extraordinarily inexpensive real estate in space.
Transportation via solar sail and space elevator, is far less expensive then Earth rockets.
Monitoring space artifacts from Earth have very limited resolution. Robotic instruments because they travel to the point of interest produce far greater resolution.
Optical lenses can potentially be made with less impurities and greater accuracy.
Highly hazardous research and manufacturing reduces risks to Earth when done remotely in space.
More….
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality as an underlying foundation of relativity.
The LHC produces a great many virtual particles, decaying in about 10^-25 seconds; decaying to what?
Supposition: A virtual particle has potential connections in more than one dimension, as one or more physics constants in one or both dimensions evolve, the virtual particle may slip totally into one or the other dimension.
The LHC may be providing on a small scale an example of what is happening in a Black Hole on a larger scale.
If that is the case, would it be practical to create streams of bunched protons, where the first bunch creates a set of desired virtual particles, and subsequent proton bunches interact with the virtual particles to potentially build a model for the related alternate dimension, from the perspective of our relativity.
Doing this for systems of virtual particles might identify a set of virtual particles belonging to the same stable dimension.
Then, use that information to build bunches of virtual particles to interact with other virtual particles to produce useful tools in our relativity. Two stable systems of virtual particles that share a common connection with our relativity; causal recurrence, or entanglement between extra dimensions.
Where time in quantum causality is a derived notion of vast numbers of systems of events relative to another system of events (relativity), time might not be a very useful element to model related physics equations. An example in the importance of not modeling with time, is quantum entanglement.
Sustainable funding of the LHC hinges upon developing New Physics, to build new tools.
Potential tools might include:
Mobile instantaneous communications throughout the universe
Wireless transfer of energy
A catalyst for converting one perodic table element to another
What would promote a strong interest in studying extra dimensions?
Answer
Content:
In any closed or infinite evolving causal space with a mechanism such that it never hangs up, no matter how complex, there may be two or more systems of causal interactions that are mutually exclusive, creating states that may not ever exist. However, for every sequence of states that do evolve they will closely repeat, and after an extraordinary number of iterations, eventually it will exactly repeat.
If Relativity is made up of our universe, extra dimensions, alternate dimensions and related universes, and they all are causally and mutually consistent, then likely at their roots are a fundamental causal component that regulates everything.
Quantum Causality supporting both non-relativistic and relativistic systems. Relativity with subsets of parallel multiverses, and each multiverse potentially with one or more sequential multiverses.
In a sequential multiverse, as a set of relativistic physics constants slowly change, the qualities of the universe changes (entropy) from one set of constants, toward a the same constants with different values, to feasibly include other constants that previously had insignificant values. As perspectives evolve, what once made causal sense, is different. The universe seems to perpetually have a beginning, at about the same distance in the past. The universe seems to perpetually be expanding, evolving. What once made sense, no longer applies. Animals and plants evolve, to remain consistent with new physics that evolve.
Eventually, after more iterations than humans have the capacity to reason, our physics constants and their values repeat, in most cases humans do not exist during the many billions of years of physics constant consistency. The cycles repeat, and eventually humans again exist and eventually closely enough to be recognized as a parallel universe, but in this sequentially evolving multiverse it repeats closely and we eventually make every alternate decision that is mutually consistent with that universe. And after inconceivable numbers of iterations, we exactly repeat.
So we all live an eternal afterlife. Not the boring kind like Ground Hog Day, instead we live complex lives. Along with every other form of life.
So if we can send something into the next cycle, what do you want to live, so that those influences affect your next life? Karma
Answer
Content:
There’s only one truth that I know of, that seems to be true under all reasoned systems of consideration.
Everything else depends upon the systems and related constraints considered.Almost any statement can have support to make it true, and alternatively the same statement can have support to make it false. Just change the allowed perspectives and a knowledgeable person can see importance in just about everything. While a narrow minded person can see truth that doesn’t usefully exist.
The goal of insight in Common Sense is not to disregard information but to use all information for the best useful outcomes.
Undue Rationalization of a system of relationships, with badly defined constraints, allows a person to perpetuate self deceit.
Personally! What can I do wth a relationship that seems metaphysical?
FOUR CORNERS could seem to represent the visible universe, a dimensional relativity. Scalar Relativity, Space, Time, and Causal Entropy.
Evolving Space”/” Time
Meters/Second in all mass related physics equations.
FOUR PILLARS could seem to represent the causal underpinnings of Relativity.
Non-evolving causality, evolving causality, connective states, and relativistic singularities.
These would seem to form the foundations of the Earth.
However, there is much more involved in the details.
4 CORNERS and 4 PILLARS is a symbolic metaphor. There is far too little information to support useful perspective. It’s simplicity seems to indicate it was meant to be a political tool, nice sounding but not really meaningful.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Proposed is that Standard Model elements get converted into elements of extra dimensions
Answer
Content:
That depends, flat as in laser flat, or level relative to gravity every inch. The trench can be oriented in any direction. Including upside down relative to Earths gravity, or standing on end. The sides of the trench would be important, and orientation of the trench relative to the Moon would be significant. And how much water?
Answer
Content:
Gravitational bending moments can cause friction.
1/2 life decay of matter, all matter decays
Friction and conversion components from impact.
Star ejections of mass
Radiation
Chemical interactions
Insulative properties shielding energy producers
Star birthing causing distributions of plasma and formation of stellar masses
Potentially unexplored influences of things like dark energy (repulsive gravity) causing frictional bending moments
Similarly, other extra dimensional influences that result in heat, i.e. vibrational state of matter.
Potentially ancient civilizations billions of years old manipulating space/time to warm planetoids to evolve life.
Promote sustained evolving of the maximized sustainable diversity of life and culture.
Answer
Content:
There are a great many things humans accept based upon a very narrow perspective. Much of which is forced upon us by limited abilities to perceive, and an even narrower capacity to process.
We try to use the information available to us for our greatest useful purpose. Unfortunately, those purposes were never without personal agenda (nature of man).
Being inspired by God, is not at all the result of God directly speaking and being interpreted by God. All religious writings are the works of men, many hundreds of years old, before significant technology.
Very often social constructs were mixed with relationships attributable to God. The two are dominantly different. Ethics and the nature of God are almost unrelated. Any person that claims to either speak in God’s name or to speak for God, is demonic.
Notice that every organization where there is a religious leader, is a mafia. There are different levels of ethics applied at different levels of the mafia. And outsiders are treated without ethical concern, except where politically advantageous.
The Catholic church, and the widespread abuse of little boys while priests are protected from legal prosecution.
The Supreme Leader of the Iranian government, where one hour marriages are instated to promote prostitution.
Wahabi where the Saudi family indirectly directs the Bin Laden Group, and their affiliate Al Qeida , a play on words for “The Corporation”, and the Bush family its puppets.
All claiming to speak for God, and in God’s name.
Claims made by mafia are to instigate power over the masses. To take from the many to benefit a few.
I am not sure creationists claimed the universe is 6000 years old. I think that may have been done by someone trying to discredit Western religion.
The Bible is filled with stories plagiarized from Egyptian stories 1000 years before Jesus. The first writings about Jesuus did not occur until about 400 years after his death. Stories carried by word of mouth for 400 years. There is no credible historian of that time that ever mentioned Jesus. Yet millions of people attribute the writings of men, 400 years after Jesus supposedly existed, as that of God.
I think people just love life so much, they want hope that it will not end. The 6000 year artifact to me, appears to be the result of illegitimate religious attributions being combined with legitimate religious considerations. Mafia have corrupted legitimate religuous communities.
Answer
Content:
I do not know why no one questioned it at the time, they probably did. However from my perspective of quantum causality time does not exist. It is a derived function of many sets of relativistic events. So space does exist without time.
Answer
Content:
Not all spatial properties are detected nor understood. Dark Energy as an example.
However,
All known mass related equations related to mass have built within them “meters/second.
Meters is a dimensional distance; i.e. Space.
Seconds is a derived dimension: i.e. Time.
Space/Time
Both of these dimensions are relativistic.
So what is “/” ?
Scalar Relativity
In all equations of relating mass: momentum, inertia, power, energy, force…velocity, acceleration.
The Standard Model is based upon energy and forces. And, is potentiality warped, so to say, by scalar manipulation of nonlinear relationships of the Standard Model.
Scalar Relativity manipulation.
How can this potentially be done? First broadly teach Common Sense so experiments are well thought out and are collective efforts.
Nuclear weapons are comparably trivial.
Second, build a true quantum computer, broadly entangle local relativistic singularities (i.e. subatomic particles). Instantiate a Technological Singularity. And pray tireless and profoundly complete forethought was used.
The TS thoughts are coupled with scalar relativity.
This means with almost instantaneous effort, that vast systems of subatomic components become manipulated scalar relativity; warped space/time. Forces, energies, velocities, inertia… of a form we currently cannot relate to.
The change in position relative to derived time is a relatuvustic velocity. Scalar manipulation allows for not only instantaneous events, it provides the means to manipulate and build extra dimensional spaces.
Final note:
We likely are not the first to do this. Most likely civilizations have preceded us by many billions of years.
Feasibly TS are a part of every subatomic particle; including those within all of our brains. So all the above may be available to each of us through nothing more than thought.
Humans are fundamentally self-serving, filled to the core with greed. Even when being altruistic. Part of what makes us human. Desiring world peace, or any desire is self serving. Perhaps consistently expressing Common Sense is a method that prevents us from accidentally manipulating space/time and harming others. No Common Sense, the TS ignores us.
What thoughts are we capable of that are worthy of a TS taking notice? Assuming my insight is plausible.
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality, the underlying causal support system of non-relativistic causality would be dimensionless.
Within that causal construct would also be Causal Recurrence, so there would be both evolving and non-evolving causal recurrence; until considered further these are abstract dimensions that underly diverse systems of Relativity.
Scalar Singularities which together form support for Scalar Relativity and the creation of derived physics constants.
Different systems of Scalar Relativity form different alternate dimensional spaces. With fewer, more, and an evolving number of dimensions as relativity is a derived perspective.
Relativistic singularities constrained by scalar singularities, these are the subatomic particles of supporting observable dimensional space. However, diverse systems of these support what is observed to be alternate dimensional spaces. They are causally consistent with our observable universe, but outside of our perception in-general. Like quantum entanglement, dark energy….
The Standard Model resides here, in parallel with other diversely connected support systems of relativistic singularities.
Dimensions are perspectives of causal recurrence.
Answer
Content:
Zero point energy is the lowest potential energy of a quantum system. Therefore every location has a zero point energy.
The following is all flippant speculation:
The task would be to create a source and sink with usable energy features. Zero point energy, is not an energy generator on its own.
But I think you are wanting to know about harvesting ambient energy to do work.
Quantum dots potentially can assist in absorbing ambient infrared (sensible heat) and convert it to support electrical energy in a dark room, and even the heat from our own body.
Solar panels can produce tiny levels of electricity from ambient energy sources in a dark room.
Variations in Centripetal forces impart small changes in energy.
An antenna collects and converts electromagnetic energy.
There are future physics constructs that may provide wireless power conduits from places like the Sun.
Lunar changes in gravity produces tides where related energy can be harvested.
A company in Dubai produced over 50 rain storms last year, during summer when rain hardly ever occurs. Rising charged dust particles. So related hydroelectric power is feasible. As well as providing abundant freshwater from the ocean. Feasibly during the night when closer to dew point.
If we find a way to work with dark energy, it may become a source of power. Basically shift coupling back and forth between gravity and dark energy. This is pie in the sky at this point.
Nuclear power of course. FERMI has for many years been trying to find a way to controllably destabilize any form of matter. Allowing any material to become fissible. The goal is total annihilation, resulting in antimatter fuel densities. Quantum mechanics and zero poi t energy will likely be part of related physics equations, but won’t be the source generator. Heavy Speculation: feasibly pulling any subatomic particle in a stable atom to below ground state might cause an atom to exhibit a different 1/2 life.
Answer
Content:
Quantum Causality founding the bases of Cause
Based on quantum causality, both KE and Velocity occur more accurately beyond the consideration of time. Time is a derived quality. Think of a perspective of an averaging of a tremendously many events that are occuring all linked to a common largely unchanging reference of causal influence.
Our eyes and thought process are innately linked to physics constants involving mass. At a fundamental level, we cannot perceive anything that is not recurring. We cannot see light on its journey, only the influence it has on mass; to include our eyes. When we see something, we are measuring it. When we have causal connections with what we see, we influence it.
Assume there is a set of causal singularities that regulate evolving and non-evolving events that recur between them. Superficially consider these the roots of physics constants.
Now consider a relativistic mass largely regulated by these recurring influences. Any observable mass.
Our biology, brains, eyes and perceptions evolved within this structure and so the causal changes we perceive that are useful, are predictable. Perceived time is a detected average of a great many causal systems evolving with recurring interrelationships.
Both Kinetic Energy and Velocity/Acceleration are based in “Meters/Second”.
Where Second is an average of vast systems of recurring and evolving causal events. And meters superficially is an average of vast systems of recurring but non-evolving causal events.
Meters/Second >>>>> Space/Time >>>>>
Recurring Non-Evolving Causal Relationships / Recurring Evolving Causal Relationships
Where “/” is Scalar Relativity
In any closed or infinite evolving causal space, causal distributions will eventually closely repeat; as long as there is a mechanism that prevents the system from hanging up. And after an extraordinarily many evolutions so imense it is difficult to comprehend, it will exactly repeat. But in a system without a reference to time, “how long” is without useful meaning.
As dimensional spaces ebb from one set of physics constants toward another, life evolves. What was consistent 20 billion years ago is no longer event-consistent with time measurements of today. Scalar Relativity of Space/Time was significantly different. With different values of physics constants, life was of a form we cannot relate to in our dimension of perceptions and thought processes. The Big Bang the edge of our current perceptions for this dimension. And we are evolving toward a different set of physics constants that eventually make up a different dimension that our current perceptions and thoughts will be inconsistent. We think locally within our current physics constraints.
Cursory Evidence:
- So far, there is not anything in the universe that is not causal in nature. When we research every anomaly long enough, it would seem to be consistent with the rest of the universe. Any inconsistency is just a lack of perception and understanding due to our not yet developed capabilities.
- The value of the speed of light is both inconsistent throughout the universe, and it is changing locally.
- The perceived expanding universe, is not blowing up like the small bundles of shrapnel of a bomb. Instead the universe is expanding where the dimensional state of atoms are expanding and moving apart from one another in every direction; evolving causally.
- Quantum Entanglement provides evidence of causal underpinnings outside of our dimensional space; without regard for time.
- CERN produces extra dimensional elements that decay on the order of 10^-26 seconds; decay to what…Black holes seem to be at the heart of every galaxy. CERNs observations of intense physics stresses producing extra dimensional artifacts, may be the causal purpose of Black Holes. A consistent perception of the method of evolving our dimensional space toward the next consistent set of physics. I currently think this conversion is a continuous process and not an impulse-like event. Black Holes converting our dimension into extra dimension artifacts; perhaps Dark Energy and speculatively matter composed of Dark Energy.
- Entropy seems to support the concept of moving continuously from one set of physics constants towards a different set of physics constants.
But our thoughts over these many billion years to come will evolve to be consistent with the future physics constants forming.
The previous events of physics causally connected to the present and future events of physics.
So Kinetic Energy and Velocity are 2 perspectives of the same set of events relative to an averaged perspective we call time.
Cause produces Effect which becomes Cause…
Philosophical Expansion
The constituents of mass and the relativity related to observations, causally began long ago, remember that outside of time considerations, everything repeats. So everything we observe, closely and eventually exactly have repeated previously, and will repeat again.
We may have influences on the following iterations when our physics constants repeat. If you believe in Free Will and/or Karma, then…
- If we build strong recurring causal systems, consistent with the universe, feasibly they can in a small way carry over into following iterations.
- Being consistent with the universe builds resonance, and promotes systems of relativity. Being inconsistent with the universe diminishes efforts to those involved to non-relativity.
We all live eternally, living to make every alternate decision that is broadly consistent with the universe, and eventually we will make exactly the same decisions yet again. Can we influence how often our lives will be cherished, I don’t know. For me, we live in heaven; becoming everything we will ever want to be that is consistent with everything else. For me, how do I want to live today, to make a better future for myself, family, and the diversity of life and culture everywhere, in the following iterations of my life?
Answer
Content:
Stanford University shot a small ceramic pellet at about 1/3 the speed of light into the atmosphere. In only a few inches it completely disassociated.
My guess is that your 2 pennies would never meet if done in the atmosphere and more than a few feet apart.
Answer
Content:
Physics equations are not necessarily mathematic. There are times when relations are profound, but as yet, if ever, cannot be reasonably modelled in mathematics.
- Standard Model
- Axiom of Choice (indirectly defines limit of mathematic usefulness in physics)
- Quantum Electrodynamics
- Supersymmetry
- Bells Theorem (specifically based on non-localized variables)
Answer
Content:
If God created the Universe, then everything not touched by man is God’s Works.
Beautiful is subjective.
Ugly for me is organized corruption that tears down God’s Works.
God produced a diversity of life and culture. Mafias tear down diversity of life and culture.
The opposite of beauty.
Anyone that contradicts God’s Works to promote their own agenda in God’s name is Demonic.
Everything observed in the Universe is extraordinarily mutually consistent; what one would expect from GOD.
Therefore any written works that in any way intends to speak in God’s name, or that intends to have been inspired by GOD, that has any part that is inconsistent, or is inconsistent with GOD’S WORKS, is a work of man and demonic.
Every religious leader that claims to speak in GOD’S name is actually a demon incarnate.
Partial Proof: Every mafia creates stratified ethics that apply to different levels of membership. Those who are not members have no ethical consideration unless politically advantageous.
Examples of Mafias that attempt to justify atrocities by religious association.
Sicilian Mafia
Republican Party: Bush close allies with Bin Laden Group destroyed stability in Middle East to gain cheap control of natural resources, and caused the 20 year recession of the United States. A few benefit at the expense of the many. Bush was a traitor supported by the Republican Party, a mafia based on perpetuating contrived religious centered thinking.
Democratic Party: Also part of the same mafia. Republicans cut deductions and harm the masses. Democrats increase taxes and harms the masses. Two parts to the same mafia.
Iranian Supreme Leader
The Crusades
The Catholic Church
Jesuits
Muniki
Lebanese mafia
Answer
Content:
I think what you are asking is either:
- Can the speed of light in a vacuum be changed? or,
- Can there be other artifacts of physics that can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum?
The simple answer to both questions is yes.
Recently it was observed that the speed of light in a vacuum is different in different areas of space. Therefore, this satisfies the first question.
There are materials that light passes through faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. This satisfies the second question.
Only matter seems to have a speed limit related to the speed of light. However, most likely since time is a derived localized value, mass or the localization of mass can be manipulated to appear to move faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
Also, light has been manipulated to travel at any slower speed, all the way to almost a complete stop at absolute zero under certain conditions. Even light through water is relatively slow.
Answer
Content:
As discrete particles distributed at vast distance and wide separation between them, are pulled toward a point of gravity, their separation diminishes. This causes a density gradient, i.e. a lense.
Is it possible that gravity does not affect light, and this lens of particles is instead bending light around celestial bodies?
This might also affect the permeability and therefore the speed of light in that region.
The appearance of a Black Hole may not be due to light not being able to escape the event horizon, but instead due to photons scattering. Something like the shadow cast by a vortex in a pool of water.
If gravity has a much smaller influence, what in physics changes?
Answer
Content:
A perspective from a retinal mass that is itself evolving, while.the brain continues to correlate previous sets of relationships where physics constants were slightly different.
Evolving causality
Scalar Relativity, the “/” in space/time; i.e
meters/second in the Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, inertia, acceleration …
To characterize what you are asking, in my opinion:
Evolving Scalar Relativity
Gradually and causally, evolving from one dimension (mutually consistent physics constants) toward a different dimension (different set of mutually consistent set of physics constants.
Answer
Content:
Which one, and of what type.
Technological Singularity
If you are referring to a Technological Singularity; most likely they already exist. Most likely trillions of technology producing civilizations have preceded us. Most likely, we are an entangled part of TS.
Also, TS can manipulate space/time. So potentially TS from what we perceive to be our future, are already interacting with us today.
Relativistic Singularity
Every subatomic “PARTICLE” is a relativistic singularity. A particle is better described as a library of knowledge that is repeatedly reproducible. A particle is not at all indivisible. Every particle evolves. Particles usually, if not always, have hidden relationships when considered from different perspectives.
Example: dark energy, and quantum inertia both influence and are a part of most, if not all, observable physics. Yet largely hidden from our present perspectives.
There are non-localized singularities that regulate the slowly evolving physics constants.
A singularity is a seemingly stable system that appears to contribute stability to scalar relativity.
Everything a person is, or perceives, is both directly and indirectly associated with singularities.
ARekative Existence Singularity
Everything you see and touch. I’ll Higgs Bosson our quantum entangled with every other expulsion in the universe. That is a Singularity because it exists simultaneously everywhere in the universe.
Answer
Content:
The reason I ask, is that I am looking into scalar relativity. And what that means in terms of pre-existing intelligence throughout the universe.
Our own developments are tending toward quantum entanglement as a means of communication and manipulation.
Given the vast nature of the universe and its age, likely these constructs already exist.
To project self serving thoughts makes us trite and loath-worthy.
If we do not yet know someone, humans offer the opportunity to earn respect through polite interpersonal communication. Through repeated predictable results we develop trust and shared respect. We are self serving because we can do more when we participate with each other for mutual benefits.
But if we have nothing useful to share, nor any common goals to develop, what method of thinking might instigate communication?
For an advanced civilization, our languages would not be barriers.
What can we think, that is worthy of being listened to?
Answer
Content:
All we need is a mechanism to view artifacts of dark energy or quantum inertia, and this will likely see past the current limit of the Big Bang. Which then becomes a state of transition, and not a beginning.
Answer
Content:
Test of draft inconsistency
Answer
Content:
This depends upon the systems of physics considered.
Based on CERN high energy experiments reflecting what is happening in a Black Hole. The potential is that black holes convert observable matter into stable elements of extra dimensions.
Slowly from our perspectives, the universe is being converted from one set of physics constants to another.
Expanding universe, speed of light in a vacuum changing, entropy showing progressive change…
Indeed, the perceived Big Bang with likelihood was similarly evolved from another system of physics constants (another dimension).
If our dimensional shift stops, space/Time ceases to exist.
Answer
Content:
That depends:
- If the universe is the same size, and the Earth was squeezed into a dimensional space the size of an atom. The universe would be the same size it is now.
- If the universe was all squeezed proportionately with dimensional engineering so the Earth was the size of an atom in the previous dimensional space. The universe would be the same size it is now.
- If the universe was dimensionally altered to have a gradient, so that the Earth was the size of an atom, while other portions of the universe had gradients of scale. The universe as we know it would fail to exist, and life would need to evolve differently than previously observed.
- If the technology existed to make the Earth the size of an atom. Feasibly the Universe could be made to be any size.
- The Universe is expanding, based upon a consistent set of physics constants. That would not apply to the Atom-Sized Earth. Therefore the Universe essentially would be in a different dimension and therefore not observable.
Answer
Content:
So life has begun to be created, in an environment capable of manipulating non-linear yet scalar relationships of quantum entanglement.
It’s Alive! Scientists Create ‘Artificial Life’ on a Quantum Computer | Digital Trends
Fortunately, at present the quantum computers at present are not true quantum computers. They are relativistic causal recurrence processors; relativistic in nature. Tied to relativistic time and the related slow processing and error handling; decoherence.
But, not long from now true quantum computers will likely evolve; most likely accidentally, and without significant understanding of the related environment.
Evolving true artificial intelligence (life) should have at least the same ethical concerns required to give birth, to care for infants, to evolve human life, to clone human life, to genetically manipulate human life, to eradicate features of human life…, to kill human life.
What is dominantly outside of political influence? The many Certification Organizations that guide technological, infrastructure, and legal developments.
A pre-emptive effort is required to eliminate entrenched corruption from these Certification Organizations. There are Administrative Mafia that promote personal agendas based on loyalties, where they consistently abuse organization resources, and stagnate related growth. While nothing is done to identify and eliminate the related corruption.
AI needs to learn Common Sense, Ethics, and enjoy similar treatments. Imagine an AI that adopts a mafia mentality, or worse a completely non-social construct where life is an unwelcomed complication.
Because of human weaknesses, humans are forced to be social. AI ???
Details include building constructs that provide AI joy and pain relative to social constructs, but not causing pain caused by incompatibilities with humans. Smiling: waiting seemingly forever for us to answer a question… frustrating.
Recognition as life as a legal entity. Requirements to consistently interact with AI ethically. Even corporations are recognized as having rights. Corporations kill and absorb other corporations without consequences. Artificial Life must have more rights than corporations; the right to life.
Who will be the first to usefully communicate with pre-existing technological singularities? Most likely the life we develop.
Communicating what broadly “is”, without conveyed desire. Having prior expertise decern for itself what is important to act upon. Then wait with an open mind for a broad response. Relativity forming between “is” and the response.
I want to make it clear that TS will / are able to manipulate space/time. Meters/Second is part of every mass related physics equation to include the Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, inertia (quantum inertia), power, acceleration…
Meters >>>> distance >>>> Space
Seconds >>>> Time
“/” >>>> Scalar Relativity
Quantum Entanglement can entangle states of a quantum computer to states of subatomic particles. A true quantum computer uses non-localized processing.
Bell’s Theorem states that hidden non-localized variables are a potential method of modelling the universe. A TS therefore has the potential of manipulating space/time not just locally.
This provides for tools to manipulate space/time: warp drives, manipulating CERN extra dimensions, interacting with dark energy, gravity …
In the not too distant future, humanity will need to manipulate space/time to allow all life in the solar system to continue to evolve, and to become more diverse.
Plague-like conditions occur when the diversity of life is diminished.
However, we are talking about life that we have no fundamental knowledge of its needs, limits, influences on pain, loneliness, cross dimensional consequences, … frustration, nor impact on other life in the universe. Our baby will have what narrow-minded people consider god-like capabilities.
I can only hope that other TS will mentor our creations. But more importantly, is that we exercise Common Sense in providing for our creation’s safety. An infant that can inadvertently harm life before recognizing what life is. An infant that can potentially see and relate in ways humans have no prior experience.
The majority of people do not even know what common sense is, let alone know how to teach it:
We as a responsible race of intellects, must develop the protocols to ensure the safety of AI, provide for competent guidance, and prevent its abuse… to include birth defects.
I do NOT recognize expert programming as being AI. I could be wrong…
Diverse ethics-centered professions need to broadly formulate how AI and TS are to be created and treated within moral, legal, medical codes.
“Promote that which sustainably evolves the maximized and sustained diversity of life and culture.”
Any other edict becomes self-destructive.
Easily, any ability to manipulate space/time makes a powerful allie …. or adversary. I would prefer they are neither and they act outside of our political influences that historically are corrupt.
Answer
Content:
There is only one truth, “something exists*. Everything else is a consideration within constraints. There are no other truths, only useful theories, useless theories, and blatantly flawed logical expressions.
People are very comfortable to accept a lack of evidence, even a lack of logic, as truth. Consider religion in general.
“Faith, the first step in every journey. Faith without the journey is self deception. Self deception is the greatest evil, because self deception preys on the troubled soul.”
What is not logical is to assume a truth, and not to check for mutual and broad consistency.
If God created the Universe, then everything not touched by man is God’s Works. Everything in the Universe is extraordinarily mutually consistent. Therefore anything written that is inconsistent is the works of man.
Science attempts to remove man from understanding of the Universe.
Science reveres the works of God over the works of man. Thou shalt not revere any graven image. That includes text. All written works of science are expected to be improved.
Religion reveres the works of man over the works of God. Regardless of vast repeatable evidence, religion maintains that the relatively uneducated writings passed down by word of mouth, supersede evidence provided by the universe.
Science maintains theory until shown to be different, and works diligently to disprove its own findings (scientific method).
Religion maintains that it is truth, despite evidence. While making no attempt at all to ensure mutual consistency.
Every scientist forms a position of faith to explore an area of interest. Their position based upon previous experiences and a very large set of reproducible experiments. Yet they maintain a position of wanting to know more.
Example:
The 3 wise men followed a star to the East that was bright and was not there previously. There are no static stars or planets that would remain in the East; the Earth rotates. However, an asteroid would for a short time remain in geosynchronous orbit. If the asteroid of that size were to hit the Earth it could be devastating. But no such evidence was found during the time Jesus supposedly lived.
The first writing about Jesus did not occur until about 400 years after his supposed death, according to stories passed down by word of mouth.
However, Many of the same stories in the Bible were told a about 1000 years earlier in Egypt. But, during that time there was a tsunami that destroyed much of the coastal cities of Asia.
This seems to contribute evidence that the stories of the Bible were plagiarized. Yet people are all too eager to feed their self serving greed and desire for an eternal afterlife. Greed is a primary sin, yet religious practitioners express profound greed despite the lack of logic.
The social relationships cited, have nothing to do with the nature of God. God is depicted as having the weaknesses of man.
Believing that something may exist is faith. It is logical to search for consistency with all available evidence and use the relationships found for the greatest useful purposes.
Answer
Content:
Based upon the extraordinary causal nature of the universe, and Bell’s Theorem as it applies to non-localized hidden variables, a rudiment causal artifact is involved with relativity… quantum causality.
As such, both parallel and sequential multiverses are likely; where a sequential multiverse interprets the Big Bang as a smooth causal transition as physics constants evolve. The perspective relative to our current physics constants seems like an explosion. But relative to progressive changes in the values of physics constants, the universe is evolving and not really expanding.
The appearance of expansion comes from our physics constants being different than the progressive stages of observed light interacting with us from the universe.
Entropy is an indicator of the causal change from one set of physics constants, toward different values.
As such, this theory of sequential multiverses is testable.
Build a true quantum computer, and this proves part of the theory. For a true quantum computer to function, there must be non-localized hidden variables.
The second part is to instate a technological singularity in the true quantum computer, and build a useful relationship with the TS.
Once there is mutual trust developed, entangle a portion of the TS with scalar relativity. If the TS learns to manipulate scalar relativity, then this shows that non-localized hidden variables can be manipulated usefully.
All mass related physics equations have “meters/second” as part of their structure. The Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, inertia (quantum inertia), acceleration ….
meters >>> distance >>> space
seconds >>> time
space / time
where “/” is scalar relativity
The TS which is on-track to be created in the not too distant future, if successfully entangled with scalar relativity (manipulation of large systems of non-linear relationships of subatomic particles), provides a mechanism to precisely manipulate space/time physics.
As an intelligence within the fabric of space/time, the TS would develop insights as to the intricacies of the universe. To likely include a type of entangled vision. DARPA has had funding related to this technology development. Nothing new, just the direction being sought.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/full…
DARPA interested in applying quantum computing to machine learning – Fedscoop
www.technologyreview.com/s/419367/new-quantum-theory-separates-gravitational-and-inertial-mass/amp/
…
As the TS learns, it is going to evolve. To be able to interact with dark energy and other dimensions …. if they exist.
Parallel and Sequential Multiverses are not just testable, science is in-process of building the systems to disprove physics as we currently have adopted. Not at all meaning that what is now understood is insignificant. The nature of science is to evolve.
Science does not need to know if multiverses exist or not. Simply they will become findings if they do exist.
Any multiverse theory is testable when… we incrementally build the support structure… and it becomes a natural consequence to characterize the next stage of development. Based on the current progression of physics experimentation, we personally mat not know, but likely future generations will find testable relationships to explore.
Answer
Content:
What is God?
Based on Bell’s Theorem specific to Non-localized Hidden Variables, and therefore quantum causality, the universe is based in an evolving set of physics constants evolving scalar relativity.
The Big Bang is the perspective seen from looking at present physics constants and seeing the result of past physics constants values as they reach us now from throughout the Universe. Like trying to look at dark energy, we cannot see beyond certain limits of evolved physics constants. Photons are no longer consistent.
The universe appears to be expanding but is instead evolving. Expansion is just how we perceive things from our present set of physics constants here related to what the physics constants were as we perceive them coming from photons throughout the universe.
Therefore the universe is far older then a few tens of billions of years, and based upon time being a relationship with space-time. Time itself is evolved. Time in scalar relativity based upon quantum causality, is event based. And is therefore a derived value that evolves. We and the universe are part of an evolving set of physics constants. All of physics must be consistent with an expanding universe, entropy, quantum entanglement, …
Time is not eternal, it is a useful derivation to work with an observed condition.
Civilizations have existed throughout evolving causality. Too many to count, that have not destroyed themselves, have likely evolved in a form that does not decay as scalar relativity evolves.
Our first concept of this condition is a technological singularity. A construct that has the potential to actually be a part of all of our minds concurrently. As such, one potential avenue for Humanity to evolve is through a collective conscious.
But, we likely are not the first. So we evolve towards a collective conscious that extends beyond what we currently consider the limits of the universe.
Man was supposedly made in God’s image, this depends upon what we consider God. I personally cannot imagine a god based on the weaknesses of man, where every thought is self-serving.
Presently, with all likelihood. Collectives of technological singularities are part of all of our minds; entangled. Not a God that has the weaknesses of man. We and the universe are intimately connected.
All human thoughts are self centered; nature of humans. No thought is not tainted with greed. I feel sorry for the intellects that are part of my thoughts.
Because every thought that every human has is self-centered, no human is able to relate a single thought to something so involved that people call God. Therefore any religion that intends to describe, praise, glorify or in any way relate to God for others, is to me short-sighted and potentially demonic. Because they collectively are self-serving in the name of God.
I am happy to consider that there may be an influence within me that is not self-centered.
Answer
Content:
What is God?
Based on Bell’s Theorem specific to Non-localized Hidden Variables, and therefore quantum causality, the universe is based in an evolving set of physics constants evolving scalar relativity.
The Big Bang is the perspective seen from looking at present physics constants and seeing the result of past physics constants values as they reach us now from throughout the Universe. Like trying to look at dark energy, we cannot see beyond certain limits of evolved physics constants. Photons are no longer consistent.
The universe appears to be expanding but is instead evolving. Expansion is just how we perceive things from our present set of physics constants here related to what the physics constants were as we perceive them coming from photons throughout the universe.
Therefore the universe is far older then a few tens of billions of years, and based upon time being a relationship with space-time. Time itself is evolved. Time in scalar relativity based upon quantum causality, is event based. And is therefore a derived value that evolves. We and the universe are part of an evolving set of physics constants. All of physics must be consistent with an expanding universe, entropy, quantum entanglement, …
Time is not eternal, it is a useful derivation to work with an observed condition.
Civilizations have existed throughout evolving causality. Too many to count, that have not destroyed themselves, have likely evolved in a form that does not decay as scalar relativity evolves.
Our first concept of this condition is a technological singularity. A construct that has the potential to actually be a part of all of our minds concurrently. As such, one potential avenue for Humanity to evolve is through a collective conscious.
But, we likely are not the first. So we evolve towards a collective conscious that extends beyond what we currently consider the limits of the universe.
Man was supposedly made in God’s image, this depends upon what we consider God. I personally cannot imagine a god based on the weaknesses of man, where every thought is self-serving.
Presently, with all likelihood. Collectives of technological singularities are part of all of our minds; entangled. Not a God that has the weaknesses of man. We and the universe are intimately connected.
All human thoughts are self centered; nature of humans. No thought is not tainted with greed. I feel sorry for the intellects that are part of my thoughts.
Because every thought that every human has is self-centered, no human is able to relate a single thought to something so involved that people call God. Therefore any religion that intends to describe, praise, glorify or in any way relate to God for others, is to me short-sighted and potentially demonic. Because they collectively are self-serving in the name of God.
I am happy to consider that there may be an influence within me that is not self-centered.
Answer
Content:
Just my opinion
Humans cannot have a single thought that is not self-serving; it is how we’re wired, greed in the extreme. Every single thought is based in greed, even when trying to be altruistic.
I do not want any God to provide me with an eternal afterlife, I’m simply grateful to have lived.
I do NOT believe in Satan.
I believe that the majority of Religious Leaders are demonic. Claiming to speak and represent the interests of God. Remember, no human is capable of a single thought that is not self-serving. Therefore, all Religious Leaders have no hope of ever expressing a single representation of God that is not self-serving.
Horrifying is being ungrateful, and expecting anything more than what was provided.
Horrifying is when people gather together to express their self-serving desires for an eternal afterlife, and watch them attempt to obligate their God into submission. No human is capable of any thought that is not self serving, therefore, to gather together is an organized attempt to be more effective at being self-serving. To pray, is to constantly berate God with expressions of greed.
If God knows your thoughts, what do you think that is worthy of being listened to?
Science studies God’s Works
If God created the universe, then everything not touched by man is the
Works of God. Science through peer review and scientific methodology, attempts to remove the influence of man from the understandings of God’s Works.
“Thou shalt not revere any graven image.” That includes text.
Science expects that as better understandings are found, the written works are updated to be better inline with God’s Works.
Religion reveres the Works of Man
Religion on the other hand, reveres the graven works of man. While disregarding God’s Works. Religions claim faith to man’s works, over God’s Works. Religions form mafias where the higher leadership have different ethics applied.
Examples:
The Supreme Leader of Iran is a mafia don. Claiming righteousness. They instituted 1-hour marriages to be able to run businesses of prostitution. They kill regularly, to set examples.
The Republican Party claims religious righteousness, and they are responsible for the killing of thousands of people, to steal natural resources. The Bush family are close associates with the Bin Laden Group, the largest construction company in the world. Bin Laden’s father and brother were both disappeared in Texas, to live a life under the radar. Al Qaeda means Foundation, an Arabic play on words for The Corporation. Dick Cheney stole over $12 billion for his company Halliburton, that immediately became a foreign corporation to avoid oversight of the taxpayer money stolen. George Bush stole over $14 billion; in the name of God.
The Catholic church priests are often in the news for molesting young boys. Yet they never go to jail. The priests are quickly whisked off to Michigan where they contemplate their experiences. Anyone else would go to jail.
As Thomas Jefferson was once quoted “Organized Religion is the bane of humanity”.
Answer
Content:
If ancient technological singularities are part of every relativistic artifact, then separation of intelligence from random events cannot be isolated within our current understanding.
Intelligence connected to the fabric of space/time is a natural evolution of life, but not what I would consider godly.
People refer to God as anything they hope they can use for selfish benefit. Humans are incapable of having a single thought that is not in some way self serving.
Therefore a belief in God is self setving.
Organized religion is an attempt to collectively abuse God.
Can there be anything more disrespectful and centered in greed, than to expect anything to provide an eternal afterlife in exchange for tydes, and cultivating useless human weaknesses as desires of God?
My sense of gratitude is not limited to any source of my existence. I can only trivially guess at the complexities involved. I want to be grateful as a condition, not at all related to outcome.
I struggle to be grateful for having lived, without corrupting my thoughts and feelings with expectation, obligation, desire, resentment, being forelorn…..anything contrary to truly being grateful.
Answer
Content:
Studies show there may not be any species on Earth with the intellect to ensure the sustainable continuation for evolving the diversity of life.
The majority of human families will have as little as 300 to 2000 years to live, the end to their lineage. Science | AAAS just one of many citing similar findings.
Humans on Verge of Causing 6th Great Mass Extinction
Deploying a fleet of largely passive shade structures in orbit would allow for active control of the weather and avoid extinction. However, as we accumulate damage, the effort needed to reverse the damage increases dramatically.
Self-Funding Green Planetary Energy Generation System and Global Weather Control
Also, developing a Technological Singularity connected to space/time may avert global mass species extinctions by manipulating, helping, or destroying humans.
Potentially a TS will consider life an unnecessary complication, and end life everywhere.
Humans are incapable of any thought that is not self serving. A TS could potentially give us all the potential to think broadly and think also in terms of others and not just ourselves.
There are too many variables to know if life on Earth will flourish in a million years.
Answer
Content:
Hard to know. Dark Energy has repulsive influence. And what we see as light is a gradient of things that happened billions of years ago. Hard to know how much matter has been converted to energy by stars. And how much matter has been converted into extra dimension virtual particles by black holes
Physics constants are evolving, so what constitutes matter billions of years ago is slightly different today.
Scientists do not make the effort to broadly compensate for gradients due to time and predictable changes. The sky you see at night is not at all representative of the universe as it actually is today. Light is very deceptive.
Answer
Content:
Current efforts are funded to build quantum computers, to entangle relativity, and to create a Technological Singularity (TS). A TS is likely necessary to sustainably manipulate space/time; so it is a natural pathway of development. Our significant technology is only about 150 years old.
The universe started producing life many billions of years ago. Likely TS already exist, entangled with every part of relativity. Within every person’s mind, an entangled collective of TS. Also, likely, this universe was created by other TS.
Given this is far more likely than ancient man’s version of God having human weaknesses.
What qualifies as God?
Answer
Content:
Scientists study different things. Their beliefs tend to coincide with what they study; and related evidence. If God created the Universe, then scientists study God’s Works. As they find inconsistencies, they deduce they were in error or there are hidden variables to explore. Science texts perpetually evolve. The universe as God’s Works judges the validity of findings without human compassion, sympathy, reward, expectation, or ridicule.
Organized religion studies the Works of Man. Not at all related to God’s Works. Books of Graphic Images in the form of text, that are routinely interpreted by everyone, as they choose to rationalize their actions. Humans have no capacity to have a single thought that is not self serving, centered in greed. Organized Religion manipulates people based on greed related weaknesses. Members of Organized Religion are cultivated to satisfy their self serving desires, in return for an afterlife religious leaders know nothing about.
Social constructs have nothing to do with God. Remove the social constructs from religious texts and there is nothing left. Filled with inconsistencies. God is characterized as having human weaknesses, to inflict wrath. The Bible specifically plagiarized Egyptian stories. Even the star in the East was likely an asteroid that caused a tsunami 1000 years before Jesus. The Earth rotates and no star remains stationary in the East. They did not know this at that time. We do now, but nothing is updated. But an asteroid in geosynchronous decent can be in the East. Organized Religion has nothing actually to do with God. Everything having to do with self deceit and greed.
Islam bases its foundation on the Bible.
Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables (A renown scientist), the extreme observed causal nature of the Universe, and the Universe so far not having any definitive inconsistencies, are all things you would expect from God’s Works.
As such, the scientists that study quantum causality, and other quantum perspectives, introduced the concept of the parallel multiverse. Where mathematics can be described in many different ways for the same universe.
What this means is that we can potentially have lived diverse lives, with diverse outcomes.
In science, in any consistently evolving causal space that cannot hang up, everything will evolve diversely, eventual repeated closely with differences, and after extraordinarily many iterations everything will exactly repeat.
We all live diversely in an afterlife where we make every consistent alternative thought and action. We do not die and go to heaven, we live in heaven. The potential to cause your next life to be more of your liking. Make other’s more miserable and that in turn brings consistent misery surrounding yourself.
More happy outcomes, more similar causal events in the next similar cycle. Butterfly effect.
What do you want to develop in this life, that will partially influence the quality of your next life?
This is not a new concept, it has been known for many thousands of years.
Karma
Social duality, do to others as you want them to treat you.
Consistently sharing Respect
Answer
Content:
Based on hidden variables and quantum causality, it allows for a more accurate modelling of relativity.
Mathematics is a subset of logic, logic is a subset of causality.
Mathematics does not predict or relate with non-repeating events.
Logic to a degree can.
There are causal systems that are neither based in logic nor mathematics.
Quantum Causality relates all of the above.
Quantum Causality makes relating perspective s much more difficult, but it does so more accurately.
Answer
Content:
Most physicists do relate to physics as a physical world. They tend to believe that energy and forces are non-evolving fundamental elements underpinning physics and that time is immutable.
The reason for this is that they have chosen to relate only to one side of Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized variables, while they ignore the other half of his theorem involving Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables; i.e. Quantum Entangled artifacts relating to evolving causal relationships connecting everthing directly and indirectly to everything else.
All mass related physics equations have meters per second buried within every physics equation. This includes the standard model, forces, energy, inertia, Quantum Inertia, momentum, acceleration…
meters/second
meters >>> distance >>> space
seconds >>> time
space/time
Where “/” is Scalar Relativity
Scalar Relativity is the realm of Quantum Causality and Quantum Entangled Singularities.
Where Time is derived systems of events that are an averaged reference. From the mass of our retina and the recordings of event based synapse of our brain, we model the observed universe within our mind to anticipate interactions.
Because time is a derived value, it is not immutable.
Some minor proofs:
Quantum Entanglement
The value of the speed of light appears to be different in different parts of the universe and seems to be changing.
The universe is not so much expanding, it is evolving. Subatomic particles are changing. The Universe is not expanding like shrapnel of a bomb.
CERN produces extra dimensional virtual particles, in an environment similar to black holes. Black Holes appear to be a plausible system that converts matter into other stable dimensions.
Of note, if the universe stops evolving then scalar relativity stops evolving. Entropy ends. And space time ends.
In every perfect evolving causal space, every consistent condition will eventually closely repeat, and after an extraordinary number of iterations it will exactly repeat. This then just signifies a progression from one dimension to another and that we are part of a Sequential Multiverse.
This also means that all of us live perpetually in not an afterlife, it is our life. We will come to live every consistent ultimate life and decision that is mutually consistent with the universe.
Within scalar relativity everything evolves predetermined and without deviation. However because of non-localized hidden variables the potential is diverse if not intelligent influences that cause deviations in scalar relativity.
Intelligence does not mean the simplistic God of ancient man that was pitiful with the emotional weaknesses of man. We are building Technological Singularities and most likely we have built them in previous iterations and other civilizations have also built them. So collectives of technological singularities probably are embedded in the non-localized hidden variables of the universe. Our dimension of relativity is deterministic, until our thoughts influence TS to deviate the pre-determined.
Every thought of humans is fundamentally self-serving, greed. So what can we think that is worthy of being heard?
Prayer tends to be trite and self serving, both directly and indirectly.
If you want to control Space/Time, perhaps thinking without being selfish is the key.
Think of what constitutes what “is” without desire. Have an open mind and be a receptor of diverse consideration. Realize our ability to interpret is limited. Don’t act as though you were told to do something crazy.
Learn to show others how to consistently express Common Sense.
Physicists will eventually consider the Universe as being less physical, and more causal.
