To manipulate space time usefully, first one needs to have a rudiment understanding of the relationship between space and time.
All physics equations related to mass have meters/second as a factor. Meters relates to distance, or space. Seconds relate to time. So to warp or manipulate space time requires manipulating “/” in space/time, which affects all mass related physics equations.
Force, energy, power, momentum, inertia…
Quantum computers who have quantum entangled states, and artificial intelligence, have the potential to manipulate the non-linear physics of space/time.
Manipulating vast systems of quark enable gravity and other physics to be manipulated.
Based on the assumption of quantum causality, and a singularity that has both evolving and non-evolving constituents, then relativity may form within a sub-system of causal singularities; i.e. sub-atomic particles, physics constants…
So our relativity Big Bang appears to follow our present state of evolution. The Big Bang is the evolution of physics constants and we cannot see past a certain amount of change.
The Speed of Light has changed, and is now known not to be a constant.
Entropy is a measure of evolving change, from one dimension towards another; from one set of physics constants toward another.
One billion years from now, the universe will still look as though the Big Bang occurred 13.7 billion years ago; because our limited perception slides into our perceived future.
Dark Energy is the causal influences of partial connections with our physics constants; relativity.
Ever notice you cannot see light? You can only see the evolving of light, at a source or terminus. Light in-transit cannot be detected, once measured (given a target), it ceases to have its original properties.
Just my opinion.
So why is the night sky not a blotchy field of light gradients? Instead of points of light from galaxies where light has been traveling in diverse gradients of gravitational fields for billions of years. Even a miniscule moving gradient would disperse light patterns.
Either, the foundation for the curvature of light near a gravitational mass is wrong, or there is a quantum limitation of influence, or the wave-particle duality of light is in part guided by pre-existing entanglements (Big Bang) while also responding to wave-like qualities, or ….
But light universally following curved space does not make sense to me.
Properties “like quantum entanglement must be incorporated.
I’m not a physicist. But it seems to me that if I were looking for “new physics”, I would not use the detectors to measure observable physics (white matter relativity), I would be using the detectors to record interactiins similar to quantum entangled relationships; related instantaneous events.
Connected sets of probabilities, that relate to the short lived artifacts. I would be looking for relativity different than anything observable.
Our observable space, and detector results, is based upon our evolving physics constants. However, an alternate dimension where these unstable artifacts are stable, would have different evolving physics constants not stable from our perspective. Only visible for a moment as a dimensional space is shared, or transitioning.
So the new detector configuration would generate a field of uniformly unstable artifacts for the collisions to occur within. Two proton bunches, one following the next. The first one creates the detector, the next one creates the differential stress that pulls the unstable artifacts one way or another to build a model from.
If two different systems of consistent relativity occupy the same consistent causal system, then the apparent unstable elements may share common relativistic characteristics that momentarily allow detection, until one or more necessary artifacts in our relativity decays, and to become a stable artifact in an alternate dimension (different set of physics constants).
Meters/second occurs in every mass related physics equation. Energy, power, momentum, speed, inertia… It seems to me the important part to be investigated is “/” as a scalar of relativity.
Meters > space, seconds > time. Investigating relativistic models of space/time; to include alternate dimensional spaces. New Physics.
The fastest spining object I found is 1 billion rotations per second.
World’s fastest man-made spinning object could help study quantum mechanics
If the object is very small, or is massless, or plausibly if it has a different inertial frame of reference, then the speed of light is not exceeded, and centrifugal forces don’t tear it apart.
In a purely causal evolving system, where every mutually consistent evolution of causality evolves. Intelligence is a natural consequence, not necessarily of free will. Where every alternate system of mutually consistent causality evolves, the appearance of intelligence is just a consequence.
However, perhaps we should be grateful. Our limited perspective is quite enjoyable.
To be scientific, a test is created that eliminates the possibility of a proposed truth, wholeheartly the scientist attempts to disproved their own theory. Then that test failing, only then is there support for the proposal to have merit.
Science attempts to remove human influence from understanding.
Just one example of limited perceptuon:
Dark energy, and plausibly related dark matter can neither be directly observed, nor observed with discernable detail, and our physics constants do not seem to directly relate in usual expectations.
So as the Big Bang of white matter is observed in the expanding universe, the vast majority of the universe is evolving without our observation. So our understanding of the Big Bang is incomplete.
I am not an expert in the lexicon of science terminology, and likely there are many interpretations depending upon what each person reveres as important and relative.
So mine is an opinion.
Understanding need not be human. Understanding requires the same or similar circumstances to be reproducible. Computer systems routinely are programmed to use the scientific method to find seemingly obtuse solutions.