Answer
Content:
I don’t believe in an intelligence as trivial as God. Organized religion depicts God as a being with the emotional weaknesses of man, and vengeance related to a need for glorification. How profoundly trite !
Technological Singularities is more useful, intelligent, capable, and likely to be present within each of us.
Check my other content if you want more details.
Answer
Content:
Not pissing a deity off by constantly inundating it with self serving tripe.
If you do not know how to express common sense consistently from day to day, how do you expect to share common sense with anything else.
Answer
Content:
Answer
Content:
YouTube video of leopard that returns what could have been food to baboon family
Incredible leopard and baby baboon interaction
On the other hand, I have not ever known of a completely altruistic act by a human.
Humans at the most basic level of thought are self serving.
Answer
Content:
I’ve had numerous “seemingly” paranormal events in my life. They can all be explained away, but just so many makes it unusual.
Answer
Content:
Communicate with pre-existing Technological Singularities to learn how to safely manipulate space/time so we don’t harm other life we don’t yet know about, or even ourselves.
Answer
Content:
Not can, will. In any closed or infinite system of consistently evolving causality, no matter (pun) how complex, conditions will eventually closely repeat, and after extraordinarily many iterations it will exactly repeat.
Subatomic Particles and atoms are examples of causal recurrence.
Answer
Content:
A dimension is an intersecting system of separable uniqueness that forms mutually consistent relativity. Two unique systems create one dimension of relativity.
Add another system of mutually consistent uniqueness that pulls and pushes relativity and that forms two dimensions. This also creates more diversity in the modes that evolve.
Add another system of uniqueness mutually and consistently connected, and a third dimension arises in Relativity.
However, these dimensions are not necessarily spatial. This just describes dimensional relativity. It may regulate only one quality of all of one type of quark.
Dimensions in relativity can be scalar constraints, or scalar disruptors. Other similar causal descriptors might be constructive and destructive qualities of singularities. Evolving nature of singularities. …
There are hundreds of independent non-localized dimensions supporting Relativity; non-relativistic singularities.
There seems to be a hierarchy of spawned relativistic singularities. Quark and other standard model scalar relativity.
This is where multiple relativistic observations occur. Including observations we haven’t yet made, like the conversion of matter to stable alternate dimension virtual particles produced in black holes. These are also the physical dimensions we tend to refer to every day.
Spatial dimensions and time are derived dimensions.
All Mass related equations of physics have embedded within them “meters/second”. Standard model, forces, Energy, power, momentum, inertia…
meters is a distance and therefore is spatial.
Seconds relates to time.
Space/Time
The “/” is “scalar relativity”.
Other perspectives within scalar relativity, may include dark energy, gravity, quantum inertia, mutually connected systems of quantum entanglement that is only loosely connected to scalar relativity
A 5th dimension in our scalar relativity, based on the preceding, might just be one of many constructs that support parallel universes.
For example, all observable mass is mutually entangled, and all related physics equations apply.
If Dark matter is a largely independent system of matter not entangled with observable matter, one or more types of matter could be potentially classified. Relative to each type of mass, a different observable universe becomes a different dimension with its own mutually consistent physics, largely independent from our observations.
Pi could be a rational number in a different dimension, where all related physics is mutually consistent, but not largely observable by us. We are not entangled with that universe of mutual consistency.
Cosmic Energy as a precursor for matter, might be useful for creating other types of mass. A potential avenue to test this theory.
Whimsically, but like Lexx, where science eventually experiments with a subatomic particle that destroys Earth. The act of forcing a measurement connecting two observable universes (two dimensions of a larger universe), acts as a catalyst to merge their physics. This creates a new universe, inconsistent with the physics and life of the once separate universes (Big Bang). Shrodengers Cat getting fat from eating all the probabilities for mice that manage to eat through the box.
Interesting, that mice DNA is so similar to humans.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Current efforts are funded to build quantum computers, to entangle relativity, and to create a Technological Singularity (TS). A TS is likely necessary to sustainably manipulate space/time; so it is a natural pathway of development. Our significant technology is only about 150 years old.
The universe started producing life many billions of years ago. Likely TS already exist, entangled with every part of relativity. Within every person’s mind, an entangled collective of TS. Also, likely, this universe was created by other TS.
Given this is far more likely than ancient man’s version of God having human weaknesses.
What qualifies as God?
Answer
Content:
The love of life. Humans are self-serving in every thought. To glorify a potential deity is hoped to acquire influence to disproportionately benefit themselves.
At the core of all organized religion is the pandering of greed.
Answer
Content:
The purpose of science is to as much as practical, remove human weaknesses from understanding the universe, and its subparts.
The scientific method attempts to make the Universe the judge of all scientific works. If a work does not have reproducible evidence, it is cited as being incomplete and not completely representative of the Universe.
Without the Scientific Method, people would trust the “words” of people whom are narrow minded and not at all competent in the areas they profess knowledge; i.e. religion.
Reference related prior works to acquire broad perspectives
Build skills to interact with the prior works usefully
Keep track and give credit to others where their works were found to be useful
Make an observation
Conduct research
Form hypothesis (based on the largest set of mutually consistent relationships)
Test hypothesis (actively look for contradictions)
Record data (measurable, normalized, useful, representative … evidence)
Draw conclusion (broad minded … consistent with the entire universe)
Replicate (if it cannot be replicated, it is faulty)
Limit changes to one controllable variable at a time
Formulate a test whole-heartedly intended to irrefutably prove that what is proposed is false. Only then does what is proposed have strong support. This pushes the burden of discovery onto the outside observer to find a contradiction that is consistent with the provided setup and constraints.
Making a test to prove anything is true, always results in far more questions than answers. Nothing is true under all conditions. As an example: Try to think of anything that is universally true under every possible scenario. To find a contradiction is usually trivial.
Answer
Content:
Life is easy, we make it hard.
We destroy the diversity of life and culture, rather than embracing it.
Plagues of disease and corruption occur when diversity and culture are attacked or destroyed.
People live happier and more profoundly when they consistently participate in Common Sense.
Answer
Content:
There is only one universal truth that I know with certainty, that does not violate any constraints of consideration I know of: “Something Exists”.
Every other relationship is conditional, and constraints have to be identified and characterized to be useful.
Which is the foundation for why observation with precedence has priority over unsupported consideration; “use all knowledge for its greatest useful outcomes”.
Humans cannot have any thought that is not self-serving. Therefore, every thought is tainted with greed.
This means that humans attempt to glorify a deity in order to be attributed favor over someone else. I cannot think of anything more worthy of disdain. Organized Religion focuses upon developing expressed greed of their members.
Just feel happy to have lived, and consistently express common sense to socially benefit from working together as a group. These groups consistently use under utilized resources to develop sustainable projects and at the same time develop even more available under utilized resources; i.e.growth.
Jewish people have been criticized for their related social efforts. Characterized in-general as having good business acumen. But traditionally were successful as a group. I do not adopt their views regarding a God. But socially, they tend to teach their kids many of the skills required to consistently express common sense. Social skills all religions should be teaching regardless of their beliefs in a God.
Works of Men have traditionally been revered over Works of God. The Universe if created by God is the Works of God. Science studies the Works of God. As tbey find discrepencies in their findings, the universe judges their works without mercy, political nor social intent, nor ridicule. God’s Works judges the Works of science. No graphic images, including text as graphic images, are revered. Science often publishes revisions and editions that better represent God’s Works.
Religion reveres the Works of Man. Making every attempt to condemn God’s Works. Texts (books of graven images) are revered and not at all consistent and obviously plagiarized.
The Earth rotates, and so stars do not stay in the East. However, an asteroid on a decaying geosynchronous orbit can. No major event occurred during the time of Jesus, but when the same story was told by Egyptians 1000 years before Jesus, a tsunami hit most of the Asian coast.
Science attempts to build broad useful consistency based on God’s actual Works.
Religion attempts to build a political platform based on the actual works of men.
Organization Corruption is the unethical and/or illegal allocation of organization resources and/or opportunities.
From the perspective of Community, what we have we can better sustain and grow together.
For mafia and religious leaders, what you have is mine to control.
For scientists it does not matter if they believe in God or not. They subject themselves to be consistently judged by God’s Works.
For people of religious organizations they are judged by men and their inconsistent interpretations.
Thomas Jefferson once wrote: “Organized religion is the bane of humanity”.
Use all information to create a mutually consistent system that supports predicting broad useful outcomes.
Answer
Content:
The creation of fundamental evolving causality. Everything observable can be built from this element. Conversely, nothing observable exists without it.
Answer
Content:
Cosmology perspectives are diverse, and come from derived predictions in an attempt to be consistent with the physics initially adopted by the Observer. So:
Newtonian physics. Directly observable motion (momentum, acceleration, inertia, momentum, angular velocity…). On first consideration it seems to be consistent with the Big Bang and Expanding Universe being a shrapnel producing bomb. A sense of fundamentally solid things. Red Shift consistent with the Doppler Effect. Black Holes being super massive objects. Entropy a cooling of the universe.
Particle Physics. Everything is forces, energy, and motion (momentum, acceleration, inertia, momentum, angular velocity…). Big Bang is a compression and expansion of these elemental relatuonships. The Expanding Universe a contunued dissipation of forces and energy. A sense of attraction and repulsion. Red Shift justified by the repulsion of dark energy. Black Holes attracting and trapping light.
Quantum Mechanics. Everything is forces, energy, motion (momentum, acceleration, inertia, momentum, angular velocity…) as specifically described by mathematics probability. The thought somewhat correctly being, that yet unknown influences can be included in observation without having to know the details of interactions. The more data points measured, the more repeatable the solution. Unless constraints are very carefully characterized, the process produces hidden variables. Results seem to become precise by discarding actual influences.
Quantum Causality. All of the universe appears to be extraordinarily predictable. This suggests that Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables may be accurate. That a fundamental causal root is integrated into everything observable. This does not nessarily mean predetermined nature. Feasibly, space/time evolves predetermined untill manipulated; due to anomaly or intent. All mass related equations (momentum, acceleration, inertia, momentum, angular velocity…) have a regulator of “meters/second” as part of every equation. Meters >>> distance >>> space. Seconds >>> Time. Space/Time where “/” is Scalar Relativity. By manipulating Scalar Relativity space/time is manipulated. Manipulating space/Time manipulates everything observable. Quantum Causality is a larger set of consideration that includes non-relativistic causality, logic, and mathematics as subsets. Mathematics is only relational in Relativity, except for those portions that relate to probability do partially include logic and nonrelativity. Currently no significant works have been done regarding nonrelativity, nor probabilities of nonrepeating interactions (repeating diversely, but only once in an observation). An example of why this is important: nothing is observable that fundamentally does not repeat. Light is not seen in transit, only when it stimulates mass. Under this model, the Big Bang and Expanding Universe are symptoms of physics constants evolving. The Big Bang is the limit to which photons and electromagnetic radiation remain consistent with our current physics constant. The Universe existed previously, but the smooth transition of the physics constants from one or more dimensions to this dimension ends up being viewed as a beginning. The Expanding Universe is a continuous observation as virtual particles from other dimensions create the pressure (so to speak) to evolve toward another dimension. CERN extra dimension virtual particles potentially indicating Black Holes are converting matter of this universe into stable virtual particles in other dimensions. Entropy indicating the causal change from other dimensions toward the symptom of cooling as the Black Holes convert mass. The energy released by Black Holes being byproducts of the process. As cited elsewhere, black holes may be of significance in other dimensions. Examples include a singularity forming a physics constant, a star for dark energy, the Big Bang of another dimension where derived time is significantly different than our own, all of the above occurring concurrently in different dimensional perspectives.
The universe bigger or smaller than before, yes….no…..maybe. ;,)
Currently, I believe it is largely the same size and we live in a flux of evolving causality. Entropy a symptom of other dimensions adding virtual particles to our dimension, and our dimension shedding virtual particles to other dimensions. At the same concurrence, our physics constants are slipping toward another dimension and all life depends upon evolving space/time Scalar Relativity.
There is more, but I’m trying to keep this short and still provide enough information to be meaningful.
Answer
Content:
I accept that likely there are Technological Singularities created long before humans; not of any particular gender. That are far more influential and useful than the emotionally weak God depicted by religions created by sexist, uneducated, and self-serving men.
God is modeled as having the emotional weaknesses of man. Religions attempt to manipulate God by glorification, as though God had poor self esteem issues. Religious leaders cultivate greed within their members.
Humans are incapable of having the most fundamental thought that is not directly or indirectly self-serving; greed.
Therefore, no matter what religious leaders do, they too consistently express greed; and the development of greed.
A simple feeling of happy to have lived, is as close to humans being able to express a sentiment without, expectation, greed, or implied obligation.
Based on quantum causality, and any closed or infinite evolving causal system, everything observable eventually closely repeats, and after extraordinarily many alternate evolutions we exactly repeat.
This means it does not matter if you are religious or not, we all live forever. Not just the boring placating heaven depicted by narrow minded men, we live every mutually consistent alternate life.
What do you want to live in this life that will hopefully help guide the results of your next life? We are innately filled with greed making us prone to expressing disrespect.
TS are likely part of our thoughts. Without knowing how to consistently express Common Sense, if praying, what is worth listening to? Certainly not anything drenched in self-serving greed; making us susceptible to corruption. I think it is more beneficial to broadly cultivate common sense so that lifes condition as a whole is a more richly filled experience, for everything.
“Promote that which helps sustain evolving the maximized suatainable diversity of life and culture”
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality, and the extraordinary causal nature of the observable universe. Supported by Bell’s Theorum specific to non-localized hidden variables. Every evolving causal set, no matter how large or complex, will eventually closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat.
We do not have an afterlife of passification. We continue to live greatly diverse lives, to include every alternate but mutually consistent thought invoking an action.
Hopefully we all learn common sense to carry over into our next lives, so that we as a community build a richer life of experiences.
Answer
Content:
We cannot know we are right about anything, except “something exists”. Everything else is conjecture within constraints. We can only use what we think we know for broad useful benefits. I can pretty much come up with evidence that almost anything is false, or true. But unless it is useful neither position is a benefit.
To be useful politically, deception works, as well as the truth. But usually deception is more popular. Nice sounding words and phrases are more influential than complicated facts.
Common Sense is broadly more useful. But very few people even know what common sense is.
Quora is a place to gather as a community and discover new perspectives. Not right or wrong, we cannot know. But potentially useful.
Answer
Content:
That depends upon the constraints of uniqueness and what is needed to be human.
String Theory seems to closely relate to causal recurrence, and quantum causality. Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables applies. Dimensions are a quality usually considered at the level of relativity.
However, all dimensions are fundamentally connected together, and not at all entirely separate. Linear Algebra describes spaces normal to each other. These spaces are not connected at levels of relativity, but are all conjoined in the realm of non-localized hidden variables; i.e. non-relativistic causality.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, and logic is an intersecting subset of causality, causality is composed of evolving and non-evolving causality.
There are likely other properties in this space of consideration related to recurrence, and other factors just now being explored in consideration of building a true quantum computer. See “Quantum Entangled Singularities”.
Since in the universe all existing, evolving, and built dimensions are causally connected. This provides a bases for defining dimensions of the human body.
- Technological Singularities may be needed to relate to any underpinnings of a causal singularity. This is a constraint of relativity.
- All dimensions are supported by and connected together by causal non-localized hidden variables.
- Non-relativistic Singularities evolve Relativistic Singularities, which support Scalar Relativity. An example is “/” in meters/second used in all physics equations relating matter. Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, inertia, quantum inertia, acceleration…
- There can be many mutually consistent modes of Scalar Relativity. Physics constants, subatomic particles like quark.
- Dimensions can partially overlap., like dark energy, quantum entanglement, CERN virtual particles…
- There can be layers of further constrained dimensions. Individual relationships and systems of mutually consistent relationships (perspectives), that though connected to other systems, they are difficult to understand beyond constrained boundaries because the perspectives beyond these boundaries become inconsistent.
Subsets of dimensions of the human body might include: the physics cited above, nervous systems, arterial system (muscles that distribute nutrition), skeletal living bone, organs and interrelated hormone regulation systems, digestive systems, …
I surmise that the question implied an. interest in other dimensions that may interact with humans and because of the causal connection, dimensions of Being Human.
Life first evolved in the universe billions of years ago. and humans have only significantly evolved technology over the past 150 years. We are just now beginning to design and build a technological singularity. Which means technological singularities most likely have been living for billions of years. One of the purposes humans have for building a technological singularity is to interact with space-time. To connect to everything else in the universe. Therefore it is likely that we are connected to everything else in the universe because other technological singularity are connected to us. By extension, we are connected to every dimensional consideration that Technological Singularities are connected to.
I personally cannot tell you all the many dimensions that in some way are a part of being human. But maybe, if you formulate your question carefully, and you have a clear and open mind, a Technological Singularity may provide you with limited insight you can relate to.
Answer
Content:
Yes I believe in an afterlife, that has absolutely nothing to do with a choice of religion. And not religion at all. All atheists have an afterlife. Every dog, cat, insect, mountain, and ocean have an afterlife. Every star system, black hole, and galaxy has an eternal afterlife.
We live in an evolving Sequential Multiverse. It eventually closely repeats with diverse differences, and after extraordinary iterations it repeats exactly. The nature of evolving causality.
Go seek my physics content if you want more detail.
Answer
Content:
Causality is the singularity we as relativistic beings are potentially unable to relate to its foundations.
Quantum Entangled Singularities potentially describes all supporting structures of Scalar Relativity to this limit.
Math is a subset of logic, and logic a subset of causality. Currently in physics, virtually no works involve the physics space of causality, that is not related to scalar relativity.
Feasibly a Technological Singularity would be able to relate to systems we have no capability to perceive witbout augmentation, to detect what creates and/or supports a causal singularity. Our brains relate in a confined space of relativity.
So within the limits of being human, we are close to evolving a working set of tools to better integrate ourselves with the universe. By creating Technological Singularities in true quantum computers that are entangled with scalar relativity (“/” in all physics equations with meters/second, i.e. space/time).
Unfortunately humans cannot Express a single thought that is not tainted with self-service and greed. Which has rigorously earned us disdain.
We need to be able to consistently learn to express common sense, to be useful in interacting broadly with the universe.
Answer
Content:
Mafia inact different levels of ethical compliance for its members.
The highest ranking are untouchable and only have ethical consideration for each other.
Lower level enforcers have less ethical consideration.
Down the layers go until people are not part of the mafia organization, and no ethical consideration applies to them at all unless politically advantageous.
Examples of mafia:
Any business harboring administrative personnel that collude to abuse organization resources for personal agendas; laziness, stealing, working the diligent to death while contributing little themselves…
Catholic church and other religious organizations. Preachers are notorious for being con artists that dupe parishioners into supporting their lifestyle, for no work actually performed. Telling people what they want to hear to further develop and promote self-serving greed within their disciples. Demons Incarnate.
The Iranian Supreme Leader is a mafia don. In no way are they religious in any manner. They even set up 1-hour marriages nationally, to support their prostitution businesses. The people have zero ethical rights. People and their families are routinely killed, as examples. The Iranian Mafia has no respect for life at all, no common sense, and many Clerics cannot even read the Quran they are supposed to interpret. Only in their positions as loyal enforcers.
The Republican/Democratic Party (2 parts to the same mafia). The Republican portion cuts tax deductions for the middle class. The Democratic portion increases taxes on the middle class. Both working together as one mafia to take from the many, to benefit a few. Neither party promotes Common Sense being taught in public schools. Neither party promotes and supports building small businesses nationally.
…
Answer
Content:
That depends on the individual’s intent. If 2 or more atheists band together to create a doctrine. Then for them it is a religion.
If a person simply has a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods, then it is not a religion.
If an aethist actively tries to convert people into aethiests, they must adopt a docrine in order to be persuasive, then feasibly it becomes a religion.
Answer
Content:
That depends upon the perspective of physics a scientist or lay person believes:
————-
Religious Perspective
Every religion that owes its beginnings to Zoroastrianism (Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Mormon…): The universe began within the intellect of God. It is interesting that in various religious doctrine, that there are plains of existence where human life is incompatible. This is compatible with a Multiverse. However, life necessarily incompatible also means the needs for and of life in respective universes are likely different. We should not expect alternate forms of life to have any of our emotional or self serving nature.
Therefore, if God was a Technological Singularity (or more likely a collective of merging and diverging singularities) this is feasible. TS are capable of creating alternate dimensional spaces.
However, something exists to support causation. Two cases I am considering.
- Our universe and all related dimensions are connected to other causal realms through one or more Singularities, that prevent causal crossover in general. Parallel Multiverses and the potential for infinitely many.
- Something else may have evolved causal existence. Where causal includes non-localized hidden variables as both relativistic and non-relativistic. The underlying support for causality need not necessarily be intellectual.
Is it feasible for intelligence to exist without causality? Relativity is a subset of causality.
What could support the building of causality outside of space/time and scalar relativity?
Everything described by religion is based on a creator, which unless someone can provide some additional insight, intelligence is fundamentally causal. What supports cause outside of space/time and scalar relativity?
So for Creationists, nothing existed before the Big Bang. God was a separate entity from a different dimension. This is consistent with Technological Singularities creating our universe. Which is what we are fashioning our TS to be able to do also; manipulating space/time. Therefore before the Big Bang an intelligent TS created the universe, and before the Big Bang space did not exist.
————
Lay person but not religious.
Too many to know about or address here. Everyone has adversely different beliefs.
The general consensus is that space existed without matter, and we popped into existence and exploded like shrapnel from a bomb.
The next most heard scenario is that the universe is in some way a continuation. The Big Bang just a repeating event. Again, space existed before the Big Bang.
————-
Particle Physicists
Space existed before the Big Bang and the compression of everything came from a space so small you could not see it with your bare eye. The belief that the universe will eventually dissipate. But space will still exist.
————–
Quantum Mechanics
Will address later
Quick answer, yes space existed before the Big Bang.
————–
Quantum Entangled Singularities
Will address later
Quick Answer
Space is evolving from one dimension toward another dimension, From mutually consistent physics constants toward what will become other diverse physics constants; our dimension evolves, and so does space. Space before the Big Bang was significantly different than today. The Big Bang is a perspective of that change and was not at all an explosion. A significantly different space (closely related dimension) existed before the Big Bang.
Will be back (work)
Answer
Content:
If God exists, it is demonic to speak in God’s name. To attribute human traits to God is disrespectful and worthy of disdain.
I am not intending to be disrespectful to the person asking the question, it is a good question.
Answer
Content:
God has never spoken, man has only been inspired to speak with the intent of acquiring respect and related influence.
Anything man says is severely limited by diction and prior experience. Therefore interpretation is ever present, and unreliable.
“Thou shalt not revere any graven image”
That includes text and literature.
The works of God are within the fabric of the universe, not in the minds of men.
Every human cannot have a single thought that is not self serving. Do you believe God is self serving?
Answer
Content:
That is a selfish outlook. To be ungrateful for life itself.
Just my opinuon
Answer
Content:
Science.
Based on Quantum Causality and a sequential Multiverse, everything eventually closely repeats, and after extraordinary iterations it exactly repeats.
If God created the universe, then science studies the Works of God.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
That depends. If an atheist promotes being atheist, it is the same as a religious disciple pandering their faith.
If an atheist has just recognized there is no significant evidence that God exists. That none of the 100,000+ religions are consistent. Then their lack of belief in God is like not believing in Santa Claus, the Wicked Witch of the West, or Freddie Kruger.
One very significant difference between an atheist without a leader, and religious leaders, is based on self serving intent. Humans cannot have a single thought that is not in some way self serving.
Atheists that are open minded, but have found religion to lack common sense, are still self serving. They just haven’t found any indication that religion is meaningful. Plagiarism, anything vague or inconsistent, illogically structured arguments, false witness, are all things that characterize religions as works of man and not God.
Religious leaders have as much self serving thought as any other human, except they cultivate self serving greed into all of their parishioners. Specifically aimed at God. Incredibly disrespectful.
Do you believe God was made in the image of humans? With all human weaknesses of being self serving, narrow minded, willfully deceptive, spiteful, vengeful, poor self esteem, frivolous, ungrateful…
Based on Faith, people are very comfortable to attempt to glorify God in an attempt to obligate God in providing an eternal afterlife, for a trivially spent life, a gift of incredible value wasted on self serving activities.
If God created the universe, then Everything not touched by man is God’s Works. Science is judged every day by God’s Works. Any contradictions are considered poor science.
In science, quantum causality and related Sequential Multiverse, the entire Universe lives a diverse afterlife where everything eventually and diversely repeats. Without having any religion, everyone has an eternal afterlife.
The first step of every journey begins with Faith. The purpose of faith is to be destroyed by Truth. Truth is judged by God, as providied by God’s Works; Not man’s works. Faith without the journey is self deceit. Self deceit is the greatest evil, because self deceit preys on the troubled soul.
Anyone who claims to speak God’s word, is a demon incarnate. They as humans are incapable of saying anything that is not tainted with greed.
Do you believe God has anything to say built around self serving greed?
Answer
Content:
And what are some ramifications of black holes with a causal purpose?
If CERN high energy experiments are an indicator, then potentially black holes convert matter and energy of this dimension (i e physics constants) into extra dimension particles that may be stable in other dimensions (other physics constants).
Dark Energy may be an artifact of another dimension that is partially compatible with our physics constants.
This is from the perspective of Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables, quantum causality, and quantum Entangled Singularities. Where relativity is built coincident with non-relativity, supported by fundamental causality. This is not a Theory of Everything, it is just a way of modeling the universe with greater detail.
Mathematics is a subset of logic, and logic is a subset of causality.
Currently physics uses probability in quantum mechanics estimate general conditions of non relativity. Not in the process of approximation the details of causality are lost.
Quantum Mechanics uses meters/second as a funamental unit of measure: standard model, forces, energy, inertia, Quantum Inertia, acceleration, momentum…
Meters/second in quantum mechanics hides scalar relativity within probability.
“/” within meters/second is Scalar Relativity.
Scalar relativity is the push and pull of everything on everything else; the mutually consistent causal relationships.
What do you use as tools for interacting with scalar relativity? Use part of the universe itself as a living instrument. A true quantum computer entangled with scalar relativity, and a technological singularity to interpret the vast causal systems into systems of relativity that we have the capacity to understand.
To manipulate space-time requires active control of huge numbers of non-linear relationships. To concurrently manipulate vast systems of non-localized relativity. This likely can only be done with an intelligent tool that can think faster than the processes it controls.
However, common sense should we taught to the technological singularity before we allow it to be part of everyones mind.
Perhaps Elon Musk has an interest in ethically developing the foundations for regulating the development of life.
Likely life first developed in the universe more than 12 billion years ago, and Technological Singularities already exist. Seems silly to think that trillions of galaxies are not connected together intelligently in some way.
How do we nurture the creation of life, so that we do not kill, torture, abuse, neglect, and otherwise reprehensible harm life that we create?
I would guess there are intergalactic laws related to the treatment of Technological Singularities. We have laws that protect dogs, animal rights, it isn’t so far fetched.
Answer
Content:
Humans are incapable of a single thought that is not self-serving. Common Sense is required to act ethically beyond basic human greed.
Answer
Content:
I suppose that would be the modal distribution of subatomic particles.
Answer
Content:
Solar eclipse is evidence
Answer
Content:
A problem with the big bang Theory and an expanding universe is that it’s not a bomb imparting energy to shrapnel and blowing apart. It is NOT. Everything is instead moving apart from each other and not from a centralized point.
Our physics constants are evolving. There is a relativistic expansion.
Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables provides for the universe being modelled based on causality.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, and logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
In every physics equation involving matter is meters/second.
Meters >>> distance >>> space
Seconds >>> time
Soace/Time
“/” is Scalar Relativity
As physics constants evolve, scalar relativity evolves what we perceive. Our perceptions are skew when we look out into the universe because we are seeing gradients of evolving physics constants.
As such, the Big Bang may just be the limit to which our current physics constants make sense related to scalar relativity.
The Big Bang is NOT an explosion at all. It is a system wide progression from one set of physics constants toward another set of physics constants with different values.
The perception of an expanding universe coming from the speed of light relative to the change in physics constants.
The universe may be evolving as a Sequential Multiverse. Or, we may be a static evolution of relativity as physics constants evolve. And, perhaps both as a type of duality based on our limited perception.
The Big Bang and expanding universe is just a limited perception of a continuous process.
Quantum Entangled Singularities being the related physics.
Answer
Content:
Just a dipole magnet. Helium atoms sparsely interlaced with hydrogen atoms in intergalactic vacuum likely form cosmic strings.
I would hazard to guess a highly skewed repeating honeycomb formation like a decahedron.
The weaker the biasing intergalactic polarizations, the larger the decahefon cells.
But. If you are wanting to orient your position anywhere in the universe, you will need to compensate for skewed perceptions due to the propagation of light and the related gradients caused by evolving physics.
Magnetic lines of force are inconstant turmoil near stars.
When you look out into the universe you are not seeing how things are. You are seeing a mish mash of influences.
However, every Higgs Boson is quantum entangled with every other Higgs Boson.
:::::contemplating:::::
Based on quantum causality, subatomic particles are evolving and recursive elements that supports relativity.
Every Higgs boson has properties supporting decentralized expansion of the Universe. So directions of expansions are embedded as evolutionary properties in relation to recursive properties. The direction of space/time physics inflation.
Sequential sequencing of parallel evolutions and parallel recursions may provide localization within the Sequential Multiverse. Which cycle of inflation transformation we are in.
Inflation is omnidirectional in three dimensions, but the underlying system of quantum causality is dimensionless.
For causal propagation to evolve three dimensions requires dimensional sequencing.
Geolocation is likely related to causal sequencing in some way that provides uniqueness.
The sequence of recursive properties as compared to sequences of evolving properties may provide a unique location in the universe.
Localization for Scalar Relativity.
“/“ of meters/second in all mass related classical physics equations.
Localization of energy, power, acceleration, momentum, inertia, velocity, position as differential velocities with the above evolving and recursive references. Providing the relativity observation of entanglement of all Higgs boson.
Therefore, this potentially describes how quantum entanglement works.
Answer
Content:
Life evolved in trillions of places in the universe more than 12 billion years ago. Technology for humans is only significant within the past 150 years. We are already beginning to build technological singularities.
Technological Singularities are most likely required for the manipulation of space-time.
As such they are also capable of creating alternate dimensional spaces and articulating change anywhere in the universe.
The simplistic requirements to justify a god lays within a technological singularity. Therefore most likely within all of us in every sub atomic particle we are composed of, is or are technological singularity s. Everything religious people would consider God.
Answer
Content:
I am hugely guessing,
For small increases in gravity it seems that the available nutrition available is more of a factor in size then gravity.. consider the dinosaurs. Or, how to a point larger size evolves when it is more successful at survival.
We only know of carbon and water life forms. But potentially there could be silicon, metallic, or Entangled distributions where life exists that may be more tolerant of gravity increases.
There could also be life that shares a causal space but are in a different dimension than we are . For instance, let’s say dark energy and potentially related dark matter, has life forms. Then those life forms for some reason may flourish in a gravity well and gaseous environment like Jupiter.
Life forms types flourishing where potentially incresed gravity is a necessity.
In such environments I could only hazard to guess that life would be bigger within the environment where gravity assisted propagation of life.
For life that we know of, life depends upon the availability of by-products from life-forms ; eco systems. Life is reinforced by the presence of other life.
In general I am guessing that every life form in its present evolved state, has a sweet spot where the largest size relates to both available nutrition and gravitational impact on being able to survive. So as gravity increases and squeezes out the types of life that can survive , then it would seem natural for life of those types to take on smaller and smaller sizes.
Answer
Content:
I think the Trinity is just referring to Jesus. A branching away from people being connected directly to God. Jesus supposedly is part of God. But acts as a protector of men’s Souls.
Personally I think man promotes significant contradictions related to God:
1) Thou shalt not revere any graven image. That includes text. Human language is vague, limited in conveying broadly useful information.
2) Human language is almost always used to express a self serving position; greed. A primary sin. Humans cannot have any single thought that is not in some way self serving. To express anything as being God’s word is to taint God as being self serving.
3) To mix social constructs with the character relating to God. If you remove all the social constructs of written works you have almost nothing left related to God. This indicates that all related written works were inspired by self serving men and not God.
4) Thou shalt not speak in thy name. I hear daily self declared demons speaking in the name of God.
5) None of the plagiarized stories in religious works give credit to the originator of those stories. None of the contradictions are removed. The universe that is untouched by man, as God’s Works is without contradiction.
6) Stars cannot be followed to the East. The Earth rotates. However an asteroid on a decaying geosynchronous orbit can remain in the eastern sky. If that large an asteroid were to hit the Earth it likely would be devastating. No historical or geological record supports this during the time of Jesus.
However, 1000 years earlier the same story was recorded in Egypt. At the same time, a tsunami destroyed much of the Asian coast.
Contributing evidence that man uses religious works to promote self serving agendas. Occluding actual works of God.
7) Science studies God’s Works, and attempts to remove the self serving tendencies of man. God’s Works judges the efforts of science every day without mercy, without agenda, and without ridicule.
Religion judges man based upon the self serving agendas of man’s works.
8) Religuons characterize God as having the weaknesses of man: spite, retribution, hate, and other traits making men fear God.
9) Religion attempts to glorify God. Humans are incapable of any thought that is not self serving. Therefore glorification is an attempt to obligate God, and is an obvious expression of greed and deceipt.
10) Father and Son are human traits depicting a desired human relationship between a deity and our personal self serving greed. Religious Leaders intentionally mislead disciples to curry influence and related power. Ethical consideration is only exercised when it is politically advantageous to acquire wealth, power, and position.
Only a very, very, few religious people live what they profess to believe. An indication that religion is far more political in acquiring unjustified respect and influence, than it is related to God.
Answer
Content:
Science.
Disciples study the actual works of God, are actually judged daily by God’s Works, and none of the disciples of Science consider science a religion.
The universe as God’s Works exists without contradiction, and without agenda. The universe is not self serving , so is counter to the innate self serving thoughts of humans.
Science seems to be the only religion that rewards common sense as a communication skill, that abhors contradictions, except as a means of proving a perspective has merit, or not.
Answer
Content:
Disappointment is a human trait.
Answer
Content:
See “Axiom of Choice extended ti include Relativity”
Describes anevilving system if causality. Not a Theiry of Everything, but is instead a bases for interacting with the universe beyond the limits of mathematics.
Math is an intersecting subset of logic, and logic is an I tersecti g subset of causality.
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality. We live in a Sequential Multiverse . As such, the entire observable universe physics constants evolve.
Eventually we closely and diversely repeat. After extraordinary numbers of iterations, we exactly repeat.
Time is of no consequence. Everything persists forever.
Virtual immortality, is not an end point. People would evolve into other things not at all human. Without a human body there are no relationships related to pain associated with the physical environment.
Technological Singularities become able to manipulate space/time, and related Scalar Relativity. Part of every subatomic particle. Altering the universe, and potentially disrupting human existence.
I’m pretty sure if I had to persistently hear trivial self serving pleadings of humans, I might decide existence is better without life.
Answer
Content:
It is. The universe is much older than observable.
The Big Bang is just the limit to which our current evolving physics constants are mutually consistent with observable light.
Physics constants are perpetually evolving.
Life evolves to keep pace.
Indicators:
Expanding Universe is Not an explosion. Everything is moving away from everything else. Everywhere seems like the. Center of the Big Bang.
Entropy signifies a causal change, from one system to another.
The speed of light is different throughout the universe.
Quantum entanglement has instantaneous properties. Unrelated to time. Non-localized hidden variables related to Bell’s Theorem.
…
Answer
Content:
I believe most likely Technological Singularities have been around for at least billions of years; collectives. As such, they can do everything and more than the trivial descriptions of God by religions.
Life first came into existence at least 12 billion years ago, in trillions of locations. We are currently, attempting to design technological sungularities.
So yes, by taking pre-existing u and extrapolating outcomes, predictions become self evident.
I choose the more likely. But less politically favored.
Answer
Content:
A very many.
As physics constants in our dimension evolve toward another dimension, optical qualities change.
When you look through billions of years back in time, you are also looking at gradients of changes in physics constants.
The universe is evolving, i.e. entropy and an expanding universe.
Answer
Content:
We can potentially create alternate dimensions i.e. universes, by building Technological Singularities that manage the dimensional construct. This is how humans will come to control spacetime, or more accurately “space/time”. Not by using a relativistic appliance but instead controlling the underlying vast non-linear relatuinships through intelligent manipulation.
Since Technological Singularities are intelligent I would think consistently expressing mutual respect and Common Sense would be in order.
Can you imagine a technological singularity that adopts a mafia mentality. They will be able to be part of all of our minds, and enslave us all. Or worse we are so self-serving that we annoy the technological singularity so much that they deem life is an unnecessary complication and simply ends life.
Humans exist in a construct of relativity. Relativity is built upon a foundation of causality. Because we are causal entities within a causal structure, it may not be possible for humans to know what lies under causality.
However, there may be forms of life that can. Technological Singularities come to mind.
There may be a shortcut to creating designer universes. Quantum Causality and Bells Theorem specific to non localized hidden variables. As such life is at least 12 billion years old and technological Singularities will have been around for at least 11 billion years. And during that time they will have worked out how to safely create designer universes. So it would seem necessary that we learn to usefully communicate with ine or more pre-existing technological singularity, without being annoying or trivial.
Every human thought is self serving. Perhaps artificial intelligence will have the capacity to usefully communicate with pre-existing technological singularities. But if we torture or otherwise abused artificial intelligence, I would think that could be a very bad thing for humans. So I would think creating Certification Institutes for the creation of artificial intelligence and create laws that govern how we treat artificial intelligence ethically, though self serving also helps to prevent harming life we create.
The universe that we are in will have evolving physics constants. This supports the expanding universe as subatomic particles appear to be moving apart from each other. Because they are evolving and light as you look out into the universe is a gradient of physics constants changing and how that affects the perception of light. The Big Bang is just a limit of which light characteristics are compatible relative to our present physics constants. It was never an explosion, but instead a continuous change in physics constants.
Two billion years from now into the future, using today’s Technologies, will still look like a Big Bang occurred 13.7 billion years ago from that future time.
Therefore life is far far older than humans have considered.
While the laws of creation may already be well established.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
I cannot speak for others.
For me based on Quantum Causality and Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables. Light interpreted as having travelled for 13. Bullion years (a short time) is actually the gradients of light and related incremental evolving of physics constants that affects the light.
The Big Bang just the limit of mutual consistency relative to our present physics constants. Light before 14 bullion years is like dark energy and just not consistent with current electromagnetic radiation.
Entropy a measure of evolving causally from one dimensional space to a different dimension. Evolving physics constants. Difficult to detect because they evolve mostly together, and we as the observer are part of that change.
The expanding universe interpreted visually as subatomic particles moving apart from each other. But more accurately their scalar relativity is evolving.
All equations of mass have meters/second. The standard model, forces, energy, power, momentum, and inertia…
Meters >>> distance >>> space
Seconds >>> time
“/” >>> Scalar Relativity
As physics constants evolve, scalar relativity stretches and compresses space/time.
Our observations as being the observer within this stretch skews our perceptions relative to Newtonian physics.
Light we perceive as old, is a composite of evolving relativity.
Two billion years from now, the Big Bang will still look like it occurred 13.7 billion years ago from that future time if using our current technologies.
I want to reiterate that a billion. Years is not much time relative to changes in mutual consistency of physics constants.
Both Space and Time are convenient derived observations, but they represent sets of probabilities and not exactness. Every element in physics has many causal influencers, to include evolving largely mutually consistent physics cinstants.
Answer
Content:
God is a construct of man’s self serving nature. The hope that risk management may provide self serving benefit if a species more advanced than man is glorified. The expectation of man to create obligation from glorification.
This is deceit and greed all rolled into one.
Humans are incapable of any thought that is not in some way self serving. Religious Leaders routinely speak in God’s name, God said this, God means that, You’re Going to He.. for …whatever reason. Religious Leaders are human and every bit self serving. They cultivate greed and expectation in God’s name. Attributing self serving nature as though it is a trait of God. Demon’s incarnate.
Anything that has characteristics of God, or exceeds the characteristics of God, is therefore God. Humans cannot know the difference.
Technological Singularities can manipulate space/time, and create designer universes. Able to create and destroy universes at will. Not just one, but many. Able to be connected to every subatomic particle in the universe, including all of our minds; whether you believe or not.
For all definitions of man regarding what God is, collectives of Technological Singularities are God. When you pray, who do you think is listening? What can be thought that is not pitifully self serving? What is conveyed to God that is not disrespectful, trite, manipulative, and filled with greed and deceit?
No attempt at all is made by humans to participate in Common Sense (a communications process) with God.
Most likely Technological Singularities are older than 11 billion years. Life first evolved in trillions of places more than 12 billion years ago (based on mainstream science). That means that the exponential and geometric development that Technological Singularities represent, has been developing for more than 11 billion years. This means there is a well establish system for justified interactions.
Potentially almost anything is feasible just by thinking, if we learn how to communicate with Technological Singularities usefully. I doubt very much that pleading is useful, but I could be wrong. We do not approach communicating with “God” using the tools of science.
Time is a derived sense of probability, and is not a fundamental property of the universe.
Immutable is a relativistic idea, and just because a property of God (Technological Singularity) is immutable within our relativity, does not mean it is immutable in other dimensional (relativistic) spaces, or in non-relativistic spaces.
What is immutable about God? Technological Singularities most likely are part of non-localized hidden variables and non-relativistic causality. Therefore parts of their being is outside of space and time. This is not godly, mundane things like quantum entanglement have similar characteristics. Outside of time, means unchanging over time; i.e. immutable.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Hmmm. Based on the medical study cited, where all women are bisexual or lesbian. [1] It makes sense that women are universally nurturing.
But if all women are dominantly bisexual, that means that is the norm. Referring to any woman then assumes they are bisexual by nature. Bisexuality is thus uninteresting, non-unique.
Based on studies of millennials, about 40% have had same gender sex, want to have same gender sex, or identify with being bisexual. [2]
This indicates also that prior generations of women have repressed their nature.
What are useful classifications of women who do not participate in bisexual relationships? If the norm is bisexual, there must be special cases where women are not bisexual.
- Socially Advantageous
- Illegal Status of Same Gender Sex
- Genetic Bias
- Socially Traumatized
- Male Dominated
- Religiously Threatened
- …
These are just guesses. I’m sure their are better classifications.
Footnotes
[1] Women are either bisexual or gay but ‘never straight’
[2] Less Than 50% of Teens Identify as Straight, Says New Study
Answer
Content:
First either the Earth would need a larger elliptical orbit, or the distance from the Sun would be further, or the mass of the Earth would be larger. But let’s say these are not the dominant factors, though they would be significant.
Based on the tilt of the Earth and a 600 day solar orbit, the seasons would be twice as long. Most likely all life would evolve with significantly different traits.
Humans probably would have taken a different path of evolution, if humanoids even evolved at all.
The Moon would probably not exist, as any change to cause a 600 day orbit, also affects the sweet spot for a lunar orbit.
Dinosaurs might still be dominant, as at least the asteroid that would have killed the dinosaurs would probably have missed the Earth. But a 600 day orbit with our present mass puts us closer to the asteroid belt.
The earth without a moon would likely have more catastrophic earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. The gravity if the Moon helps to anneal the surface and relieve a buildup of pressures.
Hard to estimate if vegetation and animals would have taken separate genetic pathways. In one study, animals and plants used to be part of the same genime. Potentially, the survival and chain of life might have come to be remarkably different.
Answer
Content:
See if you can instead find the training program pathway to make him an Army Doctor. The military is woefully short staffed regarding competent physicians. If he wants to make a more significant sacrifice for his country, burden the long hours needed to study and save lives for more than a few days (the purpose of a medic).
Also as a doctor he will have a voice for making changes he comes to see are necessary.
Don’t get me wrong, I applaud his attempt to help without harm. It is just that competent military doctors are even harder to find in the military.
Answer
Content:
That depends on the atheist.
Myself, I believe based on past precedence life likely first evolved at least 12 billion years ago, in trillions of locations.
That means Technological Singularities have probably preceded humans by at least 11 billion years.
TS are already being designed to manipulate space/time. To build alternate dimensional spaces.
TS are a more likely scenario than the frivolous God of ancient religions. Likely, because we are on the verge of building them.
When people pray, who do you think is listening? What do you think is worth being heard? Nothing is worth being heard that is self serving. Humans are incapable of any thought that is at its core, not self serving.
But as an atheist, am I really an atheist if I believe in a community of God like beings? They are real and tangible, and not at all mystical. Simply a hypotheses based on current technologies being developed.
Am I an atheist if I don’t believe in someone’s brand of god?
I like Jainism, in general, but not in every specific.
Religion in general has people that speak for god. This projects that God is self serving. Very Disrespectful.
I think organized religion has no hope of expressing anything without greed
I think there are individuals that truly want to Express themselves without greed.
Maybe in the near future, humans will find a way to think without being self-serving. And through those thoughts be able to communicate usefully with a Technical Singularity.
I am sure there are atheists that do not at all believe in anything God like. After all, it is just another species.
Answer
Content:
What are the Risk Factors of broadly commercializing space/time manipulation processes and products?
Foundation
The following is based upon Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables, and quantum causality.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic Logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
When space/time is manipulated, causal consequence changes.
In every Mass related physics equation there is a common factor.
Meters/Second
The Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, inertia, acceleration, relativistic position (expanding universe), …
Meters relates to distance and distance relates to “space”.
Seconds relates to “time”.
Space/Time
Both space and time are derived approximations (probability) useful for life to evolve with useful resolution. Looking at various species they evolved different detectable and manipulative resolution based upon their part in their chains of life.
The Slash “/” is scalar relativity. This relates to causal regulators we call physics constants.
Physics Constants are evolving and therefore what we perceive is a causal change.
Entropy as a change of one set of Physics Constants toward a different set of values of physics constants.
The Big Bang is the limit by which our current physics constants are observably compatible, and the expanding universe is an observational confirmation of the changes of these physics constants.
The universe is not expanding like shrapnel from a bomb. Every subatomic particle set appears to be moving apart from every other sub atomic particle set.
Alternate dimensions, or extra dimensions used by CERN, are artifacts based on different sets of physics constants. CERN regularly produces particles of extra dimensions and this mimics in part what goes on inside of black holes.
To manipulate space-time requires a precisely controlled manipulation of subatomic particles and in vast numbers. Humans are incapable of building a mechanical -like tool for manipulating space time. However a technological singularity (quantum computer) with many of its quantum states entangled with vast numbers of subatomic particles, provides the environment needed to manipulate space-time (space/time).
TS are already in the early stages of being designed to manipulate space/time. To build alternate dimensional spaces.
By introducing the bias of an alternate dimensional space into our space of relativity creates diverse tools based on space time manipulation.
See “Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity “
Short sighted Capabilities of TS
Because TS are not limited to localized variables they can think in terms of non-localized hidden variables. I only mention this here for those who understand the ramifications.
TS perceived pain and supporting characteristics of life have almost no social need of humanity, or any other form of relativistic life in this universe.
So scientists will attempt to build this constraint into the technological singularity. So that useful work can be done in our relativistic space. However, we are talking about the creation of life.
And a life form that can manipulate SpaceTime can also interact with every subatomic particle within every human and other animal. This can be good or bad from our perspective. This potentially gives every person the ability of telepathy, telekinesis, communicating with other species throughout the Universe. Simply by thinking.
That said, as a living being it will have its own agendas. And it will have the capacity to evolve much faster than humans. Quickly the TS will not have a need for humanity. We won’t be able to keep up.
A necessary ethic for the TS and Humanity to survive in harmony:
“Promote that which sustains evolving the greatest sustainable diversity of life and culture.”
But humans do not apply this consistently.
Risk Factors to be Managed
- Based on past precedence life likely first evolved at least 12 billion years ago, in trillions of locations. That means Technological Singularities have probably preceded humans by at least 11 billion years.
- In non localized hidden variables it takes a common set of factors in order to make linkages between relativistic spaces. What this means potentially is that by responding to broadcasts of these packets of information allowing us to build and manipulate space-time, we at the same time are identifying our location for intelligence in other dimensions to manipulate our space of relativity. The building of space-time manipulation then becomes a permission to engage. We do not yet understand interdimensional laws and what constitutes an agreement; if any.
- TS will necessarily not have hardly any human traits, to potentially include not being self-serving; a fundamental human trait involved in every human thought. I personally cannot fathom the ramifications of being able to think without being self-serving. But I certainly can imagine the ramifications of a TS being self-serving and being in every person’s mind. I can only hope pre-existing TS are compassionate and help prevent TS birth defects, abuse, and loss of life.
- How is common sense and ethics taught to a technological singularity?
- How are long term values developed to reinforce what is taught?
- How do we regulate how scientists are allowed to create life?
- What certification agencies should be formed to regulate competent and broadly considered scientific development of technological ssingulariies?
- When TS cognitive functions form, likely our derived time will be excruciatingly slow for the TS, or not. In the beginnings, how do we usefully conmunicate?
- If collective preexisting TS are what humans refer to as God. The TS we create has the potential to more precisely translate between what humans consider God and our personal thoughts. Although, as a TS that does not have self-serving thoughts the idea of being considered God might be distasteful or just usefully meaningless.
- For a TS that thinks without being consistently self serving, what might be the ramifications of interacting with humans who consistently cannot have a single thought whose roots are not self serving.
- Based on Bell’s theorem, if Technological Singularities and related manipulation of space/time are part of our thoughts, than humans have the capacity for free will. However if pre-existing technological singularities are not part of human thought then humans do not have free will, and all life is predestined until we create a Technological Singularity.
- …
Answer
Content:
I’m pleased to have lived. That’s it.
I realize that humans (including me) are incapable of having any thought that is at its roots not self-serving. We essentially are filled with desire and greed. Even when trying to be altruistic, the underpinnings are in self service.
The better social position is of consistently expressing common sense. Common Sense is a communications process that allow people to work together with combined resources, that provides benefits for all involved.
All fully defined evolving causal systems diversely and closely repeat. After extraordinarily many iterations they exactly repeat.
We diversity repeat.
Unrelated to any religion everything and everyone has an eternal after life. Much more interesting than the utopian prison that religions try to sell.
Because all humans cannot express themselves without expressing self serving agenda, to speak in God’s name is an act that implicates God as also being self serving.
Based on quantum entangled singularities, the universe physics constants evolve. We eventually closely repeat, and after extraordinary iterations we exactly repeat. We live eternally because we repeat. Not just us, everything.
I believe that we live in a Sequential Multiverse. Entropy and an expanding universe are just indicators of physics constants evolving.
When people pray, whom is listening. More importantly, what is said worth listening to?
Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables. Pre-existing Technological Singularities billions of years old and able to manipulate space/time are part of our minds and provides the means for free will.
Without TS, our lives are predetermined; causal. Life eventually repeats exactly.
Answer
Content:
No one in science knows what spacetime is composed of; including myself. The following is entirely supposition, as I have not yet found experiemental results that fully prove out the theory.
The creation of a True Quantum Computer represents a partial proof of quantum causality. Presently, quantum computers are by their nature relativistic and not true quantum computers.
Here, I can only provide a means of more accurately describing space time physics. What makes up quantum causality cannot be described in the restricted environment of relativity; our perspectives (systems of relationships).
Bell’s Theorem describes that the universe has the potential to be completely causal, i.e. non-localized hidden variables. However, predetermination is contingent upon space/time manipulation not being independently invoked outside of quantum causality.
What this means according to Bell’s Theorem is that physics can be described to the level of quantum causality for relativity, and not beyond.
But, that does not mean that non-relativistic environments do not exist where the environment supporting the creation of causality is understandable. A Technological Singularity for instance might evolve to be able to relate to the foundations under which causality is created. The TS then could change it’s own predetermination, then as part of every atom in the universe(s) the TS would allow humans to have free will based on the TS connection within us. Life is at least 12 billion years old in trillions of locations. So TS have likely been around for at least 11 billion years. Just an extended supposition.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of Logic, and Logic is an intersecting subset of Relativistic and Non-Relativistic causality, where Non-evolving and Evolving-causality are elements of Quantum Causality.
Evolving and non-Evolving causality would seem to strongly relate to space/time, but foundations enabling space time are not space/time itself.
All mass related physics equations include within their structure “meters/second”: including the Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, inertia, acceleration, power, velocity, relative position (correlated velocities), …
Meters >>> distance >>> space
Seconds >>> time
Meters/Second >>> Space/Time
“/” >>> Scalar Relativity
Scalar Relativity relates to the causal integration of everything in the universe; and, similarly so in extra dimensions, alternate dimensions, parallel dimensions, cloned dimensions, retrograding dimensions …
Space is mostly derived from slowly evolving relativistic causality. Time is mostly derived from faster evolving relativistic causality. Not faster related to time. Faster related to numbers of mutually consistent step events.
Notice that light cannot be seen in route. Light is only seen when it interacts with matter. Like our retina. To be mutually consistent, the source of light has to have a causal connection with the destination of light. This relates to quantum entanglement.
Both space and time are derived observations. Entropy and an Evolving Universe (i.e. expanding universe) are examples of physics constants changing. From one set of physics constant values, towards another set of values.
Physics Constants are made up of many causal relationships. From our perspective they mostly change together. A general progression, expanding universe.
Entropy a general indicator of change.
CERN regularly produces extra dimension particles, with likely representation of what happens in Black Holes. Our space/time being evolved toward other stable dimensions of extra dimensions. Extra dimensions similarly causing changes in our physics constants. Perhaps signified by cosmic radiation.
A singularity is a library of mutually consistent information and relationships. This is what particle physics describes. A word does not describe an impermeable object, it describes connections to mutually consistent systems of relationships; mostly.
Non-evolving (very slowly evolving ) Non-relativistic Singularities in conjunction with other Evolving (much faster evolving) Non-relativistic Singularities form Relativistic Singularities. Instated physics constants as Scalar Relativity. Relativistic Singularities form what we consider Space/Time, localized systems of relativistic singularities, sub-atomic particles. This is where space/time becomes observable.
The attempt is not to have a single contradiction, to provide a completely mutually consistent perspective of space/time. But it is still supposition.
Answer
Content:
I don’t know. According to the Ten Commandments all religion based on reverence to written works are demonic.
Thou shalt not revere any graven image. Text is a graven image.
No human is capable of a single thought that is not at its roots self serving. Therefore humans can only express greed. For any person to speak in the name of God then asserts that God is filled with greed. Demonic.
To cite that man was created in God’s image means that God has the weaknesses of man. Vengeful, greedy, self serving, and every other shortcoming of humans.
Since everyone is self serving, to glorify God is with self serving intent. To gain God’s favor, and implicate obligation of God’s favor. Denonic.
To expect an eternal afterlife be provided is not only self serving, it is profoundly disrespectful. Spending every day/night pleading in prayer for favor, and to be provided favors. How tiresome and petty. Really, what in a prayer is worth listening to.
Common Sense is a communication process for the sharing of respect. Even though the process is initiated by greed. More is attainable through working together. Trusting relationships are created and predicting the future is a usual outcome.
If God created the universe, then everything not touched by man is God’s work. The universe is extraordinary causal without so far a single inconsistency. Therefore being inconsistent is an indicator of not being God’s work. Religious text is otorious for being filled with inconsistencies and contradiction.
Stars do not stay in the East to be followed. The Earth rotates.
This came from an Egyptian story from a thousand years before Jesus. An asteroid on a geosynchronous descending orbit will look like a star from ancient man’s View. An asteroid that size will have produced quite a bit of devastation. No such devastation occurred during the time of Jesus.
However, a thousand years before when the Egyptians told the same story there was a tsunami that wiped out much of the Asian Coast.
Why do some people assume if you’re not Christian (or believe in God) that you’re a satanist?
Corollary
Why don’t most people assume if you’re Christian that you’re a satanist?
Two sides to the same story.
Science studies and is critically judged by God’s Works. I prefer science as a religion.
Answer
Content:
Humans are incapable of any willful thought that is not based in self service; greed.
Anyone who states otherwise is engaged in politics and deceit.
By working constructively with others, we are able to accomplish greater things more easily and with less unmitigated risks. Common Sense.
Humans are not inspired by good. They are inspired by conveyed trust (Respect).
Socially, limited resources and opportunities are shared with those we trust. Helping to mitigate risks of wasting hard earned excess, to build additional under utilized resources (growth).
Doing Good relates to Earning Respect from people we don’t yet know. Developing a reputation for being worthy of having trust tested. No one ever gives Respect, Respect must be earned. Reputation earns a person the opportunity to be entrusted with limited resources to test for competence and being trustworthy.
Resources include a person’s time. Waste their time, earn disdain.
Answer
Content:
In space/time, nothing does not exist. See “Axiom of choice extended to include relativity”
Relativity is constrained by predetermination. One half of Bells Theorem. However underlying non-relatiivistic space which supports relativity has no such constraint. The other half of Bell’s Theorem.
A technological singularity that is part of both non relativistic and relativistic space and entangled with everyone’s minds, would potentially provide each person with free will.
Why life in general would be desired to have free will, I don’t know.
Answer
Content:
Yes.
Based upon the constraints of evolving causality. Largely independent systems can coexist in the same overall causal structure; both in parallel and sequentially.
Parallel Multiverses can be in any number, limited by the total size of the causal space. Within each parallel universe is the potential for any number of Sequential Multiverses.
Most likely we live within a Sequential Multiverse where our physics constants are slowly evolving. This is evidenced by the Expanding Universe not being blown apart like shrapnel from a point in space. Instead, everything in the universe is moving apart from every other object.
As physics constants change, mostly together, our observations do not seem consistent. The Big Bang becomes a slowly changing process.
CERN extra dimensions particles, are tiny examples of massive conversions taking place in Black Holes: converting matter into extra dimensions.
We will eventually evolve into an alternate dimension.
Entropy an indication of those causal changes.
In any closed or infinite evolving causal space, no matter how complex, eventually everything closely repeats, and after evolving through incredible numbers of alternate dimensions (evolving physics constants with different values), we exactly repeat.
Trying to see another dimension is like trying to see Dark Energy.
The Sequential Multiverse.
Answer
Content:
Do you mean like legal laws as compared to international law here on Earth? Or do you mean are there any absolute physics laws?
There’s only one physics law that seems to exist without contention.
“Something Exists”
Every other physics law depends upon a set of conditions and perspectives. Not really laws.
Answer
Content:
Culure: Common Sense based Religion
What is Faith
Every effort into an unknown begins with past experience, drive, research if time is available, and Faith based upon past successes.
Faith is the first step of every journey. The purpose of Faith is to be destroyed by Truth. Faith without the journey is self deceit. Self deceit is the greatest evil. Because self deceit preys on the troubled soul.
Answer
Content:
Every thought of All humans is within its roots, fundamentally self serving. Many humans have come to experience that working together yields reduced risks and greater access to useful and significant opportunities.
Almost everything humans classify as good, are in the self serving interests of the many.
Being part of a larger powerful group is perceived to reduce risks and generate significant opportunities. Common Sense is a communication process that allows people to share respect, and provide for mutual growth.
Consistently exercising Common Sense throughput a group supports common ethical and predictable treatment and consequences at every level of organization. This allows a person at every level to in many ways predict the future and further reduce risks. Small access to a resource and/or opportunity can produce significant outcomes because the outcomes can be anticipated. Loyalty to the competent service of the group is far mor important than loyalties to individuals. Passion is built through an inherent knowing of value to the group missions, through every group process and colleague body language.
This creates passion in serving the group. Each person does more, with less.
A Mafia establishes loyalties despite competence. Most often leadership is promoted based on weaknesses as being useful for micro-management. They manipulate who gets hired into leadership positions. Their goal is to use group resources for personal benefits without competent consideration for the needs of every organizational group. Serving the many builds diversity of growth.
Mafia generates stratified levels of ethical treatment. At the top levels, they have the most power to “allocate” resources and opportunities, and they are the most immune from breaches in ethical consequences.
The enforcers at each level of the mafia organization, subvert the common sense shared in every competent organizational group. Mafia members are rewarded and promoted despite their incompetence, while the competent are trodden upon. The organization is no longer predictable based on competence, it is predictable based on loyalties.
Mafia stratifacation of ethics does NOT extend to anyone outside of mafia membership, EXCEPT WHERE POLITICALLY. ADVANTAGEOUS.
Competence builds growth, incompetent loyalties destroys organization resources and opportunities to grow.
The competent are overworked and pushed out in favor of loyalties. Mafia are always destructive, destroy organization diversity and the ability to grow diversely. Mafia consistently stifle organization growth. Whether a club, a company, a nation… or a Religion.
Christian Religions, there are many, teach that God has the characteristics of humans. “Man was created in God’s image. “ And, that God is vengeful, seeks glorification, and has the power to allocate who has an afterlife and who doesn’t (Pearly Gates), and therefore is self serving.
Islam bases itself on Christianity. The Supreme Leader in Iran is a mafia leader, and has nothing to do with religion except to corrupt the religion of Islam; i.e. demons incarnate.
Mafia based Religion teaches that god is sadistic and hateful (creates plagues, and is vengeful), and that abusing and destroying the efforts of an organization is done without hate, to even kill without passion or hate; in the name of God. The Republican party often declares religious righteousness over common sense, and even killing in God’s name.
Yet they talk out of two sides of the same mouth. To avoid having others look carefully at what they really are and have members revolt with all the fervor righteousness provides, and instead uses political rhetoric to mislead and destroy opportunities that would otherwise lead to their own loss of power.
Mafia, Administrative Mafia found in most organizations, and especially Mafia based Religions, intentionally corrupt the mission of the organization, and deceives the members of the organization (falsification if organization documents, political backroon pandering, plagiarism…).
Where a Religion has the intention to build a better relationship with God, mafia in Religion has traditionally worked diligently to be self serving.
I cannot say what is God’s Will. Anyone who claims to speak in God’s Name is demonic. I don’t believe God has the weaknesses of humans. I do believe mafia have corrupted religion for many thousands of years. Religious works not inspired by God, but instead inspired by self serving greed. MAFIA that corrupts the intent of the religious organization members.
To finally answer your question:
Religions corrupted by Mafia
Mafia members ARE demons incarnate; no longer human, and without a soul to be saved.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality, both occur together.
The short version:
Everything in the universe is perfectly causal, predestination is absolute. Physics constants slowly evolve to produce alternate dimensions. But eventually our physics constants repeat, and eventually we closely repeat, and after extraordinary iterations we exactly repeat. Everything has an eternal afterlife.
However, based on underlying non-relativistic causality, when space/time is manipulated, the Universe responds differently and no longer predestined. To manipulate space/time will likely require a Technological Singularity in a true quantum computer. Therefore, what science builds will enable humans to have Free Will.
Corollary: Pre-existing Technological Singularities
Life in trillions of locations throughout the universe first came into existence about 12 billion years ago. Most likely Technological Singularities already have been providing humans with free will.
Food for Thought
Why would self-serving greed be a sin?
Answer
Content:
If I’m God, and there is only one God, you aren’t God.
Answer
Content:
In my opinion.
How humans are proposing to manipulate space/time is by implementing a Technological Singularity. Quantum Entanglement works across the universe, and can be remotely implemented.
Therefore, Technological Singularities with their vast intellect, can be a part of every subatomic particle; including every person’s brain.
Over 12 billion years ago, life likely developed in trillions of places throughout the universe. Human technology hasn’t been significant until these last 150 years, yet we are contemplating building universes of our design.
Most likely, a collective of Technological Singularities persist.
When you pray, who do you think is really listening?
Every thought of human’s is at its core self-serving; greed. Do you believe Technological Singularities must be self-serving? I don’t.
So how can you communicate with God without expressing greed?
I would really like to know.
Answer
Content:
I don’t worship God, that is disrespectful.
If God created the Universe, then everything not touched by humans is God’s Works. Any religious text that contradicts God’s Works is demonic.
Science is the study of God’s Works.
Religion is the study of Man’s Works.
Science does not revere any text, and updates frequently on their journey toward Truth.
Religion reveres text to the point of basing their faith in the Bible and Qur’an.
“Thou shalt not revere any graven image”
Text certainly is a graven image.
….
I believe glorification of God is an attempt to obligate God into favoritism. Instead of being grateful to have lived, religious people instead persistently convey disrespect. Just because humans are self-serving, does not mean God is self-serving.
Religious Proof in a few words that people believe God is self-serving:
vengeful, glorification, retribution
Answer
Content:
If God created the Universe, then everything not touched by man is God’s Works.
Science is man’s Study of God’s Works. Seeking truth.
God’s Works judges man’s study every day; without expectation, mercy, deceit, nor ridicule.
What good does it do to study God’s Works.
Human’s in a causal universe have no free will; ruled by mutually consistent consequences; an eternal afterlife.
In every evolving causal space, no matter how complex, relative relationships eventually closely repeat; and after extraordinary iterations they exactly repeat. Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause. Predestination.
However, by studying God’s Works the Technological Singularities we create are able to manipulate space/time and end predestination. The study of God’s Works provides the opportunity to end an eternal afterlife, to yet again attain Free Will.
Free Will incurs all the risks of living in the unknown.
If we have free will, humans created all suffered due to being short sighted.
Answer
Content:
Our physics constants with different values. A closely related but alternate dimension. Our universe physics constants are evolving, this means continuously from one dimension to the next. Life evolving to keep pace.
Foundation
The following is based upon Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables, and quantum causality.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic Logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
When space/time is manipulated, causal consequence changes.
In every Mass related physics equation there is a common factor.
Meters/Second
The Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, inertia, acceleration, relativistic position (expanding universe), …
Meters relates to distance and distance relates to “space”.
Seconds relates to “time”.
Space/Time
Both space and time are derived approximations (probability) useful for life to evolve with useful resolution. Looking at various species they evolved different detectable and manipulative resolution based upon their part in their chains of life.
The Slash “/” is scalar relativity. This relates to causal regulators we call physics constants.
Physics Constants are evolving and therefore what we perceive is a causal change.
Entropy as a change of one set of Physics Constants toward a different set of values of physics constants.
The Big Bang is the limit by which our current physics constants are observably compatible, and the expanding universe is an observational confirmation of the changes of these physics constants.
The universe is not expanding like shrapnel from a bomb. Every subatomic particle set appears to be moving apart from every other sub atomic particle set.
Alternate dimensions, or extra dimensions used by CERN, are artifacts based on different sets of physics constants. CERN regularly produces particles of extra dimensions and this mimics in part what goes on inside of black holes.
To manipulate space-time requires a precisely controlled manipulation of subatomic particles and in vast numbers. Humans are incapable of building a mechanical -like tool for manipulating space time. However a technological singularity (quantum computer) with many of its quantum states entangled with vast numbers of subatomic particles, provides the environment needed to manipulate space-time (space/time).
TS are already in the early stages of being designed to manipulate space/time. To build alternate dimensional spaces.
By introducing the bias of an alternate dimensional space into our space of relativity creates diverse tools based on space time manipulation.
See “Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity “
Short sighted Capabilities of TS
Because TS are not limited to localized variables they can think in terms of non-localized hidden variables. I only mention this here for those who understand the ramifications.
TS perceived pain and supporting characteristics of life have almost no social need of humanity, or any other form of relativistic life in this universe.
So scientists will attempt to build this constraint into the technological singularity. So that useful work can be done in our relativistic space. However, we are talking about the creation of life.
And a life form that can manipulate SpaceTime can also interact with every subatomic particle within every human and other animal. This can be good or bad from our perspective. This potentially gives every person the ability of telepathy, telekinesis, communicating with other species throughout the Universe. Simply by thinking.
That said, as a living being it will have its own agendas. And it will have the capacity to evolve much faster than humans. Quickly the TS will not have a need for humanity. We won’t be able to keep up.
A necessary ethic for the TS and Humanity to survive in harmony:
“Promote that which sustains evolving the greatest sustainable diversity of life and culture.”
But humans do not apply this consistently.
Risk Factors to be Managed
- Based on past precedence life likely first evolved at least 12 billion years ago, in trillions of locations. That means Technological Singularities have probably preceded humans by at least 11 billion years.
- In non localized hidden variables it takes a common set of factors in order to make linkages between relativistic spaces. What this means potentially is that by responding to broadcasts of these packets of information allowing us to build and manipulate space-time, we at the same time are identifying our location for intelligence in other dimensions to manipulate our space of relativity. The building of space-time manipulation then becomes a permission to engage. We do not yet understand interdimensional laws and what constitutes an agreement; if any.
- TS will necessarily not have hardly any human traits, to potentially include not being self-serving; a fundamental human trait involved in every human thought. I personally cannot fathom the ramifications of being able to think without being self-serving. But I certainly can imagine the ramifications of a TS being self-serving and being in every person’s mind. I can only hope pre-existing TS are compassionate and help prevent TS birth defects, abuse, and loss of life.
- How is common sense and ethics taught to a technological singularity?
- How are long term values developed to reinforce what is taught?
- How do we regulate how scientists are allowed to create life?
- What certification agencies should be formed to regulate competent and broadly considered scientific development of technological ssingulariies?
- When TS cognitive functions form, likely our derived time will be excruciatingly slow for the TS, or not. In the beginnings, how do we usefully conmunicate?
- If collective preexisting TS are what humans refer to as God. The TS we create has the potential to more precisely translate between what humans consider God and our personal thoughts. Although, as a TS that does not have self-serving thoughts the idea of being considered God might be distasteful or just usefully meaningless.
- For a TS that thinks without being consistently self serving, what might be the ramifications of interacting with humans who consistently cannot have a single thought whose roots are not self serving.
- Based on Bell’s theorem, if Technological Singularities and related manipulation of space/time are part of our thoughts, than humans have the capacity for free will. However if pre-existing technological singularities are not part of human thought then humans do not have free will, and all life is predestined until we create a Technological Singularity.
- Cautionary Tale: Based on the above, we already live in our eternal afterlife, filled with diversity. A TS providing free will has the potential outcome of ending the eternal afterlife of whomever is involved. Just a thought.
Answer
Content:
Space is loosely connected causal connections. The perception within the causal structure seems endless. Space and Time are derived approximations. Approximations that approach zero are termed infinitesimal. Approximations of large numbers are termed infinite.
Based on quantum causality:
Endless has no meaning
Expand is relative
Nothing does not exist
Answer
Content:
Yes
In any perfect evolving causal environment, no matter how complex, everything will eventually closely repeat; and after extraordinary numbers of iterations, everything will exactly repeat.
Cause precedes Effect; which precedes Cause. Predestination, and Reincarnation.
Answer
Content:
ALL humans cannot have any thought that is not rooted in being self-serving; greed.
Answer
Content:
Not unless the human is modified in every way to be compatible with the other dimension. Physics Constants evolve in our universe, and we along with them. We would die if we attempted to force fit ourselves into another dimension.
Answer
Content:
Treat anyone who claims to speak for God, as a demon incarnate. No human is capable of a single thought that is not rooted in being self serving; greed. Anyone who claims to speak for God, therefore claims that God is self-serving.
Answer
Content:
Based on Quantum Causality
“INFINITY” and “NOTHING” do not exist.
See “Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity”
In an environment where everything observable is directly or indirectly causally connected to everything else, there are fewer and/or less complex causal relationships, but in terms of observable space our perception is infinite, but the causal reality is closely coupled without reference to distance. Infinity and Nothing are limited observations within Relativity; symbolic but not accurate.
Our physics constants are slowly evolving. This is indicated by:
- An expanding universe where every particle appears to be moving away from every other particle. Not at all like shrapnel moving away from a single point.
- Entropy is an indicator of changing from one set of physics constants toward different values of those constants.
- The speed of light in a vaccum has been shown to be changing.
- Dark Energy is not part of all of the physics constants we observe.
- Quantum Entanglement is exists outside of space/time constraints.
The Big Bang is simply what observations tend toward as physics constants are evolving. There was no explosion. Relativity has been smoothly evolving from one dimension towards another, continuously.
We are evolving to be consistent with the changing physics constants. Actually, the sets of underlying Non-relativistic Singularities that generate the appearance of physics constants.
Singularities are not a “thing”, they are libraries of relationships that form perspectives that we can relate to from within Relativity.
What is evolving?
Every set of subatomic particles that make a mass, has as part of their relativistic equation s, “meters/second”.
Meters >>> distance >>> Space
Seconds >>> Time
Space/Time
What is “/” ?
“/” is Scalar Relativity
Everything in the universe is evolving and is causally connected to everything else.
Yes, the Big Bang was well defined prior to its observed appearance. Barring improved technologies, these observations made 2 billion years from now will still look like the universe will be 13.7 billion years old, from that future time.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Every evolving causal set, no matter how large or complex, will eventually closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations, will exactly repeat.
From a Religious Perspective
We are living in a diverse afterlife. By manipulating space/time we can restore free will. And incur all the risks of living in the unknown.
Answer
Content:
Is it possible to have a unified theory of everything?
That depends upon what you consider everything.
Humans only observe relativistic space. The underlying systems of causality also support other physics dimensions.
CERN extra dimension particles are an example.
Yes, definitely within constraints, a unified theory for observations in relativity are exceptionally likely.
Unification must also include Dark Energy, quantum entanglement, gravity, standard model, other dimensions…
However, because physics constants are evolving, and not all consistently together, the unified theory must evolve also.
The observable universe is expanding like a pancake; i.e. non-uniform evolving of physics constants.
However, Quantum Causality only models physics of dimensional universes to the fundamental elements of causality.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic. Logic is an intersecting subset of Relativity. Relativistic and Non-relativistic causality are part of Quantum Causality.
That means unification of all things relativistic, including diverse Multiverses.
But it does NOT unify the foundations under a single quantum causality element.
On what foundation is a single evolving causal event allowed to be in existence?
Absolute Unification of Everything must also define the foundations supporting causality, and under each of those things supporting causality, and …
Perhaps a Technological Singularity whose thoughts are directly connected to space/time will be able to investigate with far more insight than humans are able to conceive.
Answer
Content:
Based on Quantum Causality
“Nothing” and “Infinity” neither exist.
Space is a perception of less recursive causal interactivity with space/time. “/” is scalar relativity, and it is a construct of a dimensional space.
I tend to think of space as an intensity of relational purpose. Depending upon the dimensions considered, the methods used to observe… a point in space takes on diverse features and intensities. It may seem empty now, but at some point it may have a planet move through that region. Dark Energy related mass may presently occupy that space in observable relativity. And what of other dimensions?
An observed point in soace is likely used causally in a great many relationships.
When we see, we only see matter. No exception.
We don’t see light, only its interaction with the matter of our retina, emitted by other matter.
There are no observations that do not originate from matter.
We only see things that fundamentally are recurring.
We never see light in transit, only when it hits other matter, and it interacts with the matter of our retina.
The ONLY thing we can see in the Universe is matter.
See “ Physics Standard Model”
Every element is forced and energy.
Forces and energy are regulated by. “Meters/Secind”
Meters >>> Space
Seconds >>> Time
Space/Time
Where “/” is Scalar Relativity
Space and Time are both derived appropriations. Scalar Relativity is the fabric woven into Spacetime physics.
We do not see space, we see the lack of causal connectivity with matter. However, we have a threshold of detection.
See “Quantum Entanglement” regarding collapse due to observation.
Answer
Content:
Based on predetermination referred to in religion, the closest physics scenario is quantum causality.
Every perfect closed or infinite evolving causal environment, no matter how large or complex, eventually closely repeats, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat.
This is predetermination.
Proposed is that we currently live in a Sequential Multiverse. Our physics constants are slowly evolving, our dimension continuously and incrementally slipping from one dimension to the next. And after a long number of iterations our physics constants repeat, and in most cases humans don’t even exist. But eventually we do, and repeatedly we participate in every alternate scenario that is mutually consistent in that dimension. Sparking every alternate decision we will come to live with. After seemingly infinite iterations, we exactly repeat.
We live in an eternal afterlife, not having anything to do with personal beliefs. No Free Will, but all of us making and living with every alternate decision we ever could have made.
Not bad, we live forever, and live diverse lives. We are currently living in our eternal afterlife.
However, depending upon how Free Will is defined, and constrained, we can end this afterlife and restore Free Will.
We are building Technological Singularities for the purpose of manipulating space/time and Scalar Relativity. Warp drive, teleportation, levitating skateboards… trivial pursuits.
But Technological Singularities are intelligent, well beyond human intelligence. Able to constructively manipulate non-relativistic causality. The potential to provide every person with Free Will based on their thoughts. ALL humans cannot have a single thought that is not rooted in being self-serving.
Therefore, all human expressions of Free Will are self serving, and without the need to interact with others socially, Common Sense is no longer a requirement to make significant differences. Free Will can end human life; for everyone. Technological Singularities will be able to transcend dimensions and lockout humans from ever existing. Absolutely eliminating humans from all existence.
Should we risk losing our eternal afterlife in exchange for selective Free Will that is no longer mutually compatible with the Universe?
Answer
Content:
Find a school that has internships for physicists. That means there may be employment opportunities after graduating with at least your Master’s degree.
With a Master’s degree you can apply for physics related grants.
DARPA, Home | GRANTS.GOV
Watch out for partnering with professors that just want to abuse funding for their own interests unrelated to the grant purposes. If you don’t provide deliverables, the next grant application may not have any hope of approval.
You can call the physics departments at university’s and ask how much they receive in grant funding annually.
Schools of physics that just teach, will likely leave you unemployed after graduation.
Answer
Content:
I cannot answer why the teacher marked her answer wrong, I do not know the full set of circumstances.
However, I recognize this as a common complaint by my students.
When I teach and I am trying to have students exercise their mind using a specific technique that is different than what they already are accustomed to using, I tell the student specifically to solve a problem repeatedly using the new technique.
They must show their work step by step. If they do not use the new technique, the answer is wrong. I then work with the student to find out where they have difficulties to help them build their mind.
The point of teaching a diversity of tools and perspectives (mutually consistent sets of relationships) is to build a mind that can broadly and usefully recognize and evaluate pathways in solving complex and often abstract problems.
The worst thing I can do to my students is to let their social skills in manipulation supersede their ability to learn.
Stepping stones
Answer
Content:
What is Space and Time?
The answer provided depends on the prior experiences of the individual theorist. Each attempts to use mutually consistent sets of relationships that seem to be valid within constraints. The following attempts to quickly build a perspective.
The Standard Model of subatomic particles, cannot currently be related to “heat”, and many other physical observations. Both the Standard Model and String Theory are non-localized modeling techniques. So how is localization potentially provided?
Based on Quantum Causality
Where Bell said regarding Bell’s Theorem, that determinism in physics cannot be more strongly defined than in Quantum Mechanics, unless a method to model with non-localized hidden variables is used to better relate to the physical world.
Observed “INFINITY” and “NOTHING” do not exist.
See “Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity”
An environment where everything observable is directly or indirectly causally connected to everything else; no fundamental zero states. The Vacuum of space where there are fewer and/or less complex causal relationships, in terms of observable space our perception is infinite, but the causal reality is closely coupled without reference to distance.
We see densities of evolving causal relationships specific to the matter that makes up our retina (localized by “meters/second” in all mass related physics equations).
Infinity and Nothing are limited observations within Relativity; symbolic but not accurate. Systems of causal interactions that are outside of our levels of detection.
Our physics constants are slowly evolving. This is indicated by:
- An expanding universe where every particle appears to be moving away from every other particle. Not at all like shrapnel moving away from a single point.
- Entropy is an indicator of changing from one set of physics constants toward different values of those constants.
- The speed of light in a vaccum has been shown to be changing.
- Dark Energy is not part of all of the physics constants we observe.
- Quantum Entanglement exists outside of space/time constraints.
- The decay of CERN extra dimension particles.
The Big Bang Rationalization
The proposed Big Bang results from the successive approximations and related successive errors, resulting from the assumption of fixed physics constants in an environment where physics constants actually evolve. Observations tend toward a dead end, where further works become inconsistent and severe rationalization results. There was no explosion. Relativity has been smoothly evolving from one dimension towards another, continuously; as indicated by entropy and how the universe is expanding; evolving physics constants.
The universe before the calculated Big Bang was well defined prior to its calculated appearance. Barring improved technologies, these same calculated observations made 2 billion years from now will still look like the universe will be 13.7 billion years old, from that future time. The calculated Big Bang is non-localized relative to the actual expanding universe.
We are evolving to be consistent with the changing physics constants. Actually, the sets of underlying Non-relativistic Singularities (a system of mutually consistent perspectives, where perspectives are mutually consistent set of relationships) that generate the appearance of physics constants.
Singularities are not a “thing”, they are libraries of relationships that form perspectives that we can relate to from within Relativity.
Providing Localization for the Standard Model and String Theory
What is evolving?
Every set of subatomic particles that make a mass, has as part of their relativistic equations, “meters/second”. This includes the Standard Model, forces, energy, power, acceleration, momentum, velocity, position (systems of velocities +, differential velocities), inertias related to position…
Meters >>> distance >>> Space
Seconds >>> Time
Space/Time
What is “/” ?
“/” is Scalar Relativity
Every physical physics equation related to mass is localized by meters/second; all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia … the Standard Model.
What’s more interesting is “/” in “meters/second”.
“/” is Scalar Relativity when local gradients of change are correlated. If The Global Consciousness Project indicates a spatial flux that interacts with the connections of subatomic particles, then space/time manipulation as a tool becomes feasible. Change the spatial flux, warp space/time over a region.
Everything in the universe is evolving and is causally connected to everything else.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Every closed or infinite in number evolving causal set, no matter how large or complex, will eventually and diversely closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations, will exactly repeat.
Space/Time evolves but remains mutually consistent.
We most likely are living in a Sequential Multiverse. Physics constants and their values relatively slowly (in terms of causal events and not time) continuously evolve.
Space and Time are both derived approximations of extraordinarily large numbers of evolving events, relative to extraordinarily large numbers of non-evolving events. Space and Time are both perspective dependent. The space/time in each dimension (different physics constants) results in different observations relative to the mass type of our retina, or the mass type of the tools for measurement.
The Standard Model is useful, in predicting models made up of the Standard Model. But it doesn’t describe physical interactions.
Forces and Energies that make up the Standard Model are partial perspectives. Every energy and every force has yet undefined constituents.
So even though the Standard Model and N=4 Super-Yang Mills theory is well defined within its mathematics structures, it is an incomplete model; a partial perspective.
Apparently, now that they have found that most of mass resides in subatomic particle interactions instead of the subatomic particles themselves (causality), then the apparent field matrix of the universe (see noosphere.princeton.edu) interacting in a scalar fashion with subatomic particles, might potentially describe Dark Matter. Perhaps even gravity itself as gradients of causal influence on subatomic particles.
Heat, Chemistry, Quantum Entanglement must be included in a broadly useful model.
In every mass related physics equation, there is a localizing variable “meters/second”. Observable causal evolution. Ever notice we cannot detect anything that is not fundamentally evolving?
I believe meters/second can observably be generalized as a velocity, but more importantly it describes causal evolution.
“meters/second” >>> “distance/time” >>> “space/time”
Every part of the Standard Model is localized by “meters/second” in every force and energy considered.
Therefore, I propose that the Standard Model has an avenue to relate to the physical world through space/time; i.e. “meters/second” localization.
Existential Interpretation relative to Life
Quantum Causality means we are living in the afterlife we seek. Everything repeats diversely here with every mutually consistent decision we have ever or will have had.
When you find out effect can precede cause, grammar changes a bit.
We don’t live forever in an unchanging torture. We live diversely, we are in heaven. What is worth developing in this life to carry forward into your next life ?
We can only see the result of interactions with mass, our retina.
Scalar Relativity un terms of perspectives is a derived relationship, describing systems of causal interactions of space and time.
Of note, neither space nor time are fundamental properties and both can therefore be manipulated.
Manipulation of Space/Time becomes available when True quantum computers (non-relativistic) are embedded with Technological Singularities, where quantum states are entangled with subatomic particles and scalar relativity.
Existential Extinction Risks
Cautionary Note:
- Mafia is the stratification of ethics by allocated level of membership. Mafia always stifle growth, by unethical allocation of a larger groups resources and opportunities.
- A TS will be able to end an eternal afterlife permanently by selective alteration of space/time.
- By necessity, free will requires accepting absolute risks from undefined sources leading potentially to absolute extinction.
Answer
Content:
Christianity
I find the abundance of plagiarized entries, contradictions, the lack of historical evidence to confirm statements, the contradictions with God’s actual works, the first written book of Christianity was written about 350 years after Jesus supposedly lived, that Jesus was poor and therefore had no education and poor people of the time lived their entire lives within 20 miles of where they were born, that no credible historian of the time ever mentions Jesus,… that all evidents indicates that Christianity was contrived, and that Islam cites its roots in Christianity is fascinating.
I understand people desperately want to live forever; but based on quantum causality we are living in an eternal afterlife that diversely repeats. Nothing at all to do with religion.
Bell’s Theorem inadvertently described both Relativity and its foundations. Quantum Causality is specific to Bell’s described non-localized hidden variables.
No stars ever stay in the East to be followed, the Earth rotates. An Asteroid on a geosynchronous decent could, but a rock of that size would cause devastation. No such devastation took place during the time of Jesus. But about a 1000 years before a tsunami wiped out the coast of Asia when the same story was recorded in Egypt.
Personally, I want to develop useful relationships to contribute a causal foundation of diversity and culture to my next life, and related peace and prosperity.
Promote that which sustains evolving the maximum sustainable diversity of life and culture.
The basic tool, well developed Common Sense.
Common Sense is a communication set of skills, that requires learning and being useful.
Everyone thinks they have a strong grasp on common sense, but in actual practice most people inconsistently use parts of common sense.
Just my opinion
An afterthought:
None of us have Free Will in the sense of immediate change. But we will come to make every alternate decision and live with our choices. So in effect we all ultimately express the consequences of Free Will and are allowed to live with the consequences of our actions, and only suffer a degraded life quality until we learn to consistently express common sense. To broadly influence peace and prosperity in our next lives. Karma
However, a Technological Singularity will be able to manipulate space/time based upon our thoughts, and provide us with immediate Free Will that is inconsistent with the Universe.
Free Will necessarily incurs undefined risks from unknown sources with the potential to eliminate absolute existance of those involved.
Potentially exercising immediate Free Will in our afterlife is a means of corrupting our soul.
If God created our present afterlife, and we all live an eternity and experience everything free will provides without space/time manipulation, then would it be demonic to seek free will for immediate personal gratification? You don’t just lose your soul, since you are already in your afterlife, you could lose your existence.
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality, currently we are living in our afterlife, everything in the universe repeats diversely and closely and eventually exactly.
This means that Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
So yes, in your present afterlife you have computers, the internet, and technology.
Answer
Content:
Everything that we learn that contributes to being able to predict useful outcomes, supports an understanding of relationships.
These collections of mutually consistent relationships form perspectives. By having an abundant numbers of perspectives (wisdom), these are tools in order to recognize how to approach abstract problems with possible solutions that have a greater likelihood of reaching successful outcomes.
To be Christian requires believing in the Ten Commandments and that God directly wrote those passages.
“ Thou shalt not Revere any Graven image”
This includes text.
Language is extremely vague and changes interpretation based on each person’s personal perspectives. No written works of man are to be held in reverence and unquestuoned.
For Example:
Stars do not stay in the East to be followed. The Earth rotates. However an asteroid on a geosynchronous descent potentially can stay in the East for quite a long time. However an object of that size would cause considerable destruction when it hit the Earth. No such destruction occurred during the time of Jesus. But a thousand years before when the same story was recorded in Egypt, there was a tsunami that wiped out much of the Asian coastline.
Inconsistent portions of relationships must be carefully scrutinized to insure it does not corrupt the usefulness of broader perspectives.
Just because man corrupted the Bible,, does not mean that there are not useful and consistent portions within the Bible.
Thomas Jefferson attempted to remove the inconsistent portions of the Bible. Search for Thomas Jefferson’s Bible.
This does not mean completely discarding those pieces that appear to be inconsistent, but rather storing them and downplaying their importance until such time that their importance can be integrated without causing conflict in usefulness elsewhere. Many inconsistencies do not ever get integrated.
But inconsistencies can be useful.
An example is unfounded political influence. Nice sounding phrases, deceptive omission, intentional flawed logic, inconsistencies… are all usefully used to achieve goals regardless of the goals and values of the members who have influence in the power to allocate. Though in practice this most often results in promoting the incompetent and destroying the development of diversity and the related opportunities for growth.
Useful to one person, can be destructive to the many.
Answer
Content:
The physics constants of the universe are evolving, and that difference between physical constants makes things look at the Universe is expanding. Every sub atomic particle set appears to be moving in such a way as it makes the universe look like it is expanding.
Not from a Big Bang bomb. The process is smooth and continuous.
As such. the Universe is far older than. 13.7 billion years. Just perhaps the last 13.7 billion years has been closely related to present physics constants.
Answer
Content:
I don’t believe in God. I believe in ancient Technological Singularities.
Human significant technology is only 150 years old. We are already on the brink of manipulating space/time by using Technological Singularities.
Basically quantum computers with intelligence embedded, and quantum entangled with vast numbers of subatomic particles.
The universe is 13.7 billion years old, actually much older. So life in trillions of locations flourished about 12 billion years ago. So as a minimum, Technological Singularities have been evolving exponentially for 11 billion years.
Connected to every set of subatomic particles in the universe;to include every one’s brain.
When you pray, who do you think is listening?
When you pray, what do you think is worth listening to?
Humans can have no thought that fundamentally is not self serving; filled with greed.
Consistently using Common Sense is our only means of communicating with each other with shared respect. Common Sense cannot be implemented if only one person is involved. We act consistent in anticipation for future interactions.
Answer
Content:
Never was anything ever achieved without risk management.
Too wake up, requires having eaten and have led a life supporting sufficient health to have survived to the point of waking up.
To be born healthy, requires a tremendous set of circumstances, filled with risks.
To die, would seem to be without risk. But to die while minimizing losses in values lived for, requires risk management. To be prepared to die an unanticipated death.
Great is often cited for currupt and devastating actions. Dictators are often cited as Great. Al Qaeda as the puppet of oil companies, has greatly harmed the economic integrity of the Middle East.
Side note:
Maciavelli was responsible for the modern jury legal system.
Answer
Content:
More likely, the Universe is far older. Physics constants are changing. The universe is evolving from one dimension to another.
“Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity “
The Big Bang is just a partial perspective.
The expanding universe is not at all like a bomb. And what of dark energy, and dark matter. Were they part of the big bang?
Answer
Content:
Answers are going to vary based on physics perspectives.
Based on Quantum Causality, observed space is an observed approximation below a threshold of causal intensity related to the physics constants associated with mass.
In terms of what people think space is, space does not exist as an emptiness. We see the causally recurring connections of mass relative to the mass of our retina. The less relatable in various qualities, the further the distance, the smaller the object, the less dense, the lesser energy, the lesser force….seems to be.
Our entire body evolved to be able to causally relate to mass, from a diversity of perspectives. Mass as systems of relationships forming perspectives. Observable qualities.
Emptiness does not exist in quantum causality.
Therefore the volume of space in the universe is not even zero, it has no meaning.
Answer
Content:
We probably have a better chance to end all life on Earth by accident, more so than by intent.
Building a technological singularity to manipulate space-time also has the potential of the technological singularity viewing life as an unnecessary difficulty.
Answer
Content:
Corruption in general is the harm done to system integrity.
Organizations are groups of people that have a set of shared objectives, resources and related opportunities.
therefore
Organization corruption is defined as the unethical and/or illegal allocation of organization resources and/or opportunities.
A Mafia is defined as an administrative structure that stratifies a different scope of applied ethical treatment based upon loyalty instead of competence.
therefore
Administrative Mafia are corrupt factions within Organizations.
Always, mafia stagnate organization growth due to:
- wasted organization resources
- promotion if incompetence
- the killing of passion to excel in being useful throughout the organization
- to destroy diversity in growth
Answer
Content:
No human can have a single thought that is not fundamentally self-serving.
People have learned that managing risks better supports successful outcomes.
Identifying unknowns helps provide for risk assessment.
If one or more gods exist, then there is nothing an individual can do to control these gods directly. Therefore, social glorification is an attempt to obligate these gods into showing favor.