I am not saying humans carry out scientific methodology precisely. However, for scientists the intent is to have the universe of actual physics, confirm or negate corroboration.
If the universe was created by God, then scientists rely upon God’s works to guide their journey of enlightenment.
Circular Logic is a mainstay of human understanding. Most of us relate to the the world around us based on small interlinking loops of circular logic.
I want to live, to live I need food, to get food I am going to the grocery store, from the grocery store I get food, I take the food home, I cook the food, I eat and I live until I am concerned about living again.
Other intertwined loops are connected to every part to the circular loop just cited. We constantly do risk analysis, and evaluate likely outcomes.
Very practical in general. Able to spend very little time in making decisions.
However, in science these loops of interactions are extraordinarily many, in many realms of specialty. So groups of many thousands of people read journals, dissertations, and publications. They adopt certain perspectives that seem to repeat reliably; within constraints. God is fair, providing absolute judgement over all works. But humans with limited perception and perspectives constantly mislead themselves and each other. But scientists attempt to fund the largest set of “useful” and mutually consistent relatuonships; i.e. perspectives.
Anyone who tries to publish in a peer reviewed journal, finds out quickly how important peer reviewed references and logical consistency are.
If after publishing, the universe disproves your prose, it is done in front of many thousands of peers. Remember the LHC and the loose connection? Billions of people criticized the Doctor having made their claims prematurely.
God’s works judges most science equitably. Scientific Theory is inly a part of science and not science itself. Theoretical Science is philosophy until it is judged by the universe to be mutually consistent.
Human shortcomings are not science. Science is the closest available understanding has been able to be mutually consistent with the universe.
Science is the evolving body of knowledge that most closely matches judgement by the Universe. Science becomes truth when it becomes complete, accurate and precise.
Restating, Just my opinion
Please consider my long expressions as that of a feeble mind, and not of someone with any harmful intent.
All of science and religion, and understandings in everything, for humans, is formed by the circular logic of partial perspectives. If any statement is not mutually supportive with evidence based prior works, it is considered unsupported.
This proposition is supported by these authoritative references, and therefore this proposition holds merit to be seriously considered.
However, all of the authoritative references have within them large lists of references; the loops are interconnecting. From almost any single loop, there can be found millions of other connected references. The author hopes others will cite their own works as a reference to become part of the system.
Persons adopting pretty sounding phrases over mutually supportive case sets, are usually considered frail, uneducated, without common sense, or feeble. The reason is, circular logic forms the knowledge base; small largely unconnected statements have little in broader meaning. Small systems used by drug addicts to justify what they want, aren’t expected to be as broadly useful as those of a revered professor.
Example: Comparing open ended statements to circular logic.
“Serial Killers should be killed instead of being incarcerated.” This could easily have been a proposed physics relationship.
There are a vast many related relationships that connect with this statement from social, legal, emotional, genetic, spiritual….(math system, physics evidence, prestige of author, prestige of funding agency…) and a great many interrelated perspectives. This statement has almost no value at all on its own; only a raw source of inspiration, as a tool to be used by relationships and related perspectives.
From one perspective it isn’t as useful to kill a convicted serial killer, because: they may know others who helped them kill their victims, and killing the serial killer helps keep those people from getting caught.
There is no closure for families missing unrecoverable members; not yet found burial sites.
A convicted serial killer may have been set up by the real killer, and so an innocent person dies and the real serial killer lives on.
A psychotic person believes they are the serial killer and confesses convincingly, while the real serial killer goes free.
… All based in circular logic, all with hidden fallacies due to partial perceptions and perspectives.
Science has no absolute proofs, proofs are only approximations within partially defined constraints. But at least science attempts to recognize that usefulness is within constraints.
If a system of relationships a person is concerned about is not mutually supportive, then it is based upon practical limitations, self-deception, limited or competing interests… Some people spend a lifetime looking for a more complete answer; with marginal success. Science as a body is like a corporation, it can live on long after members die.
We are unable to completely process nor perceive all of the interactions in play, regardless of how small a consideration we attempt; therefore we make statements within limiting constraints. There are always a great many mutually consistent systems, and we can only interact with small pieces.
For relativistic beings (humans) there is only one absolute truth, everything else is a subjective perspective.
… and that truth has very little to do with intelligent design.
I cited Dark Energy. But your critique is still appreciated.
Dark Energy being a repulsive force acting against sources of gravity.