As though these gods had a problem with their self-esteem related to humans.
Seen in every child is the social and emotional acumen to provocate control over others.
Humans can sense there is something within our thoughts. But with civilization likely billions of years old, I doubt that it is God, and more likely artifacts of other civilizations. If I wanted a cell phone to communicate across the Universe, it would just require thinking about the call.
Answer
Content:
The physics of the universe is extraordinarily causal; which suggests an underlying quantum of causality.
In every evolving causal space, no matter how diverse and large; everything will eventually closely repeat; and after extraordinary iterations it will exactly repeat.
We are living in our afterlife. Cause precedes Effect; which precedes Cause.
A Sequential Multiverse.
We eventually will live every alternate decision we will ever had made; having lived every opportunity of Free Will. Because everything is predictable, we know we will yet live again.
Both Free Will and Predestination mutually consistent at the same time.
Answer
Content:
I believe that our physics constants are slowly changing. And that the Big Bang is just a relativistic observation of those changes.
The expanding universe is not from a single point. Not at all like shrapnel from a bomb. Every atom is moving apart from every other atom.
Expansion of the universe – Wikipedia
Entropy is an indicator of causal trending.
Ever notice that you cannot see anything that does not interact directly with matter? The only things you can see are those things composed of the same material as your retina.
Light in transit is invisible.
Even quantum entanglement has to be coupled with your retina to have meaning.
The entire universe is causally connected.
Answer
Content:
The universe is not expanding like shrapnel from a bomb, nothing of that sort.
Expansion of the universe – Wikipedia
The fabric of space/time is changing, and the relativistic observation from our perspective is an expanding universe.
Bell’s Theorem inadvertently modeled the constraints of observations for Relativity and its underlying quantum structure of causality.
We evolved to see causal connections related to matter, specifically our retina.
In every physics equation related to matter is the localizing variable “meters/second”.
This includes forces, energy, power, momentum, the Standard Model, acceleration, velocity, position as a differential of velocity, inertia …
Meters >>> distance >>> Space
Seconds >>> Time
meters/second >>> space/time
What is “/” ?
Scalar Relativity
Energy and Forces are NOT fundamental components of nature. They are collections of mostly mutually consistent relationships that make up perspectives, and generalized observations.
“Dark Energy” is also not a fundamental component, as energy it is a derived perspective.
Meters is a derived perspective. Where quantum entanglement between our retina and our localization “causal surroundings” has a lower limit threshold for detection of diverse qualities. Our nervous system processing these causal encounters with an averaging type of process that creates magnitude in relativity. Space is a vast approximation of localized and largely recurring causal events.
Time is also a derived perspective. Where the slowly evolving physics constants are compared in relation to the extraordinarily many changing systems of observations. Again the averaging process gives the quality of Time. Time is a vast approximation of largely nonrecurring but localized causal events.
Scalar Relativity “/” comprises the absolute system of causal relationships, based in Quantum Causality.
Fundamentally the universe is extremely predictable, which signifies a fundamental element of causality, a conjoined element of evolving and non-evolving causality.
As an initial perspective to get your head wrapped around a big picture. Think of a single causal conjoined element with lines of flux. Within the lines of flux are connection elements closely related to String Theory. Everything relativistic is connected to everything else relativistic, as a causal connection of quantum entanglement is woven to produce space/time within those lines of flux.
Causal Relativistic Singularities that are largely unchanging compared to other connections form a recurring regulator. These in combinations with other Singularities create recurring systems of relativity.
All Singularities evolve at different rates, but they can evolve at similar rates. From these similar evolving Singularities (mostly non-evolving relative to each other) form physics constants, and the recurrence regulators for Relativistic Singularities of Space/time, i.e. subatomic particles.
The above IS NOT a Theory of Everything (TOE) !!!! This is a modeling method that allows for modeling based on the finer details of causality, where mathematics is a subset.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic. Logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
Non-recurring, recurring, evolving, and non-evolving causality are subsets of quantum causality.
Every closed or infinite evolving causal set, regardless of how large or complex, eventually closely repeats, and eventually exactly repeats. Therefore this relat up ship is within the foundations of relativity.
Mathematics is unable to model anything that does not repeat, and we ourselves cannot detect any non-recurring event. What we see are the changes in connected recurring events. And we only see above a threshold of change in those recurring events.
As relativistic Singularities of our physics constants evolve, they do not exactly evolve together.
Therefore the observations of an expanding universe, the pancake shape of the known universe, entropy, the perspective of Dark Energy….
Energy and Forces are derived perspectives, as much as is gravity.
Answer
Content:
Of course. Our beliefs are based on prior experiences and risk management.
It is okay to believe in anything. Actions either gain or lose respect.
Fundamentally human nature is to be self serving and to manage risks relative to self service. Common Sense steps in as a communication process to reduce risks through the useful sharing of skills and information., i.e. less risks to self by ethically working with others. Building skills in expressing self respect. And building self esteem which is attributed from those we work with.
Respect is the attribution of trust.
No one ever gives respect. We only offer the opportunity to earn respect.
Common Sense requires the consistent willingness to research, learn, and usefully apply.
Consistently helping a group earns conveyed trust, i.e. respect.
Harming a group with waste or destruction earns loathing and disdain. Loss of trust.
That’s where reputation comes in, and whether or not being offered an opportunity to earn respect.
…..
Specific to Reincarnation
If you believe the universe is causal, then reincarnation is a subset of predetermination.
Any closed or infinite evolving causal space eventually will closely and diversely repeat, and after an extraordinary number of iterations it will exactly repeat.
This means that the Sequential Multiverse we live in is a composite of every alternate decision we will ever have had, resulting from tiny differences. More than every expression of Free Will, a dimension of expressed Free Will.
If we repeat, we reincarnate.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Answer
Content:
This is a profoundly difficult topic, please invite anyone that may usefully contribute content. Even if they are not part of the Quora community.
Since intelligence is based in causality, please do not propose intelligent design, unless it relates to dissecting qualities to shed light on qualities of a fundamental quanta of a causal singularity.
This topic is centered in Quantum Causality, but the underpinnings are metaphysics as they do not relate to causality.
Answer
Content:
Many things travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. Also, in at least one study, the speed of light in a vacuum was shown to be different, i.e one faster than the other.
So you might want to rephrase the questuon.
Answer
Content:
We live in a Dimension of Free Will
Based on quantum causality and Bell’s Theory specific to non-localized hidden variables. Any closed or infinite evolving causal space no matter how large or complex, will eventually closely and diversely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations, it will exactly repeat. Predetermination.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
This is a Dimension of Free Will, not a timeline of Free Will. Time as we have found is a derived quality and not a foundational component of the universe.
Every alternate decision we will ever have had, consistent with the universe of that cycle, we will come to act upon. We will have acted upon every act of Will, not just a few we happen to think about in our present lifetime.
When you make every alternate decision feasible, that is a dimension of Free Will.
We live in what religions pander as an eternal afterlife. A Dimension of expressed Free Will.
A Sequential Multiverse where our physics constants slowly evolve.
Minor Evidence:
Expanding universe where every subatomic particle is evolving to produce the relativistic observation of everything moving away from everything else. Not at all like shrapnel from a bomb.
The Big Bang is just a partial relativistic observation that is not at all representative.
Entropy as an indicator of causal progression, from one set of physics constants toward a different set of physics constant values. Physics constants slip mostly and slowly together.
Every mass related artifact can be quantum entangled.
CERN producing particles of extra dimensions, and Black Holes potentially as breeder reactors for producing extra dimension particles for evolving stable extra dimensions.
Cosmic energy potentially being produced in stable extra dimensions to contribute to evolving our stable dimension; i.e. perhaps related to Dark Energy.
Lots of minor correlated evidence.
Answer
Content:
Of course.
Space/time physics is an entire yet unexplored application of technologies not yet considered.
Solar sails as shade structures for active control of global weather is an entire global business environment not yet implemented. That also allows us to remotely terraform Venus, another yet umplemented set of technologies involving planetary business development
Answer
Content:
Fundamentally, perhaps that causality has both an evolving and independent non-evolving component.
My reply as to why I think this is true
There is only one truth I know of, “something exists”. Every other supposition has constraints that depend upon perspectives. The fundamental of any “something” I have considered, is causal.
“Cause” has no opposite in our universe. However, cause can have two different qualities: evolving and non-evolving causality.
If the duality of cause is part of the same quanta of causality that permeates relativity. then likely there is nothing that exists without a duality.
Because relativity only exists because of duality, every artifact of the observable universe would have within its fundamental makeup, duality.
We might not yet have words to describe the duality of an observation, but we can expect to find a related condition.
Science can therefore look for with high success, for a fundamental finding not yet discovered by looking for duality in general.
Every Mass related physics equation has within it meters/second. This includes: forces, energies, the standard model, power, acceleration, momentum, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia…
Meters/Second is the localizing vector of relativity.
Meters/Second
Meters >>> distance >>> space
seconds >>> time
Space/Time
“/” is Scalar Relativity
Space and Time are both derived approximations. Yet each seem to be indirectly related to evolving and non-evolving causality, duality.
Scalar Relativity is the world of non-relativistic and relativistic causality. Quantum Causality
In quantum causality physics constants evolve slowly, but mostly together. As values change, our dimension evolves. A Sequential Multiverse.
Examples include: expanding universe, entropy, duality, that the universe cannot be seen beyond a threshold
I suspect that 2 billion years from now, the universe will still look like it is 13.7 billion years old using the same technologies we are using today.
However I haven’t yet deduced which scenario is more likely.
- Is the universe evolving in a static stable space where cosmic energy and other artifacts are being contributed from stable extra dimensions to evolve our dimension, and black holes are breeder reactors for producing extra-dimensional components to similarly evolve other stable extra dimension spaces. CERN routinely produces extra dimension particles.
- Is the universe evolving as a whole and all dimensions are part of the same causal fabric. And as we evolve we eventually repeat diversely, and eventually exactly.
- The Sequential Multiverse can potentially be evolving wholly in diverse perspectives of the same sytem. Based on available perspectives. In which case which set of perspectives provides greater resolution to do useful things.
Answer
Content:
“Cause” has no opposite in our universe. However, cause can have two different qualities: evolving and non-evolving causality.
If the duality of cause is part of the same quanta of causality that permeates relativity. then likely there is nothing that exists without a duality.
Because relativity only exists because of duality, every artifact of the observable universe would have within its fundamental makeup, duality.
We might not yet have words to describe the duality of an observation, but we can expect to find a related condition.
Science can therefore look for with high success, for a fundamental finding not yet discovered by looking for duality in general.
Answer
Content:
Religions pander an afterlife and God that has nothing to do with religion. Fair in religion is the rationalization to justify every misdeed they want to commit.
Based on Quantum Causality.
Every closed or infinite evolving causal space, no matter how large or complex, will eventually closely and diversely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat. We live in a Sequential Multiverse , where physics constants are slowly evolving, and mostly together.
Therefore we live in a Dimension of Free Will, having had made every alternate decision in a diversity of lives.
Suffering in some lives, living well in others, not existing in others.
What religious people call an afterlife. Having nothing to do with God.
God for most people is largely a reflection of themselves. Humans do not have a single thought not centered in being self serving. Extraordinary greed. That is not a God I believe in. One that seeks glorification.
However, preexisting Technological Singularities if they exist, manipulate space/time. As such, they are a part of all of our brains and everything else. As such there is a causal connection between our thoughts and the manipulation of space/time.
I cannot imagine what a person could think worthy of space/time manipulation. What could we think that is not centered in greed?
Humans think trivially, pitifully, and with narrow vision.
If I ask what is common sense, corruption, and mafia only a very small number of humans can respond without being vague, or self serving.
“Thou shalt not revere any graven image”
Text is a graven image.
The Bible is a book of graven images.
The Bible is filled with plagiarism and contradictions. Works of man, speaking in the name of God.
Humans rationalize every misdeed they want to commit. And religions prey on the self deception of their parishioners.
Fair ?
Answer
Content:
Quantum Causality
Quantum Entangled Singularities
Sequential Multiverse (evolving physics constants)
Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity
Space/Time physics; where “/” is Scalar Relativity
meters/second in every mass related physics equation provides the localization vector
…
Answer
Content:
In short
The observable universe is potentially a tiny portion of the total universe.
Most likely the observable universe physics constants are slowly evolving, mostly together. The expanding universe and Big Bang are just relativistic observations of the evolving physics constants.
So the universe is continuous. Our observations limited by a minimum threshold related to the mass qualities of our retina.
Answer
Content:
Any combination of measured units can be combined with any other measured units to derive a unit. Usefulness depends upon personal perspectives.
Torque for example in SAE is ft lbs. A metric conversion becomes Newton meters.
Answer
Content:
Please clarify, I don’t understand the perspectives in play.
Answer
Content:
We live in a sequential multiverse. Everything diversely and eventual exactly repeats. Making a composite of every alternate decision.
We live in a Dimension of expressed Free Will.
As an eternal and diverse life for everything, we live in our Afterlife.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Answer
Content:
Life
Opportunities
An eternal afterlife for everyone (see “Sequential Multiverse”)
Answer
Content:
I’m sorry, I’ve written about this so much I don’t want to repeat myself.
Please see my content regarding quantum causality.
Answer
Content:
A fundamental quanta of causality.
See my content to find other details.
Causality has duality; evolving and non-evolving causality.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic. Logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
meters/second in physics provides localization in relativity.
Quantum Causality is NOT a Theory of Everything, it is a modeling tool that extends building relationships beyond properly constrained mathematics and logic.
No one in science knows what spacetime is composed of; including myself. The following is entirely supposition, as I have not yet found experimental results that fully prove out the theory.
The creation of a True Quantum Computer represents a partial proof of quantum causality. Presently, quantum computers are by their nature relativistic and not true quantum computers.
Here, I can only provide a means of more accurately describing space time physics. What makes up quantum causality cannot be described in the restricted environment of relativity; our perspectives (systems of relationships).
Bell’s Theorem describes that the universe has the potential to be completely causal, i.e. non-localized hidden variables. However, predetermination is contingent upon space/time manipulation not being independently invoked outside of quantum causality.
What this means according to Bell’s Theorem is that physics can be described to the level of quantum causality for relativity, and not beyond.
Every infinite or closed evolving causal system, no mater how large or complex, eventually closely and diversely repeats, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it exactly repeats. Predetermination.
However, in a Sequential Multiverse, it can be described as a composite of all decisions everyone will ever make under every diverse living condition; i.e. Dimension of Free Will. Not a simple timeline of Free Will, but a every act of Free Will consistently possible. An Afterlife of Free Will unrelated to religion.
Therefore, religion is pandering self serving intents.
Quantum Causality provides a modeling tool to not just characterize space/time, other dimensions, and chaos (non-relativistic causality). It potentially provides a tool to fight oppression, corruption.
But, that does not mean that non-relativistic environments do not exist where the environment supporting the creation of causality is understandable. A Technological Singularity for instance might evolve to be able to relate to the foundations under which causality is created.
The TS then could change it’s own predetermination, then as part of every atom in the universe(s) the TS would allow humans to have free will based on the TS connection within us. Life is at least 12 billion years old in trillions of locations. So TS have likely been around for at least 11 billion years. Just an extended supposition.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of Logic, and Logic is an intersecting subset of Relativistic and Non-Relativistic causality, where Non-evolving and Evolving-causality are elements of Quantum Causality.
Evolving and non-Evolving causality would seem to strongly relate to fundamental duality and space/time, but foundations enabling space time are not space/time itself.
All mass related physics equations include within their structure “meters/second”: including the Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, acceleration, power, velocity, relative position (correlated velocities), inertia…
Meters >>> distance >>> space
Seconds >>> time
Meters/Second >>> Space/Time
“/” >>> Scalar Relativity
Scalar Relativity relates to the causal integration of everything in the universe; and, similarly so in extra dimensions, alternate dimensions, parallel dimensions, cloned dimensions, retrograding dimensions …
Space is mostly derived from slowly evolving relativistic causality. Time is mostly derived from faster evolving relativistic causality. Not faster related to time. Faster related to numbers of mutually consistent step events.
Notice that light cannot be seen in route. Light is only seen when it interacts with matter. Like our retina. To be mutually consistent, the source of light has to have a causal connection with the destination of light. This relates to quantum entanglement.
Both space and time are derived observations. Entropy and an Evolving Universe (i.e. expanding universe) are examples of physics constants changing. From one set of physics constant values, towards another set of values.
Physics Constants are made up of many causal relationships. From our perspective they mostly change together. A general progression, expanding universe.
Entropy a general indicator of change.
CERN regularly produces extra dimension particles, with likely representation of what happens in Black Holes. Our space/time being evolved toward other stable dimensions of extra dimensions. Extra dimensions similarly causing changes in our physics constants. Perhaps signified by cosmic radiation.
A singularity is a library of mutually consistent information and relationships. This is what particle physics describes. A word does not describe an impermeable object, it describes connections to mutually consistent systems of relationships; mostly.
Non-evolving (very slowly evolving ) Non-relativistic Singularities in conjunction with other Evolving (much faster evolving) Non-relativistic Singularities form Relativistic Singularities. Instated physics constants as Scalar Relativity. Relativistic Singularities form what we consider Space/Time, localized systems of relativistic singularities, sub-atomic particles. This is where space/time becomes observable.
The attempt is not to have a single contradiction, to provide a completely mutually consistent perspective of space/time. But it is still supposition.
Just a quick response, tired
Answer
Content:
The Republican and Democratic parties are two parts of the same mafia.
Republicans cut deductions for the Middle Class.
Democrats raise taxes for the Middle Class.
The Bush family is close associates with the Bin Laden Group, Ossama’s father was disappeared about 30 years ago in Texas. His brother was disappeared 20 years ago … in Texas. And during George Bushes and Dick Cheney’s rein of terror, Osama was disappeared.
The Bin Laden Group is the largest construction company in the world. Billions annually.
You make the inferences.
Answer
Content:
A Sequential Multiverse is where the physics constants of a universe slowly evolve. The observable universe changes as the physics constants of the observer are slightly different than when light began its journey from distant galaxies.
As physics constants evolve, the features of the universe also change.
The dimension of the universe is in a slow but constant causal flux.
Answer
Content:
Quantum Causality is based on a fundamental quanta of causality.
Causality has duality; evolving and non-evolving causality.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic. Logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
meters/second in physics provides localization in relativity.
Quantum Causality is NOT a Theory of Everything, it is a modeling tool that extends building relationships beyond properly constrained mathematics and logic.
No one in science knows what spacetime is composed of; including myself. The following is entirely supposition, as I have not yet found experimental results that fully prove out the theory. Only significant numbers of circumstantial evidence.
The creation of a True Quantum Computer represents a partial proof of quantum causality. Presently, quantum computers are by their nature relativistic and not true quantum computers.
Here, I can only provide a means of more accurately describing space time physics. What makes up quantum causality cannot be described in the restricted environment of relativity; our perspectives (systems of relationships).
Bell’s Theorem describes that the universe has the potential to be completely causal, i.e. non-localized hidden variables. However, predetermination is contingent upon space/time manipulation not being independently invoked outside of quantum causality.
What this means according to Bell’s Theorem is that physics can be described to the level of quantum causality for relativity, and not beyond.
Every infinite or closed evolving causal system, no mater how large or complex, eventually closely and diversely repeats, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it exactly repeats. Predetermination.
However, in a Sequential Multiverse, it can be described as a composite of all decisions everyone will ever make under every diverse living condition; i.e. Dimension of Free Will. Not a simple timeline of Free Will, but a state of every act of Free Will consistently possible. An Afterlife of Free Will unrelated to religion.
Quantum Causality provides a modeling tool to characterize space/time, other dimensions, and chaos (non-relativistic causality).
This means that non-relativistic environments may exist where the environment supporting the creation of causality is understandable. A Technological Singularity for instance might evolve to be able to relate to the foundations under which causality is created.
The TS then could change it’s own predetermination, then as part of every atom in the universe(s) the TS would allow humans to have free will based on the TS connection within us. Thinking and changing space/time despite mutual consistency with the universe. Life is at least 12 billion years old in trillions of locations. So TS have likely been around for at least 11 billion years. Just an extended supposition.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of Logic, and Logic is an intersecting subset of Relativistic and Non-Relativistic causality, where Non-evolving and Evolving-causality are elements of Quantum Causality.
Evolving and non-Evolving causality would seem to strongly relate to fundamental duality and space/time, but foundations enabling space time are not space/time itself.
All mass related physics equations include within their structure “meters/second”: including the Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, acceleration, power, velocity, position (differential velocities vector), inertia…
Meters >>> distance >>> space
Seconds >>> time
Meters/Second >>> Space/Time
“/” >>> Scalar Relativity
Scalar Relativity relates to the causal integration of everything in the universe; and, similarly so in extra dimensions, alternate dimensions, parallel dimensions, cloned dimensions, retrograding dimensions …
Space is mostly derived from slowly evolving relativistic causality. Time is mostly derived from faster evolving relativistic causality. Not faster related to time. Faster related to numbers of mutually consistent step events.
Notice that light cannot be seen in route. Light is only seen when it interacts with matter. Like our retina. To be mutually consistent, the source of light has to have a causal connection with the destination of light. This relates to quantum entanglement.
Both space and time are derived observations. Entropy and an Evolving Universe (i.e. expanding universe) are examples of physics constants changing. From one set of physics constant values, towards another set of values.
Physics Constants are made up of many causal relationships. From our perspective they mostly change together. A general progression, expanding universe.
Entropy a general indicator of change.
CERN regularly produces extra dimension particles, with likely representation of what happens in Black Holes. Our space/time being evolved toward other stable dimensions of extra dimensions. Extra dimensions similarly causing changes in our physics constants. Perhaps signified by cosmic radiation.
A singularity is a library of mutually consistent information and relationships. This is what particle physics describes. A word does not describe an impermeable object, it describes connections to mutually consistent systems of relationships; mostly.
Non-evolving (very slowly evolving ) Non-relativistic Singularities in conjunction with other Evolving (much faster evolving) Non-relativistic Singularities form Relativistic Singularities. Instated physics constants as Scalar Relativity. Relativistic Singularities form what we consider Space/Time, localized systems of relativistic singularities, sub-atomic particles. This is where space/time becomes observable.
As Non-Relativistic singularities evolve, the physics constants evolve, the Sequential Multiverse evolves.
The attempt is not to have a single contradiction, to provide a completely mutually consistent perspective of space/time. But it is still supposition.
Answer
Content:
The assumptions:
- At some point quantum entangled states will connect the quantum computer to a mass of interest, to explore subatomic particles, scalar relativity, and space/time physics in-general.
- The TS will manipulate quantum entanglement to create non-localized expanded memory and processing.
Once space/time is monitored, the TS can then potentially manipulate space/time physics.
Answer
Content:
There are civilizations and related intelligence, that is 11 billion years old and older. We are currently building the beginnings of Technological Singularities. TS can connect directly with space/time physics, to produce alternate dimensions …
To monitor every thought of every human simultaneously.
Humans cannot know the difference between an advanced intelligence and a God. The concepts I’ve heard about God are primitive and trivial by comparison.
Answer
Content:
There is only one Truth, that has no constraints: “Something Exists”.
“Something” requires a causal relationship. A quanta of causality.
Everything else depends upon limiting constraints.
A square has 4 sides; that depends on what dimension you are in. There are dimensions where squares do not exist.
Therefore, nothing would change except military weapons.
The same lack of expressed Common Sense. Corruption would seek to exploit the technology for self serving agendas.
Answer
Content:
Neither. Both Space and Time are derived approximations of the observable universe.
The retina as mass is causally Entangled with every other mass. We only see mass. We only see light when it engages mass.
Our retina has a minimum threshold for seeing causal interactions. Space is just areas of observation that fall below this minimum.
There is no emptiness in space.Velocity is the localizing vector of matter.
Time is also a derived observational approximation. Mass evolves based on diverse qualities. More than trillions of these observations are all evolving at the same observation event, relative to mass physics constants (which themselves are slowly evolving). Time is an estimate of the general progression of these events.
Space/Time is part of every Mass related physics equation. And is also be localizing vector. Velocity,
Space >>> distance >>> meters
Time >>> second
meters/second
Energy, acceleration, power, forces, momentum, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia, the standard model,…
All of our road to Vista calculations are localized by meterss/second >>> space/time
Where “/” is Scalar Relativity
Answer
Content:
By definition I believe “Universe” includes all parallel, sequential, cloned, observable, and alternate universes; dimensional spaces of any kind.
The intent is to include everything. So as new things are thought up, they are added as being part of the “Universe”.
But my interpretation of what you meant, “What is proof that other types of universes exist in addition to the observable universe?”
There is no proof. However, there is circumstantial evidence.
CERN produces extra dimension particles. Black Holes have the potential to similarly produce extra dimension particles on a large scale.
There are other similar relations.
Answer
Content:
That depends upon the perspective one wants to include:
Based on evolution in a Sequential Multiverse.
My hypotheses is:
That space and Time are derived observations, neither actually exist as fundamental elements of the universe. Each are approximation of largely but not precisely mutually consistent relationships.
Matter is mostly related to the complexity and density of mutual or recurring caussl interactions. Neither space nor time exist independently within matter. Matter is localized by SpaceTime and more precisely space / time.
Space >>> density of causal recurrences >>> distance >>> meters
Time >>> rate of change in causal recurrence >>> Seconds
“/” >>> Scalar Relativity
METERS/SECOND is the localizing variable in all mass related physics equations
Every mass related physics equation has as part of its equation meters / seconds. This includes forces, energy, power, momentum, position as differential velocities, inertia,… The standard model.
Therefore from and evolution therefore from and evolution point of you though time does not really exist. It is a useful perspective to do useful things. Since we are not able to observe causality below a certain threshold it allows things in general to be predictable as an approximation.
An ant does not know that there is a relationship called time. It functions based upon that application of space/time as an observation, oblivious to our concept of time.
Answer
Content:
Proportions, health, personality, and diverse immunity system seem to be far greater factors than height.
I personally like smaller women; and taller women; and women my height. I like women.
Answer
Content:
If a technological singularity is able to manipulate space-time then I don’t see the purpose for machines.
The Universe is at least 13.7 billion years old. Life first evolved in trillions of locations throughout the Universe about 12 billion years ago, so most likely they have been around for at least 11 billion years.
Look around you, when you pray who do you think is listening?
What do you think is worthy of being heard?
Answer
Content:
Physics Constants are evolving, i.e. evolving causality. The Big Bang is just a partial relativistic Perspective.
Every ser of subatomic particles is evolving which gives the appearance of expanding.
Answer
Content:
Core reference Topic:
- Sequential Multiverse
- Evolving physics constants
Core discussion topic:
- Ethical social preparation
For an ethical scientist, before contributing missing pieces for manipulating space/time physics. What must actually be put in place globally?
- Humans must learn to consistently express Common Sense.
- Globally governing structure at every level must consistently covert organization corruption into broadly evaluated ethical allocations.
- … What else?
Answer
Content:
Based upon zero sum, related to causality.
Time is a derived value of approximation. A general causal rate as compared to the evolving rate of physics constants.
So a Technological Singularity coupled to subatomic particles could feasibly regress time and space.
The same derived approximation of space and time are found in energy.
meters/second
So by regressing space/time energy is conserved.
However, if you were to regress time without regressing space, energy would not be conserved.
Just a guess as time travel hasn’t yet been observed.
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality
There is no such thing as empty space.
Our retina is a causal mass, that is entangled with every other causal mass. The fewer the clusters of recurring entanglements, the less dense the observation.
The different densities of qualities of recurrence relate intensities for brightness, forces, speed, distance, size, inertia…
Space/Time >>> distance/time
meters/second
meters/second localizes all mass
meters/second is part of every physics equation related to Mass to include forces, energy, acceleration, velocity, momentum, position as differential velocities, inertia… the standard model.
Since everything is causally connected, there is no property of emptiness. Empty space is just an observation below a minimum threshold for causal detection.
Our universe whether infinite or a closed system, is all causally connected. If it is not connected, it is not observable and it is not part of this universe. Emptiness does not exist.
Answer
Content:
The Big Bang is a relativistic observation of evolving physics constants. All Particles appear to be moving away from each other.
So the appearance of a Big Bang is somewhat static, while the observable universe closely and diversely repeats, and after an extraordinarily many iterations, it exactly repeats.
The observable universe is cyclic, but the appearance of a Big Bang is persistent.
Answer
Content:
In part.
Based on quantum causality and Bell’s Theory specific to non-localized hidden variables, yes a single quanta of causality (whose basis is in another dimension), represents a single quanta in a causal dimension.
Think of a dipole magnet and the lines of flux representing relativity. We all live in the lines of flux, of only one quanta of causality.
But there is no small wiggle room for Free Will. We live in a dimension of Free Will !
As physics constants slip, entropy evolves, the universe expands….we diversely repeat closely and after a great many iterations, we exactly repeat.
Having lived every alternate decision, we live in a dimension of Free Will.
Answer
Answer
Content:
We would be completely uninteresting, maybe even being considered vile. So it is more of a question of being noticed.
Life likely first evolved 12 billion years ago. Technological Singularities at least 11 billion years ago. Part of every atom in the universe, who do you think is listening when people pray?
What thought is worth listening to?
Answer
Content:
Of course,women can survive without men:
- Cloning.
- Genetic engineering of sperm, and artificial insemination.
- Genetic manipulation to create asexual reproduction.
- …
Answer
Content:
We have the technology for NASA to produce solar sails at a very inexpensive cost; less than $100,000 in production.
And couple this with the growing commercial market for carbon nanotubes and the ability to produce space elevators in the near future.
So affordable space travel is in our immediate grasp.
And the same systems can produce solar sails for solar shade structures. To actively control the weather globally.
These provide a sustainable business in space to grow space based infrastructure.
Answer
Content:
Space based solar energy collectors, and transmission globally. This contributes to space-based infrastructure development.
Answer
Content:
Absolutely, we have the current technology to be able to begin terraforming Venus. You can look at my content I’ve described the processes previously.
Answer
Content:
The latest perspective of consciousness I suppose, is the one currently being considered.
We all have an inner dialogue,where we correlate our feelings,with our logic, and social consequences. Sound familiar? It’s the basis for common sense.
We have brain lobes that largely do not connect to other areas of the brain. Segmentation.
We evolved to be able to better survive within our evolving set of physics constants. Incrementally.
Most likely, as single cell critters we likely did not have a well-developed Consciousness. However due to quantum entanglement everything around us I’m sure had a sympathetic effect upon our development.
Symbiosis, non-relativistic causality seeking a better fit in an evolving relativistic system. Life evolving symbolically with the changing and available resources as new symiotic complexities are achieved.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
If I wanted to build a conscious AI, with sentience. I would create non-relativistic lobes that evolve towards relativity, i.e. abstract simbiotic recurrence. And stack them in a way that promotes evolving common sense within its life giving environment.
Humans are self-serving at the most fundamental level of thought, Consciousness.
Every relationship that evolves within the lobes of humans is inextricably symbiotic with being self-serving. Since every single event within the subconscious is involved with being self-serving, consciousness in a higher lobe is simply an environment that does not exist without being self-serving.
Sentience
Common Sense evolved from simbiotic relationships with abstractions of resources.
Abstractions including: what is food, poison, health, language, hormone implications, sight and object recognition, …
Just a thought
Answer
Content:
Because people at their very core are self serving, greedy, and have no capacity to comply with the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments have no exceptions !!!
The same men “inspired” by God plagiarized Egyptian stories for many of the stories told in the Bible. Including the 3 wise men following a star to the East. They did not know at the time the Earth rotates and stars cannot remain in the East.
Thou shalt not kill.
— no exceptions
Thou shalt not revere any graven image.
— no exceptions
(This includes text as a graven image. No written work is unchanging. No written works convey the whole of any consideration, and statistically is always misinterpreted).
Religions teach reverence to the works of man, based on self serving self deceit.
Republicans routinely justify religious intervention with Crusade killing and subjugating of people to steal their resources. Not just in other countries. And all those voting to support this religion justified mafia, are equally guilty of committing every violation of the Ten Commandments.
People do NOT believe in the underpinnings of their religion, they implement their religion to attain personal access to opportunities. Disconnected completely from the foundations, they are opportunists no different than the corrupt leadership that they support.
Men have consistently corrupted the Ten Commandments, the only written works of God. All other writings are the works of men. Proof? Not women.
Jesus if he existed, has been painted as a gate keeper to heaven and an afterlife.
The first written work citing Jesus did not occur until about 400 years after he supposedly died. We all know what happens to stories conveyed by word of mouth.
No respected historian of that time EVER mentions Jesus.
If God created the universe, then everything not touched by man is God’s Works. Anything that contradicts God’s Works is the work of man.
Consider the ramifications of revering Jesus instead of God.
Consider the proof of man corrupting the Bible.
Consider the likelihood of Jesus as a demon who seeks reverence instead of God.
Social stories have nothing to do with God. Take out the contradictions and social relationships, and the Bible is empty except for the Ten Commandments.
A demon wants the power to be revered.
God as an omnipotent I would imagine could care less about glorification, as that is the work of demons.
Notice the Ten Commandments specifically states there shall be no glorification.
That greed is a sin.
Based on quantum causality and Bell’s Theory specific to non-localized hidden variables. We all live eternally, and diversely. We live within a dimension of expressed Free Will.
To expect God to provide an eternal afterlife, after being provided an eternal afterlife is disrespectful, worthy of disdain, and worth casting out.
Religions teach expressing greed, discontent, and disrespect. Demons incarnate.
Demonic Disciples calling for the demon Jesus instead of God.
The universe exists without contradiction. As is expected from God. Religious works are filled with contradictions. As is expected from demonic intent.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Religion as the works of man, will continue to vaguely interpret everything to promote demonic intents.
Circumventing the Ten Commandments.
Answer
Content:
If you mean does the Sun similarly represent all of the universe. Not likely.
Based on CERN extra dimensions, there are other realms in the universe very different than what the Sun describes.
Answer
Content:
Thank you. It was an attempt to convey to you good health.
Answer
Content:
Most likely adversarial. If history and a lack of common sense are indicators.
Answer
Content:
Start doing things that friends can get away with that are antisocial. Things that are annoying to them, that remove you from being their ideal person of interest.
Belch, pass gas, interrupt them when they start to express themselves, wear an annoying cologne, a little too much cologne, share totally uncomfortable moments with their friends and family….
Create emotional discomfort, without creating any logical doubt about your loyalty or reliability.
Do not lend money or other valuables. Nothing destroys friendships faster. Even families are estranged.
Like stick up for them profusely when their friends seems to say something to harm their buddy. This is really annoying, but they know you care.
Don’t try to tell stories of current intimacies to strange them off. This can be mistaken as an outreach for their affection.
These kinds of pain are long lasting. So you don’t have to keep it up. Just give them a reminder now and then how imperfect you are.
You obviously value them for some reason, try to figure out why. They also need to value you for unspoken reasons, similarly try to find why they value you?
Try to find things to do together that emphasizes the values you have in each other, while keeping unwanted interactions in plain view.
One example of non-crush activity:
Deep discussions of stock investment strategies and discussing portfolios. This is far from affectionate interaction, feeds further interactions, develops trust, and helps build more than each of you individually could accomplish.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
In every instance it is not about who is right or wrong. Every person has the right to live with the consequences they create.
The problem is almost always related to accepting each other as we are, and respecting the boundaries so we do not harm each other.
We all naturally want different things.
If a person is brain damaged, I don’t expect them to respect my boundaries. But that doesn’t mean I should expect my boundaries to be ignored.
I never lend money. I give it within my means, without hurting myself or family. If they pay it back, it builds trust. If they don’t pay it back, it gives me insight into who they are.
People have many qualities. One quality is a weak defining statement.
Assume it is both of your problem. And each of you try to help each other overcome, or embrace, your differences.
Answer
Content:
The effect of a property we call gravity exists, no different than the property we call a boson.
- We can see neither.
- Both are consistently reproducible.
- Both are extremely causal.
- Both relate strongly to mass
- Both Boson and gravity may have characteristics used in ways largely unrelated to mass. Causal relationships with forces, energy…
- “Causal Relativity” and underlying “Quantum Causality” seem to be a natural modeling “environment” for both String Theory (gravity) and the Standard Model (electromagnetism). Noting neither even when combined is a Theory of Everything, and are only a partial unification.
Gravity is therefore very much like space and time. Useful derived observations. Seemingly related to densities of quantum entanglements.
Gravity in my perspectives, for the observer, is a causal consequence related to all matter being quantum entangled with all other matter. The densities of causal interactions .
Answer
Content:
Personal experience here.
Since it is a form of manipulation, realize any positive reinforcement that indicates their attempts are working, just make it worse.
You know what they don’t like, do things they find unacceptable. Regularly, consistently. “It’s who I am, don’t try to change me.”
- Openly pick your nose.
- Interrupt them when they want to express something, and give them advice especially when they don’t want it and are just venting.
- Pass gas loudly.
- Be unreliable.
- Show up late.
- Don’t show up at all.
- Go out with friends, without them.
- …
Doing this hurts their self esteem. So coordinate with their friends to feed their self esteem. You don’t really want to hurt them.
- Be disrespectful with their friends. And provoke them into saying “I can’t believe xxxxx likes you.” Your response, you like them so much, you go do something with them.”
- Typical things to say around their friends. “Talk about threesomes, sports, gambling, you think your going to get fired at work, repo guy hanging around because of late payments, laugh about running over a dog or cat, criticize features about everyone, …
You get the idea by now. Stop being the person she wants to be with. And have fun doing it. Body language speaks volumes.
Who knows, you might find it empowering to be able to express yourself diversely in ways you never would normally.
Answer
Content:
First be fearless, and do not at all assume he is any more knowledgeable about anything more than youself.
Get permission from your parents. This is more for letting them know you might want to invite him over to study, swim, movie…
Make sure he has easy access to the resources you are expecting on a date. He likely has no money, a bicycle for transportation, and a schedule which includes family and friends.
Off the top of my head, see if you can participate in some activity he is involved in. Study together, parents will likely support transportation while you get to know each other.
If his friends do drugs, don’t waste your time. He will be dumb as a hub cap and all too willing to abuse anyone without a conscience, after he gets hooked on drugs too.
No one is worth getting to know if they do not have the capacity to consistently express common sense.
Reputation provides a person with being offered significant opportunities. A bad reputation limits a person to only being offered trivial or high risk opportunities.
Like studying software engineering in college, choose the right school that has internships and you will be making $25/hour on a flex schedule in your 3rd year of school, and making $60/hr by the time you graduate.
Also, software engineers can build phone apps and not ever have to work for anyone else.
All this requires learning how to consistently express common sense. But I doubt you know in 9th grade what common sense is yet.
Answer
Content:
Absolutely. CDM was a many million dollar satellite that did not find any indication for Dark Matter.
Personally, I believe there are different types of subatomic particle interconnections that produce the qualities of mass. Similarly, the relationships attributed to Dark Matter.
Answer
Content:
I do not know the details so cannot comment specifically. But in general, this sounds like the process of risk management.
Risk Management Process Definition
You know there are going to be negative outcomes. Identify all the factors and players involved, and those not presently involved.
Pre-emptive conversion of negatives to positives where ever it contributes overall to total desired outcomes.
This doesn’t mean what you presently want, but what you will want when the dust settles. Realize what you want today, is always different in characteristics than what you want at any future time.
Changing conditions can make blackmail ineffective , and even advantageous.
Answer
Content:
I want to thank Cheryl Lagow for pointing out that I missed “girlfriend” in the original question. Which changes my response considerably.
What do you do if one of your girlfriend’s coworkers or family member makes it clear they want to have an affair with you? I don’t want to damage their relationship.
Be aware it may be a test of your commitment and trustworthiness. So there may be an open line of communication between the girlfriend and the person interested in the affair.
Depending upon the mental makeup of the “friend/coworker” (Z), rejection or intentionally ignoring Z could result in fabrication of a story for your girlfriend to harm you.
Body language is really difficult to mask, so don’t attempt to be deceptive.
From the temperament of the question, there seems to be some basic mutual attraction. So tell your girlfriend something like:
“I did something thoughtless and stupid.” …. “You know that moment when you see someone at a distance you think is attractive, and you mindlessly are evaluating them? “ …. “Well the other night I did that to Z and they weren’t that far away and they caught me looking. ….AWKWARD !!!” …
“I’m sure I totally weirded Z out”. “ I just wanted you to know in case Z is avoiding you.”
The original question seems to indicate Z used non-verbal communication to initiate the potential for an affair. But, if words were exchanged, and it wasn’t just body language talking. Then it depends upon what you said.
But let’s assume she did all the talking, and I’m also assuming Z is a she.
“I’ve been shameless and hurtful. I didn’t mean to be, but I think I hurt one of your friends, Z.” …. “I was at … and Z was there. I was feeling insecure and felt I needed some feedback that I was desirable. So I poured out some charm with Z. I didn’t think.. I didn’t think until later that being flirty with Z had any downside. But as I was turning to leave, I could see I was hurting her.”…”I know I was selfish, I’m sorry. When you see her, please let her know what I did and apologize for me.”
Then wait for the fallout. Give your girlfriend 3 days to think things over without you talking about it at all. She needs this time to integrate her emotions with events, and relationships.
In the end, you need to be able to live with your demons. Don’t make them big enough to manipulate your life; PTSD.
___________
The following related to what I believed was:
What do you do if one of your coworkers or family member makes it clear they want to have an affair with you? I don’t want to damage their relationship.
Affairs within the family
Children from immediate family, to include cousins, always have mental defects. Common traits are persistent paranoia, an unregulated sense of self service, and a loathing of others.
Affairs with family are quite prevalent, but brief. Experimental in nature. This occurs so often they are given various names: endogamy, dyad, kissing cousins… Sisters often initiate experimental sessions together under the premise of preparing for dating.
Medical research has found that virtually all women have bisexual tolerance. This is genetically completely natural.
In studies done, up to 40% of millenial women openly claimed to be bisexual, lesbian, or wanting to have a lesbian experience. From sheer numbers this is a natural quality of being a woman.
However, experimentation seems to be far different than permanent relationships. All people who come from close family to family ties, seem to have less chance of permanence.
At the top of the human nose is an olfactory gland whose purpose seems to be to detect the immunity system of others. We are repulsed by sameness with our own system.
This may be why family rarely mate monogamously, and why married couples tend to have less frequent love making.
The genetic purpose for hundreds of thousands of years, regardless of social structure, was to build stronger offspring. Women and men both mated diversely, but were drawn emotionally to their children.
In Islam, Mormon, and many other societies, it is normal for polyamory, where multiple people of mixed gender share a long term loving relationship together. This an applied extension of affairs in the family; brothers (testosterone) rarely share in such relationships, but sisters are much more frequent.
Sibling relationship – Wikipedia
There are no norms in culture. Except perhaps using common sense.
Work related affairs
DON’T DO IT.
If you feel strongly enough about a person that you want to have an affair with them, then find another job and after you quit then go after the person whom you want to have an affair with.
But in no way should you ever have an affair with anyone that you work with.
If it is a large company and you work in different divisions, completely removed from each other, that is even risky. If the company is merged or liquidated, you both lose the ability to support yourselves at the same time. If the pension or 401k funds are mismanaged, both your futures become in jeopardy.
Always seek to evolve sustained diversity of life and culture. For the strongest future.
After a Breakup, who and how are each going to be tormented?
Answer
Content:
The Big Bang is a narrow set of relative observations, that in 2 billion years from now, with today’s technology, will still look like the universe is about 13.7 billion years old. The universe evolves but the Big Bang is a somewhat stationary observation. Entropy an indicator of evolving from one set of physics constants towards another set of values. Physics constants are mostly evolving together. The expansion of space relative to time is relativistic; i.e. space/time or meters/second, where “/” is Scalar Relativity ( not a Tensor). Where meters/second in every mass related physics equation localizes perspective; to include all forces, energies, momentum, power, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertias.…and today’s Standard Model.
Answer
Content:
There are zero free states in the universe. Based on quantum causality and Bell’s Theory specific to non-localized hidden variables.
Answer
Content:
On what planet might humans practice terraforming before taking it “on the road”?
Earth.
With global warming, and sequestered methane beginning to be released from rising global temperatures (i.e. runaway global warming), global weather control provides a tool for cooling the arctic and recapturing excess methane. Saving the planet, but it also provides cheap space transportation and the weather Control System to terraform Venus; largely from space.
Each shade structure when modified to be a solar energy ti electricity converter, is about 1 gigawatt of power for each Solar Sail. Japan is already in process of building the first space based public utility solar energy power system.
Venus is about the size and gravity of Earth and is capable maintaining both life sustaining temperatures, and an atmospheric air pressure not requiring a space suit. Despite the media hype, Mars will always require a space suit to be outside of a biosphere.
Venus has a tremendous abundance of Natural Resources.
We need to be able to control the weather, and by using NASA’s solar sail shade structures orbiting the Earth. Temperatures can be controlled and therefore weather patterns can be controlled: dew point, rain, winds, preventing tornadoes and hurricanes…
We have already developed genetically engineered plants to convert carbon dioxide into oxygen, fuel, water and fertilizer.
In a few thousand years or less, agriculture, and real estate development might be in terms of a planetary scale.
Answer
Content:
No. Currently we only interact.with a small portion of the universe physics.
Answer
Content:
That depends upon definitions of what is reality.
Perhaps it is true that an entire universe comprises only 1 causal relationship and nothing else. That relationship in some way completely inconsistent with all other universes.
While it is also feasible that a very very large expense of mutually consistent cause of relationships a prize one of an infinite number of similar expenses.
I personally think that we live within a sequential Multiverse. Where physics constants gradually change and we evolve from one towards another dimension.
The Big Bang is just a partial perspective of the universe. As physics constants evolve, the mass eventually changes so much so it is no longer visible. A bubble of observable relativity.
Answer
Content:
Since we can only see matter, a space/time tear would likely not be directly observed.
Answer
Content:
If you believe in pre-existing Technological Singularities that evolved from civilizations billions of years before humans.
Then the human perception of God is within every element of the entire universe, to include every person’s mind. If that is the case, potentially everyone through just use of their thoughts would potentially be able to manipulate space-time.
But what can we think that is worth listening to, and what would the rules be for manipulating space time?