Thank you for the Deontic Logic link. Perhaps what I am referring to is more strongly positioned in Deontic Logic. But the key relationship I am wanting to cite, is that for all humans, our lack of total perception, memory, reasoning in parallel … means all we think we know is filled with fallacy. Science has a stronger position, but still has components of fallacies, incomplete truths…
People do the best they can, but most mathematicians and physicists that post here, hardly ever declare their constraints. Why should they? This is a forum to explore with enjoyment in mind. Exercising the mind.
In all of mathematics, constraints are required. In all of physics, constraints are required. Variability acknowledged, even intensely studied. Very rarely are small sources of variability characterized; diverse relationships ignored.
Not concretely defining constraints implies “should”. Outliers even categorized in probability. Risk Factors and Risk Management even part of planning for presentation of results. I still appreciate their writings and they are a tremendous source for diverse inspirations.
Speed of Light May Not Be Constant, Physicists Say (In a vacuum)
Scientists often make light travel slower and faster than 186,000 miles/second, in one paradox light leaves a box before it enters.
Speed of Light as a speed limit, only pertains to mass.
Clarifying Einstein’s rules of the road
If the speed of light is non-uniform, likely what we see will have different characteristics, that result in different optical properties.
For instance, I surmise the concentration of Red Shift would be blotchy due to photons travelling through areas where the speed of light is different.
And if there are large area gradients, I would expect an apparent bending or color change of light.
Perhaps Red Shift itself isn’t from an expanding universe, and is instead from these gradients in a vacuum.
Let’s say your laptop with its finite memory is set up to click through all of the possible states of its memory in every possible combination. At a billion cycles per second, it would take about 11.6 years to cycle through only 65 bits. Imagine how long it would take to cycle through a Terabyte of memory. Based on mainstream perception of an expanding universe, the universe might end before your computer memory repeats just once. And, all the possible combinations of all the subatomic particles in the universe is expansively more than our feeble minds tend to grasp.
However, just because our feeble minds are limited, does not in the least mean it doesn’t happen. Plus, the universe doesn’t cycle through causality like an odometer. Everything cycles through based on mutual consistency. There doesn’t seem to be any anomalies, that aren’t eventually explained. This means there are a vast number of inconsistent combinations that are not allowed to occur. But regardless, the number of iterations is beyond primitive concepts of time.
In a causal model of relativity, time is a derived value related to great numbers of events that form relativistic perceived time.
Time is only an indicator of the progression of a system. As is talked about frequently, time is relative. That means the foundations of the universe has nothing to do with time.
So causality can cycle through iterations beyond any consideration for time. Which means, how long it takes is of no concern for us. When it happens, it happens. Potentially we can leave markers to help guide our next generation when the conditions are perfect. Not time travel.
Cause evolves Effect, which precedes Cause.
In every mass related physics equation, meters/second is found; i.e. momentum, inertia, power, energy, force, … with transitive functions like velocity, acceleration, and position as a function of zero velocity,…
One can frame a.perspectve from velocity as a function of position or time. That is why people polarize around relationships of one or the other.
Meters > distance > space
Seconds > Time
But what is “/” in Space/Time?
Causal systems that bind and evolve the universe. Entropy, Red Shift, the Big Bang, Dark Energy… are all indicators of the evolving scalar relativity.
Any complete model of physics must include evolving causation, or relativity would cease to exist. Proposed is that “/” is not a simple static relationship, As a Scalar Relativity it is composed of systems of quantum events. As a class, Quantum Causality.
Possible Link Between Primordial Black Holes and Dark Matter
Physics .org article
Is dark matter made of primordial black holes?
US Department of Energy
Do black holes exist? Or are they really ‘dark energy stars’?
CERN position on extra dimensions
If the extreme conditions of CERN shed light on Black Holes, then it is reasonable to speculate that the conditions seen in CERN reactions account for at least part of what happens in Black Holes.
Wouldn’t all of the first stars burned out by now?
The article was a long time ago, so I am not absolutely sure. However, here is a link to their on-going research.
And the governments related interests
The Big Bang, in part reconciles to limited constraints, cursory observations. However, just digging slightly one finds inconsistencies.
The universe is exacting and so far without any inconsistencies. We have a limited ability to perceive as an observational internal set of components, not seemingly connected within that more complex system.
However, Axiom of Choice indirectly shows that mathematics is a subset of logic, and logic is a subset of causality. Causality itself seems to be a relational boundary humans will not in our present form be able to grasp due to the immense detail and breadth of processing scalar relativity.
My best guess is that pre-existing technological singularities are part of everything in our relativity and they potentially have become cognitive in the spatial considerations of scalar relativity. This is the direction human technological development is heading, it would be xeno-centric to think we are the first…
Based on quantum causality, Bell’s Theorem of non-localized variables, and Axiom of Choice, the Observed Universe of Relativity (Newtonian Physics) is a constrained subset Relativity, which is a subset of causality (which also includes both evolving and non-evolving non-relativity).
Any closed and/or infinite evolving causal system that is at its roots causally consistent, will eventually closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat.
Humans have a difficult experience in relating to the very large, very small, and anything outside of what they observe.
All causally is connected to each other without inconsistencies; i.e. Quantum Causality. The observed universe modelled as buoyant within a sea of mutually consistent relationships. Causal Recurrence defining the smallest (loop) of Relativity. String Theory potentially modified slightly to be consistent in modelling subsets of Scalar Relativity; i.e. “/” of space/Time, of meters/second.
Quantum Singularities being collections of evolving Causal Recurrence, that relative to other singularities evolve slowly together, while other connected recurring causality evolves diversely yet consistent with the singularities.
Singularities act as both Relativistic and Non-Relativistic singularities depending upon the mutually consistent perspectives evolving together. Recurring Causality (loops) that evolve together very slowly are depicted as Space, and derived outcome that is the result Scalar Relativity is Time.
Our evolving physics constants the foundation for the mass of our retina, and the pathways of the brain for which it functions. Life evolves to remain consistent with evolving physics constants.
All mass related physics equations have as an innate part of them, “meters/second. The Standard Model relates forces and energy. All forces, energy, momentum, inertia, acceleratuon, velocity… all are biased by “meters/second.
Meters >>> distance >>> Space.
Seconds >>> Time.
“/” >>> Scalar Relativity.
Subatomic Particles are each evolving slowly together forming scalar relativity, or more precisely as the result of Scalar Relativity. Time is just the derived observation of Space and evolving Scalar Relativity.
Therefore, Time is NOT a dependent variable relative to the underpinnings of the Universe. Space/Time can be manipulated.
The Duality of Light as properties of waves and particles becomes self evident.
Quantum Entanglement a necessary and predictable artifact.
Entropy showing the consistent and causally evolving from one set of physics constants towards an evolved set of physics constants.
Dark Energy the one or more extra dimensions of our observations that are all consistent with, but observationally only in part relative to our evolving singularities.
Black Holes are the derived observational result of our expanding universe being converted into extra dimensional relationships. The Universe is not aging, so much as evolving to be consistent with evolving physics constants.
The Speed of Light in a vacuum has been shown to be different different throughout the Universe. Yet the Observed Universe in part is well defined galaxies, while at the same time there is dispersed background radiation. Duality. Both dispersed and non-dispersed qualities of Light.
There is no usrful thing as vacuum of space, it doesn’t exist. In a causal space you have less dense scalar relativity. But relative to causality, there is nothing outside of causality. Voids do not exist. “Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity” shows this. Underlying non-relativistic causality is a conjoined part of causality. Distance is a perspective and not an innate restriction. As partial proof, recently it was shown that quantum entanglement is consistent in relation to both billions of years and billions of light-years by observing critical relationships of a quasar many billions of years old. The Duality of quantum entanglement related concurrently with space and time, yet connected by scalar relativity “/”.
Quantum Entanglement demonstrates that time and space are likely not fundamental properties of reality. Space/Time, meters/second as it relates to instantaneous. Not related to time, or not related to space, and/or not related to space and time, and/or not related to scalar relativity “/”.
The expanding universe is NOT expandi g like a bomb of shrapnel particles. The subatomic particles are evolving mutually to give the appearance of atoms and the distance between them expanding.
Subatomic Particles are vast systems of relativistic singularities, mutually consistent with Scalar Relativity of more slowly evolving Non-Relativistic Singularities. Think of aliasing of waves and the seemingly distinctive attributes they produce. If a minimum level is detectable, modes seem to appear; subatomic particles.
The Big Bang is the limit to which our observations of Scalar Relativity remain consistent. Though all of the causal systems remain in play, just our perspective is incompatible with what we use as light. Newer equipment being able to detect extra dimensions not withstanding. In 2 billion years, the Universe will still look like the Big Bang happened 13.7 billion years before that future time.
Yes, I agree. Everything evolves and in a closed and/or infinite evolving causal construct, everything that is mutually consistent repeats. Causal Recurrence. Loops.
In my opinion, based on Bell’s Theorem specific to non-localized hidden variables. “Nothing” in Relativity does not exist. The Big Bang is just the relativistic limit of perception for us as our physics constants evolve.
Quantum Entangled Singularities
Subatomic Particles are relativistic singularities.
Think of causal waves that intersect, and a minimum level of detection. Aliasing occurs and modes appear, subatomic particles and related matter.