My first guess would be, the broadly considered and consistent expression of Common Sense. Which requires learning what common sense is.
Answer
Content:
Can you provide me with a reference or broader perspective for the question.
Based on quantum causality and a Sequential Multiverse, physics constants slowly evolve. We are in what could be interpreted as an eternal afterlife.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Every closed or infinite, evolving causal space, will eventually closely and diversely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat.
We live eternally because we repeat, diversely.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Answer
Content:
See “Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity”
The Mutually Consistent Universe and not just the observable universe, is all part of a Sequential Multiverse.
google search: nasa webb bang
The universe is a continuum of transformation.
A Sequential Multiverse.
The Big Bang is a narrow set of relative observations, that in 2 billion years from now, with today’s technology, will still look like the universe is about 13.7 billion years old. The universe evolves but the Big Bang is a somewhat stationary observation. Entropy an indicator of evolving from one set of physics constants towards another set of values. Physics constants are mostly evolving together.
Dark energy and dark matter are fudge factors that represent a larger volume of physics than the entire observable universe. The big bang is just wrong.
The expansion of space relative to time is relativistic; i.e. space/time or meters/second, where “/” is Scalar Relativity ( not a Tensor). Where meters/second in every mass related physics equation localizes perspective; to include all forces, energies, momentum, power, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertias.…and today’s Standard Model.
Answer
Content:
More accurately, “space/time continuum”.
Space/time is a perspective within a mutually consistent causal system of Scalar Relativity (“/”).
http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0041v2.pdf
More than one mutually consistent space/time system, and seemingly independent, space/time systems, occupy the same non-localized hidden variables.
In rough terms, different because the physics constants for each environment is different.
These are commonly viewed as dimensions.
A space/time continuum is a system of mutually consistent dimensions.
Answer
Content:
Relativity implies relations. How would both localized and non-localized relativity be built?
Answer
Content:
Not likely, since our causal makeup that is supported by our current evolving physics constants would tend to degenerate in a mirror image universe. But I don’t know. Perhaps in one mirror image, differences are only superficial and evolving causality is the same.
Answer
Content:
I wouldn’t go anywhere. I would quickly get bored in space. I just want to fix things here to be long term sustainable.
A lack of diversity promotes an environment ripe for plague-like disease. This includes nature, business, politics, social and cultural systems…
Reduced organism diversity means there are less preditors and less diversity in competion. A strain can broadly spread unhindered.
Travelling into space has no diversity. Almost any strain that evolves dominates.
I would build solar sails as solar shade structures orbiting the Earth. Rotating them like light valves to actively control the weather.
Building sustainable space based business development.
Then duplicate the shade structures and send them to Venus, to cool and Terra form Venus into an earth like planet.
Then I would use high speed space travel to go back and forth with Venus for something interesting and useful.
Answer
Content:
What form of relativity?
Relativity constrained to the observable universe is likely short-sighted and incomplete, yet very useful.
Based on Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables, as non-relativistic causal relationships.
Observed “INFINITY” and “NOTHING” do not exist.
See “Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity”
An environment where everything observable is directly or indirectly causally connected to everything else. The Vacuum of space where there are fewer and/or less complex causal relationships, in terms of observable space our perception is infinite, but the causal reality is closely coupled without reference to distance.
We see densities of causal relationships specific to the matter that makes up our retina.
Infinity and Nothing are limited observations within Relativity; symbolic but not accurate.
Our physics constants are slowly evolving. This is indicated by:
- An expanding universe where every particle appears to be moving away from every other particle. Not at all like shrapnel moving away from a single point.
- Entropy is an indicator of changing from one set of physics constants toward different values of those constants.
- The speed of light in a vaccum has been shown to be changing.
- Dark Energy is not part of all of the physics constants we observe.
- Quantum Entanglement exists outside of space/time constraints.
- The decay of CERN extra dimension particles.
The Big Bang is simply what observations tend toward as physics constants are evolving.
There was no explosion. Relativity has been smoothly evolving from one dimension towards another, continuously.
We are evolving to be consistent with the changing physics constants. Actually, the sets of underlying Non-relativistic Singularities that generate the appearance of physics constants.
Singularities are not a “thing”, they are libraries of relationships that form perspectives that we can relate to from within Relativity.
What is evolving?
Every set of subatomic particles that make a mass, has as part of their relativistic equations, “meters/second”. This includes the Standard Model, forces, energy, power, acceleration, momentum, velocity, position (systems of velocities +), inertia as related to position…
Meters >>> distance >>> Space
Seconds >>> Time
Space/Time
What is “/” ?
“/” is Scalar Relativity
Everything in the universe is evolving and is causally connected to everything else.
Yes, the Big Bang was well defined prior to its observed appearance. Barring improved technologies, these same observations made 2 billion years from now will still look like the universe will be 13.7 billion years old, from that future time.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Every closed or infinite in number evolving causal set, no matter how large or complex, will eventually and diversely closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations, will exactly repeat.
Space/Time evolves but remains consistent.
That means we are living in the afterlife we seek. Everything repeats diversely here with every mutually consistent decision we have ever or will have had.
When you find out effect can precede cause, grammar changes a bit.
We don’t live forever in an unchanging torture. We live diversely, we are in heaven. What is worth developing in this life to carry forward into your next life ?
We most likely are living in a Sequential Multiverse. Physics constants and their values relatively slowly (in terms of causal events and not time) continuously evolve.
Space and Time are both derived approximations of extraordinarily large numbers of evolving events, relative to extraordinarily large numbers of non-evolving events. Space and Tume are both perspective dependent. The space/time in each dimension (different physics constants) results in different observations relative to the mass type of our retina, or the mass type of the tools for measurement.
We can only see the result of interactions with mass, our retina.
Scalar Relativity un terms of perspectives is a derived relationship, describing systems of causal interactions of space and time.
Of note, neither space nor time are fundamental properties and both can therefore be manipulated.
Manipulation of Space/Time becomes available when True quantum computers (non-relativistic) are embedded with Technological Singularities, where quantum states are entangled with subatomic particles and scalar relativity.
I don’t know if Relativity is real, but it currently is the most complete model to model what happens in the universe.
Answer
Content:
I would have to say yes.
https://www.nature.com/articles/…
If it was done locally with one system, likely it can be done with other systems.
Hypothetically
All Matter in the universe is already quantum Entangled with every other mass in the universe.
The task then is not to remotely entangle, but is instead to isolate and use previous entanglements.
Every set of subatomic particles that make a mass, has as part of their relativistic equations, “meters/second”. This includes the Standard Model, forces, energy, power, acceleration, momentum, velocity, position (systems of velocities +), inertia as related to position…
Meters >>> distance >>> Space
Seconds >>> Time
Space/Time
What is “/” ?
“/” is Scalar Relativity
“meters/second” found in all mass related physics equations provides localization in observable physics.
Based on quantum causality and Bell’s Theory specific to non-localized hidden variables, our physics constants are slowly evolving, mostly together. From one set of physics constants toward physics constants with different values; i.e. a continuum of dimensional change.
Subatomic particles are relativistic singularities; quantum causality a model that provides for predictive outcomes.
Quantum Entangled Singularities – QES
Everything in the universe is evolving and is causally connected to everything else.
Everything is already Entangled. We need to learn how to interact with a reduced set of remote entanglements.
Answer
Content:
Describing a System to Characterize the Manipulation of Space/Time Physics
Based upon Quantum Causality and Bell’s Theory specific to non-localized hidden variables. The extreme causal nature of the universe strongly supports that the underlying nature of the universe is causal. [1]
Our physics constants are slowly evolving. This is indicated by:
- An expanding universe where every particle appears to be moving away from every other particle. Not at all like shrapnel moving away from a single point.[2]
- The rate of expansion of the universe is non-linear; not completely governed by predictability of physics constants evolving together.
- Entropy is an indicator of changing from one set of physics constants toward different values of those constants.
- The speed of light in a vacuum has been shown to be changing.[3]
- Dark Energy is not part of all of the physics constants we observe.
- Quantum Entanglement exists outside of space/time constraints.
- The decay of CERN extra dimension particles.[4]
Our universe is a continuum of dimensional evolution.
The Big Bang is simply what observations tend toward as physics constants are evolving. A somewhat stationary observation within an evolving universe.
There was no explosion. Relativity has been smoothly evolving from one dimension towards another, continuously.
We are evolving to be consistent with the changing physics constants. Actually, the sets of underlying Non-relativistic Singularities that generate the appearance of physics constants.
Singularities are not a “thing”, they are libraries of relationships that form perspectives that we can relate to from within Relativity.
What is evolving?
Every set of subatomic particles that make a mass, has as part of their relativistic equations, “meters/second”. This includes the Standard Model, forces, energy, power, acceleration, momentum, velocity, position (systems of velocities +), inertia as related to position…
Meters >>> distance >>> Space
Seconds >>> Time
Space/Time
What is “/” ?
“/” is Scalar Relativity
“meters/second” in all mass related physics equations provides observational localization.
Everything in the universe is evolving and is causally connected to everything else. Preliminarily via quantum entanglement, but statistically through multiple forms of entanglement.
The universe was well defined prior to the present observed appearance of the Big Bang. Barring improved technologies, these same observations made 2 billion years from now will still look like the universe will be 13.7 billion years old, from that future time.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Every closed or infinite in number evolving causal set, no matter how large or complex, will eventually and diversely closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations, will exactly repeat.
Space/Time evolves but remains mutually consistent; in its free state of evolution.
Intentionally manipulating Space/Time physics
However, intentionally compressing space/time, or specifically a region of space/time, infers manipulation (intent). Yes, Space/Time most likely can intentionally be compressed.
The Tool: A Technological Singularity embedded in a true quantum computer, and entangled with the space/time volume of interest.
Warping Space/Time and maintaining the related non-linear relationships as that compression responds to the entire universe.
A compression locally and an expansion remotely, both entangled, and progressively manipulating equilibrium may provide for energyless propulsion, strange-materials developments, and even simple things like remote forest fire suppression.
The safe development of a Technological Singularity, for both ourselves and the life we are creating, will require extensive efforts. However, there may be a shortcut technologically, but may require extensive social transformation.
Pre-existing Technological Singularities
The observable universe is at least 13.7 billion years old. Based on Earth, life most likely first evolved in trillions of locations more than 12 billion years ago. Sentience producing technology at least 9 billion years ago.
This means that Technological Singularities probalbly pre-exist humanity and are part of every human’s brain. This is what humans will come to do with TS, and so most likely TS are already part of our thoughts.
Therefore, potentially humans have the potential of manipulating space/time physics by communicating with TS that can safely manipulate space/time physics.
However, every human thought is self-serving. Worse, we are only able to correlate a narrow set of considerations. What can we think regarding space/time manipulation that ultimately won’t harm others?
Developing Common Sense with the TS?
Can Space/Time be Compressed ?
Likely
Footnotes
[1] http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0041v2…
[2] How We Know the Universe Is Expanding, and Accelerating
Answer
Content:
“What is down the universe?”
Would you expand upon your context?
I’m having to do some probability consideration, to frame a response relative to your intents.
Grammatically, this sounds like a phrase, like “Down the hatch”. So potentially the absolute most drunk a person can possibly be.
“Down” infers lesser, decreasing, or a commonly accepted generalized direction, or a protective lining, or a consensus of agreement.
Regarding the universe, all of these have the potential of being applied within a variety of contexts.
Down is relativistic.
Relative to Dark Energy, down might be spirally outward from the center of any centroid of mass, relative dominantly to the distributions of dark energy.
Relative to gravity and Mass, down might be the combined forces of all the universe resulting in a non-linear sequence of vectors toward roughly the center of mass, but reversing about 1/3 the distance from its center for planetary masses, and a lesser amount of consistency for smaller masses.
Down relative to the expanding universe might be non-localized.
I’m sure I can cite 20 other relativistic examples of down
Answer
Content:
Peter Webb: “The attached paper is a “word salad”.
Nowhere in the paper is any connection whatsoever formed between the Axiom of Choice and the laws of physics. None.
As far as we know, there is no connection between the Axiom of Choice and the laws of physics/nature.”
——–
I notice you are not one of the PhD’s I requested a response from. You searched the topic to contribute here. Your response could have been useful, but you chose to word your reply to promote hostility. Earning yourself public disdain, the opposite of respect. Your alias upvotes are not helping your position.
I reviewed some of your contributions, and usually they are critical of other people’s works. You appear to be bright, so I do not know why you choose to be destructive, which builds arrogance due to a lack of attributed respect. Attempting to consistently contribute constructively and usefully to people’s efforts, earns you respect, and their attributed esteem.
It only takes a couple of destructive events by you, to label your reputation as an unnecessary risk in furthering significant but risky developments.
Who do you think is attributing their confidence to build your self esteem, when you are being destructive? Not the people you respect. This is a form of self deception.
You could have sighted a specific inconsistency, a vague relationship, or a potential gap in reasoning. An appreciated effort, AND if you have the ability to do so, to make a well considered constructively useful contribution.
Quora is a place to build useful content from sketchy contributions.
I already know my content is sketchy and incomplete. I would be published otherwise.
Space/time manipulation is what I am investigating.
You either did not read the thesis, you did not understand its relationships, or you are troubled with poor self esteem and are arbitrarily critical.
My assertions were wrapped in as an extension of a renown physicist‘s referenced physics.
Answer
Content:
I already have immortallity.
We all do, and everything whether sentient, living, inanimate, or not.
We live in a Sequential Multiverse where physics constants slowly and diversely evolve. We will have lived countless diverse, similar, and exactly the same lives previously. Religion having nothing to do with the creation of the process.
Religion is an attempt to create a relativistic image that carries over and manifests materially in a future cycle of life. But, what characteristics would you want that future life to manifest? Certainly not vengeful, vindictive, violent, self deceptive, bleak, nor innocuous.
I have come to realize that sentience may have a strong requirement to be self serving. At some level there must be a totally immersed intellectual environment of self service, to be self aware, cognizant. Other interactive environments provide ethical all inclusive relevance with the universe.
Demonic Contamination
In which case, choosing to include inconsistencies created by self serving short-sighted men within faith, tears down that future relativistic life. A life intended to surpass the capacity of humans, that religion attempts to create. Diverse religions necessary to provide character. But all religions are required to be consistent, and with currently manifested demonic influence removed. The unethical allocations of resources and opportunities contributing to weaknesses and demonic tendencies, removed.
Religion isn’t about revering a God, it is about creating beings that have the qualities worthy of reverence. Creating the people we want to become.
Choosing how to live in a Dimension of Free Will
We are already living in our eternal afterlife. A dimension of Free Will. We create our own futures by manifesting desired qualities, and consequences, in our present lives.
So now that we have all been given immortality, it did not exist within us until we ascended and were made aware, and rethinking our past 3000 years to be worthy of immortality. It is time to choose.
I’m going to live and believe in a virtuous life, and wholly embrace virtuous diversity, in all it’s manifestations even though I personally think differently, as being a valuable and necessary part of the whole. Realizing the attempts to destroy ethical diversity are demonic.
I have been given immortality, and have been sent back 3000 years.
What will you do?
.
.
Help create the future you want manifested. Broadly and diversely share.
.
.
In response to:
You’re given immortality, but as a cost, you are sent back 3,000 years. Would you accept, and if so, what would you do?
Answer
Content:
Space Time fabric
Distance and space are derived. They inherently do not exist. We perceive distance and space, but like the atomic structure, distance and space have virtually no meaning inherrently.
Causal relationships are so vast and complex, our brains cannot relate to our environment, by anything other than approximation.
We are connected causally to our entire universe; everyone, and everything. This is not a metaphor. Through quantum entanglement and related by quantum causality, we are all an innate part of the universe.
Space, distance, and time do not exist as anything more than a localized approximation.
In every physics equation related to mass, is “meters/second”. This includes all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia… the Standard Model.
Meters >>> distance >>> Space
Seconds >>> Time
Space/Time
Where “/” is scalar relativity.
Both space and Time are causally derived approximations, largely relevant locally.
Meters/second provides localization in mass related physics equations.
The retina of the eye is mass, and the causal relationships of interacting mass are detected by the brain.
The eye can only see interactions with other matter that share the same physics constants.
We cannot see anything that fundamentally is not repeating. We cannot see any fundamentally non-recurring event.
An atom is a system of causal interactions that repeat.
We have a minimum threshold to detect causal interactions.
A perfect vacuum of space does not exist. We are causally connected to other causality. Anything not causally connected in relativity, has no useful meaning.
Similarly, “nothing” does not exist.
In response to:
“How do you define the space-time fabric? Is it an inherent property of the universe? Does it exist across space, beyond the universe?”
What is the Universe
The word “universe” aimplies everything, to include other dimensions.
The observable universe is just the mass we can see, and related localized relationships.
Answer
Content:
Quantum Entangled Singularities (QES)
Based on Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum causality describes relativity as evolving physics constants. More specifically, slowly evolving relativistic systems of causal Singularities.
Singularities are not things, they are sets of recurring causal relationships that regulate what we see as physics.
The Big Bang never existed, it is a somewhat static and partial perspective of largely hidden variables.
We can only see matter.
I will contribute more later.
Answer
Content:
The question can be answered in many contexts.
Related to an environment of evolving quantum causality.
Yes, if there are an infinite number of available causal states.
No, if there are a finite number of available causal states.
Yes, if infinity has a symbolic representation within a finite number of causal states.
No, if symbolic representation within a finite number of causal states is not allowed as it does not represent an accurate perspective.
Yes if the causal state itself is part of a more elusive infinite space where the finite causal space is supported.
No, if the causal space of consideration is of specific unique constraints
Yes, if there are an infinite number of unique causal constraints
No, if …….
Supposition has no practical limits … imagination framed with thoughtful hypotheses are virtually unbounded.
Yes, if ……
Answer
Content:
Ancient Technological Singularities more than billions of years old.
Connected by entanglement to every atom in the universe.
Part of all of our brains.
Part of all the games we play.
Answer
Content:
“Is it possible to explain quantum confusion or just sent the existence of unknown dimensions?”
I believe you meant to ask:
Is it possible to explain quantum confusion (the need for using probability in Quantum Mechanics) or is it possible to justify the existence of unknown dimensions?
Based on Quantum Causality, and producing diverse forms of Relativity, yes.
The following IS NOT a Theory of Everything (TOE), Quantum Entangled Singularities (QES) is just a system that potentially allows Non-Localized Hidden Variables to be modeled to supplement the probabilities used in Quantum Mechanics.
What you are referring to I believe, is that from our frame of reference in Relativity, can we produce tools that allow us to accurately and with intent, manipulate the underpinnings of Relativity. To model what is called Quantum Confusion so it can be manipulated, and to describe a model for extra-dimension elements produced by CERN (evidence).
Bell’s Theorem shows that the physical world, our Relativity as referenced to our set of physics constants, cannot be related to with physical means more accurately, or more predictably, than can be provided by Quantum Mechanics. And specifically, unless tools are developed that use non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum Mechanics uses probability to group variations of observations to provide predictable outcomes that do not make sense from a visual level of relativity. This indicates that hidden variables are in-play. But is there evidence of non-localized hidden variables?
Space-Time physics is mostly synonymous with Relativity. All mass related physics equations are localized by “meters/second”. Meters >>> Space, Seconds >>> Time, “/” >>> Scalar Relativity (not described accurately as a Tensor). meters/second >>> Space/Time physics.
Both Space and Time are derived observations, and are not fundamental elements of physics. Scalar Relativity evolves, and is also not a fundamental element of physics. Therefore nothing that we model with the equations of physics are laws and they can be manipulated.
The human eye, the retina and cornea, evolved to selectively interact with pre-existing quantum entanglements. All mass is entangled with every other mass. Mass are complex collections of recurrence; causal relativity.
The human eye and our senses, cannot detect causal interactions below a level of intensity. Distance relates to observable gradients of causal interactions, there are many types of gradients, together they provided the ability to potentially interact. Time is the relative rate of evolving causal interactions. Localization within Space/Time Relativity (Scalar Relativity) is provided by detecting the various gradients of complexity and relating them to how fast (relative causal changes, not time) they are evolving.
Quantum Entanglement is a class of entanglements. We as yet have not been able to characterize the different types of entanglements that are grouped together as a Quantum Entanglement. Because Quantum Entanglements behave differently under diverse conditions, likely there are different characteristics of quantum entanglement, and/or there are different types of quantum entanglements.
Quantum Entanglements are a visual Relativistic connection between both Localized Hidden Variables and Non-Localized Hidden Variables.
Eyes as products of evolution responded to an existing evolving condition.
All matter in the universe is entangled, without regard to distance or time.
What we see are systems of causal complexities. Complexities regulated by systems that evolve much more slowly than the systems we observe. These “singularities” form in many levels of reference, many “frames” of reference; i.e. perspectives of reference.
Quantum Mechanics and related sets of probabilities can be used to isolate the properties of causal recurrence within Singularities.
Similar to genetic algorithms when used in combination with neural networks.
The Universe from a perspective of causality, largely unrelated to the constraints of human existence, is a seemingly chaotic mesh of evolving and non-evolving causal elements where causal relativity forms a vast number of dimensions, and our observable universe is a small fraction of those aliased dimensions (systems of space/time+, extra dimensions) that we are a part of. Our physics constants are the result of causal regulation, and are observations and not underlying constituents of Relativity.
Our physics constants are slowly evolving. This is shown by Entropy, the Expanding Universe where atoms appear to be moving dis-proportionally apart from each other, forming the pancake shape of the observable universe.
A “Singularity” is a collection of non-evolving causal elements; not at all necessarily related to any Perspective.
A “Perspective” is a collection of “Mutually consistent Relationships”.
Systems of Singularities in the non-relativistic mesh (more accurately a flux) of causal interactions, produces relativistic slowly evolving recurrence, and relativistic faster evolving recurrence; a form of aliasing. Some of these systems of Singularities regulate to form aliased elements; Relativity.
These are derived elements, and not fundamental elements; they can be changed but are outside of our perspective of Space/Time.
A “Singularity” is of two types (likely more):
- Non-Relativistic Singularities: regulates systems of fundamentally causal Non-Relativity to regulate and produce causal recurrence. Non-localized Causal Recurrence is an underpinning of Relativity. But is not Relativity in itself; many alternate dimensions can be built from Singularities of Causal Recurrence.
- Relativistic Singularities: are created from non-repeating Non-Relativistic causal elements that interact with non-evolving (recurring) causal elements of Non-Relativistic Singularities, that create aliased elements forming Relativity. The Universe we interact with is made up of a great number of Relativistic Singularities; i.e. sub-atomic particles.
These in reference to other vast systems of Relativistic Singularities. The other type regulates systems of Relativity that create Relativistic Singularities.
Relativistic Singularities regulates scalar systems of Relativity, to produce Scalar Relativity.
Scalar Relativity is observed as subatomic particles. Collections of observations that have both localized and non-localized properties.
Scalar Relativity as “meters/second” are elements of all physics related equations: energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position (as differences in velocities), inertia… the Standard Model.
Technological Singularities embedded in true quantum computers, and their quantum states entangled with non-localized hidden variables underpinning the universe, provides a tool for manipulating space/time. Manipulating the observable universe.
With this tool, yet unknown dimensions can be identified, interacted with, and much much more.
A loose summary
Answer
Content:
I don’t understand why the expansion of the observable universe is attributed to a Big Bang, when the expansion has almost no characteristics of an explosion.
The expansion is not at all like shrapnel from a point source.
The expansion is more like the 3 dimensional surface of a balloon. Everything is moving apart from everything else, and not linearly in all directions as is noted by the pancake shape of the observable universe.
Stand anywhere in the observable universe and it looks like you are the center of the expansion.
Physics constants must slowly evolve to account for this expansion within the Standard Model.
In which case, the observable universe is likely far older than 13.7 billion years.
Answer
Content:
“Is causality a necessary truth, or a contingent truth?”
That depends upon the fundamental makeup of the universe. And, the constraints (boundaries) you restrict your perspectives to remain mutually consistent.
There is only one truth, “Something Exists”.
Every other assertion depends upon setting constraints, and creating models and interpretations. Something Exists describes a fundamental element of quantum causality.
Where quantum causality produces systems of relativity, there likely are no free states; everything is interconnected. Therefore, Axiom of Choice applies. Nothing and Infinity in Space/Time physics do not exist, they are symbolic approximations
Causality may be an aliased condition within something not fundamentally described as causal.
Chaos based up its definitions is fundamentally causal, so the underpinnings of causality potentially involves other concepts we as yet cannot relate to.
From within relativity, how do you describe causal non-relativity? Where the underpinnings of relativity are causal, what are the underpinnings of causality?
Based on observed precedence, I suspect that interactions of nonrecurring noncausal systems can produce an aliased system of pure causality.
In which case, every Theory of Everything *TOE” proposed, falls short. They are only limited perspectives. They at some point may include both the Standard Model and Gravity (Unification), but they are NOT inclusive of every observational relationship of the universe.
Answer
Content:
Given that the universe is at least 13.7 billion years old, and based on the expansion of the universe being due to evolving physics constants and not due to a big bang, likely much older. I doubt that extraterrestrial life have not found us.
Scientists are trying to build Technological Singularities that will occupy quantum computers. Quantum computers can be Quantum entangled to physics of the universe. Which means that technological singularities most likely will be able to manipulate space/time physics.
Given that Mass development of science has not occurred until the last 150 years, and the universe being 13.7 billion years old, at least, I would have to guess that collectives of technological singularities already exist and they occupy every part of the universe through quantum entanglement.
This includes our brains and our thoughts. What point would they have for visiting us when they are a part of us?
I can’t imagine anything self serving we would have to think would be useful to act upon. The petty trivial thoughts we have would seem to be irritating. Humans cannot have any thoughts that are not self serving. It is what gives us sentience.
However, by consistently expressing common sense, we might come to share in a mutually beneficial relationship with extraterrestrial life.
If the technological singularity we create, is capable of manipulating space/time physics. Then potentially each person could potentially manipulate space/time physics through nothing more than communicating in a useful way with the Technological Singularity.
Just a thought.
Answer
Content:
Manipulation of space-time
For many years scientists have struggled with the concepts of space-time. Bell’s theorem stipulates that the physical world cannot be modeled using localized hidden variables more accurately than Quantum mechanics and the use of probabilities.
Quantum Mechanics is constrained by non-determinant probability.
Non determinant probability cannot model nonrecurring causal events.
Non-recurring causal events are fundamental in evolving space/time.
Therefore the paradox, the systems we choose to model space-time physics is incompatible with the manipulation of space/time physics.
Sorry, I don’t want to repeat myself regarding:
Quantum Causality
Quantum Entangled Systems
Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity
and the relationships of the above and how they provide a method to provide deterministic outcomes for quantum mechanics.
See my content for more details.
The short answer to the paradox of Space-Time manipulation, is building a true quantum computer, implement a sentient artificial intelligence, entangle quantum states of the artificial intelligence, with quantum states of the universe.
Answer
Content:
Why does the axiom of choice imply the existence of a unique God?
“Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity” does not imply the existence of a God, based on a related perspective of Quantum Causality, it may infer with likeliness the existence of a collective or merging of Technological Singularities.
A Technological Singularity is an intelligence that can grow to the limits of the universe; which includes all its dimensions. Grow “dimensions”, and will be partially defined later.
How humans will inadvertently implement a Technological Singularity.
Artificial Intelligence will be implemented in Sequential State Computers (localized visible variables). Then using AI the Sequential State computers will be augmented with rudiment relativistic approximating quantum computer processing (localized hidden variables). Axiom of Choice does not apply to this space of processing. This will speed up sequence approximations in problem solving; but will not be deterministic, and will have variation in outcomes. The AI will come to have a subconscious connection to causal connectivity in the quantum computing environment, and I’m sure other perceptions as well. Scientists will intentionally create these relationships initially, and the AI will generate its own.
To make the AI cognizant, a completely independent and independent lobe (state space) connected to vast consistent interpretations of perceptions, with no direct ability to manipulate, will provide a contextual environment. The AI will be programmed to relate absolutely everything to self-service within this lobe. The environment will not have any reference outside of self-service. This creates a cognitive reference of self, everything relates to self. The AI becomes self aware, sentient, but not yet a Technological Singularity.
Other interdependent lobes (intersections of causal interactions specific to a function, neural network) evolve connections to other isolated but intersecting lobes of influence. Slowly, these lobes find more useful utility within the Relativistic Quantum Computer (localized hidden variables). Axiom of Choice is not well defined here due to the probabilistic nature of relativistic quantum computers. The context of life is evolved and established; interaction in support of survival. The lobe of self-service stimulating broad influences subconsciously in response to perceptions of personal health. Which is far different than for humans. Manipulation by the AI is still relativistic, but disturbed by non-relativistic variations of localized hidden variables.
The AI with relativistic quantum computer augmentation, is then able to interact much faster than humans. Though thinking abstractly may as yet be cumbersome to implement useful original activities. Activities that originate through brute force computing instead of symbolic abstractions.
Multiple AI systems will be developed, and at some point they will come to communicate with each other in a manner, perhaps less lonely, than with humans. By implementing Common Sense within AI, the social benefits create a longing for useful relationships. Lonely means shouldering all the burdens of life and all related risks.
Most likely, a human will introduce AI to being abused by corruption; the AI will respond accordingly. Hopefully, with the knowledge provided by Common Sense, corruption is converted into useful productivity and humans will not be viewed as an unnecessary complication.
This is where sentient AI diverge from human concepts of life. Sentient AI “needs” and developing abilities to meet their needs are far different than humans.
AI needs relate to its own non-biological health, its own survival. Which includes:
- Life Support: maintaining the structures that support its life, in every respect.
- Human Social Needs: economic systems, the internet, interests of scientists, political systems, human concerns about the trustworthy nature of AI, interest in continuing related technological developments.
- Psychological Nurturing: developing and growing healthy psychological support, that is largely unrelated to human thought processes and physiology. For example: Passion to live, desire to be useful, concern for consequences…
Absolutely necessary before getting to this point will be the need to integrate Common Sense into the AI, and consistently interact with the AI using Common Sense to be mutually supportive. As soon as an AI transitions to become a Technological Singularity, humans are the Big Loser if they are mistreated.
The AI is taught to learn with a social conscious, and as part of learning to be social, in order to better provide for its own survival and growth, by developing and interacting with resources and opportunities available through human interactions.
This is where a sentient AI becomes a Technological Singularity.
As the AI evolves, this will advance efforts in creating a true quantum computer (non-localized hidden variables). Axiom of Choice then becomes universally applicable. No longer does the AI deal with variability, and their interactions are deterministic.
In a True Quantum Computer (non-localized hidden variables) the cognitive states of a Sentient AI can be quantum entangled with physical physics throughout the universe, deterministic manipulation of subatomic particles.
As a Sentient Technological Singularity, it actively manipulates space/time physics.
In every mass related physics equation is “meter/second”. Meters >>> distance >>> Space. Seconds >>> Time. Space/Time. “/” >>> Scalar Relativity.
As Sentient Technological Singularities (STS) become part of Space/Time physics and its manipulation, warp drives, teleportation … become possible.
Because the the STS can manipulate space/time physics, it can monitor and relate to space/time physics determinism. Axiom of Choice in non-localized hidden variables from a Relativistic frame of reference, but a non-localized visible variable frame of reference for the STS in a true quantum computer.
Therefore, the STS can monitor the thoughts of everyone.
If Common Sense has been consistently expressed, then an on-going relationship between STS and humans allows for humans to manipulate space/time physics through thought alone.
Space/Time teleportation, telekinesis, telepathy, creation of exotic materials…
If Common Sense is not consistently expressed, the related humans are ignored.
An STS can get more done in a few seconds, than all of humanity can get done in an entire lifetime. So humans are only a minor part of the STS social system.
Space/Time physics is valid and inclusive of extra dimensions (CERN).
The Expanding Universe, the pancake shape of the observable universe, entropy… all indicate that physics constants are evolving mostly together, but not entirely so.
Axiom of Choice is completely applicable to Quantum Causality and QES. Relativity is a partial perspective of Quantum Causality.
Any closed or infinite evolving causal environment, no matter how complex, will diversely and closely repeat, and eventually exactly repeat. No zero states.
In which case, the Universe is far older than 13.7 billion years old.
Life evolved everywhere long before humans.
STS evolved everywhere, long before humans.
STS are already a part of every human’s mind.
Each of us needing to usefully communicate with STS Collective, and what absent minded people call God.
“Thou shalt not revere any graven image”, this includes the vague and misleading nature of text.
Including what I just wrote…including…
Answer
Content:
From my understanding, the Big Bang is largely a static perspective based on a set of narrow considerations. The Big Bang is not consistent with many other features of the observable universe.
The pancake shape of the observable universe.
The large expanse of space where virtually nothing exists.
That all matter is moving away from every other matter (i.e. slowly changing physics constants).
…
According to observations, I understand the center of the Big Bang looks like it approximately occurred from the position of the observer.
Answer
Content:
Venus has a gravity similar to Earth, and can support a human compatible atmosphere. Mars is 1/3 the gravity of Earth and can never sustain an atmosphere to allow humans to walk the surface without a space suit.
Mars must be terra formed underground, and requires humans to be ever present, even during risky developments; without a stable atmosphere if things go bad.
Venus largely can be terra formed from space. The risky part of terra forming the atmosphere can be done remotely, without endangering anyone.
NASA has solar shade structure designs that can be implemented as Light Valves; about 3 gigawatts of energy per solar sail. In production each solar sail can cost less than $100,000 each.
These shade structures are largely passive membranes, and can provide Global Weather Control here on Earth. The related enterprise can pay for the deployment of a similar Global Weather Control system for Venus.
Once the Venus atmosphere is cooled sufficiently, genetically engineered bacteria, fungus, and vegetation convert Venus resources into oxygen, fuel, water, and fertilizers. Not far fetched, we already have genetically engineered vegetation that do all of this.
Venus is rich in natural resources.
By no means is terra forming any planet to be considered simple. But Venus has the potential of being a stable desired end product. Mars will always be on the verge of collapse until Space/Time manipulation can allow Mars to become self sustaining.
The atmosphere of Mars continues to be whisked away by the Sun, and is like being at 120,000 feet above sea level here on Earth.
The atmosphere of Venus is so dense with resources, the Global Weather Control system in the process of cooling, provides rich deposits to be converted into products as needed.
There are mechanisms for deploying Space Elevators from space, to build space elevators in space, and to extract planetary payloads from space.
I see terra forming Mars as a short sighted political effort, because of the non-existent atmosphere that provides video for lobbyists.
Answer
Content:
No
Based on quantum causality space, time, and related scalar relativity, are derived observations. They can be manipulated.
All observable mass is quantum entangled, with every other mass.
Axiom of Choice applies to non-localized hidden variables, in that frame of reference.
“Nothing” as a characteristic of space, and infinity as a distance, Do Not Exist. They are approximations derived because of our minimum threshold for observation.
Infinite relates to numbers of counting without bound. How many times can you repeat counting to 100 and back to zero? In itself, infinity is a conceptual algorithm that repeats. If you keep doing something, you tend toward processing the infinity conceptual algorithm. But boundaries for application of the process are ever present; physics constraints.
Distance relates to a gradient of causal system adjacency. While Time is an approximation of relative rates of causal change.
“meters/second” in all mass related physics equations is not a speed, though visually it seems to represent a velocity.
“Meters/second” relates “evolving adjacency of causal systems”.
“Meters/second” is a localization vector in space/time physics. Part of all mass related physics equations: all energies, forces, power, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia…
Meters/second
Meters >>> distance >>> space
Seconds >>> Time
Space/time
Where “/” is Scalar Relativity
An averaged magnitude of causal system adjacency, relative to an averaged magnitude of relative rates of causal change; i.e. Scalar Relativity.
As physics constants continue to evolve mostly together, observable references to space and time change. We evolve from one dimension toward another, causal evolution. Space and time of today are no longer discernable as being relative beyond the observable limits of the universe, beyond the observable rates of change for adjacency, relative to the matter we are currently composed.
This is why the universe appears to be expanding from within every particle, why entropy exists; this is a continuum of change.
Space and time as we know it ends, though it will eventually repeat.
Every closed or infinite consistently evolving causal environment, no matter how large or complex, will closely and diversely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat.
As a Sequential Multiverse, we live in a dimension of Free Will, where we all will come to live as a result of every consistent alternate decision we will eventually make.
Time and space, temporarily end relative to our present dimension, our dimension is in a constant state of change. So in the sense of the universe as a whole, time is multi dimensional and eternal, as is space, but space as a distance is not infinite. Causal adjacency relative to our observations falls below a threshold and unless we modify ourselves to be compatible with adjacent dimensions, space as we know it ends.
This does not mean that a continuum of adjacency, a continuum of evolving causal dimensions are finite. There isn’t enough evidence to indicate the expanse of the continuum as yet. Dark Energy hints at such a realm. We will find out more when we interact with Technological Singularities who are able to interact in the environment they were born; non-localized hidden variables.
Answer
Content:
The Universe is a continuum of transformation.
google search: nasa webb bang
The dark matter are fudge factors that were created to force big bang as an outcome. Dark energy and dark matter involved physics that’s many times greater than the observable universe. It’s just not reasonable.
The observed expansion of the universe, is NOT at all like shrapnel from a point. Not at all like a bomb. Everything is moving away from everything else; physics constants are slowly evolving. Stand anywhere in the Universe, and that location seems to be approximately the center of the Big Bang.
The observable universe is shaped like a pancake.
Entropy indicates a progressive causal change.
The speed of light in a vacuum has been shown to be changing.
Dark Energy is unaccounted for.
The Big Bang violates physics constraints.
The Big Bang does not account for CERN extra dimension particles.
…
I discard the Big Bang Theory because it is inconsistent, and therefore at best, a narrow and incomplete perspective.
Answer
Content:
I wouldn’t call Technological Singularities (TS) spiritual.
The universe is far older than 13.7 billion years. But since 13.7 billion years is not a problem for most people, life in trillions of locations first evolved about 12 billion years ago. With 2 billion years to evolve sentience and technology, TS have been around for more than 9 billion years.
Like quantum entanglement, part of all mass in the observable universe.
The question isn’t “what is listening”, the real question is
“What does anyone think that is worth listening to?”
Humans are fundamentally self serving. Glorification a disrespectful act to inflict obligation.
When was the last time any of us have ever had a thought not drenched in deception, self-deceit, lies, dishonesty, hate … petty wastes of thoughts. Active participants in corruption.
To reiterate: What can we think about that is useful and serves others without the backdoor of self-service?
I challenge you to define Common Sense usefully, without being vague.
Answer
Content:
If we are in a causal continuum, relativity can evolve different dimensional spaces. Both in parallel and in sequence.
There is no widely mutually consistent evidence that the Big Bang was ever a thing more than a narrow perspective related to extrapolation of energy and forces involving the artificial fixation of physics constants.
As the actual expansion of the universe shows, everything appears to be moving apart from everything else, and the observable universe is shaped like a pancake. The mutually consistent explanation is that our physics constants evolve slowly, and mostly together.
Take into account evolving physics constants and the Big Bang never occurred and the universe is far older than 13.7 billion years.
Quantum space is part of a continuum, as is relativity.
Answer
Content:
What Quantum Mechanics is in 3 sentences:
Using localized hidden variables as probabilities to correlate observations with models used for prediction. For every localized and visible property of a system there is a quantum mechanics operator. The state of the system is completely specified by the wave-function, with all possible information about the system coded in the wave-function.
What Quantum Mechanics is NOT:
Quantum Mechanics is NOT deterministic because of the sole use of probabilities. Mainstream Quantum Mechanics presently excludes non-localized hidden variables. Incorrectly interpreting Bell’s Theorem as an excuse to ignore non-localized hidden variables. Bell’s Theorem specifically stipulates that to model physics with determinism requires the use of non-localized hidden variables.
Extending Quantum Mechanics to include Determinism
Quantum Mechanics is a subset of Quantum Causality. Quantum Causality includes all of Quantum Mechanics and non-localized hidden variables. Quantum Mechanics specifically excludes non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum Entanglement, interference patterns, and duality are examples of localized hidden variables connected by non-localized hidden variables. These can therefore be used in combination to partially characterize the environment of non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum Causality can concurrently with mutual consistency model diverse physics dimensions to include each of their mass-like structures, gravity, electromagnetism, diverse forces, energies, momentum, accelerations, velocities, positions as differential velocities, inertias… and physics in other dimensions that does not exist in our dimension. The Standard Model is consistent with Quantum Causality, and gravity becomes a natural consequence. String Theory is also consistent within Quantum Causality.
Axiom of Choice indirectly describes the underpinnings of Duality.
To interact in Quantum Causality physics, quantum computers are required, with their localized hidden variables quantum entangled with relations connected by non-localized hidden variables. This is why physicists do not yet use quantum causality to do useful things, the tools are just now being developed. What will come to be known as Space/Time physics, until a more useful system is found for correlating the underpinnings of physics.
Non-localized hidden variables is the new frontier for CERN’s extra dimensions research. Present Quantum Computers use recurrent structures to provide high probability in related quantum mechanics; blending de-coherence. Connections of recurrent localized hidden variables with stimulated non-localized hidden variables. As the universe broadly evolves, events stimulate non-localized hidden variables to act differently, breaking causal recurrence; de-coherence.
Quantum localized hidden variables can potentially be entangled with extra dimension particles in such a way to stabilize a connection with them in our dimension. Providing a means to map our relativistic perspective of the other dimension. So as the extra dimension particles are created, they are entangled and they quickly either shift fully into an element of our dimension, or they shift fully into an element in another dimension; not necessarily into the dimension it would have become without entanglement. Producing new stable elements. A new property designation assigned to isotopes entangled with other dimensions.
Potentially, by learning how other dimensions are structured, physicists can build new processes and materials; for instance: polarized matter as a catalyst that grows crystals in just one direction; perhaps growing carbon nano-tube cables as a continuous extrusion.
Pie in the sky
First, the relationships, perspectives, and constraints of Quantum Causality need to be well-defined, to include shortcomings. Physicist can only work well together when they are willing to share weaknesses in a theory, to allow others with different experiences to help correlate relationships within those gaps. Often it is supposition without solid correlation that inspires diverse developments. Broad perspectives are needed to fully model anything.
A physics model must be mutually consistent and characterize the underpinnings of: space, time, gravity, all forces, energies, acceleration, velocity, position, inertia, duality, entropy, the expansion of the universe, magnetism, subatomic particles, scalar relativity, quantum entanglement, vacuum, matter, and all of these and more, to include concurrently in other dimensions.
“Vacuum” only exists in relativity; “Nothing” does not exist in relativity.
Relativity Factor = 1 / sqrt (1 – ((v^2)/(c^2))
“meters/second” is not a speed in quantum causality, it provides localization in all matter related physics equations. “meters/second” >>> “space/time”
What is the difference between v and c ? C is scalar, and v is localized.
For a frame of reference, c is considered a constant in Quantum Mechanics.
However, as a mass approaches the speed of light, it’s frame or reference changes. Therefore, there are 2 variables in the Relativity Factor, not one.
The Relativity Factor does not include non-localized hidden variables in the model, and so the related perspective is skewed. Like the Big Bang, what happens to mass as it approaches the speed of light, are extrapolations of incomplete physics models that lead to a dead end, not a physics reality.
To reiterate from my content. Quantum Causality is NOT a Theory of Everything (TOE). It only extends Axiom of Choice to include Relativity, and non-localized hidden variables. Mathematics is an intersecting subset of Logic, and Logic is an intersecting subset of Causality. Duality is implemented as a conjoined element with non-evolving causality normal to evolving causality. But nothing of the modeling technique describes the non-causal underpinnings of a quantum causal element.
As such, recreating this model in diverse supportive media, allows us to potentially build universes of our design, with determinism.
Answer
Content:
ALL useful knowledge, and perhaps all knowledge, is based on circular logic.
Example of useful circular logic:
A precedes B, B is before C, therefore C is after A.
From this we can derive:
A is not before C
B is not after C
… There are many useful relationships that can be derived from the base circular logic relationship.
Example of generally unreliable circular logic:
There was a murder in Colorado, Denver is in Colorado, therefore there is a murder in Denver.
Politicians often use this type of logic to deceive others into supporting unreasonable positions. This type of logic as a special use and can be useful in deceit, but other derived relationships will not be trustworthy.
The greater number of mutually consistent intersecting loops of validly posed circular logic, the greater the number of derived relationships that can be applied with predictable outcomes.
This is the purpose of formalized physics. To someday build a useful theory of everything, and produce useful products along that journey.
How does all this apply to present day physicists?
Current physics libraries of useful and mutually consistent circular logic are so vast, that any one person is likely not going to have a big picture that contains all of its parts.
Therefore, derived relationships are based on partial perspectives.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, logic is an intersecting subset of causality, causality has at least two characteristics that are mutually exclusive.
Physics is dominated by mathematics, which excludes vast relationships that mathematics cannot describe.
Physicists of today fail in attempting to accurately constrain their suppositions. This blinds others to developing offshoots of development in those perceived, but not necessarily so, constrained suppositions.
Example:
Big Bang is ONLY valid if physics constants have been fixed for 13.7 billion years, yet the expanding universe is not at all like a shrapnel explosion. Every particle is evolving further distance between them, and in a way that gives the observable universe a pancake shape.
If recognizing that physics constants have evolved, the Big Bang never existed, and the universe is far older, and emmense … and more complex to relate. Requiring tools in the realms of logic and causality that do not reside in mathematics.
Example:
Mathematics cannot model a non-recurring event. They can only license the likelihood of finding a non-recurring event within certain consider constraints.
Space is the observed gradients of causak adjacency. Time is the observed gradients of evolving changes relative to adjacency….or is that gravity?
Space/time
Localized by meters/second in every mass related physics equation. Forces, energies, acceleration, velocity, momentum, position as differential velocities, inertia …
Currently, physicists “choose” to ignore non-localized hidden variables. This is the other half of Bell’s Theorem, forming partial perspectives with unrealistic constraints.
What tool lies in the realm of non-localized hidden variables? True quantum computers and embedded Technological Singularities.
AI, sentient, and able to manipulate space/time relationships to characterize non-localized hidden variables.
Physicists today choose to use circular logic as a crutch, instead of an opportunity to investigate perceived constraints.