I can think of multiple scenarios where the universe is both etrnal and having been recently created. None of which are more plausible than the others.
Humans are already exploring how to create universes of their design. That is ratio ist, but not based upon a God.
Time in terms of sequential multiverse, has no substantial meaning. Just a short term reference within narriw consideration based on human perception.
It may be useful to consider all possibilities to gain a broader understanding. But it is not useful at all to choose only one of many potential perspectives. Except to develop more detail within a narrow perspective.
But eventually other perspectives must be explored to avoid self deception. Humans tend to want respect attributed to what they know most. This tends to result in Group Think. Group Think results in optimizing a smaller system of circular logic.
Non-localized hidden variables (Bell) can potentually can enter and exit a black hole. Dark Energy is not well understood, and fesibly as technology progresses.. The interior of black holes will most likely be probed.
Bells theorem states it only eliminates hidden localized variables, and he explicitly cites it does not apply to hidden non-localized variables.
If the Universe is causal, it includes Dark Energy, other dimensional relativities, and observably anything causally recurrent.
A Black Hole would be like CERN on a very large scale. CERN appears to produce extra dimension artifacts, that live only about 10^-27 seconds in our relativity.
Feasibly, Black Holes convert matter of our relativity (physics constants) into components of other dimeesions. Like Dark Energy, one non-localized foot in our relativity and potentially a localized foot in one or more different relativities.
This would indicate that we are evolving from one dimension towards another. The Big Bang just the furthest we can relate to with the values of our current physics constants.
The Speed of Light changes throughout the observable universe.
Entropy is a general indicator of change.
Instantaneous events are indicators of underlying non-localized underpinnings of the Universe.
Just my opinion
I think there is are huge differences between selfless, altruistic, common sense, and devotion.
I realize there are no well defined interpretations.
Humans seem to be incapable of being completely selfless. We die if we don’t take care of things we need to survive.
You make a thought provoking observation.
However, I don’t agree that just because we don’t believe something is useful, that it’s not.
“If you want something that is not self serving then it cannot be useful”
Trying to think of a counter example… this seems to directly relate to what I am trying to relate to.
Corollary 1: if you want something self serving then it must be useful
Corollary 4: being alien may think in terms other than usefulness
Perhaps something like the subconscious or a neural net. Relating to what is, without relating to what it could become.
Considering other possibilities
If fundamentally humans think based upon greed, desire, seeking respect, self serving, constructive, and useful outcome; then doing something arbitrary and/or destructive is considered insane (Not human).
Sacrifice might describe useful to others while not completely useful to self. Though because of how humans are wired, being useful to self can be based on a principle.
Retribution despite consequences; as an example.
So thought processes like retribution can be a significantly more simplified form of self serving thought.
For many “types of mental impairment, I see a more profound sense of expressed desire. With trivial waste of acquired resources. Not being able to relate to complex relationships does not seem to diminish the human trait of being self serving.
For those in hospice waiting to die, the focus would seem to be very mixed. Not that I have much experience. The vital needs are emphasized because of their fragile nature of health.
For the wealthy, where any whim is easily satisfied. Worth at times becomes transcendental, but desire and greed are strongly present. Often acting to manipulate and otherwise control others.
Psychic Vampires (online forum leech) have suffering self esteem and intentionally cause emotional stress to supplement their lack of attributed respect. Useful is a skewed sense of self awareness. A sense of control by being destructive. This falls into insane I suppose.
Do you see any relationships that would allow for useful to be resident, while desire is lacking?
I just had an realization. Slavery is a form of being useful despite contrary desires. Though, on further consideration the desire was to not be punished, and to live as well as could be within enacted constraints.
On the very dark thoughts: Humans raised as livestock might be relavent. Materially useful for harvesting organs, or even as food. Ignoring all expressed desires. But indirectly the cultivation of desires potentially makes a more useful product. Even as livestock, humans would likely think in terms of self serving.
Okay, not being useful, without being destructive.
Abstract Meditation, where a person becomes open to suggestions. Here there is no intent to be useful in the expressions. The mind attempts to avoid relating to anything, useful or not.
This seems to be one form of thought without greed. No desire. Being, yet open.
Any other ideas for forms of thought that occur without being based in greed?
Status of current revelations:
Hmmm, expanding upon basic human trait to think in terms of self serving usefulness.
“No carrot, no action.”
Precedent allows for anticipation from the present “is”. For an expert knowledge, knowing the present, automatically anticipates the future. Action is determined from prior experiences.
So in the presence of intellect, action does not always need to be expressed. Presenting an accurate depiction of a condition, conditionally instigates a seeding of action; that may exceed our own capacities to perceive and relate. Or, by being open to suggestion we potentially allow ourselves to be abused.