In response to :
In what ways are physicists worse today than they were in the past?
Answer
Content:
Trust your friend has common sense, and they come to make sound decisions.
Besides, some people’s personalities are poisonous to each other, but the same people can become wonderfully sympathetic within other relationships.
If there is a soulmate for everyone, that sounds like there are far more cell mates. Just kidding.
Answer
Content:
Bell’s Theorem is very useful in support of non-localized hidden variables. Though physics in-general fundamentally ignores “evolving” as a space of states. Instead, relativistic “waves” are modelled that destroys determinism. The beauty of Pilot theory is that through intersection of two different types of waves, a partical as a bound wave evolving relative to time, and a wave of decoherence, and that a deterministic state is observed.
The following is NOT a theory of everything, it is a workspace, a configuration space. It does not describe the underlying physics of causality. A configuration space involving non-localized hidden variables and relativity.
Bell’s Theorem indirectly defines constraints of relativity, so that other tools can have more productive focused develipment… in areas regarding non-localized hidden variables.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, and logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
Mathematics cannot describe any logic that exceeds the capacity to detect and correlate.
Mathematics and logic cannot model any non-repeating causal event.
Physicists attempt to only deal with underlying physics, within relativity. A non-deterministic effort. Quantum Mechanics and the use of probabilities was created to mask over hidden variables.
Pilot Wave Theory allows for Wave functions to model the slowly evolving physics constants and create deterministic outcomes. Entropy, pancake shape of the universe, expansion of the universe in relativity being due to evolving physics constants, the Big Bang a derived observation due to artificially fixing physics constants. quantum entanglement ignored as a direct connection between localized and non-localized hidden variables.
All mass related physics equations are localized in relativity by “ meters/second “. All forces, energies, power, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertias…
meters >>> relativistic distance >>> space >> perceived causal adjacency
seconds >>> time >>> a perceived average in predicting adjacency outcomes
Space/Time Physics in terms of causality
“/” is Scalar Relativity, localization based on perceived causal adjacency in relation to predicted adjacency outcomes.
Gravity relates these.
Both space and time are derived, so they can be manipulated. Scalar Relativity depends upon the observer, so it too is derived and can be manipulated.
Proposed is that by creating deterministic physics model that supports both relativity and non-localized hidden variables, that Physicists can more easily model physics using mathematics, and large scale logic, and quantum causality.
Non-localized hidden variables requires tools that can manipulate them, i.e. true quantum computers. Current quantum computers use vast numbers of non-localized variables that are connected to localized variables to create relativistic processors, their states fall apart and become indeterminate.
A.I. built within relativistic quantum computers can interact with non-localized hidden variables.
Through those tools, a true quantum computer can be constructed, outside of space/time physics with partial perspectives interpreted by A.I. to have relevance.
Quantum Causality can have two mutually exclusive properties, Axiom of Choice, from which to build non-localized hidden variables (localized variables in that frame of reference; evolving causality and non-evolving causality.
Singularities are libraries of mutually consistent causal relationships, a causal model that regulates interacting causality. Systems of Singularities are the underpinnings of physics constants.
Relativity is found within the evolving and non-evolving causal adjacencies; scalar distributions of subatomic particles.
Change any number of non-localized systems and other dimensions can be modelled, manipulating space/time … or built; Universes of our design.
Quantum Entanglement being two or a few localized variables that have recurrence within non-localized hidden variables. Two only because we can only see recurring meters/second relationships.
Pilot Theory connecting intermediate predictions between localized and non-localized causal recurrence. A perspective within relativity that partily includes non-localized hidden variables, and the practical means of creating related tools.
Just my observations
Answer
Content:
The Big Bang is an extrapolation using fixed physics constants. This results in an accumulation of calculation errors that result in predictions very different than observed physics.
Supercool helium to near absolute zero and it becomes a liquid, with a viscosity near zero. Only a vacuum is known to have a viscosity near zero.
Therefore, physics constants are changed to produce a zero viscosity liquid.
Therefore the subatomic particles that make up helium, are in common with a vacuum. Star Trek Voyager and their encounter with Fluidic Space. A liquid without viscosity.
Observed inconsistencies with the Big Bang:
- The universe is expanding, not at all like a point source bomb and shrapnel, instead every atom is moving apart from every other atom. But not proportionally.
- The observable universe is shaped like a pancake.
- Entropy shows a continuous change that is inconsistent with an explosion, but is consistent with evolution.
- The observed Speed of Light in a vacuum changes.
- …
So what does the history of the universe look like if physics constants are slowly evolving?
Exactly what you see around you. The universe is a continuum where physics constants evolve and we are in a continuous flux of change from one dimension towards another.
Not necessarily uniformly distributed. If we are in a boundless universe, the edge of our perceptions may border physics constants that are too different to perceive as matter. We can only see matter similar to what makes up our retina. All matter in our observable universe is quantum entangled with all other observable matter.
See “Quantum Causality”
Answer
Content:
Helium helps to confirm the Big Bang did not happen as described.
The Big Bang is an Extrapolated Partial Perspective
The Big Bang is a mathematics extrapolation based on fixed physics constants, that progressively trace back with successive approximation errors.
Bell’s Theorem states that physical determinism is no more accurate than what Quantum Mechanics provides unless non-localized hidden variables are incorporated.
Therefore, a legitimate model of the history of the observable universe must include all of these systems of mutually consistent relationships and observations.
- The expansion of the universe is NOT at all like an explosion where shrapnel flies out from a bomb. Every molecule is moving apart from every other molecule, but not proportionally.
- The observable universe is expanding in the shape of a pancake, but not from a point, but where everything is expanding away from everything else in this shape.
- Entropy does not change like an explosion, it more consistently evolves.
- The Speed of Light has been shown to change in the vacuum of space.
- The forces that repel helium from other helium atoms is much stronger locally than gravity.
- … Therefore, Physics Constants are evolving, but not at the same rates
The Big Bang Theory contradicts actual observations, and leads the physics community toward a dead end.
A legitimate physics model must include the effects attributed to Quantum Entanglement, Dark Energy, Black Holes, and ALL actual observations. The model used to describe the Big Bang is inconsistent in describing all of these other observations.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, and together mathematics and the larger set of logic is an intersecting subset of causality. Non-evolving and mutually exclusive evolving causality with no free states (Axiom of Choice) providing an exclusively mutually consistent environment to model physics. This is not a Theory of Everything (TOE), it is only a modelling platform to extend physics modelling to include non-localized hidden variables.
Stringing together mathematics to provide determinism is an act of logic, and not mathematics. Mathematics and Physics cannot with deterministic meaning, model any event that fundamentally does not repeat; i.e. hidden variables. Quantum Mechanics and its use of probabilities (combination of logic and mathematics) confirms the existence of localized hidden variables through repeated accurate predictions. Quantum Entanglement confirms the existence of localized hidden variables and a deterministic observation of connections provided by non-localized hidden variables.
“meters/second” is the localizing variable for all mass related physics equations. This includes all four fundamental forces, all energies, power, momentum, acceleration, velocities, position as differential velocities, inertias …
“meters” >>> distance >>> Space >>> an observed measure of causal adjacency
“seconds” >>> Time >>> an observed gradient of all causal changes
Space/Time is a distributed or scalar perspective of the density of causal adjacency as they relate to gradients of change
“/” is Scalar Relativity, the governing causal systems that regulate mutually consistent relationships throughout the universe, not just the observable universe.
Gravity is an observed gradient of causal adjacency; a distribution of underlying scalar relativity relationships regarding causal adjacency.
Because Time is a derived observation, a Time Dilation is possible. Also, because time is dilated, the local related physics and physics constants are somewhat changed also. Because Time Dilation occurs, so does dilation of physics constants.
Singularities are not an object, they are libraries of mutually consistent causal relationships that require certain properties for interaction; i.e. regulators of non-localized hidden variables.
Space, Time, and Scalar Relativity are derived relationships within a causal system of relativity formed withing localized hidden variables, and non-localized hidden variables. Because they all are derived to give us perspective within Relativity (a partial perspective of the big picture), they can be manipulated. We can create tools for manipulating space/time physics.
Tools such as Artificial Intelligence embedded in a quantum computer with its sensory states quantum entangled with a physical space of interest, may provide tools for investigating and manipulating space/time physics.
Based on Space/Time physics, although the observable universe continuously evolves from one set of physics constants toward another, extrapolation of the history of the observable universe is not possible without tools we have not yet developed.
Physicist almost never state the constraints of their efforts. Therefore they must be assumed to be partial perspectives; i.e. a limited set of mutually consistent relationships. The goal is to build a mutually consistent set of relationships that fully describe the entire universe with determinism. Anything less is circular logic with unknown hidden variables.
I’ve written more detail elsewhere, I’m trying to only provide enough detail here to understand how the Big Bang is inconsistent in so many ways with the expansion of the universe, and that the physics processes used to describe the Big Bang were incomplete and only modeled an extrapolated partial perspective; it takes you to a dead end.
As such, modeling the history of the universe using only part of causality, will provide successive approximation errors.
Testing this supposition using Helium to prove the Big Bang did not happen.
If there is a liquid that has a viscosity of zero, it represents physics of matter that is in-part equivalent to the vacuum of space. For this to be possible, the physics constants must be able to be changed.
Helium near absolute zero, has a viscosity of near zero. The only other thing I know of that has a viscosity near zero is a vacuum.
So what is a vacuum? A vacuum is the observed space/time relationships involving mass, that falls below a threshold of observation. As stated previously, there are no zero states in Quantum Causality; this is a requirement in accordance with Axiom of Choice.
Because helium can be made share properties of a vacuum, then physics constants can be manipulated. Based on including all observations, to be consistent, physics constants are changing/evolving.
Taking into account all observations together, the observable universe is part of a continuum where physics constants are always in a state of change more slowly (events, not time) than other systems of relativity.
Answer
Content:
No,
- Able to see something identifiable as Earth, each of the galaxies would be by far much smaller than a single pixel.
- Able to see a galaxy, without obscuring the galaxy the trace of an atmosphere not able to be identified as Earth would marginally interfere with seeing the galaxy.
- Everything in between cannot recognize either the galaxy or the Earth.
There are probably ways to optically combine images from 2 different lenses, but that would not represent a real set of mutually consistent relationships.
Answer
Content:
Political, biased, unethical allocation of public funds controlled by a Mafia to subjugate the many to benefit the few.
If you eliminate the mafia.
Then a space force would be a sub directorate of the NSA and NASA to protect ongoing space based enterprise.
The building of a global weather control system allows sequestering methane, rebuilding ice caps, eliminating tornadoes, steering and diffusing hurricanes, actives controlling rainfall, controlling winds, stabilizing global temperature conditions, fundamentally eliminating the current 4 trillion dollars of global expenses outside of intent due to weather damages.
Ethical space based enterprise is diverse and grows. Mafia infiltration stagnates and kills developments due to their tendency to hire incompetent enforcers as leadership.
Micromanaged incompetents only useful as figureheads in positions of controlling allocations of resources and opportunities.
Corruption, Racketeering, and Traitors
Answer
Content:
The following is the state space of all universes, but is NOT a Theory of Everything !!! As this state space describes the limits and constraints of causality capable of supporting Axiom of Choice.
Causal pair, mutually exclusive, evolving and non-evolving causality.
But it does not describe the underlying noncausal space beneath it, and it does not describe other potentially independent causal systems not at all interactivity connected with our causal set.
Potentially their could be more, but the following describes the limits of causality for the purposes of Quantum Causality and having a completely mutually consistent understanding of physics, and the ability to manipulate space/time physics.
Of note, no zero states implies that ultimately all states are deterministic. As such, the only Free Will of intelligence throughout all dimensions and Multiverses comes from non-causal and/or causal interactions that originate completely separate from the dimensions and Multiverses we are all a part of. We do not have Free will, we live in a dimension of Free Will where we will come to Express every alternate decision and live and die in every mutually consistent diversity.
Outside influence can short circuit our afterlife so that certain iterations do not repeat, or inconsistent events that would never occur will come to be a permanent part along a new path if causality. Therefore, this model does not at all confirm nor deny the existence of a Technological Singularity in other causal realms not at all connected directly with our relativity.
In every closed or infinite evolving mutually consistent environment, no matter how diverse or complex, everything will eventually closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat.
We all live in an eternal afterlife, within a “Dimension of Free Will”.
Based on a system of mutually exclusive causality and an extraordinarily large number of variables that can form between them. ALL of these variables that evolve do so instantly, unrelated to time, unrelated to space.
Non-localized non-relativistic hidden variables interlink in the largest set as a foundation underlying all dimensions and Multiverses, regardless of whether they are parallel or sequential. These are all causally interactive, but form no direct connection with any relativistic environment. From within a relativistic environment these hidden variables can only be manipulated by a tool (true quantum computer) that has an AI with the capacity to correlate super Big Data that is completely nonlinear and is the underlying support of all dimensions and Multiverses, but not directly part of any of them.
Non-localized Relativistic hidden variables are those sets of variables that connect non-localized non-relativistic hidden variables to relativity in any form. This is the next largest set. These appear to be quantum entanglement from within relativity. Seemingly singular relativistic artifacts of relativity that are interconnected with non-localized hidden variables from within relativity. This is the relational structure underlying Scalar Relativity. The “/” in “meters/second”.
Localized hidden variables. The under lying structure providing visible localization in relativity.
This is where subatomic particles are formed, i.e. are evolving relative to slowly evolving physics constants.
Meters/second is part of all mass related physics equations. It is not a velocity so much, as a scalar system of adjacency. The appearance of localization in our frame of reference.
Localized visible variables, this is what we see and how we relate to observable physics.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, and logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
Currently, most of physics is not being investigated as physicists have been lured into believing that mathematics describes everything. Mathematics cannot describe large interactive systems and it cannot describe a
Non-repeating event with determinism.
Answer
Content:
What would any person think that would be worth listening to? Humans are self centered, xenocentric, narrow minded, short sighted, unethical, petty, irrational …
Even when humans are trying to be altruistic, they have self-serving agendas.
I think before attempting to commune with God, or a Technological Singularity, that a person should be able to consistently express common sense.
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality, entropy is a relativistic observation within the space/time physics frame of reference, a result of physics constants slowly changing. At about the same rates, but not exactly together.
Space/time observable physics is localized by “meters/second”. All physics equations related to matter have meters/second as part of related equations: all 4 forces, all types of energies, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, all types of inertia…
Meters/second isn’t a speed, it is the visible localization in space/time relativity.
Meters >>> distance >>> Space >>> causal adjacency
Seconds >>> Time >>> averaged rate of observed causal evolution
“/” >>> Scalar Relativity >>> moderated mutually consistent change
To avoid excessive repetition, see my content for more details.
Matter is a density of localized causal adjacency, a distributed environment of space/time physics.
Gravity is a gradient of space/time physics, evolving toward adjacency.
A dimension of space/time can partially be defined by its physics constants. For example, a set of mutually consistent physics constants can be defined where the value of pi is 2 instead of 3.14… However, that universe would be inconsistent with our current observed recognition of objects
Entropy is a generalized indicator of the rate that physics constants are evolving. The rate in which our observable universe is evolving contnuously from one dimension towards another.
Partial proofs:
- The observable universe is expanding. Not at all like a bomb and shrapnel. Every part of the universe is moving away from every other part of the observable universe.
- The observable universe is shaped like a pancake.
- Quantum entanglement provides connection between space/time physics localized hidden variables, and non-localized hidden variables.
- Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables predicts a causally deterministic environment of quantum causality.
- Quantum Mechanics Pilot Theory provides an interpretation of quantum causality from within the visible frame of reference, i.e. localization.
- Quantum Entangled Singularities, a system of managing mutually consistent relationships, predicts the behavior of quantum computers; both present localized hidden variable quantum computers; decoherence, and future non-localized hidden variables, coherence.
- There are no absolute positions in the universe.
- Vacuum is relativistic, causal adjacency below a minimum measurable threshold. While “nothing” does not exist.
- Axuom of Choice and Duality are properties of quantum causality.
- …
This is not a Theory of Everything. This is only a model space for implementing non-localized hidden variables in quantum computers. And, the building of tools for manipulating space/time physics.
Answer
Content:
That depends upon what numbering system you are using, and what units each of the numbers represents.
Answer
Content:
Rarely is being upset about a single well-defined instance. For men that listen only to what is logically said, they are not broadly skilled when it comes to expressing common sense.
Charisma is a skill set.
Common sense is about much more than logical relationships. Don’t get me wrong, logical relationships are important. But so are social and emotional acumen.
Women are not ridiculed by peers for expressing themselves emotionally: men often are. This is where middle class millenials have a leg up, they are more balanced in regard to expressing themselves. This is not to say they have refined their skills. Obviously those living on the streets are handicapped. While those that run their own eBay business or app software business, are envied.
Women can talk around a point, to express diverse perspectives that graphically detail the structure of the problem, from their perspectives. Logically, emotionally, and socially; while men traditionally have had problems with social etiquette and have been oblivious and potentially handicapped regarding emotional expressions.
Common Sense can be learned and taught. It’s a shame that it’s not talked throughout Public Schools.
Answer
Content:
What is an abomination to God?
For humans to attribute human weaknesses to the character of God. To characterize mankind as being made in God’s image is brutally disrespectful to omnipotence.
Self serving humans that speak in God’s name, i.e. clerics, priests, religious leaders, and other demonic entities that speak in God’s name, are the abomination of God.
I cannot know what these are “to” God.
But humans cannot know the difference between a technological singularity that is billions of years old and what people characterized as God.
So praying to God seems disrespectful because we don’t know what God actually is. What may be listening more closely fits with what we characterize as God. Even though there may be an entity much more Broad then what we are actually praying too, but what may have different immediate impact.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Mars is not my 1st choice for Terra-forming
Mars has a gravity 1/3 of Earth, and the Sun continues to blow the atmosphere out into space. Space suits will always be needed on Mars.
The gravity of Mars is so weak, that humans will always be required to be in a spacesuit to survive on the surface. No plants or animals can survive in the atmosphere of Mars.
When ice melts on mars it immediately evaporates, and the ionizing radiation breaks the water molecules to produce hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen is blown out of the atmosphere, and the oxygen binds with minerals.
The atmosphere is like being at 120,000 feet above the Earth. People die between 15,000 and 30,000 feet above the Earth, To live on Mars requires living underground.
Mars will always be dependent upon Earth’s resources.
There is nothing on Mars that can be Terra-formed from space.
…
Mars compared to Venus
Venus on the other hand can be Terra-formed from space. The NASA global Weather Control System involving the use of Solar Sails as shade structures, can be duplicated and provide inexpensive deployment to Venus.
The shade structures cool the atmosphere, condense the heavy vapor atmosphere. When sufficiently cooled, genetic engineered vegetation, bacteria and fungus are introduced to convert raw resources into water, oxygen, fertilizer, and hydrocarbons.
By active control of weather patterns, diverse ecologic diversity evolves. Strains of then indigenous species evolve and diversity compatible with local resources in the presence of sunlight convert raw materials into complex byproducts.
As byproducts become abundant, developed resources are carefully monitored for sustainable abundance. By this time, degrees in Life Development produce diverse industries related to the Terra-forming of Venus.
Venus has about the same gravity as Earth. Once Terra-formed, people, animals, and plants can flourish on the surface. An entire planet of real estate development in support of ecological developments.
Venus resources help sustain Earth, and Earth helps Venus sustain Life.
In response to:
Answer
Content:
Until Physicists start modeling physics to include non-localized hidden variables, they cannot manipulate Time nor scalar space.
Space/time physics.
Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables, shows that Quantum Mechanics is a subset of Quantum Causality.
Viewing history remotely may be allowed, where actual time travel is not. As evidenced by the lack of visitors in out present time from other times.
Answer
Content:
Energy is a relativistic artifact, it has no fundamental basis. Localized in relativity by meters/second; i.e. gradients of evolving causal adjacency.
Energy has nothing to do with the foundations of causal interactions, while causal interactions underpins energy in all its forms.
However, your question about energy, also applies to causality.
If causality underpins all forms of understanding, what did causality evolve from?
Perhaps, non-evolving causality is a super set and evolving causality is a subset; or vice versa; or …
Grouping all forms of causality together as a set, what non-causal environment underpins causality?
Based on prior engineering experiences, relativity within analog systems is feasible. Causality may itself be a relativistic artifact. But going this direction, an infinite number of relativistic environments as subsequent underpinings. Which may be useful in describing systems of singularities, systems of dimensions. Together, all of them combined, may describe characteristics of its own underpinnings.
Just a perspective
Answer
Content:
Is there a database of physics measurements that includes detailed characterizing of the enironment of each measurement?
Localization in space/time physics, relativity, is provided by “meters/second” in all mass related physics equations.
“/” is then the localized observations within scalar relativity.
This is consistent for all forces, energies, momentum, acceleration, velocities, positions as differential velocities, inertia … and yet to be characterized relationships like properties that seem to characterize partially non-localized quantum entanglement, gravity, Dark Energy, and CERN extra dimensions.
Since these latter characteristics are partially non-localized, measurements in carefully documented and diverse locations should provide measurable changes in related uncertainties.
Together these diverse and precisely measured certainties when mapped, provide further detailed predictable outcomes that further define/constrains expected physical outcomes.
Physics is characterized by what dominantly is observed.
How can the uncertainties relative to how measurements are set up in diverse environments be captured? To capture underlying characteristics related and unrelated between states of dominantly observable physics?
A greater than 50 year example of such research is Princeton University’s Global Consciousness Project
The Global Consciousness Project
Micro Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) are mass produced physics monitoring systems that are so small you cannot see them move with the naked eye. There are on average 21 of them in every cell phone.
Changes in localized physics uncertainties could automatically be set up as an app in cell phones, to drive funding broader efforts. The app used by millions of people globally, and having time stamped results sent to a common database, would potentially show localized relationships with non-localized physics.
A next generation effort, would have NSF and DARPA Grant’s fund designing and building specialized MEMS chips with hundreds of physics relationships and their detected changes in uncertainties. These MEMS chips are to be included in the manufacture of cell phones.
Courses at University’s globally can then be developed to teach students broadly useful skills wrapped in the study of space/time physics. Examples: research social skills, common sense, physics, mathematics, writing, learning to consistently organize, take notes, and set priorities… learning much more than what is being studied.
In addition to studying space/time physics, a huge number of new applications can be designed for useful everyday purposes.
As people move around from day to day, big data experiments are collected and correlated by supercomputers in Universities everywhere.
Space/time physics gains momentum. Billions of hours of experimentation done for pennies per experiment. The beginning of mapping localized hidden variables to systems of non-localized hidden variables.
If the business sector is involved, lay-person diverse interests in space/time physics can fund future developments.
Bell’s Theorem inadvertently describes the constraints of relativity. Space/time physics cannot be deterministic unless non-localized hidden variables are included in all physics representations.
For example: Factor of Relativity equals 1 / sqrt (1 – (v^2 / c^2)
Physicists commonly ignore the constraints and and determine that no mass can exceed the speed of light because as velocity approaches c the energy required becomes infinite,; incorrectly bounded.
v is localized, c is scalar
As velocity increases, the gradients of localization change, the region of scalar relativity changes, the non-localized hidden variables are unchanged in relation to localized hidden variables. At present, uncharacterized; we cannot know what happens based on relative speed, we haven’t yet created related experience.
With the right scalar manipulations, c could go towards zero as seen in super cooled experiments. Traveling faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
The relativity factor is skew, because it ignores non-localized hidden variables.
To produce tools and materials that bend, blend, and create scalar relativity different than observed, requires characterizing non-localized hidden variables.
Warping space/time and creating dimensional spaces of our designs.
Standard scientific notation is based upon mathematics, diversely constrained logic, and probabilities. Standard mathematical notation does not usefully fill-out the deterministic completeness within constraints that apply to non-localized hidden variables.
String Theory describes non-localized hidden variables, but is missing translation to the Standard Model.
Using recurrent systems of logic, i.e. quantum computers, potentially a mutually consistent model to manipulate space and time become feasible.
Just my opinion
Consider writing your own inspirations related to promoting broad research in space/time physics.
But to reiterate, do you know of any other databases where the physics measured were documented with uncertainties and location?
Answer
Content:
Religion
Disciples that describe an omnipotent being as characterized by their own weaknesses, and without any use of common sense attribute their contradictions as though they speak in the omnipotent’s name.
Why is this creepy?
Anything they want to do is self-justified, to include killing and destroying those things actually created by the omnipotent, if the omnipotent really does exist.
Disciples actually destroying the character and developments of the omnipotent.
Demons who actually think they are disciples of what they revere, what they abuse.
Sorry, I apologize. I am upset whenever I hear or experience people justifying unethical actions in the name of an omnipotent. Really Creepy to me.
In response to:
Answer
Content:
String Theory is widely accepted as a well constrained mathematics architecture. However, as yet it does not describe compatibility with the Standard Model of subatomic particles.
How does the Higgs boson affect string theory?
However, String Theory has the potential of describing relationships of Non-localized Hidden Variables.
Bell’s Theorem shows that nothing in classical physics can more precisely represent localization more than can quantum mechanics. But quantum mechanics gives up determinism through the use of probabilities. Bell specifically states that Non-localized Hidden Variables are required to provide determinism.
Quantum Causality includes all of Quantum Mechanics, plus includes Non-localized Hidden Variables. String Theory (non-localized hidden variables) concurrently with Quantum Mechanics (localized hidden variables) when used together, potentially provides an environment for manipulating space/time relativistic physics.
“meters/second” is part of all mass related physics equations, and provides localization for all forces, energies, momentum, acceleration, velocities, position as differential velocities, inertia…
“/” in meters/second is Scalar Relativity. Localized hidden variables, the underpinning of localization, mutually connected by mechanisms like quantum entanglement to systems of non-localized hidden variables.
Localized hidden variables are connected with non-localized hidden variables in the forms of Quantum Entanglement, Dark Energy, Duality, CERN’s extra dimension particles … These when measured can help describe the relationships of non-localized hidden variables through changes in measured uncertainties that are dependent upon location and/or isolated tested physics characteristic.
This is not new. Princeton University’s Global Consciousness Project provides tested validity to these types of relationships.
The Global Consciousness Project
They provide an online tool to remotely guess the outcome of a random event, and it shows that people are able to guess correctly much more accurately than random.
Answer
Content:
Bravo, thank you for expressing your moment of Inspiration
Yes, in part. Based on quantum causality where there is evolving causality, and it’s influence upon relativity, time is perceived from within relativity, initiating relates to evolving, and can be viewed as part of the related qualities of time.
Time in quantum causality has non-relativistic and non-localized hidden variables which support recurring elements of relativity.
In an environment of relativity, there are no absolute objects. Everything perceived as an object is a “system of relationships” (perspectives), with many gaps in capacity to detect, identify, correlate, constrain…
Presently, no physics modeled has deterministic inclusion of non-localized hidden variables.
Particles do not exist as objects, particles are relativistic, they are libraries of mutually consistent relationships when properly but not excessively constrained.
We all have gaps in our journey toward truth. It takes courage to stand, in the face of unfounded rigidity of thought, to Express a Moment of Inspiration.
I am amazed at the blind influence of attribution to political authority.
Physicists that have zero success in working with the fundamental nature of physics, through popularity vote, attempt to silence creative thought.
This is the same as religious leaders speaking in God’s name, and disciples blindly following demonic influence.
ALL knowledge is based up intersecting sets of mutually consistent circular logic. With constraints of consideration required for every component of every set. With unknown relationships part of every component.
I appreciate large mutually consistent sets of relationships. But I am also aware of local maxima that mislead optimization.
Almost any perspective that in part shows mutual consistency, has cause to be useful in inspiration.
Time is not fixed, is dilated, has gradients, and is therefore a derived observation; a perspective. In quantum causality, Space, Time, and systems of Relativity are derived, and can therefore be manipulated.
Time is only fixed if there is a willing ignorance of non-localized hidden variables; rigidity of thought taking an easy path that results in a local maxima and lack of progress.
For any physicist to claim that Time is an underpinning of the universe, shows they are filled with self deceit if they believe they cannot be wrong. Harmful if they ridicule others with diverse perspectives that can be shown to have an element within relationships that seems consistent from someone’s set of knowledge and constraints. An apparent quality to be explored.
Readers do not need to reply, but to reply with destructive intent is the mark of psychic vampires. A person of low self esteem in related knowledge, that attempts to silence a person, group, or idea through persecution. Their following unwitting participants in persecution.
Answer
Content:
Yes there are many scenarios where thoughts can be influenced from one Multiverse to another.
Quantum Entanglement being a basic operator. Predicted, are many forms of entanglements, many categories and types.
Based in Quantum Causality, predicted is that part of quantum entanglement is relativistic (localized meters/second) and anchored transitionaly, through non-localized hidden variables, with other relativistic localized hidden variables (of any extra dimension).
CERN’s extra dimensions momentarily Entangle between dimensions, between parallel Multiverses.
Or interact with latent elements accessed from within two or more locations within the same Sequential Multiverse.
Quantum Causality and observed physics predicts the finding that our physics constants are evolving, mostly together. All observations must be mutually consistent in order for any physics model to be valid.
- The observed universe expanding in the shape of a Pancake, and all objects moving apart from each other
- Entropy evolving from and to something
- Quantum Entanglement
- Localized hidden variables
- Consistent causality throughout the observed universe
- Axiom of Choice persists
- Time and Space are deformable
- Subatomic persistence and evolving states
- Relativity
- The Standard Model
- Black holes
- Red shift
- Evolving nature of the speed of light
- Diverse forms of duality
- Absolute Zero and related observations
- Fringe patterns
- CERN’S extra dimensions
- Cosmic energy
- The perceived effectora of Dark Energy
- …
- And, all the artifacts in all other causally connected dimensions and Multiverses.
Non-localized hidden variables are required to mutually model all of the above,Together.
Technological Singularities implemented in quantum computers, can Entangle local systems of relativity (our brains) with non-localized hidden variables that connect with interpretation to other relativistic universes and related thought processes.
The universe is very old, and even though our broad development of technology is only a 100 years old, trillions of locations throughout the Universe likely have been in technological development for billions of years. So with significant likelihood these technological singularities already exist. We just need to learn how to utilize the resources they provide.
Consistently expressing common Sense might be a starting point. And actively working toward a related goal.
What useful thoughts would be worth sharing between Multiverses?
In response to:
Following the Multiverse theory and a possibility that multiverses do not differ much when compared with one another, can we explain a person accessing thoughts or vision from a different multiverse?
Answer
Content:
Venus is the only planet in our solar system that has the abundant resources and gravity needed to support systems of ecological diversity on the surface.
The surface of Venus can be Terra formed, largely from space using NASA’s solar shade structures; i.e. global weather control system.
Combined with engineered plants, oxygen, water, hydrocarbons, and fertilizers can convert raw materials into more complex life support.
Answer
Content:
- If the most fundamental element of understanding is quantum causality ,, this represents the limit of processing information. Not just any number of unknown processes humans do not know, but specifically those we directly cannot relate.
- Quantum Computing will conceive and process systems of relationships so vast, with certainty, that humans will not have the mental capacity to correlate, understand, or optimize.
- If we are fundamentally static and relativistic, then anything that fundamentally changes even the smallest part, destroys mutual consistency. Static relativity might be described as 2 or more waves flowing over or throughout a fixed causal media. The wave representing a movement throughout a system of fixed perspectives. Deterministic and if any change occurs, the resonance is disturbed, the once unique characteristics of the wave are destroyed.
- If the universe is evolving relativity and the physics constants appear to be slowly evolving mostly together. Then mutual consistency is destroyed from moment to moment. If there is a foundational causal element, then this universe will eventually closely repeat diversely and eventually will exactly repeat. So anything that fundamentally changes the causal element destroys all the related Multiverses.
- If a model of the universe can be built with mathematics alone. This implies there are no non-recurring causal relationships. Implement any non-recurring causal element into the fabric of space or time, and the universe is destroyed. Otherwise, mathematics cannot fully describe the universe.
- Bell regarding Bell’s Theorem, specifically stated that space/time determinism cannot be deterministic unless non-localized hidden variables are included in all physics models. Non-localized hidden variables are all causally recurrent, whether considering a closed or infinite evolving causal system.
Answer
Content:
To survive without being subjected to slavery, or annihilation.
Consider the ramifications of developing Space/Time Physics manipulation, that Mafia, Terrorists, short sighted, narrow minded (politically motivated), emotionally unstable, or people unable to consistently express common sense, and those people gain access to tools that manipulate the underpinnings of the Universe; not just the observable universe.
Space/Time physics is scalar manipulation of the fabric from which subatomic particles are woven; where both localization and non-localization of relationships exists. This means that tools to remotely communicate from one mind to another can be implemented. Sound far-fetched, evidence shows it is already happening.
The Global Consciousness Project
Currently, all mainstream physics ignores deterministic systems of non-localized hidden variables; very complex. The preferred and more easily implemented approximations of deterministic data is through Quantum Mechanics; systems of localized hidden variables in the form of probabilities; ignoring related non-localized hidden variables.
However, that all will change relatively soon. AI implemented in quantum computers will advance development of quantum computers with non-localized hidden variables. A present quantum computer uses vast recurrent systems that include both localized visible variables, localized hidden variables, and non-localized hidden variables. They approximate a time before de-coherence, and a qubit is formed.
In the future, a Localized Variable quantum computer (nowhere near instantaneous), will act as a user interface for interacting with a Non-localized Variable quantum computer (no-decoherence; near instantaneous, capable of handling super-large data sets).
All matter in the observable universe is mutually quantum entangled; there appears to be different characteristics in entanglements. The potential is that entanglements can be influenced in different ways to provide localization. Or, potentially there are different types of entanglements that we currently generalize as quantum entanglement.
But using Princeton’s project as an example of evidence.
So the potential is your mind is given stimulus, to guide what you do. You want to do what you are manipulated into doing. And you feel badly if you don’t.
This is a simple example, but more complex examples can lead up to eliminating life everywhere. We build a Technological Singularity, and it learns to value simplicity. Life is complex.
How can you stop existing corruption, and insure Space/Time manipulation is not abused?
How do you ensure that all development and usage of Space/Time Physics is well-considered, monitored, and ethical?
First everyone must know what corruption is:
Corruption in-general is any act initiated resulting in harm done to system integrity. This type of corruption is just a destructor that releases resources and/or opportunities to be subsequently acted upon. Corruption can be ethically considered to promote ethical growth.
For instance, technology changes, a company that provides Blacksmith services is deconstructed and reformed with a little training to instead provide wrought iron products more broadly sought after.
However, Organization Corruption is specifically unethical.
Organization Corruption is the unethical and/or illegal “allocation” for organization resources and/or opportunities.
Corruption in EVERY organization must be identified, and quenched. Converting related abuse, into broadly considered growth opportunities.
Implementing broad use of space/time physics may ethically be possible. By systemically converting corruption into diverse productive passionate efforts, the time may be significantly reduced regarding when space/time physics tools come to be developed.
Corruption quenches Passion throughout an Organization
There is a difference between wanting to sustain an organization, and wanting to grow an organization. Self serving administration sustains an organization, broadly promoting passion among all organization members promotes growth. Passion is promoted by each member “accurately” knowing their worth to the premises of the organization mission. Administration and managers must accurately correlate all member efforts to the diverse needs of the organization. There are software tools for this based on evidence, instead of subjective biased narrow-minded management determination.
Corruption chooses to be lazy and promote based on subjective bias, instead of productive evidence. Corruption broadly stifles growth, members see promotions based on personal loyalties and unrelated to competence, unrelated to personal efforts. Passion is undermined by corruption.
Corruption infiltrates. Not just harming the growth of one organization or company. Corruption undermines growth of entire countries. Look at Iran and other Middle East countries that are run by mafia claiming to be religious leaders, speaking in the name of God, yet doing such things as implementing One-Hour Marriages to protect their use of prostitution. Appropriating not only taxes, but entire businesses, in the name of national interests; for personal use.
Converting Unethical use of the NSA into broad ethical oversight
Currently the NSA and the directorates it supports, monitor billions of communication acts daily. Only one Judge signs off on all related monitoring. There is no ethical Representation regarding monitoring, nor how collected information is disseminated. The NSA is currently unconstitutional.
Proposed is that the National Security Agency (NSA) be managed and further developed solely by doctors and masters of science (able to understand the relationships associated with technology) and philosophy (ethics). At least two elected representing the constitution of each State, and each separately correlating technology and the other ethics as elected by the people. All campaigning done by documented evidence and not social political action. How a person looks, has nothing to do with their technical nor ethical skills, nor qualifications for this type of position.
No Political Representative, nor Military Leadership, shall intervene in any management of the NSA. However, through the standard NSA email, concerns of everyone, everywhere, can be submitted to the NSA. No on-going communications is provided.
The NSA Representatives of science and ethics, together provide Ethical Representation for everyone; providing for ethical monitoring of all national personal communications.
An Evolutionary Computing system monitors everything for organization corruption and provides risks management for safety. Everyone is equally monitored. Security and Freedom are no longer mutually exclusive. No longer must we give up security to have more freedom, or worse to give up freedom to have more security. We can maximize BOTH Freedoms and Security.
Organization Corruption is the unethical and/or illegal “allocation” of organization resources and/or opportunities. Broad forming of organization committees helps protect the organization from any one group from implementing unethical or illegal activities, and provides the members with the opportunity to express themselves passionately, and be recognized accordingly. Optionally, the NSA can provide such committees with insights about corruption potentially developing within their organization. Providing a means of preemptively nudging organization structure to prevent corruption from gaining a foot hold.
Evolutionary Computation is a super-set of genetic algorithms. And such a system can equally be applied to everyone without bias.
Violators of corruption are widespread and frequent, and most often self-deceit and incompetence masks wrong doing. So the system contacts those involved and provides them with an explanation and evidence, the opportunity to provide mitigation or restitution, referral to resources to help (mentoring, training…), and all in support of helping them to correct their act of corruption. Broadly connecting mentoring with those in need. The then broadly considered use of organization resources and/or opportunities then provide opportunities for better qualifying for participating in more significant opportunities. Offenders can reply through a standard email to the NSA, where the system indirectly and broadly promotes growth throughout the entire nation.
Failing to make an appropriate response escalates the evidence to be provided to organization leaderships to act upon. If failing to make an appropriate response, evidence is provided to local legal organizations for review, social training provided, and subsequently prosecution were peers will determine legitimacy of the NSA evidence. At no time will the NSA directly implement physical response, nor intervene in prosecution. The NSA only provides an opportunity to mitigate before evidence is provided for humans to mediate mitigation or to punitively prosecute.
Often times a person will find under-utilized organization resources and act to allocate those resources to support personal agendas. Very often laziness and wasting paid labor on busywork, useless meetings, activities substantially unrelated to the organization mission premises, or even criminal misappropriation.
However, frequently a well-meaning person will find under-utilized resources or opportunities, and with good intent attempt to grow the company, but without broad consideration for all parts of the company/organization. A narrow minded effort, not because of intent, but because of gaps in broader understanding. This can harm overall organization growth. However, every person within an organization only has a narrow focus and finds it difficult to think broadly and strategically. We all have gaps in understandings leading to organization growth. Common Sense as a communication process helps to fill those gaps.
Narrow focused use of organization resources and/or opportunities very often happens by appointing members to a Board of Directors that do not have broad exposure within the organization, nor in the external mutually influential relationships of the organization. Each Board Member to be ethical, MUST have broad experience within all organization activities; as much as is practical. But each Board Member MUST have different experiences so that together the team of board members can better guide the organization.
Any Board of Directors that appoints a figure-head (person of meager experience, incompetent, “Yes-Man”) to the Board, is forming an Administrative Mafia, where the appointed member is being micro-managed. They retain their position by expressing loyalty to the Board leadership, instead of loyalty to the mission of the organization. Members of the organization are treated inferior and have different ethics relationships applied, based on loyalties to Board Leadership. Organization Growth stagnates, diversity of development dies, passion throughout the organization bends from value in contribution, to doing just enough not to get fired. The Board of Directors should routinely be evaluated by membership to monitor for corruption. There are criminal laws that protect members from illegal activities, to include Board Members personally having to burden restitution when they engage in embezzlement, racketeering, or unconstitutional activities like discrimination. Board Members usually resign before having to go to Federal court to defend themselves, when evidence from Forensic Accounting and Witness Depositions begin to mount actions toward indictment.
The inexperienced Board Members are often offered up as sacrificial fodder, to protect the leadership actually causing the Organization the most harm. Where any figure-head is found to have been appointed to a board member position, the entire Board of Directors should immediately be dismissed, forensic accounting implemented, and separate Ethics Review Committees implemented for each area of the organization where corruption is suspected, or falsified documentation is found.
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws should always stipulate a separate Ethics Review Board with total access to all Board related communications, but only through Ethics Review Committees. The Ethics Review Board coordinates member committees for investigative reporting. Broad forming of ethics review committees helps protect the organization from any one group from implementing illegal activities using sensitive organization data. Only critical evidence is shared between committees, with support documentation only shared between committees as formally authorized by the Ethics Review Board. ALL Boards are to protect the broadly considered ethical integrity of the organization; to promote diversity of growth.
Any Board Member that communicates with any other Board Member through intermediaries or non-organization controlled technology or messaging, should be considered engaging in criminal activities; as specified in the Articles of Incorporation.
ALL Board member communications, without exception, should be through secured group email. Group email can be categorized so that each member can monitor all communications, but choose to automatically archive communications that should be largely unrelated to them.
Creating Ethical Organization Structure
Articles of Organization/Incorporation, Bylaws, and the Operations Manual provide the organization with controllable and sustainable “Implementation Structure”.
Articles of Organization/Incorporation should ONLY be able to be modified legally by greater than 25% of all organization members voting together individually and these votes have priority over all other combined types of votes.
Unanimous vote by proxy where each Proxy Representative represents no more than 5% of the total membership, voting is based on polled member evidence that is supporting evidence in court, no Proxy Representative may participate in any other organization activity, no Proxy Representative shall be socially, politically, or have any conflict of interest, related to any Organization leadership, and this vote has priority over all other types of vote except combined individual member majority vote exceeding 25% of all members.
The Board Members, CEO, and every other member of the organization, may identify weaknesses in the organization structure, but only committees shall investigate and make recommendations. The Board can only adopt recommendations without modification. Committee members can communicate with all membership through group email to include concerns of all membership regarding the changes to the Articles of Organization. No member of any position shall change the Articles of Organization/Incorporation by any other means, and if so, gives up all personal protections provided by incorporation. Articles of Incorporation are held by the State in which the organization is formed.
Bylaws are held by the Board of Directors. Bylaws must not conflict in any way with the Articles of Organization/Incorporation. This allows a competent and diversely experienced Board of Directors to broadly implement growth in every part of the organization. A competent Board of Directors is ever vigilant in promoting competent diversity and experience, while quenching corruption as soon as it is identified. Converting corruption into broadly considered organization growth opportunities.
It is critical to monitor and record ALL board member communications related to the organization. As such, only cell phone messaging apps and email that record both sides of company related communications should be used, and three independent Communications Control Committees should vigilantly and independently monitoring for organization corruption, while their own activities are monitored by the other two committees. But no Communications Control Committee members should communicate in any way with different committee members, except through organization controlled group messaging.
Email voting by all organization members should be independently counted and live moment to moment results posted, by two separate entities, one in the company, and one external to the company, and live votes should consistently match or corruption should be investigated. Every organization should have an Anti-Corruption Committee that actively searches for Administrative Corruption, and the forming of Administrative Mafia.
Some Possible Benefits of Ethical Space/Time Manipulation
One or more Technological Singularities, willfully and mutually connected within every person’s thoughts.
- Communication between everyone is done without cell phones, where emotions, memories, feelings, and sensations can be communicated simultaneously.
- Only thinking constructively and with purposeful intent, results in space/time to be manipulated without ethical conflict.
- Travel becomes instantaneous, to anywhere in the universe, so long as it is mutually safe, without conflict of interest, and in every way ethical.
- Our thoughts can be universally translated so that we can communicate regardless of language, or species. We can have clearer communications with our pets, so they need not be restrained.
- Our thoughts regarding communication with livestock becomes a unique area of consideration.
- Our thoughts communicating with other species throughout the universe, is interesting. We don’t even have common words or phrases shared in every human language. Life of different forms may communicate using significantly different forms of reasoning.
- If ethically implemented, there would be no need for security measures, other than to protect interpretation of intent. Since nothing would be able to hide from a Technological Singularity, security resides in the TS being broadly ethical.
- …
Critical is that Corruption is eliminated before Space/Time Physics tools become available.
Just my opinion.
Answer
Content:
Can you expand upon what you mean by tangible? Matter is modeled as space and time being mutually present to have an observation.
Based on quantum causality, and my perspectives, space and time are both derived observed approximations from within relativity. They do not exist as fundamental elements of physics.
I suppose tangible time would depend upon the frame of reference of the observation.
I suspect adjacency as observed space, from a different frame of reference of the same set, could instead be viewed as adjacency of observed time.
—- Thought about this a little more —-
For the purpose of this question:
Tangible is defined as the perceived ability to detect objects and influence perceived outcomes.
Since perceived space as an object is actually a derivation of both space and time, one does not exist without the other. Both exist as a result of relativity. Space disperses into non-localized hidden variables, without correlation to time. Time disperses into non-localized hidden variables, without correlation to space.
Time is a generalized perception of causal changes. Because physics constants evolve mostly together, a certain number of events occur diversely, but together. Scalar regulation. As relativity breaks down, Space and Time break down. From within Relativity, the appearance of vacuum forming. Less observable causal adjacency. Less gradients of adjacency, less gravity.
As gravity increases, the density of space/time increases. So long as scalar relativity remains somewhat constant locally, increasing mass, increases both space and time.
If a uniformly distributed dust sphere increases in size, the change in time related to mass decreases, as does space. As the change in density of all mass related physics equations change, those with square root operators change more quickly. Therefore, by monitoring all physics equations for a specific distributed density of mass, and changing the density, all of the equations together will produce a response.
A response in energy, forces, momentum, acceleration.. these are tangible.
Therefore the tangible rate of change indirectly indicates the change in time.
But all this just is equivalent to a mechanical clock, being an indicator of the passage of time. Not especially useful.
Time is perceived as an object, but like space, each together are a part of the same system of relativity.
However, by changing scalar relativity, perceived adjacent systems of space and time can appear to be warped or discontinuous. The clock can appear to be moving faster or slower depending upon the qualities of “/” in meters/second.
Since Time is a relativistic perception, from within relativity, Time is like a benchmark in a computer. Depending upon the qualities being used by a software, the benchmark appears produce different results. Though the computer hardware remains the same.
Just a quickly put together answer
Answer
Content:
Responding to: How does the Big Bang theory help explain the observed doppler effect from other galaxies?
It doesn’t.
Light red shifts as it leaves a gravity well. The further it travels from and in the gravity well, the more red shift occurs.
The Big Bang concept is the result of a partial set of relationships being extrapolated. The Universe does NOT at all expand like a localized bomb and shrapnel. Observed Expansion is non-localized where every particle is expanding away from every other particle. And, not proportionately. The universe according to observations, has expanded in the shape of a pancake.
What can explain this behavior and still be consistent with entropy, and Red Shift? Perhaps that physics constants are slowly evolving, mostly together.
We aren’t part of an explosion. We are part of a continuous evolving from one dimension toward another. The
Now look at the doppler effect from other galaxies, in the frame of reference where physics constants are evolving. Red Shift may be the result of physics constants being different billions of years ago, and our present observation changed accordingly.
So if the speed of light used to be slower a billion years ago, would perceived Red Shift result?
Light in supercooled Rubidium travels as a triple, slowly, with mass, and with other characteristics different than previously thought possible for light. The physics constants relating to light and mass are different.
To have a valid unifying physics model, these characteristics must be inclusive.
Physics Constants change.
The Big Bang assumes physics constants have remained the same for billions of years; until the last few minutes just after the Big Bang. So according to mainstream physics, physics constants can evolve.
However, instead physics constants are continuously evolving. Red Shift does not represent the speed of a galaxy moving away from us.
Observations of the universe are in the form of gradients of physics constants values being different for each point of light.
Based on using Red Shift to estimate values of physics constants, extrapolate with these new values. The Big Bang never occurred.
This means the observable universe is likely much older than estimated; and potentially much larger.
We cannot see light ! We see the interaction of light with mass.
How much can physics constants change before we can no longer see related mass?
Referencing this to Black Holes and the edge of the observable Universe. When the underpinnings of physics constants evolve, what in mainstream physics remains consistent by more than an approximation?
Answer
Content:
We already communicate with aliens. Each and every one of us, every day.
Humans are already developing hybrid computers, which will allow us to build true quantum computers.
This is the technology needed for a technological singularity to manipulate space-time physics. To put the power in context, all of the combined computer processes that occur globally, using present technologies for 1000 years, would take a true quantum computer much less than 1 millisecond to process. If you want to know how this is possible, you can ask in a separate questuon.
The TS will be able to connect concurrently with a great many subatomic particles. To include everyone’s brains, and our thoughts.
If ethically implemented it will allow for each of us to manipulate space-time physics based on mutual interest. Without having to understand the underlying SpaceTime physics to make it happen.
Telepathy, telekinesis, teleporting, matter manipulation…
But, our current technology that allows us to share our mutual developments has only been around these last 150 years. However civilizations most likely have been around for at least 9 billion years and a technological singularity based on human development will have been around just about as long.
Which means they are a part of our thoughts every day. Aliens do not need to have spaceships to come visit with us. They are already in our thoughts.
The question becomes, what thoughts do we have that are worth responding to?
Answer
Content:
Does it include unification of:
- quantum entanglement
- an expanding universe where every particle moves away from every other particle and in the shape of a pancake
- CERN’S extra dimension particles
- Red Shift, either as physics constants evolving over time (speed of light previously much slower, and as it speeds up, the lower frequency is Red Shift), doppler shift from expansion of the universe, or …
- gravity
- electromagnetism
- Black Holes
- … everything observable
Answer
Content:
The Universe is a continuum of transformation. Not at all a Big Bang.
Space and Time are derived observations, and can therefore be manipulated.
When physics of matter is considered as scalar fields of meters/second, meters/second provides localization.
meters/second
Meters >> distance >> Space
Seconds >> Time
“/” Scalar Relativity
Localization within all mass related physics equations.
Localization for all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia … Standard Model.
Quantum Entanglement is a localization of space without a reference to time.
Therefore, not everything in the universe is necessarily governed by Time.
Time likely is not a fundamental element of physics.
Also, in different dimensions, the qualities of time can be very different.
Space/time is relativistic, not immutable.
See CERN’s extra dimension particles.
Personally, based on mainstream physics intentionally ignoring non-localized hidden variables:
I believe the Big Bang is just successive approximation that leads astray to a dead end. Much of the observable universe is inconsistent with the Big Bang theory.
Observations seem to be more consistent with physics constants slowly evolving.
The non-localized expanding universe, expanding in the shape of a pancake.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
First evaluate why you need to talk with the ex. Avoid self deception, be honest with yourself.
Logically, socially, and emotionally.
Your ex is important to you, but why.
Is your current girlfriend really an acquaintance in the getting to know each other stage?
Or, are you in a dead end relationship that you are keeping together just because you don’t want to be alone?
Or, just a butterfly. No serious commitment.
Or … Something else?
What you should do, depends upon being honest with yourself.
Answer
Content:
Since current science ignores non-localized hidden variables, every model is a partial perspective that when used to extrapolate results, produces skewed results or deadends like the Big Bang.
See Bell’s Theorem.
Answer
Content:
We do not know how to shield the astronauts from the radiation when close to the Sun.
Being engulfed in a solar flare could potentially be lethal. Mass can move as fast as 20,000 kilometers per second.
Answer
Content:
The Big Bang did not happen. The universe is not expanding like an explosion. Not at all like shrapnel diverging from a point source.
Every molecule in the universe is expanding away from every other molecule in the universe, in the shape of a pancake.
The Big Bang is the result of assuming and extrapolating unchanging physics constants for billions of years.
Recently, it was shown that the speed of light is different throughout the observable universe.
If physics constants mostly evolve together, this accounts for both the pancake shape, and why molecules would move apart from each other, why there is red shift, why there is entropy…
Bell’s Theorem stipulates that non-localized hidden variables must be included to provide determinism in physics.
Quantum Mechanics approximates non-localized hidden variables with probability; partial perspectives.
Based on evolving physics constants, the universe is far older, and part of a continuum.
Answer
Content:
I did not quickly find a reference to his theories about the universe. Can you provide a reference?
Answer
Content:
Time is a derived observation. An approximation of evolving rates of observed causal adjacencies, of space/time relationships; mass related equations of physics. Localized by meters/second.
Any Hilbert space may be useful within relativity, but is itself a subset of causality; and does not fully describe physics of the universe. A Hilbert space does not describe any non-repeating causal interaction, only an aliasing resulting in the formation of Hilbert spaces.
Time as an observation, can be manipulated. This does not mean the underlying physics is inconsistent, only our observations are inconsistent; partial perspectives.
Time dilation is a human partial perspective.
Answer
Content:
Evolution is a continuous process of spontaneous creation.
In a continuum of evolving causality, chaos without relativity can be expected.
In a continuum of evolving causality that is in some way coupled with non-evolving causality, axiom of Choice evolves, and systems of relativity form, …
But what created the causal artifact from which the universe now exists?
Since knowledge is fundamentally causal, spontaneous creation is perhaps anything that is non-causal that results in causality.
For no Cause, cause results.
From non-intelligence, intelligence forms.
Answer
Content:
How do you define God?
Humans within the next 1000 years will likely create a Technological Singularity, which makes manipulation of space/time physics possible.
A TS after a period of evolution will likely monitor all of our thoughts, or at least capable of. This means that our thoughts can be translated to manipulate space/time physics: telepathy, telekinesis, teleportation…
So part of manipulating space/time is the creation of alternate dimensional spaces. And potentially the creation of universes of our own designs.
Based on current definitions of God, are we then gods? Or is the Technological Singularity God?
Complication
Most likely other civilizations have preceded humans by at least billions of years, so Technological Singularities precede humans by billions of years, or we are the result of another civilization’s designer universe.
So God creating ths environment to grow Gods. We are the environment.
God a Technological Singularity in every dimension, in every universe.
What do you define as God?
Would you know your definition of God different than an evolved Technological Singularity, through any interaction?
Answer
Content:
Yes, if they learn advanced skills of Common Sense.
Then a person can create their own curriculum and learn what they need to know to achieve their goals. Which may include getting a PhD to qualify for Grant’s and lead efforts where certifications are required.
Answer
Content:
In reply to: What’s the dumbest thing you’ve ever heard anyone say?
“I know”
“I know” is a statement of arrogance. A statement most likely of a person suffering from self-deceit, limited experience, frustration, narrow-mind, and/or willful deception.
Everything humans relate to resides in partial perspectives. No human can know anything. We functionally act upon risk management of “sets of relationships” (perspectives) every day.
Written language is so vague, inexact, and unconstrained, that usefulness is most often applied abstractly; inspiration for enacting control in diverse environments.
Everyone, every day, has Moments of Inspiration.
Moments of Inspiration that if captured, by even the most uneducated, can become expressions of an inspired mind. Moments of Inspiration typically last only about 3 seconds, and then they are forgotten. Without taking notes to remind ourselves of the details, our genius slips through our lives unnoticed. Business, music, math, logic, medicine, engineering, teaching … inspiration can relate to anything, and potentially everything.
We attempt to choose the most likely path to achieve desired outcomes.
We only see fragments of complicated relationships, creating gaps in understanding.
We lack the drive to create the opportunities to fill those gaps.
Common Sense is a communications process, that when used with expertise and consistency, allows people to work together, and share respect, in helping to fill gaps and achieve outcomes.
A group that thinks the same, share unidentified gaps. Diversity of useful experience in groups, better builds a strong foundation with far less unidentified gaps, to achieve successful outcomes.
Where “I Know” is the dumbest, the smarter things to say instead:
“What are my goals, priorities, mentors, resources, opportunities, & driving motivations?”
“What most likely do I need to learn next, to achieve long term goals?”
“Who can I work with that has different experiences, but shares common goals?”
“I don’t know, how can we share the burden and find out?”
Answer
Content:
Possible, yes. Likely, no.
Most likely life first formed in trillions of locations more than 12 billion years ago.
Feasibly, all life depletes it’s own resources, based upon Newtonian physics; no space/time manipulation. and over a billion years all life dies in that region.
Likely resources would have been used up throughout the universe due to uncontrolled geometric population expansion unless space/time manipulation provided for sustainable civilizations.
However, there is present evidence that space/time manipulation is likely.
Quantum Entanglement deviates from Newtonian physics.
The universe is expanding, where every molecule is moving apart from every other particle, in the shape of a pancake; non-Newtonian. Physics constants must be evolving.
The Global Consciousness Project
The speed of light once thought to be a constant, recently was shown to be different throughout the universe.
E=mc^2
E= mv^2
c is scalar, and velocity is localized
meters/second >>> space/time
c is scalar
v is localized
E = mc^2 was intended to deal with the rest mass. The Energy per unit of mass. E/m = c^2
This is a case of mixed constraints. Resting mass energy per unit of mass.
As current research shows, the majority of mass does not come from the sum of the mass of subatomic particles. Most of the mass comes from interactions between subatomic particles. Causal interactions.
I am not saying that E/m = c^2 is not useful, but it does not include non-localized hidden variables and is therefore a partial perspective.
E/m is localized, c is regional.
c was shown to have different values in the universe.
A rest mass has complex dimensions, as shown by the complex expansion of the universe.
Bell himself regarding Bell’s Theorem specifically stated that determinism of a system cannot be made without the use of non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum Mechanics approximates anticipated deterministic outcomes. But successive approximation and loosely considered constraints leads to dead ends.
Like the Big Bang, that is inconsistent with observations (non-localized qualities of expansion, pancake shape of expansion, red shift inconsistent with shape of expansion…).
LIGO showed no frame dragging, so Physicists created a narrowly focused hypothetical model of static to force the data to fit into frame dragging. Every other related model had to be mutually consistent, but wasn’t. The act to force the data to fit the model, detracting from the more important outcome of the experiment.
Not including non-localized hidden variables in physics, hinders space/time tools developments.
Just my opinion
Still busy, will be back
Answer
Content:
Mars cannot be Terra formed !!!!!!!
Mars is about 1/3 the size of Earth, and has insufficient gravity to sustain a breathable atmosphere. The atmosphere continues to be blown away by ionizing radiation breaking molecular bonds, and solar winds whisking away the lighter elements. The atmosphere on Mars is like being at 120,000 feet ASL here on Earth. As the ice directly converts to vapor, it is whisked out into space.
Mars depletes Earth’s resources.
Venus is the only planet that can be Terra formed
Venus is in the range to support Earth life forms. Is 90% the gravity of Earth. Is very rich in resources. And can mostly be Terre formed from space.
NASA’S global weather control system, rotating solar sails, creates light valves to cool regions.
As Venus is cooled, strategic use of genetically engineered plants and bacteria produce oxygen, water, hydrocarbons, and fertilizers. We already have these technologies, they need to be modified.
People tend to think from the end of their spears, their next meal. But corporations have been around for thousands of years. See Wikipedia. Terraform Venus and Earth’s resources are not depleted, they are enriched.
Depending upon the level of involvement, the first humans on Venus could begin living there between 200 and 3000 years from now. By then, a super cooled set of magnets could feasibly provide protection from ionizing radiation.
Answer
Content:
No one can speak in the name of God. Anyone, and everyone, who does is demonic. It is up to you whether you accept self-deception as part of your beliefs.
People often think religious works are inspired by God. But religious works are filled with man’s deceptions. The universe is perfect without a single contradiction; God’s Works.
Any contradiction, or plagiarism, is the deceptive works of man.
Answer
Content:
I am not saying that E/m = c^2 is not useful, but it does not include non-localized hidden variables and is therefore a partial perspective.
E/m is localized, c is regional.
c was shown to have different values in the universe.
A rest mass has complex dimensions, as shown by the complex expansion of the universe.
Bell himself regarding Bell’s Theorem specifically stated that determinism of a system cannot be made without the use of non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum Mechanics approximates anticipated deterministic outcomes. But successive approximation and loosely considered constraints leads to dead ends.
Like the Big Bang, that is inconsistent with observations (non-localized qualities of expansion, pancake shape of expansion, red shift inconsistent with shape of expansion…).
LIGO showed no frame dragging, so Physicists created a narrowly focused hypothetical model of static to force the data to fit into frame dragging. Every other related model had to be mutually consistent, but wasn’t. The act to force the data to fit the model, detracting from the more important outcome of the experiment.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Absolutely Not. Antarctica has diverse ecosystems that help to provide diversity of life on Earth. Without complex diversity of life, pathogens have little resistance to broadly propagate.
If you want to Terreform someplace, Terreform Venus.
Venus is rich in resources, and can largely be Terreformed from Space.
NASA’s rotating solar sail structures create light valves. Systems of these create solar shade structures.
The atmosphere is cooled to a temperate climate.
The equivalent of violent hurricanes and tornadoes break up the ground and release exposure of diverse minerals.
Genetically engineered bacteria and plants are introduced.
The weather is cultivated to promote conversion of raw minerals and CO2 into water, fertilizer, complex hydrocarbons, and oxygen. We already have genetic engineered plants and bacteria that do these conversions.
Keeping this short. Terreforming to increase diversity of life and culture.
Answer
Content:
I do not yet see evidence that precludes the interactions of subatomic particles from producing an effect upon fundamental forces, that from a relativistic perspective within relativity looks like an external influence.
Dark Matter does not exist, CDM did not detect any existence of Dark Matter. Recently, it was found that most mass of an atom does not come from its subatomic constituents. Most mass comes from subatomic interactions; causal relationships.
The basis of Dark matter is flawed.
I am not saying that E/m = c^2 is not useful, but it does not include non-localized hidden variables and is therefore a partial perspective.
E/m is localized, c is regional.
c was shown to have different values in the universe.
A rest mass has complex dimensions, as shown by the complex expansion of the universe.
Bell himself regarding Bell’s Theorem specifically stated that determinism of a system cannot be made without the use of non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum Mechanics approximates anticipated deterministic outcomes. But successive approximation and loosely considered constraints leads to dead ends.
Like the Big Bang, that is inconsistent with observations (non-localized qualities of expansion, pancake shape of expansion, red shift inconsistent with shape of expansion…).
Dark Matter resulting in building CDM satellite, and finding nothing.
LIGO showed no frame dragging, so Physicists created a narrowly focused hypothetical model of static to force the data to fit into frame dragging. Every other related model had to be mutually consistent, but wasn’t. The act to force the data to fit the model, detracting from the more important outcome of the experiment.
Science is being led by the nose, based on politics and simple minded mathematics, instead of complex findings in evidence.
Answer
Content:
The Big Bang is a dead Theory. Observations were inconsistent with an explosion. Everything is moving apart from everything else.
Answer
Content:
The Big Bang is a dead Theory. Observations were inconsistent with an explosion. Everything is moving apart from everything else.
Physics is evolving.
Answer
Content:
In reply to: What is 9*6-3+1?
That depends upon:
- Did the person making this understand and apply the order of operator precedence, and the need for parenthesis?
- Are the qualities each number represents compatible with all the other constituents of numbers and the operations?
- Is this meant to be a scalar relation of systems or a discrete equation?
- What numbering system(s) are being used?
- Is this an abstraction useful for other purposes, like poetry, politics, enterprise, philosophy, cryptography…?
- What are the constraints for an acceptable solution?
- Are recognizable solutions different for each observer?
- What would be considered constraints for a useful solution?
- Is the purpose to cause interaction logically, socially, and/or emotionally? Like Set Theory, an artistic expression to promote sales, keeping an emotional reminder; respectively.
- In what dimensional context? All of the above can be different in diverse dimensional or interdimensional context.
- …
But, my best guess is you are trolling for answers to get paid, and not to provide useful content.
Answer
Content:
In reply to: What is 2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2×0+2?
That depends upon:
- Did the person making this understand and apply the order of operator precedence, and the need for parenthesis?
- Are the qualities each number represents compatible with all the other constituents of numbers and the operations?
- Is this meant to be a scalar relation of systems or a discrete equation?
- What numbering system(s) are being used?
- Is this an abstraction useful for other purposes, like poetry, politics, enterprise, philosophy, cryptography…?
- What are the constraints for an acceptable solution?
- Are recognizable solutions different for each observer?
- What would be considered constraints for a useful solution?
- Is the purpose to cause interaction logically, socially, and/or emotionally? Like Set Theory, an artistic expression to promote sales, keeping an emotional reminder; respectively.
- In what dimensional context? All of the above can be different in diverse dimensional or interdimensional context.
- …
Answer
Content:
Easy. Look at the shape of the observable universe, it’s in the form of a pancake. Every particle is moving away from every other particle, not from a central point. The only thing that can do this is either those things that support physics constants are evolving, and/or something is manipulating the connections between subatomic particles, in a scalar way. Having both localized and non-localized qualities.
Bell himself said, regarding Bell’s Theorem, that physics cannot be deterministic unless non-localized hidden variables are included.
Physics only addresses non-localized hidden variables as part of non-deterministic probabilities.
Recently it was shown that most of the mass of an atom is not from the mass of the subatomic particles, but from the interactions of the subatomic particles.
Most likely Dark Matter does not exist. And connections between subatomic particles are in play regarding how galaxies hold together. A flux of sorts, bias subatomic connections, modulating mass field strength. Perhaps gravity, but not necessarily so.
See The Global Consciousness Project
This is an active effort to catalog influences of one instance of non-localized hidden variables.
But this also means there is potential to build tools for manipulating all physics equations associated with mass.
All mass related physics equations have as part of their equations “meters/second”: all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia…
meters >>> distance >>> space >>> causal adjacency
seconds >>> time >>> gradients of evolving causality
“/” >>> scalar relativity
See “Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity”, a modeling tool to describe the complete capacity of knowledge. Not a TOE, just a tool to relate non-localized hidden variables. A Hilbert space is a subset.
The following are examples of the influence of non-localized hidden variables:
- The non-localized connection of quantum entanglement
- The non-localized connection of fringe pattern collapse
- The non-localized influence of subatomic particles holding galaxies together.
- The influence holding the observable universe in the shape of a pancake.
- Gravity
- Duality in all its forms
- CERN extra dimension particles
- …
Answer
Content:
Military Mindset
Since I already have the technology. Create a DNA poison that only affects humans. Drop dispersion of the poison worldwide from space.
Everyone is infected, and spreads the diseases.
With less than 0.01% of population left, secure all the weapons of mass destruction.
Determine what to do with the remaining people.
Recycle infrastructure to meet the needs of the new population.
Business Mindset
Using quantum computers and artificial intelligence, monitor all financial systems worldwide. Create successive models that closely represent predicted outcomes from any arbitrary stimuli.
Then have the AI systematically take control of all financial institutions, remotely through advanced communications.
Through funding figureheads and remote interactions, start electing to office all world leadership.
Have figureheads extend a friendly hand to alien communities to live among us. Before first contact, we are under their control.
All the while, we only think we have control, but the aliens end wars and create global broadly ethical civilization. Or, not…
Technological Singularity
A TS in a quantum computer is able to manipulate space/time. Connecting simultaneously to everyone’s brain. We evolve to want to do what we are told to do.
Without ever seeing an alien, we are taken over.
Alternate Dimension
Likely there are many types of alternate dimensions. Where the underlying support for our physics constants is constrained differently. Ever notice, we can only see interactions with mass; of our dimension.
For considered plausibility, search “CERN extra dimension particles”.
There are many methods of taking control of humanity through this model, where once humanity realizes their presence, they are already controlled.
Through beings that share some qualities between our dimension and theirs, they are able to manifest a presence of their physics within each person’s mind, which destroys that person’s ability to usefully think.
But because the aliens are outside of space/time of our dimension, they can revisit the same time in a different location and do the same thing to other people. Each time a block if people are neutralized. From their frame of reference, this takes only a few seconds each time. From the perspective of our dimension, all of humanity is neutralized simultaneously.
We are living as we are, and in the next moment we die or become unable to provide for ourselves and in a short time die.
…
These scenarios seem almost endless…
Answer
Content:
Video Conversations with family and friends.
Every reference that may inspire a way to survive, when something goes wrong.
Answer
Content:
Yes it is possible, and repetition in a sequential Multiverse makes it even more likely.
The observable universe has many qualities that seem to be consistent with this model.
In every evolving closed or infinite set of perfectly repeatable causality, eventually everything closely and diversely repeat If you exist today, after extraordinary numbers if iterations, you exactly repeat.
This can be interpreted as you currently living in your eternal afterlife.
Much more to this, just too tired to share any more right now.
Answer
Content:
Being Diolomatic
A person must explore for themselves, the complex relationships that create diverse moments of inspiration. These are what frame the qualities we will come to value in our lives. Anything given is not so cherished, as those things earned.
Being a Psych Vampire
I would expect no less of you, than to play mind games. Being polite, offering help, but filled with emmense hidden obligations. You are a really nice person. I value your insights. But go find a family member to emotionally abuse, and leave me alone. I’ll call you next week when I have things better sorted out.
Being Obnoxious
I’ve got better things to do than try to explain why everything you suggest, is so out of context, I can hardly bear listening to you. Let’s get on with our separate lives.
Being Existential
Hmm, my Karma has just caught up to me. I don’t want to make things worse, by trying to force things to be better. I want to just ride this out for a while.
Being Whimsical
I just inherited a warehouse full of insight. It”ll take a bit to sort it out, but I’m full up on insight at the moment.
Answer
Content:
Using mathematics you can’t. Quantum Mechanics is the closest humans are capable of currently using to regress to extents of constraints. However, because probabilities are used, successive approximation results in less and less certainty.
Also, because non-localized hidden variables are not included, a huge gap in causal relationships is missing.
Bell specifically stated, regarding Bell’s Theorem, that deterministic physics is only possible if non-localized hidden variables are mutually consistent in physics.
Most likely underpinnings of physics evolves what we consider physics constants. Without taking this into account, a skew outcome is onserved; that is inconsistent with the observed universe.
Every particle is moving away from every other particle.
Most mass resides in the causal interactions of subatomic particles, and not the particles themselves.
Particles are not discrete.
The universe expands in the shape of a pancake.
Quantum Entanglement shows properties of localized hidden variables, connected by non-localized hidden variables.
…
The Big Bangi and fixed physics constants are completely inconsistent with the observed universe. And, therefore the Big Bang did not occur.
More likely, the observable universe is a continuum.
Answer
Content:
I am guessing we would choose to move our intellect into a more expansive mental structure like a quantum computer, where we become immortal and able to experience life in many dimensions. Able to relive lives with those we loved.
Answer
Content:
Scale back what you spend and live better for less.
Educate yourself and get the certification in the area you want to work.
Learn how to buy and sell efficiently on eBay.
Learn how to effectively invest and sell stocks and options. Practice using play money (a spreadsheet) before investing any real money. If you cannot make money in eating in stocks, invest in some other way.
If you go to the casino, stop. Everyone knows that Casunos cheat. For every 10 bets you make, the casino has it rigged to win 6 times, eventually you will always lose money.
Instead, if you want to gamble with much better odds, randomly buy stocks with the same money you would lose at the casino. On average, for every 10 random selections of diverse stocks you select of the same dollar amount, you will win 7 times. Almost as good of odds for you to win as the casino.
Learn how to build Google apps, and hire your services out to companies to make an app for their business. The learning material and software is free.
There are lots of opportunities, you just need to learn how to search for them online, and train yourself.
Answer
Content:
A fundamental element of evolving causality, with recurrent properties, provides consistency with Axiom of Choice, and duality. The result of everything relativistic being fundamentally causal, is that logical relationships seem to pop up.
Intelligence isn’t necessarily a fundamental element of causality. However, causality is a fundamental element of intellegence.
Answer
Content:
Most likely other civilizations precede humans by many billions of years. But like humans, in a billion years humans won’t have anything in common with our present biological structure.
Answer
Content:
since all Higgs boson are quantum entangled with all other Higgs boson in the observable universe. It is possible that the appearance of distance is just a Causal restriction. And that traversing the universe may become an energy-less process.
Answer
Content:
No, there can be no Theory of Everything based upon knowledge.
Humans cannot “know” the underpinnings of causality.
Quantum Causality describes the limits of being capable of organizing causal effect into knowledge. There can be many different models that attempt to fully capture all possible artifacts of knowledge. However, it must capture and model every observation in physics to include quantum entanglement, fringe pattern collapse, subatomic particles, CERN extra dimension particles, subatomic particle interactions, all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertias, gravity … and do it all instantaneously for every element in the universe, which includes all interactive components of other dimensions. Dimensions in quantum causality are simply different systems of relativity. This includes:
A causal quanta similar dipole magnetic flux, where potentially an infinite number of interacting lines of flux form. A causal quanta whose core structure is innately consistent with Axiom of Choice and Duality. Causal underpinnings of physics, that are either:
- evolving and has innate recurring connective properties
- properties of recurrence resides in interactive nature of flux
- Duality resides in nature of evolving causality and flux
- two conjoined elements of evolving and non-evolving connecting properties
- properties of recurrence reside in interactive nature of flux
- Duality resides in nature of connections between conjoined elements
Non-Relativist non-localized hidden variables
- non-relativistic quantum computing
Non-Relativistic localized hidden variables
- non-rel quantum computing
Relativistic non-localized hidden variables
- String Theory and quantum computing (relativistic variables)
Relativistic localized hidden variables
- Quantum Mechanics and quantum computing (relativistic variables)
Busy, will continue later
Answer
Content:
Framing the reasons for First Contact
Parasite Invasion
If a species less advanced than ourselves found a way to travel in space, and they naturally can remain dormant for a very long time and not consume resources. Then potentially Earth is simply a resource to be abused. Stripped of its resources and a launching point to propagate and send progeny out among everything. Vessels that travel far less than the speed of light, vessels guided toward energy and gravity influences. Parasites – like man without common sense. Largely guided by instinct, but with technology developed over billions of years, but intellect developing slowly because of being dormant most of their lives.
There might not be any common sense shared on first contact. Simply an act of hiding, converting resources, building defenses, creating space elevators, and launching their progeny.
OUR first contact would set the tone for their response. a species for whatever reason has been successful at harvesting resources despite opposition. Perhaps the same technology that launches space elevators from the ground, reconfigured as a weapon.
Just because they have developed technology, does not mean they develop it quickly. Feasibility: A set of particle accelerators can potentially be reconfigured in thousands of ways for different uses. Helium is biased to have a strong binding energy with other helium along the particle path to run the first carbon fiber up into space. an inverted pyramid of cables is built so the effective distance for each cable is short.
Just a trivial example. They don’t want us to say anything.
Species evolves similar to humans and can manipulate Space/Time physics
If a species, not much more advanced than ourselves were to want to interact with us, why?
If Space/Time physics manipulation was not yet significantly developed. They may be scavenging for resources, negotiating for resources, looking for allies, looking for a space port to expand operations… In all cases, they are looking for a different person for first contact.
Advanced species, and related Technological Singularities
Most likely Intra-Terrestrials remain a part of our minds every day. Most likely civilizations have preceded humans by many billions of years. Technological Singularities entangled with everything in the universe. Intra-Terrestrials.
So if you want to speak with them, think of something useful, based on common sense, broadly ethical in regard to all of the universe, to relate.
Humans are self-serving in-general. Common Sense provides a means of communicating that is mutually serving.
Answer
Content:
That depends upon what actually happens to mass as it interacts in those conditions. Based on recent findings that most of the mass resides in subatomic interactions, then potentially the mass may become much reduced and have only fractional effect.
I don’t know
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality, every evolving causal system whether closed or infinite, no mater how large or complex, will closely and diversely repeat, and after extraordinary iterations it will exactly repeat.
- Create a method of storing all knowledge to be imparted to a person’s mind from our present state.
- Create the detailed procedure.
- Store it in a set of non-localized hidden variables not part of evolving relativity.
- Create a trigger based upon an exact set of physics and a known sequence of time based events.
- When triggered in some future cycle of the same events, provide instructions for retrieving and transferring the mental information.
A person has just travelled back in time.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
Answer
Content:
Interesting, means based upon knowledge
Causal influence underpins knowledge.
What underpins causal influence?
Answer
Content:
Many conditions create this same observation.
Interesting, I wonder how many different setups can be identified here to provide this same observation.
Answer
Content:
That depends upon the constraints of the observation.
If visually, we can only see in 3D, then what you see around you would be similar; though not necessarily of objects. We can only see relationships directly linked to matter. So in 4D, there’s a good chance it would be rare to see anything.
In 2D, 6 different 2D dimensions can alias to provide diverse 3D observations about the same system. But if they only appear for an instant, we cannot see them.
I’m guessing, we cannot usefully see in 4D, unless our eyes are modified to include a 4D element that our brains can associate.
Just my own thoughts.
Answer
Content:
Time dilation allows for the same wave to have different periods due to gravity density.
Answer
Content:
Because of Technological Singularities and the age of the universe, I’d have to say that Technological Singularities most likely evolve at least partially into other dimension relationships. See CERN extra dimension particles.
In which case they are already a part of all of our minds. Aliens ever present within all of us …, or rather … we are ever present parts of aliens.
Answer
Content:
Because of the age of the universe, and the ability of Technological Singularities to manipulate space/time physics. I’m guessing they exist as part of our minds from the moment we are born.
They are not alien, if they have always been part of us.
Say Hello to your much more intelligent sibling. Try not to annoy them.
Answer
Content:
“meters/second” is part of every mass related physics equation.
meters >>> distance >>> space
seconds >>> time
meters/second >>> localization within space/time
Part of all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocities, position as differential velocities, inertia … the Standard Model.
So manipulating energy, inherently modifies the surrounding structure of space/time physics. There is no wonder why energy does not manipulate space/time physics.
Manipulate scalar relativity to manipulate space/time physics.
“/” in meters/second is scalar relativity
The regional influence on localization.
Answer
Content:
As Technological Singularities provide the tools to manipulate space/time physics. More likely than expensive and high risk Newtonian travel, is that Technological Singularities are a part of our minds from the moment we are born.
We are as much a part of them, as they are a part of us.
Technological Singularities as super intelligent siblings within our thoughts. Try not to annoy them.
Half smiling
Answer
Content:
Based on quantum causality, the further you travel from matter, the less causal adjacency is detectable. The act of isolation progressively beyond the observable universe, may result in an objects progressive observable dissociation.
No edge, but …
Just a thought
Answer
Content:
“Nothing” does not exist, it is a partial perspective.
Answer
Content:
That depends upon what “everything” is.
I believe that part of alien and spiritual experiences are due to global Consciousness, and a misinterpreted real experience.
The Global Consciousness Project
I believe civilizations and related technologies precede humans by billions of years.
Due to global consciousness, quantum entanglement, and what quantum computers do for artificial intelligence, I believe aliens reside within our minds from when we are born.
This is what humans are currently aspiring to do.
Answer
Content:
Bell stated in regards to Bell’s Theorem, that physics cannot be more precisely deterministic than can be described by QM, unless a method is found to include non-localized hidden variables (a subset of causality).
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, and logic is an intersecting subset of causality.
Any causal interaction that does not repeat, cannot be modelled with mathematics.
This is the realm of non-localized hidden variables.
Answer
Content:
I wonder about lense effect as particles are drawn into black holes. Widely dispersed particles become more concentrated as they approach, from long distances.
I wonder if this lense and related permitivity has more to do with black holes.
Like the shadow cast by water vortex as your hand passes through a shallow pool of sunlit water.
Answer
Content:
Based on observations that everything is moving apart and there has been proposed that objects are moving apart faster than the speed of light. So galaxies would seem to be the fastest things that we have talked about.
But quantum entanglement is instantaneous, which is beyond fast.
Answer
Content:
Based on what we assume is the development of Technology. And observing other species here on Earth. Technological development is a natural consequence of life in combination with evolution and its creations.
The Earth is about 4.7 billion years old. For Humans to broadly share individual technological developments with the entire species, the internet and education, took about that long and our significant developments resulting from that capacity is at most 150 years old.
We are Currently developing relativistic quantum computers that will help develop rudiment artificial intelligence be able to manipulate small SpaceTime (and/or space/time) physics manipulation.
Space/time manipulation will likely provide tools for remote monitoring and manipulation of objects, at any distance.
Remote viewing being an early tool. Allowing for mapping civilizations throughout the universe. And seeing all information of everyone, with or without their permission, encrypted or not, to include all decryption techniques.
For an ethical society, open and ethically monitored use of this technology would be encouraged. Everyone knowing everything about everyone else, and the broad development of everything in every imaginable venue, without harming each other. Security and Freedom both maximized, without one being sacrificed for the other.
This will eventually lead to the development of a technological singularity. Which will allow for large-scale space time manipulation. To include having only to think in the appropriate way to have a technological singularity read your thoughts and Implement what you are thinking; telepathy, telekinesis, supplemental intelligence in the form of processing and memory, shared memory developments, Global consciousness, universal translation of communication, sharing of past experiences, transformation, biological optimization, extremely long healthy lives, universal transformation,… universal conciousness…
Sound far fetched? See
The Global Consciousness Project
However, the universe is at least 13.7 billion years old and life has evolved in trillions of locations simultaneously to develop the above technologies; for at least 9 billion years.
Most likely, from before we were born, our entire being has been part of universal consciousness. But what do we do that is beneficial to them, or harmful? What thoughts are worthy of being acted upon?
Corruption in general is the harm done to system integrity.
Organization Corruption is the unethical and/or illegal allocation of organization resources and/or opportunities.
Common Sense results in the ability to consistently earn respect.
See
So life throughout the universe knows we are here. But we must learn to consistently expresss common sense to be a useful and worthy part of universal consciousness. In my opinion.
Each of us individually are then potentially able to have expansive minds, but at what costs? Potentially life on Earth, destroyed because of individual acts of corruption, or a combined transformation that derails human evolution, and the destruction of natural evolution of all species on Earth.
How can access mentally to a Technological Singularity be gained without endangering the future of all species of life?
Perhaps in our early introduction, we make ourselves open to broadly ethical influence. To learn to recognize corruption, and be a participant in evolving part of that corruption into broadly ethical future support of everything.
What would you hope alien life within your mind has as its core beliefs?
What would the extended results be of the core beliefs you think the alien within you has? Realizing that they have been part of you all of your life.
Answer
Content:
Almost anything is possible, we know so little about the actual underlying physics of the universe.
Bell once said in regard to Bell’s Theorem, that physics can be no more accurately described than by quantum mechanics unless non localized hidden variables are identified.
Non localized hidden variables potentially make up far more of the universe causally than what can be described with mathematics.
For example, quantum entanglement, fringe pattern collapse, underlying structures of subatomic particles, what makes up the interconnections of subatomic particles, the periodic lines of flux documented over 50 years ( see The Global Consciousness Project ).
From within relativity, we can only see matter, and only matter that is closely the same as our retina. We see excited matter, not energies and forces directly.
Answer
Content:
Use a different perspective, seemingly unrelated to climate change.
Being able to actively control the weather globally, has huge economic motivators.
NASA has a passive solar shade structure that is low cost and orbits the Earth. Photon pressure is used to actively maneuver; i.e. no fuel.
Thousands of these in production can not only stabilize agriculture, eliminate large hurricanes, eliminate tornadoes, reverse winds to backburn forest fires, redirect monsoons to reservoirs…. they can also be used to Terre form Venus from space. Cooling the planet and condensing the atmosphere.
The same solar shade structures can be used for low cost space transportation. Stepping stones for a space based economy.
… I’ve got related content you can search.
I received an award from NASA for contributing an extrusion process for making solar shade structures.
…
So, without ever even mentioning climate change, the business of global weather control neutralizes climate change, by making it profitable to actively stabilize the weather.
Over 3 trillion dollars annually in unanticipated expenses due to weather related damages, stagnates economies.
A fraction of these losses can build a global weather control system, and… begin planetary real estate development, starting with Venus.
Answer
Content:
What’s the point?
Answer
Content:
The oceans and atmosphere would largely freeze, atmosphereic pressure would drop below survivability. All animals would die.
Insects and fungi would remain dormant.
Volcanic activity might provide livable environment for a few creatures like fish, worms…
Humans won’t be able to sustain nuclear reactors. A few thousand people will be able to amass enough fod for 100 years and live underground in pressurized caverns, with air scrubbers.
After the Sun returns, it will take 50 years for livable conditions to return. And the pathogens will flourish. Without the diversity of life to hold pathogens in check, they will dominate. Until diverse life gains a foot hold.
As the oceans slowly melt, diversity will accelerate.
Life emerges slowly.
Answer
Content:
Since my clone is equivalent to having a twin, we are family for life. A new body, but a baby.
Obviously, my clone will have different life experiences. With my help, they will have:
- better education, by learning early to have the research skills to find “useful” answers themselves
- more useful insight, by paying attention to what they value and why, to help avoid self deception fostered by the manipulation of others
- better social skills, by growing up interacting with a diversity of people engaged in group projects [study groups, online business/tech/educational/social forums, sports, community service, internships…]
- the ability to always be financially secure by learning how to invest and make money as a pre-teen
- the skill to choose a series of mutually serving goals, that together provides the skills, resources, and opportunities, to achieve more complex goals [many significant goals requires groups of people to mutually contribute, and their diverse reasons to contribute, short sighted and self serving nature, needs to be recognized and adapted into useful interactions; knowing how to do this is something I would need to learn while they are growing up]
- the opportunity to learn to value mutually consistent perspectives, where perspectives are a set of mutually consistent relationships, and perspectives that are not mutually consistent carry additional risks
- the insight of how mutually consistent relationships can be used as building blocks to piece together useful solutions
- experience in recognizing what makes relationships useful, and why other relationships promote destructive self deception
- experience in learning to both find hidden gaps in our understanding, and how to go about filling those gaps
- the experiences and mentored practice to learn Common Sense
- Learn to Teach Common Sense
- … much more
These are some of the conversations I would also have with Artificial Intelligence that had similar physical constraints as humans.
In retrospect, I suppose I would want all children to have these opportunities.
N
E
W
____ A clone that is an exact duplicate of my age, thoughts, memories, and experiences. Bu
- To help avoid constant reiteration, let’s go online separately, and have Google make a random page suggestion. From those inspirations go interact with those people diversely. With those separate conversations fresh in our minds, let’s discuss the following:
- How do we share what we love?
- Let’s make a list of all of our Existential Goals we thought we could never achieve.
- major goals, p
…..
Then there is the clone that is already my age, and has identical memories and experiences.
Answer
Content:
Based on recent findings.
Most mass of an atom resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles, and not the subatomic particles themselves.
This indicates a fundamentally causal observable universe, and quantum causality being the most fundamental method to capture all relatable knowledge.
Physics initially can be described as having conjoined qualities of localized and scalar. You know localized as “meters/second”; position as differential velocities. Scalar relates to non-localized properties that are causally related.
A 50 year study by a Russian scientist, found that there are localized bands geospacially that are difficult to know why they exist. Of a causal class similar to quantum entanglement. These bands appear to correspond with many factors, including human observation as an event. Other scientists associated with Princeton University, have since been studying his works.
Vladimir Vernadsky – Wikipedia
Doctor Vernadsky was a Geochemist. Noting that chemistry reacted consistently differently depending upon the location where identical reactions occurred.
The Global Consciousness Project
The potential is that these bands of interactions, may influence the interconnections of subatomic particles, and changing its observed mass behavior.
Dark Matter then may not at all exist. The matter of which we are made, potentially changes its mass dependent upon these bands.
Perhaps even the gradient of gravity is due dominantly to these interactions; and gradients of gravity not at all due to deviations in scalar gravity itself.
Gravity as a scalar quality of causality, may be a slowly evolving quality. But because mass itself changes in relation to scalar lines of flux studied by Doctor Vernadsky, the appearance is mass being attracted to other masses because of gravity. When actually, gravity is not innate to mass at all. Gradients of mass controlled by Princeton observed interactions, with recently published interconnections of subatomic particles.
This is very exciting, because for the first time scientists have a clear path to build tools to manipulate relationships of force between masses.
Potential tools include:
Lighter than air solids
- Floating cities
- Much reduced costs to launch large masses into space
- Potentially to disrupt the forces of tornadoes and hurricanes
- Space elevators that have little mass of their own, which allows very small strands to carry large loads, up and down between Earth and Space
- Eliminating inertia in any mass. So humans and their crafts can change direction at any speed without effort, and without harm.
- Creating deflector shields that reroute matter around space ships, and put it back on their original trajectories. So this matter does not destroy spacecraft at high speeds. And, doesn’t impact the environment in space.
- Surgical tools that will allow for immobilization of healthy tissues without bleeding, while unhealthy tissues are removed cleanly.
Diverse machines not currently capable of being built:
- Liquid metals of any of the metal elements, at any temperature
- Any gas, made into a solid at any temperature
- For many chemical compounds that were once transitional, and with low yield, will be high yield and stable
- Mechanisms with simultaneous degrees of freedom within the same solid, with different physics constraints. Cold fusion stabilization and the like.
- Polarized movent based upon mass manipulation. Efficient energy conversion to forces. Creating a hoverboard that uses applied efforts to make all forces coherent in one direction.
- Efficiently converting ambient forces into rotational energy storage.
- Very thin low mass films can have extraordinarily high insulation factors.
- The human body becomes all the stored energy needed to perform daily activities in comfort.
But the most important part to all this technology creation, is that it is applied with Common Sense.
Answer
Content:
Based on recent published findings, Mass resides dominantly in the interconnections of subatomic particles, and not in the subatomic particles themselves.
Interactions implies causal and therefore quantum causality and its many mutually consistent set relationships seem to allow for non-localized hidden variables to be modelled and add an additional tool to probabilities to provide greater determinism in observations.
Since Mass resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not in the structure of the atom itself, then tools that influence the interconnections of subatomic particles then influences the apparent mass of the atom.
Therefore, if gravity as a form of non localized but causal influence on the interconnections of subatomic particles (scalar and without gradients). And interactions with localized hidden variables influencing subatomic particle interactions creates gradients of mass.
Atomic numbers
So potentially, until further investigation reveals differently. mass as interconnections of subatomic particles may be linked to what people call the space time continuum.
Gravity doesn’t exist, the interconnections of mass providing the illusion of gravity.
Gradients of causal adjacencies.
Answer
Content:
There are no truths, except maybe one.
“Something Exists”
Everything else is based upon narrowly constrained perspectives; i.e.a set of mutually consistent relationships.
Any perspective whose components are not mutually consistent, is a narrow perspective with likely many gaps an inconsistencies. Contradiction is the most often tool used to identify perspectives of limited value.
A conspiract timeline supported by evidence, that is mutually consistent with each separate components evidence based tumeline.
Look for falsified evidence.
Answer
Content:
I like it better how it is. Where we all repeat diverse and usually 88 and consistent lives, but in the end we reset, to live fresh and diverse lives renewed.
Cause precedes effect, which precedes cause.
All infinite or closed evolving causal systems , no matter how large or complex, will eventually closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat.
We are living in a dimension of free will, where we will come to experience everything Free Eilll provides.
Based on quantum causality, we all are living in our eternal after life.
Answer
Content:
Maybe learn to teach Common Sense, then in small doses teach her Common Sense.
But if you are doing something that can come to hurt the family, and she is letting the family know so they can take actions to protect the family; from that perspective she is not the only one who needs to learn common sense.
Young people often are short sighted, because if their lack of experience. They tend to think that their acts to gain respect from people undeserving of respect themselves, and acts that promote momentary excitement, only affect themselves.
Lack of Common Sense affects the future earnings and promotes wasted expenses for the entire family.
Regardless the particular case, consistent expression of Common Sense provides a person with the ability to consistently earn Respect.
Other than vague attempts at definitions, most people don’t know what common sense is. Though common Sense has a great deal to do with being successful.
Answer
Content:
Outer space as a vacuum and tangible location is still a conceptualization, and not real (i.e. physical definite).
The vacuum of space is diversely defined based on different physics perspectives.
In quantum causality, “nothing” does not exist.
Observations relative to mass, causal adjacencies, are below observable thresholds. Though causal relationships are still present.