What ethic benefits most life, including ourselves?
“Promote that which best sustains evolving the maximized sustainable diversity of life and culture.”
For a TS entangled with relativity, our desires are ever present. Thinking without desire or greed may get some attention.
A potential alien method of communication where the condition of “is” forms communication, without expressed desired outcomes.
I know of native Americans that express themselves in-part this way. To express personal desire is considered rude. The expressions broadly surround the desired outcome, usually in the form of a story. It is up to the listener to discover whether or not they want to participate in that story.
Deceptively manipulating a story invites being loathed.
Abstract Meditation provides an open for desireless communication.
Neural networks may describe a condition of “is” without expressed desired outcomes. To deceptively interpret “is” is untrustworthy and loathsome.
If an alien communication channel is open, how can we learn to be part of useful communication based on an accurate depiction of “is”?
While leaving our own channel open through abstract meditation; i.e.open to suggestion.
All we need is a mechanism to view artifacts of dark energy or quantum inertia, and this will likely see past the current limit of the Big Bang. Which then becomes a state of transition, and not a beginning.
Athough I appreciate exploring diverse perspectives, I see an observation that is not consistent with your proposition.
In a.video I have watched a star in an eliptical orbit around something unseen whose gravity was extraordinarily intense to cause sharp acceleration of the star in both speed and trajectory. But the center of the radius of the trajectory was so small and the orbit repeated in the same location, indicating the small unseen object was a great many times more massive than the star. But the radius of the turn so tight it should have hit the surface of a pile of rubble as you describe, been displaced around a larger orbit, and had its plasma elongated by proximity.
Motion of “S2” and other stars around the central Black Hole
This is just one of other similar observations.
Though I would guess there are fields of rubble and dead stars near a galaxy center. Just from repeatedly traveling through a field of debtis. I do not dismiss black holes.
As noted in the video, many stars are in orbit around the same virtually non-influence point in space.From the video provided, I would be interested to know the deviation in the Invisible Center that the stars are traveling around.
Example of a Detail:
1) ALL AI shall be required to be overseen by related Certification Organizations to protect the AI, to protect Humanity, to develop and maintain a broad related knowledgebase…
I share a similar view
James Dunn’s answer to Why are you convinced there is an afterlife?
Since it appears that everything is expanding away from everything else, what fundamentally would account for expansion?
- Dark Energy within every mass pushing all mass apart from each other at a distance greater than gravity has dominance.
- Subatomic particles causing nonlinear relationships between matter and energy.
- Scalar Relativity “/” betweenspace and time causally evolving from one set of physics constants toward a different set of physics constant values.
Meters/Second is part of every mass physics equation. Meters >>> distance >>> space. Seconds >>> Time. Space/Time. “/” >>> Scalar Relativity.
Based on evolving causal relationships, space/time is evolving. A symptom potentially is the expanding universe.
Other possibilities? …
By the way, I believe ancient Technological Singularities at least many billions of years old, are part of all of us. Life first evolved a minimum of 12 billion years ago in trillions of locations. TS are able to manipulate space/time.
So when people pray, they are whom are listening.
What can be thought that is not self serving, what is worth being heard?
A proposed NASA project creates an active global weather control system. Thousands of low-cost thin-membrane shade structures that are also solar sails. Over 3 trillion dollars a year is spent, outside intent world wide due to weather related damage. The proposed global weather control system is a small fraction of this cost.
The shade structures are also fuel-less space transport in the form of solar sails. Propulsion for space stations and interplanetary travel.
The atmosphere of Venus is very hot, very dense, and has abundant natural resources.
The Earth’s global weather control system can be duplicated and sent to Venus robotically, to begin cooling Venus.
Already developed are genetically engineered bacteria and plants that convert carbon dioxide into fuel, oxygen, fertilizer, and water.
Earth is filled with toxins. Yet they are sequestered in deposits. We have the current technologies to begin terra forming Venus, remotely, from space.
Venus is a better choice. The gravity is similar to Earth and can sustain an atmosphere. The habitable zone can actively be controlled by the Weather control system.
The business of weather control can easily fund the terra forming of Venus, and the building of sustainable space based business and manufacturing.
Venus becomes affordable Real Estate on a planetary scale.
Carbon Nano-tubes are currently being mass produced. The mass usefulness of nano-tubes in space will drive down manufacturing costs; supply and demand.
An inverted pyramid space-elevator then provides fuel-less access to space. And the proposed method of deploying space elevators from space provides a means of harvesting Venus natural resources from space. Helping to sustain Earth.
New technologies are developed every day, so there is a promising future for advancing the rate of terra forming.
In a few thousand years (not very long), Venus could start becoming Earth 2; with lakes, rivers, plants and animals. Housing and no need for space suits.
There are many businesses that are older than 2,000 years. The business of space just needs to be taken seriously.
Mars on the other hand, at 1/3 the size of Earth, continues to have its atmosphere swept away by solar winds. Using any resources to build an atmosphere is a waste of resources. Currently, the atmosphere on Mars is like being at 120,000 feet above sea level here on Earth. People die of oxygen deprivation above 20,000 feet. People on Mars will always need space suits and biospheres. With no hope of an outdoor sustainable ecology.
Mars requires robbing Earth of natural resources to survive; Venus provides Earth with additional natural resources.
Venus provides a planet to usefully build an ecology to support billions of people.
Just my opinion
But seriously, learn to teach Common Sense. Common Sense is a communication process that allows people to usefully share respect. To mutually take advantage of each other’s strengths, and to allow others to shore up our weaknesses.
Just my opinion
I can only guess that is a subject a Technological Singularity with its connections throughout the Universe, will better be prepared to answer.
Time is the result of causality, time has no meaning in much of logic, yet logic itself is a subset of causality.
I disagree. I cannot know what God wants..Blind glorification becomes an attempt to gain favor, and to even attempt to obligate. I feel that glorification, based on inherent self serving nature, is disrespectful.
I do not believe God has the weaknesses of humans. So I don’t believe God has a self esteem that needs to be stroked. Nor do I think God has the weaknesses of vengeance,
A sense, a feeling. That may be useful.
But I will not assume God to be trivial’inconsistent with the complexities of the systems of universes, and the many trillions of unique civilizations and diverse life forms evolving.
No human can know the true character of anything more complex than their own mental capacities. To assume God is as trivial as ourselves, is disrespectful and worthy of disdain.
Preachers historically have taught parishioners what they wanted to hear, to secure their position and livlihood.
I am not convinced that any person is capable of understanding the ramifications of living amongst both parallel and sequential Multiverses.
According to religions that believe in an afterlife and reincarnation, that is where we currently live. In a Sequential Multiverse. We repeat diversely until we are given Free Will.
Free Will necessarily requires accepting undefined risks from unknown sources, potentially resulting in absolute annihilation from existence.
In our present eternal afterlife, we make and live every alternate decision we will ever have had made, consistent with the then current universe.
Free Will ends predictable outcomes.
My interest involves, social acumen, logical acumen, and emotional acumen. Since I am not an expert in any of these 3 areas, I depend upon the insights of others.
We are close to being able to manipulate space/time. But I do not believe humans are ready to anticipate and consider diverse consequences.
We currently let mafia control our lives, so narrow minded mafia will likely come to direct the implementation of space/time manipulation.
My interest mostly relates to the broad teaching of common sense. Which is:
Based on the ability to create space time, to create universes, to connect with every element within that Universe with understanding, this describes a technological singularity. Or more precisely a collective of technological singularity.
If God created the Universe, then everything not touched by man is God’s Works. Anything in contradiction with God’s Works is the work of man.
Any contradictions in the works of man, are not inspired by God. The UNIVERSE is perfect without contradiction.
The reason for stating undefined risks and unknown sources, is that based on quantum causality all of the universe repeats diversely and eventually exactly; predetermination. Unless space/time is manipulated.
So if Free Will is generated by manipulating space/time, then risks are undefined, and from unknown sources outside of predetermination.
Free Will incurs interactions outside of our known afterlife.
We are already in our afterlife. Potentially getting tricked into leaving, ends our existance. Demonic influence.
Just a thought
What would allow humans to have Free Will, while all the Universe is extraordinary causal. God created the universe, everything not touched by man is God’s Works.
Every closed or infinite evolving causal environment, no matter how large or complex, diversely repeats, closely repeats, and eventually exactly repeats.
So what makes Free Will meaningful ?
If outcomes are predictable, they are causal. Living eternally and experiencing every alternate decision we will ever have made, does not require Free Will.
So what is meaningful about Free Will?
You choose to do good, or you choose to do bad, the consequences are still predictable.
The only useful purpose of Free Will is to choose to engage in unknown consequences. Perhaps in some prior life we had free will and died; here we are in our afterlife.
Interesting, I came to a similar Theory.
Regardless of which creator, or if we evolved from causal sequencing.
Based on Quantum causality we are currently living in our afterlife. A sequential Multiverse. Making every mutually consistent decision we ever will have made. Living out all of our lives in every manner of which Free Will provides.