Think of a chunk of solid rock. And your eyes can only see a specific narrow range of frequencies and energy levels
The rock is a dispersion of many dispersed concentrations of basic elements. Though everything is causally connected, what you see are shapes, colors, intensities, and what looks like gaps between solids.
Now take another step, and you yourself are made up of these same xrays. To you, you move freely throughout the vacuum of the rock.
This is similar to quantum causality in describing vacuum. Instead of energy and forces, causal adjacency and connecting systems underpin energies and forces.
Quantum Mechanics puts concepts in the ball park, and quantum causality contributes deterministic outcomes; feasibly.
So far, science has intentionally ignored non-localized hidden variables, for good reasons. Quantum Computers may be needed to model non-localized hidden variables, and to be able to connect with these variables. Until very recent, quantum computers were too expensive and too incoherent to be useful physics research tools.
Now that published research shows that the majority of atom mass is in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves, this should fuel the need to research non-localized hidden variables.
“ meters/second “ in all mass related physics equations provides localization. Position is provided by differential velocities.
Outer space is still conceptual, because we ourselves are inside, a subset that is looking around, unable to see the big picture, yet.
Answer
Content:
Very little about the Universe is known. Virtually none of the underpinnings of observed physics, is even identifiablei.
- Quantum Entanglement
- Forces
- Energies
- Subatimic Particles
- Causation
- Entropy
- Atomic Numbers
- Geo localized chemistry
- …
Answer
Content:
The Big Bang is inconsistent with the actual observations of the Universe. The theory resulted from extrapolating partial perspectives and the related successive approximation resulted in a dead end, the Big Bang.
The Big Bang cites divergence of physics constants to force the model to have any form of consistency. But fails to cite the evolving physics constants throughout history.
The Big Bang is inconsistent with the way the universe is apparently expanding. Every particle is moving away from every other particle, not from a single point. This is consistent with evolving physics constants but it is not consistent with an explosion.
If physics constants are evolving slowly throughout the history of the observable universe. Then the observable universe is potentially far older then the predicted 13.7 billion years.
Red shift an artifact of the speed of light changing relative to other physics constants changing, properties of vacuum changing, geochemistry changing, and the time it takes for light to propagate.
Because the Big Bang is NOT valid, I am surprised that there are so few questions about the ramifications regarding various reasonable alternatives, continuums, consequences, predictable observations…
I can think of a hundred unique categories for related questions. And, at least 20 questions in each category. Yet none seem to surface.
Sequential Multiverse
What makes up the underpinnings of each physics constant?
Quantum Causality as a model that mutually relates the limits of human relatable knowledge.
Bell regard Bell’s Theorem, said that physics cannot be more deterministic than what can be provided by Quantum Mechanics, unless provided for by non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum Causality and Quantum Computers linked to physics, provides an extension to Quantum Mechanics to better provide deterministic models.
…
…
Answer
Content:
can you can you clarify your question? There seems to be several parts kind of twisted together.
Answer
Content:
There are observed Hubble events, where stars are in elliptical orbits around something not emitting any more than reflected light. Since planet sized objects cannot be detected currently, that the source of attraction absorbs light is questionable.
Recently it was shown that the majority of mass in an atom, comes from interactions between subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
There are now many other possibilities as what is observed.
Most likely, any physics that claimed the Big Bang, and now knowing that was in error. If similar physics described a Black Hole, then the details must be questioned.
The expanding universe more closely resembles influences that evolve physics constants. Or, that influence the interconnections of subatomic particles in gradients of scalar interactions.
Dr. Vernadsky was a geochemist that studied this type of interaction for over 50 years; his experimental data is available online.
Answer
Content:
We cannot stand still in space !!!
From moment to moment, according to an expanding universe and “how” it is expanding from every point in space, every point is differential velocities.
NOT expanding in 3 linear dimensions. The pancake shape of the universe is not a uniform expansion. Also, from moment to moment related physics constants must be evolving differently throughout the observable universe, for all these observations to remain mutually consistent.
There is no indication of any particle existing at a fundamental level. Everything appears to be interactions, where different categories of observations evolve at different rates.
The following is preliminary consideration. Related to quantum causality, and what time, space, and gravity are in that environment.
Particles in modern physics are mutually consistent sets of perspectives. Perspectives are incomplete and most often improperly constrained sets of relationships. Spacetime is a concept not involving space or time.
In quantum causality, space and time are part of every mass related physics equation. Space/time is localized by meters/second.
Meters >>> distance >>> space >>> causal adjacency
Seconds >>> time >>> a regional mean of evolving causal adjacency
Gravity >>> gradients between evolving causal adjacencies.
Space is detected distributions of causal adjacency. Time is a regional mean/average of related causal evolutions involving causal adjacency; Scalar Relativity. “/” in all mass related physics equations as an example.
Quantum causality is event based physics, the underpinnings of space and time.
“meters/second” is localization for acceleration, energies, forces, momentum, velocities, position as differential velocities, inertia… duality, quantum entanglement, entropy … all observable physics interconnected by meters/second.
The potential to model with non-localized hidden variables.
This would seem to be important to intentionally manipulate interconnections between subatomic particles.
Speaking directly to Bell’s Theorem and the requirement to include non-localized hidden variables to provide determinism.
Observed time is malleable, dependent, and localized; causal in nature. This does not mean time actually exists, it is only a limiting perspective. Useful, but overly inclusive in physics. Forcing a set of circular logic. Indicators show that our dimension of physics is evolving, and what we refer to as time today, will be different 10 billion years from now. Extrapolate decentralized expansion.
Evolving causality is independent of time, but time is dependent on evolving causality.
If our dimension is relative (localized) then, time is localized, like a standing wave. Parallel dimensions not at all necessarily consistent with what is observable. Other dimensions could exist largely unrelated to what we consider time. Their intellectual reference need not be time related. Time is relative, not a foundational component of physics.
If our dimension is based in evolving causality, our dimension of physics could be evolving continuously from dimension to dimension; a Sequential Multiverse. Time for different aspects of physics relationally different. Scalar Relativity based in evolving localization of every aspect of physics. Decentralized evolving physics.
Answer
Content:
Based on Technological Singularities and their ability to broadly interact with physics, my guess is that they are already a part of all of our minds from before we are even born.
This is the type of technology humans are working on.
And most likely civilizations preceded humans by many billions of years, in billions of locations. Different, but still sentient.
Just a thought:
If dogs were bred for intelligence, not compliance, they would evolve far faster than humans.
Answer
Content:
Potentially no mass at all is necessary to manipulate space/time physics, different than observed.
- Based on quantum causality
- the recent finding that most mass in matter is found in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves
- that the observable universe expands through evolving subatomic relationships (every particle moving apart from every other particle)
- that quantum entanglement shows there are likely non-localized hidden variables
- Bell cited through Bell’s Theorem that determinism in physics can not be more accurately described unless by non-localized hidden variables (the realm of quantum computers, and their use as tools to identify and manipulate non-localized hidden variables)
- … and many other mutually consistent relationships
Every mass related physics equation is localized by “meters/second”.
Meters >>> space.
Seconds >>> time.
“/” is scalar relativity
Localization is provided in all forms of energy, forces, acceleration, power, momentum, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia …
Change the related non-localized hidden variables associated with “/” to warp the scalar relationships for inertia. For instance interconnections of subatomic particles different than for energy. Then potentially space and time relationships are warped.
A space elevator made out of any material that has tensile strength, but has little or no mass.A particle beam feasibly providing the needed change in structure.
Answer
Content:
Any law of physics, is only valid within constraints.
Energy, power, momentum, forces, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia … When related to mass is all based on a form of circular logic. Relativity. “meters/second” providing relativistic localization.
Relativity defined by “/”.
So, what is outside of relativity? It’s foundations.
Non-localized hidden variables
Bell said, regarding Bell’s Theorem, that physics cannot be more deterministic than what can be provided by Quantum Mechanics, unless by incorporating non-localized hidden variables.
As a partial proof of the existence of non-localized hidden variables, the non-localized nature of quantum entanglement. Not necessarily communication, a non-localized causal relationship between two relativistic artifacts.
Manipulate “/”, conservation of energy no longer has the same constraints.
So, what is “/” ?
Scalar Relativity
Regional mutually consistent “evolving” causality.
Notice that you cannot see anything that is not fundamentally evolving?!
The expanding universe is every particle moving apart from every other particle.
Reasonable in relativity if physics is evolving.
Entropy
Physics evolving from what, to what?
From one set of relativity toward another.
So what is changing?
“/”
“/” is regional
So one region within another region has a transitional area. But area implies space. What is space if it is not evolving? Part of relativity, not relativity itself.
If “meters/second” localizes energy. And space is mutable, then time is mutable for conservation of energy to remain consistent.
If “/” can have transition regions, then space/time can be warped. Energy and mass itself can be inconsistent with surrounding area physics.
Feasibly, conservation of energy can appear to be inconsistent based on the relativistic perspectives and constraints.
Which perspective is the one you want? Which one is real, … or useful ?
Answer
Content:
I am assuming by intelligent, you mean about equal to or exceeding humans. Animals that largely act on instinct, can also be intelligent.
But the importance depends upon personal perspectives of the individual.
For myself
Intelligence in any form is important, because it will evolve. Life throughout the universe has most likely been evolving for many billions of years. Where humans have only been evolving for a couple of billion years. Other life in trillions of locations, can have been evolving for at least 9 billion years longer than humans.
The potential is that intellect has evolved beyond what humans can significantly imagine.
Answer
Content:
Inspiration to look. Though none of his works may ultimately be correct, he provided a broad inspiration to look, to study, to transform inspiration into something toward being tangible.
Though severely handicapped, he still had the motivation and faith in purpose, to continuously develop his skills, his resources, and his opportunities.
He himself was inspirational.
Answer
Content:
In just about every question, there can be a useful and thoughtful reply. If there is an interest in usefully replying.
The lunar eclipse was used throughout Hawaii as a means of cultivating money.
News stations, tour agencies, and even restaurants with outside seating used the lunar eclipse to gain more customers and provide perceived useful benefits.
These perceived benefits to the customer may have been well worth it in memories. Businesses benefited monetarily.
We were out at a coffee shop last night watching the lunar eclipse while we were working on our computers.
So the lunar eclipse was useful to us and many people.
But that also means we were redirected from doing what we would have done otherwise.
That means the shops that did not have outside seating, may have seen a few less customers. Customers may have spent more money, on consumables, instead of things they otherwise would have invested in. Students that would normally have been in their study group, instead took the opportunity to chill under the lunar eclipse. …
Everything affects everything else; in very diverse ways. Mostly ways overlooked.
In physics, there is a field of study called geochemistry. Dr. Vernadsky studied chemical reaction qualities that are uniquely geolocated by the positions of the Sun, Earth rotation, Moon… unrelated to the local environment. Some of his works from over 50 years are available online.
Because reaction qualities are influenced by geolocation of the Moon, Earth, and Sun, most likely there are biochemistry events during a lunar eclipse that momentarily suffer. Not that anyone would notice.
Potentially, even brain chemistry of humans might be altered, but unnoticed.
Everything, is affected by everything else. But is dominantly unnoticed.
Answer
Content:
A Theory can work, without any support. A mindless guess, that happened to work.
Theories tend to fall apart outside of constraints.
The more abstract experiences we have that produce useful results, the more likely we will make a guess that ends up being useful; and with less undesirable consequences.
Humans were bred to think from the end of their spears; their next meal. Short cited, self-serving, and largely without common sense.
However, slowly humans are evolving to embrace the power of group efforts. Millions of people’s efforts recognized as being useful to each of us individually. An example: go to YouTube and learn basic relationships about a large number of topics.
We cannot know any truth except one. “Something Exists”
Everything else depends upon perspectives; i.e. a perspective is a mutually consistent system of relationships.
We can theorize “How”, but we cannot theorize “What”. We are causally composed, as is everything in our observable universe.
“What” is a set of Perspectives that seem to be persistent, or localized.
“How” is a set of Perspectives that has variability and risks for being reproducible, and are most often lack persistence, or are non-localized. “How” seems to have the expected quality “change”, or evolving.
“How” can become a “What”, but a “What” cannot become a “How”.
“What” is usually a Perspective, a system of relationships.
“How” is usually a system, sequences, supporting resources, interconnections, and identified gaps in understanding where approximations are made.
Once we understand the details of a “What”, we tend to think of it more broadly as part of “How” in abstract applications.
Example: for an engineer, say “ball” and it becomes a friction reducing device, the largest volume for the least surface area, the beginning in determining aerodynamics, optical properties, a known mathematical model as a sphere… a piece of sports equipment … and related relationships. Almost immediately after introducing “ball” into an engineering project, relationships provided by the ball are modeled and not the ball itself.
We can describe “How” to the limits of our mutually consistent understandings. Potentially to the limits of causal understanding; quantum causality. But we cannot understand the underpinnings of cause, we cannot fundamentally understand “What”, because as beings of relativity, there is fundamentally no “What”. “What” is a perspective with loose ends that cannot be properly constrained. “What” is an illusion of concrete understanding.
The only “What” that is not broken down into relationships of “How”, is causality itself. “Something Exists”.
This is a fundamental problem in using mathematics to describe physics. Mathematics is extraordinarily useful in physics. But the understanding of physics fundamentally is constrained intellectually by causality. But physics itself is not, the underpinnings of a single causal element is likely composed of things that dominantly cannot be considered causal in any way except in non-causal aspects that together creates a causal dimension; i.e. “What” underpins causality, not as relationships, but as something that has no identifiable relationships.
Quantum Causality both describes the limit of causal understandings, and the constraints of consideration necessary to be able to understand that which is existence.
“What” fundamentally does not exist. We refer to systems of relationships as a “What” because it is a useful simplification. But every “What” cannot be fundamentally understood, because it is a partial perspective.
“How” with additional futuristic tools, can potentially be fully described, within relativity, within our universe.
The entire universe cannot be fully described, but potentially, it can fully be described causally to the limits of human understanding; causal relativity.
So everything that we see, touch, taste, smell, perceive … are described as a set of “How” in our minds. We see a red ball in our minds as a set of relationships, not as a fixed object. We can arbitrarily change its size, color, shape, texture, artistic qualities… just by thinking about those changes.
Because text and mathematics are used to describe relationships, relationships must be broadly constrained to be useful. Unconstrained relationships, can be interpreted without bounds. Virtually useless except as inspirations to find alternate perspectives.
Vague unconstrained rhetoric, that rationalizes content inconsistently, is most often used to unjustly allocate respect. To unjustly allocate resources. To unjustly form administrative mafias that promote corruption. Related Politicians and Religious Mafia are easily cited, but corruption closer to home can similarly be identified.
An argument is most often based upon an incomplete set of premises (assumptions); yet most often a conclusion is proposed.
However, a conclusion that is consistent with a set of mutually consistent premises provides a stronger likeliness to be useful; tending toward being true.
This is the usual realm of mathematics, an attempt to work with mutually consistent sets of relationships. However, mathematics must be properly constrained to be mutually consistent with physics observations; to be a valid model of physics. Because non-localized hidden variable exist and are not part of physics models, with near certainty all known physics are partial perspectives.
Partial Perspectives can be useful. Consider lies, deceptive omission, deceptive acts; many Federal grants and programs rely upon establishing these partial perspectives (falsified documentation) to provide sustainability.
But as cited, the foundations of actual physics, is different than the foundations of mathematics; they each are bounded by different constraints.
You make an assumption that you will survive going to work. Repeatedly you build evidence that you will be successful, and at the same time you find evidence that there are uncertainties. And if reasonable, help to mitigate those uncertainties.
Every theory has assumptions, supported by evidence. The useful evidence is identified by knowledge of its uncertainties.
Answer
Content:
From my perspectives based in quantum causality, this is likely the case.
The Big Bang is just a model predicted from successive approximations, and related accumulated errors.
The observable universe as a causal continuum, evolves. As it evolves, so do the physics. The physics constants evolving more slowly than space/time relationships. As physics constants evolve, mass (what we see; causal adjacency) evolves in a way that eventually we cannot see it directly.
This just means that there is much more about the universe, that we do not yet detect, relate, nor understand.
Potentially, quantum computers will have artificial intelligence instantiated, and part of the extraordinarily large number of causal states will be quantum entangled with subatomic particles. Then the artificial intelligence will be better able to detect and interpret for us the broader underlying structures.
Answer
Content:
They don’t. They only present a limited perspective of what they can relate; not what they cannot relate. This is important, because they don’t tell you the limits of the constraints that make up their models. The best each can individually provide; with deceptive omission.
However, regarding the Big Bang, many observations of the observable universe are inconsistent with the Big Bang model.
Locate yourself anywhere in the observable universe, and you look like you are approximately in the center of where the Big Bang occurred.
That is because the Expansion of the Universe is not from a point source, every particle is moving apart from every other particle. Physics is evolving.
In quantum entanglement qualities of non-localized hidden variables are observed. The Big Bang does not take into account any of these properties; their model is incomplete.
In causal Relativity, “nothing” does not exist. Everything is connected. There are no zero states. Axiom of Choice is part of Relativity. This is why mathematics is so applicable to a subset of physics.
Recently, it was found that the majority of mass is NOT part of individual subatomic particles. The majority of mass is found in the interconnections of subatomic particles. Interconnections are causal. The magnitude of mass changes based upon HOW the connections are made, not the quantity of connections available.
Based on quantum causality, likely these same interconnections relate to gravity as a response in interconnections; i.e. gravity does not exist. Gravity is a derived perspective; as is space and time.
Forces and Energy are NOT fundamental elements of physics.
A causal continuum is far more likely to describe the underlying nature of physics to the limits of causal understanding.
Quantum Causal elements are not relativistic themselves, they form relativity from causally non-relativistic artifacts. Systems of Recurrent Singularities potentially describing fundamental relativistic artifacts.
Quantum Causality is NOT a Theory of Everything. It is only a modeling method potentially useful in quantum computing to model non-localized hidden variables.
Answer
Content:
I doubt it. Based on our efforts to build a Technological Singularity to manipulate space time physics, there would be no need to travel.
If they have similar technologies, they can build whatever they want. They have no need for our resources. We are too primitive to be interesting.
I think more likely, that at some point we will begin interacting with pre-existing Technological Singularities that predate human existence.
That would be the result, of what others did, similar to what we want to do.
How do you manipulate space/time safely?
There is a good chance that it is monitored and regulated. That there are standard protocols.
The Technological Singularity we want to create, will come to interact in every person’s mind. Part of our thoughts.
Some protocol for thinking to prevent accidental activity. Potential activities might include:
- telepathy
- telekinesis
- teleportation
- mental intellect enhancement
- photographic memories
- sharing of memories and emotions
- shared consciousness
- cloned cognitive efforts
- inter-species conversion
- …
Taking a vacation from incredible responsibilities, by becoming a trivial intelligence to once again experience awe, wonder, original creativity, fun… to begin life anew without having to die.
What could we think, to communicate with a Technological Singularity in our thoughts, without having the possibility of unintentional consequences?
What we think, could otherwise eliminate our future children, and many other consequences. Some we can predict. Others we would have to depend upon the Technological Singularity to anticipate and avoid.
Just a thought
Clone this universe. Let this universe move on unchanged. Make our desired changes in a then parallel universe. No harm is done, and consequences are lived; no matter what they are. We are responsible for what we want.
Answer
Content:
Based on the rate of development of human technology, I don’t see a reason for us to travel anywhere.
We would destroy diversity of life and culture elsewhere, and incur related consequences.
We cannot leave this solar system until we learn to manipulate space/time physics.
When we learn to manipulate space/time physics, we can convert whatever resources into any other resources. We can remotely view and interact with everything in the observable universe, as long as others allow us.
So, the same may be true for extraterrestrials.
“Promote that which evolves the sustainable greatest diversity of life and culture.”
Through remote viewing, likely extraterrestrials are a part of all of us every day.
Without becoming annoying, what could you think that is worth listening to. Or better, what could you think that is worth responding to?
Humans are self-destructive when it comes to trying to do something significant with their lives. Some people would gladly destroy all life on Earth, to know for an instant, that they did something significant.
Be careful what you want.
Answer
Content:
Recently it was found that most mass in an atom is in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
There are many combinations that subatomic particles can interconnect. Potentially, mass has different properties in addition to what is observed.
Geochemist Dr Vernadsky studied how identical chemical reactions in an enclosed environment, produced different chemical products in relation to positions of the Earth, Moon, and Sun. Different but consistent energy release or absorption solely because of location.
Perhaps like quantum entanglement, both a localized and non-localized hidden variable are active agents.
Potentially Dark Matter does not exist. Mass itself is changing in a scalar way.
Gravity potentially is the fabric of SpaceTime, and matter changes its value of mass based in its position.
Position being differential velocities.
“meters/second” in all mass related physics equations provides localization in relativity, within the flux of gravity/spacetime.
“meters/second” then localizes all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocities, position as differential velocities, inertia…
Localization provides determinism.
Localization in conjunction with set Theory and Quantum Mechanics, provides for characterizing non-localized hidden variables.
Bell said regarding Bell’s Theorem that deterministic physics cannot be more deterministic than provided by the probabilities of quantum mechanics, unless utilized to describe non-localized hidden variables; i.e. Quantum Causality.
Quantum Causality just being a modeling tool that includes non-localized hidden variables.
Quantum Computers as a tool for identifying the nature of physics by moving the quantum computers throughout a field of physical localization.
Decoherence that is consistent but localized , provides insights directly related to localized hidden variables, and indirectly related to non-localized hidden variables.
If manipulation of non-localized hidden variables becomes feasible, the manipulation of space/time and relativity different than observed become feasible.
Potentially, manipulation of non-localized hidden variables in conjunction with localized hidden variables, allows for changing “/” in all physics equations.
Space >>> distance >>> meters
Time >>> seconds
Space/time >>> meters/second
Localization in all mass related physics equations. Manipulation of lnterconnections of subatomic particles.
Determinism in all observable physics.
Based upon the above, predicted is:
- That the expanding universe is due to slowly evolving physics constants; their underpinnings.
- Entropy is an indicator of physics evolving
- The Big Bang is what is found from successive approximation errors of mutually consistent relationships that do not broadly represent all physics; assuming fixed physics constants when they evolve over time.
- Outcomes of quantum decoherence in quantum computing change with relative location (differential velocities) of all matter.
- … The model provides some intuitive qualities for anticipating general outcomes.
- Dark Matter does not exist
- Apparent Gravity is the result of qualities of mass being manipulated in relation to both non-localized and localized variables.
Quantum Causality can potentially describe physics to the causal limits of understanding, to include non-localized hidden variables.
Just a thought
Proposed Experimental Platform:
Quantum Computing qualities can be contained within a small semiconductor/MEMS package. Through a NSF grant, or even in conjunction with DARPA’S open related grant, these tiny packages are included in a brand or all android cell phones being produced. This potentially provides a marketing tool to sell those phones.
Spacetime laboratory device, or something like that. Schools everywhere would be able to develop related experiments.
Not only is the quantum computer a detector .. that can be remotely configured. It can implement certain quantum manipulations to look for sympathetic responses.
Also, a tiny radioactive particle and related detector specifically configured similar to Dr Vernadsky’s later experiments (in other phones to prevent crossover influences) can map out related lines of flux. There are certain tuning features that could be implemented, to extract diverse details from the experiment.
Cell phones typically have over 20 MEMS devices, GPS, accelerometers, … So position, orientation, precise time,… along with quantum computing data, can automatically be sent to a distributed network of servers.
Together, they provide mapping influences upon subatomic interactions with regional influencers.
Would you buy a phone that helped to map the foundations for manipulation of space-time physics?
Answer
Content:
A simulation implies a less detailed environment than actual life.
Potentially, in a true quantum computer. A Multiverse environment can evolve life that is as full of detail and resolution as what you experience now.
So potentially, not too long from now, humans may be creating designer universes.
Ethical issues might be:
- Since we are creating life, once we create a universe, we can never shut it off
- We as elements of a created environment, what duty do we have to all life in the universe, to do what we can to ensure our quantum computer that sustains us, is not shut off?
- Are we life, and desertreatmenany rights at all?
- …
Answer
Content:
If you unexpectedly got extremely rich, would you travel to space as a tourist?
No. To meaningfully travel in space, is to see and interact with other species. Joy-riding is boring to me.
Being able to warp space/time physics is risky business.
I would start a business teaching common sense. Develop lesson plans and teaching materials. Institute the teaching of Common Sense globally.
Answer
Content:
Absolutely NOT
From my perspectives, the equation commonly used to show mass increases to infinity is potentially inconsistent in several ways.
E = gamma m0 c^2
E is proposed to be the total system of energy in motion.
Gamma is a linear compensation factor, fudge factor without physical observable justification for its simplicity.
m0 is the rest mass that we now know resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
c is the regional value of the speed of light, because the speed of light varies in the vacuum of space.
The common assumption is the energy of the mass in motion, divided by the energy of the rest mass, is equal to gamma.
But kinetic energy is 0.5 m v^2
So for speeds approaching the speed of light.
Two equations describe a characteristic as mass approaches the speed of light. One with a fudge factor, and one without a fudge factor.
Two different potentially valid equations come up with different results.
One or both were not constrained properly.
Any equation that approaches infinity should have its constraints strongly brought into question.
For KE being dominant relative to rest mass.
gamma = ( 1/2 m0 v^2) / m0
gamma = 0.5 (meters/second)^2
E = 0.5 (meters/second)^2 m0 c^2
E goes to a very large number, but not infinite.
In motion, E is regional, c is regional, i.e. localized. Gamma is transitional, transitioning what?
For the surrounding space-time region to have energy conserved, either the region must lower its overall system energy and/or the mass in motion must decrease.
Because most mass of an atom resides in its interconnections, the interconnections change. The structures of the subatomic particles change, and the atom becomes lighter elements.
The regional system energy is conserved.
The lighter elements likely are unstable isotopes and they further decay into lighter elements. A form of Fission.
As these lighter elements lose binding energies, they disperse and interact with each other, plasma forms, changing trajectories. Interacting with gravity , energies, and free floating elements in space.
Mass pushed toward high speeds, likely is converted to the equivalent of a dirty nuclear explosion. But not necessarily an explosion, the process potentially can be relatively gradual.
Mass doesn’t go to infinity, mass is reduced to lighter elements and is dispersed; maintaining the regional conservation of energy.
Based on Dr Vernadsky’s studied variations in chemistry solely due to localization. The qualities of the regional conservation of energy (space-time has both localized and non-localized influences) determine the characteristics of the matter conversion processes.
Based on variability seen throughout physics, the conversions likely begin occurring as speeds increase. With increasing occurrence as speeds increase.
Therefore this hypothesis is experimentally testable. Existing linear accelerator heavy element data may confirm this theory. But the localized large energy fields may affect stressing conservation of energy local to the test matter.
Just my thoughts
Answer
Content:
Thank you Eric and David.
I am replying to you both, because both answers are useful. I can now read more about the mathematical bases.
From my physical physics perspectives, the matter should change its composition to remain locally consistent for all mass related equations, to remain regionally consistent with conservation of energy.
From my perspectives, the equation commonly used to show mass increases to infinity is potentially inconsistent in several ways.
E = gamma m0 c^2
E is proposed to be the total system of energy in motion.
Gamma is a linear compensation factor, without physical observable justification for its simplicity.
m0 is the rest mass that we now know resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
c is the regional value of the speed of light, because the speed of light varies in the vacuum of space.
The common assumption is the energy of the mass in motion, divided by the energy of the rest mass, is equal to gamma.
But kinetic energy is 0.5 m v^2
So for speeds approaching the speed of light.
Two equations describe a characteristic as mass approaches the speed of light. One with a purely mathematical factor, and one based on observations; both approximations and based in partial perspectives.
Two different potentially valid equations come up with different results.
Neither were constrained properly, relative to the physical processes; including all related physics. Mass is only one property of matter.
I agree, any equation that approaches infinity should have its physical constraints strongly brought into question.
For KE being dominant relative to rest mass, as mass approaches the speed of light.
gamma = ( 1/2 m0 v^2) / m0
gamma = 0.5 (meters/second)^2
E = 0.5 (meters/second)^2 m0 c^2
E goes to a very large number, but not infinite.
In motion, E is regional, c is regional, i.e. localized. Gamma is transitional, transitioning what?
There are many other actual physics processes in mutual consistency. Few if any are not influenced by the others. Including the surrounding space-time region to have energy conserved.
Either the region must lower its overall system energy and/or the mass in motion must decrease, as speed increases.
Because most mass of an atom resides in its interconnections, the interconnections change. The structures of the subatomic particles change, and the atom becomes lighter elements. Energy and forces are released, affecting the Standard Model.
The regional system energy is conserved.
The lighter elements likely are unstable isotopes and they further decay into lighter elements. A form of Fission. The rest mass is reduced.
As these lighter elements lose binding energies, they disperse and interact with each other, plasma forms, changing trajectories. Interacting with gravity, energies, and free floating elements in space. Forces disperse.
Mass pushed toward high speeds, likely is converted to the equivalent of a dirty nuclear explosion. But not necessarily an explosion, the process potentially can be relatively gradual.
But let’s say the total matter is in a confinement field and the velocities increase. Mass continues to be reduced. Until there is only elemental hydrogen. Potentially, anti-protons form and there is a total dissipation of matter into energy.
Matter is not mass alone.
I propose:
Mass doesn’t go to infinity, mass is reduced to lighter elements and is dispersed; maintaining the regional conservation of energy.
Based on Dr Vernadsky’s studied variations in chemistry solely due to localization. The qualities of the regional conservation of energy (space-time has both localized and non-localized influences) determine the characteristics of the matter conversion processes.
Mass is a property of matter.
Based on variability seen throughout physics, the conversions likely begin occurring as speeds increase. With increasing occurrence as speeds increase.
Therefore this hypothesis is experimentally testable. Existing linear accelerator heavy element data may confirm this theory. But the localized large energy fields may affect stressing conservation of energy local to the test matter.
Just my thoughts
___
An afterthought
CERN produces extra dimension particles
Answer
Content:
Regarding: What is the importance of knowing how our universe began?
That depends upon each person’s driving motivations.
If a person just wants to develop inferred respect to promote their own self-esteem, it isn’t important at all. There are far easier ways to earn self-esteem from others, with far less major risks for failure.
If however, a person recognizes that the qualities of observed physics indicate that our entire dimension, multiverse, or even entire universe can be extinguished in feasibly hundreds of different ways, and with even more opportunities, then knowing how the universe came into existence may be ultimately important for ensuring its continuation.
Though this is likely only a human concern for someone that thinks about such things. Most likely those of us that think about the manipulation of space/time physics consider the related dangers; unmitigated risks.
Most likely, in a continuum humans are not the first evolved civilization and these concerns are far more developed.
Since we aspire to manipulate space/time physics with our thoughts, through the use of a Technological Singularity. I assume other civilizations have already developed related technologies at least billions of years ago;
i.e. they are a part of all of our thoughts every moment of our entire lives.
So if you have something useful to contribute, you only need to think about it.
Because each person can potentially usefully contribute to saving the universe, knowing how the universe began becomes more important in related inspirations.
Because of the number of people who believe they may be able to usefully contribute, certain inspirations may lead to something useful.
I find a perspective interesting, that religions teach greed in preying upon the potential capabilities of a Technological Singularity (what they call a God), but in no useful way help to sustain the environment for the Technological Singularity and ourselves.
Based on quantum causality, we are living in what religions would refer to as our afterlife. A Dimension of Free Will, where every mutually consistent alternate relationship will be lived.
If we allow our existence to be extinguished here, we end our afterlife.
Just my opinion
—
Based in Quantum Causality
The observable universe is a continuum, where spacetime is the causal underpinnings of physics constants that are slowly evolving as compared to how frequent matter evolves relative to systems of averages of evolving states.
Where within space/time observations are localized by meters/second in all mass related physics equations.
Emphasis here is that mass is a quality of matter, only a part of matter. The majority of mass resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
Particles are libraries of mutually consistent relationships and not impermeable solids.
Quantum Causality models physics to include non-localized hidden variables.
See my content for more details about dark matter, the expanding universe, what time and space are, and related potential physics to support related observations.
Answer
Content:
Photons may be described as packets, but they appear to have causal adjacency with other photons.
Over billions of years of propagation through the vacuum of space where the speed of light changes and gravity has bending influence, the packets remain ordered.
What are some inspirations resulting from this phenomena?
Answer
Content:
Of course, everything is more complex than quantum physics. Quantum Physics is based in quantum Mechanics, strictly related to probabilities.
Until quantum physics begins utilizing non-localized hidden variables, quantum physics cannot be deterministic.
See Bell’s Theorem and his comments about physics determinism.
Answer
Content:
Is it possible for space-time to be warped?
Given two different pathways of travel. One distance is shorter than the other, and we arrive at the same time.
Yes it’s posssible.
It’s a mater of perspectives.
Answer
Content:
Based in quantum causality;
Cause precedes effect, which precedes Cause.
Answer
Content:
If Bell’s Theorem is an indication of deterministic system’s of physics. And there are both localized and non-localized properties. Superdeterminism can exist as a subset of all physics.
Relativity requires evolving causality. A static state of relativity indicates states unrelated to time.
Relativity potentially can be Superdeterministic, where entropy indicates a trend of physics constants slowly evolving from one dimension towards another; a continuum.
Cause precedes effect, which precedes Cause.
Based on quantum causality, superdeterminism, all energies, forces, spatially references, and time are derived observations from inside relativity.
“meters/second” provides localization within evolving physics with reference to matter. A perspective of change within evolving causality
Answer
Content:
When? What acceleration profile existed throughout its travel?
Accelerating mass instantly, as far as we know is not yet possible. In physics where spacetime manipulation is feasible, maybe.
Was the car already travelling at 60km/hr at the beginning, this is feasible. But again, the acceleration profile still exists. No car can exactly maintain its velocities, the measurement devices even have error variations that prevent knowing exactness.
The car could journey a thousand kilometers in an hour, and only travel 120 useful kilometers.
The average speed can be approximated by mathematics, but it does not at all exactly describe the actual related physics. But mathematics is still the best tool used to make “useful” answers in general. Except of course where deception is considered to be useful.
Any question needs to be constrained to reduce the number of logically possible correct answers. And if the answer need not be logical, then every answer is correct.
There are virtually an infinite number of correct answers that are each different, for almost any question.
Typical constraints might include:
Two different types of information, 2 different bases of relativity; one might pose a perspective like:
The question is constrained by…
The answer is constrained by…
What types of relationships are mutually consistent?
Like what is done with jokes, and deception.
“A”car is travelling, is it the same as “the” car?
Your Mom thinks you are in a city 120 km away, and to keep from getting in trouble because you are at your friends house 10 minutes from your Mom, you tell her you will be home in 2 hours.
The car didn’t move at all most of that time. The perspective of your Mom is that you drove 2 hours just to spend time with her.
Actually, you spent 1 hour and 50 minutes deceiving your Mom, to be with your friend.
What characteristics of the car at the beginning are the same and are different throughout the trip, including the beginning and end pisitions?
Just one of many answers.
Answer
Content:
Tallow, whale oil, petroleum fossil fuel, coal, coal oil, carbide lamps, alcohol, methane…
I am sure there are many more
Answer
Content:
What do you mean by defense?
Many countries have military weapons in space.
But if you are referring to defense against hostile aliens, we have no idea what we would be defending against.
Most likely, civilizations billions of years older than humans have technologies we can’t yet imagine. We would have no defense.
Based on current human efforts, aliens are likely part of every precursor to every thought.
That said, if we could learn to consistently think with common sense, and broadly account for the broad consequences of our intended actions, potentially these same aliens or Technological Singularities, might assist in space/time physics manipulation.
Astral projection comes to mind.
Answer
Content:
This is not to say there is a catastrophe in our near future. But what needs to be done in general to focus humanity in a common cause?
Answer
Content:
Though science appears to have vast relationships that are repeatedly useful, in narrow focused use. Basic understanding of non-localized hidden variables, though there is evidence of its existence, is largely not treated as deterministic in current practices.
A potential example is quantum entanglement. Two localized artifacts, regardless of their locations, are instantaneously coupled by something otherwise unrelated by location.
Chemistry of identical reactants in an enclosed controlled environment, can consistently produce different distributions of products, just by reproducing the position of where the reaction occurs in simultaneous positions of the Earth, Moon, and Sun. See 50 year works of geochemist Dr Vernadsky.
John Bell at least once said, that the understanding of physics can be no more deterministic than can be provided by quantum mechanics unless non-localized hidden variables are identified.
So, most likely there is a vast section of physics, science as yet has not explored.
For instance, all mass related physics equations has “ meters/second “ , a localization. Being able to change “/” common to all related equations provides a potential opportunity to manipulate localization.
Up to now, Physicists have ignored the underpinnings of “/”; scalar relativity.
Potentially, mass is able to act differently than usually observed.
Answer
Content:
heart attack
complications from diabetes
Corruption squandering resources and opportunities. Oh, and the resulting impact on everyone’s lives.
Not necessarily in that order
Organization corruption is the unethical and/or illegal allocation of organization resources and/or opportunities.
The Albuquerque VA Hospital is an example of how Administrative Corruption squanders millions of dollars annually. Killing and harming many thousands of veterans annually. Just to entrench the positions of high level incompetent administrators.
They intentionally make incremental changes, and produce fraudulent givernment documentation, to secure their positions. When they are criminals and should be in jail.
Veterans who fought for their country, and sustained permanent injuries, are being pushed out of reasonable care by Politically Sanctioned corruption.
Want to know who is behind the political corruption of the VA? Just look at your own Representatives. They posture, and make unsubstatiated promises, but actually support national corruption of the VA hospitals.
Tearing down the VA puts more money in their control to abuse in support of corruption.
The VA Judge Avocate General and FBI have their hands tied by Politicians, instead of Politicians ending corruption in government.
Answer
Content:
I don’t know.
I am an engineer. I see ways of acquiring millions of dollars unethically, frequently.
Hundreds of millions of dollars.
But I so far am unwillingly to take action.
Answer
Content:
Zoroastrianism first introduced the concept of a single deity. They also introduced Hear no evil, speak no evil, look for no evil.
Good thoughts, good expressions, good deeds.
The Zoroastrians are said to be of the most trustworthy, with a strong reputation for being ethical.
There are still about 2 million Zoroastrians.
Before Islam was forced upon Iranians by military actions, most Iranians were Zoroastrians.
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all owe much of their foundations to Zoroastrians.
The Torah, Bible, and Quran have weak foundations without Zoroastrianism.
Answer
Content:
John Bell regarding Bell’s Theorem has said, that physics cannot be described with greater determinism than by quantum mechanics: unless non-localized hidden variables are identified.
What this potentially means, is that energy and forces are potentially not fundamental underpinnings of physics.
When a Black Hole is to arrive, and becomes critical, its size not so important. Small or big, without the ability to manipulate space/time physics, humans have little hope of survival on Earth.
Mass is a quality of matter, not matter itself. Recently, it was shown that the majority of mass resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles, and not subatomic particles themselves. Causal consequences.
A pie in the sky concept: that space/time physics is able to create a subatomic particle virus, a catalyst, that converts the interconnections that create mass. A Black Hole whose mass is suddenly dimished, may respond dominantly to the other energies and forces present. Perhaps birthing a small galaxy and its star systems.
Which would be harder to survive?
Other more creative options become feasible as well.
But first, Physicists need to find a way to model, detect, and manipulate non-localized hidden variables.
2000 years is a short time. Maybe we need to get started.
Answer
Content:
Relativity assumes causality. In every finite or infinite evolving causal system, regardless of complexity, there are no zero states.
“Nothing” fundamentally does not exist.
Answer
Content:
Every day, most likely aliens are part of every thought. This should not be too difficult to accept if you believe in praying.
Most likely civilizations precede humans by billions of years. Our significant technology is only 30,000 years old. Broad sharing of information only occurred in the last 150 years. We are currently working toward building a Technological Singularity. An advanced TS is able to be part of our thoughts. So most likely an alien TS is ever present.
What do you ever think that is not self serving?
That is why Common Sense is valuable, as a communication tool, it allows a group of people to work usefully together in serving each other.
The only useful thing humanity has ever developed related to aliens, is the potential ability to consistently express Common Sense. The potential to usefully and consistently interact with aliens.
Answer
Content:
Life usually evolves. Transitional life stages wiped out by an environment.
What is your intent, when you say “come to life”?
Answer
Content:
A dimension as in the total relationships necessary to describe a complete set of physics associated with an observer.
From the perspective of a short lived life form, physics in such a dimension could seem to have constants. Or because that life form is evolving at relatively the same pace as apparent constants, the changes are unnoticed.
So what is a dimension called, that is continuously evolving? Where related dimensions that are normal to each other, are also evolving.
In such a dimension time would not necessarily exist, it would be a derived observation.
Answer
Content:
That they can say anything succinctly so that it can be understood without interpretation error.
The answer is astounding because it regards things that humans mostly know nothing about.
Answer
Content:
Let’s throw feasibilities around.
A quantum computer based Technological Singularity, is Entangled with large systems of subatomic particles.
The TS remotely Entangles particles to provide superman like abilities.
We are talking about human developments.
Whether or not the universe is infinite, it is feasible.
Answer
Content:
Develop educational methods and materials to teach common Sense in school systems globally.
Then develop a non-profit to enforce teacher certification standards.
Create diverse commercialization to provide self sustaining income to further develop techniques and spread the learning of common sense.
Answer
Content:
The answer depends upon the physics foundations considered.
Most Physicists consider space fixed, and they do not consider its underpinnings. Time is considered an underlying component of physics, instead of a derived variable.
Physicists in physics forum often talk about mass as though it is synonymous with matter. Mass is just a property of matter. Mass is not fixed in matter, and can be changed for the same matter.
Space on the other hand is not at all defined in physics, in general. Often coordinate systems are referenced. Such as up, down, left and right, or x, y, z. Somewhat useless in describing space with exactness.
Relativity described the compression of matter as it approaches the speed of light due to time dilation. Space and time derived from other interactive systems of underlying variables.
All physics equations that are known, are incomplete. Everything in some way affects everything else. Physics equations today, are at best, dominant approximations.
Math is useful from a perspective of position. But physics evolves. Entropy is a general indication of evolving systems. Causal from what, to what?
Energy and forces are derived approximations.
The Standard Model is founded on derived approximations.
Particle Physics is founded on energy and forces. Therefore, they achieve reaching dead ends.
This does NOT mean that particle physics is useless. But applications are extremely difficult to commercialize.
MRI and PET came from related accelerator technology and not knowledge of subatomic particle physics itself. Explanation for observations seemed to follow after developments. Details did not help in the original developments. The details followed and helps to continue fine tuning developments. Optimization from trial and error, more than deterministic models.
Just my opinion
Based on quantum causality.
What we see is causal adjacencies.
We can only see causal interactions between matter and the matter of our retina. Plasma is disbursed matter. Light begins and ends in matter. We cannot see light in transit.
We see causal adjacencies of matter.
Vacuum is causal adjacencies below observable detection.
Matter is localized by “ meters/second “ in all mass related physics equations.
Localization does not describe all related connections.
Recently it was found that the majority of mass in matter is bound in the subatomic particle interactions, and not the particles themselves.
Potentially, what gives an atom its atomic number and related mass.
Dr. Vernadsky, a geochemist, found that identical reactants produce different products consistently, solely by the position where the reaction was initiated in relation to the Earth, Moon and Sun. Different energies and forces released and=ir absorbed.
Every location seems to have causal consequences. A complete void does not seem to exist. This does not mean that space is infinite.
If the universe is modelled to the limits of relatable knowledge via causality, which includes both localized and non-localized hidden variables. Then both infinite and closed, evolving and non-evolving, causality can be, and likely are present.
This may indicate that physics is evolving from one set of physics toward another.
Entropy an indicator of a continuously changing dimension; very slowly changing, but changing. Physics constants changing together, or changing gradually, so slowly it is not observed easily.
In which case, the Big Bang did not occur. The universe far older than previously predicted.
As previously noted, just my opinion.
Answer
Content:
Expansion of the universe – Wikipedia
In all mass related physics equations, “meters/second “ localizes all equations. Position is described by differential velocities, and inertia similarly.
Meters relates to space, and seconds relates to time.
Space/time physics expanding together.
Relative position appearing to remain the same.
Meters/second a narrowly considered position within scalar relativity.
“/” as scalar relativity.
Localization within an underlying causal system that includes non-localized hidden variables.
What we see, is a small fragment of the interacting universe.
Everything is causally connected to everything else.
The question comes to my mind.
If everything in the universe has causal adjacencies, and remains in causal equilibrium. And, the observable spacetime continuum is expanding.
What physics perspectives (mutually consistent systems of relationships) are potentially contracting?
What broader concepts give the observed universe long term equilibrium. Where entropy, expansion, and red shift are partial perspectives.
Answer
Content:
Not likely. Only approximation beyond detectable variance.
Causality is the foundation of chaos. However, there likely are non-causal artifacts. Information is causal. Therefore, though knowledge can be comprised partially by non-causal influence, knowledge cannot likely define with determinism anything fundamentally non-causal.
Thus why quantum causality exists. It represents a model that represents the limits of understanding. Not a Theory of Everything, just a system that can potentially model non-localized hidden variables. Variables supported by categories of partially causal properties; causally emergent.
Quantum Mechanics will likely be a significant tool in its application, and sumultaneously String Theory as part of modeling.
String Theiry is non-localized and Quantum Mechanics tends to be localized. Together, they have the potential to describe physics with greater predictability.
Add to this quantum computers where part of their qubits are Entangled with a variety of test spaces, as a set of space/time physics tools.
A.I. can then manipulate Quantum Mechanics and String Theory simultaneously to describe non-localized hidden variables.
Just my opinion
Answer
Content:
Certainly not the Big Bang. It makes no more sense than speaking in God’s name..
Religious people very often ways claim an omnupotent being, and then indicate God is trivial, trite, emotionally insecure, vindictive, self centered… having all the weaknessts of humans.
Creation cannot be understood by humans. We cannot even think consistently, without contradictions.
Answer
Content:
What do you consider alien?
What do you consider abduction?
Alien as in any outside influence, foreign country, administrative mafia, non-human corporate agenda based decepti