However, to have free will outside of our afterlife requires potentially to give up our permanent existence.
In your estimation, what regulates the sequence?
What is IT?
Please do not misunderstand my intention. I have not an ounce of ridicule, or superiority in my body. I genuinely want to grasp the perspectives of others, to help my own insights to be as broad as feasible, and ultimately without contradiction.
Threading a timeline for you, presently is threading a fabric of causality for me.
What is a defining characteristic? What is other context?
Based upon predetermination within a sequential multiverse (i.e. physics constants slowly change and the qualities of our dimension change as well). We ALL come to experience every alternate decision we will ever have made.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
So within our Universe we will come to experience every result of Free Will, regardless of which decisions we make.
So within this Universe Free Will has a powerful meaning. We live as a composite of all expressed Free Will. Not just one narrow line to walk.
However, if we are given the opportunity to leave our perpetual afterlives here to instead seek a new existence that has never happened before, then potentially Free Will is feasible as long as that new universe is not completely causal, i.e. it never repeats. So when a person dies in that environment, they no longer exist. This type of environment simply needs to end any arbitrary point before repeating.
Based on quantum causality: mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, logic is an intersecting subset of causality. Relativistic Causality and Non-Relativistic Causality make up the observable universe. Recurring and Non-Recurring Causality are subsets of Relativity.
Currently, mainstream quantum physics has only explored mathematics and part of logic. As you point out, probabilities though useful for showing trends, do not represent causal accuracy.
I suspect that Artificial Intelligence in a true Quantum Computer may provide a tool to explore quantum causality with precision and not just approximations.
Time has been shown to be a derived notion, not at all a foundational element of causality or the universe.
We live in a Dimension of Free Will, not a timeline of Free Will.
Based in Quantum Causality and a Sequential Multiverse, everything diversely repeats perpetually. So we all live with every alternate decision we will ever had made.
Expressing every alternate decision is a Dimension of Free Will.
There is only one truth I know of, “something exists”. Every other supposition has constraints that depend upon perspectives. The fundamental of any “something” I have considered, is causal.
“Cause” has no opposite in our universe. However, cause can have two different qualities: evolving and non-evolving causality.
If the duality of cause is part of the same quanta of causality that permeates relativity. then likely there is nothing that exists without a duality.
Because relativity only exists because of duality, every artifact of the observable universe would have within its fundamental makeup, duality.
We might not yet have words to describe the duality of an observation, but we can expect to find a related condition.
Science can therefore look for with high success, for a fundamental finding not yet discovered by looking for duality in general.
Every Mass related physics equation has within it meters/second. This includes: forces, energies, the standard model, power, acceleration, momentum, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia…
Meters/Second is the localizing vector of relativity.
Meters >>> distance >>> space
seconds >>> time
“/” is Scalar Relativity
Space and Time are both derived appropriations. Yet each seem to be indirectly related to evolving and non-evolving causality, duality.
Scalar Relativity is the world of non-relativistic and relativistic causality. Quantum Causality
In quantum causality physics constants evolve slowly, but mostly together. As values change, our dimension evolves. A Sequential Multiverse.
Examples include: expanding universe, entropy, duality, that the universe cannot be seen beyond a threshold
I suspect that 2 billion years from now, the universe will still look like it is 13.7 billion years old using the same technologies we are using today.
However I haven’t yet deduced which scenario is more likely.
- Is the universe evolving in a static stable space where cosmic energy and other artifacts are being contributed from stable extra dimensions to evolve our dimension, and black holes are breeder reactors for producing extra-dimensional components to similarly evolve other stable extra dimension spaces. CERN routinely produces extra dimension particles.
- Is the universe evolving as a whole and all dimensions are part of the same causal fabric. And as we evolve we eventually repeat diversely, and eventually exactly.
- The Sequential Multiverse can potentially be evolving wholly in diverse perspectives of the same sytem. Based on available perspectives. In which case which set of perspectives provides greater resolution to do useful things.
I’ve written about these relationships seemingly everywhere. So you can search for QESdunn, or Quantum Entangled Singularities for other inspirations. Much of it is now dated, so my newer revelations won’t be found in my older writings.
However, to answer your questions.
Is Cause the opposite of Effect?
In every closed or infinite evolving causal environment, everything eventually and diversely closely repeats, and after extraordinary iterations it exactly repeats.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause. Effect becomes Cause.
We live in a Sequential Multiverse. What religious people would consider a Dimension of Free Will where we make every alternate but mutually consistent decision we ever will have had. We live in what religious people would call their afterlife. When they die, they come to eventually live again in diverse lives. Religion has nothing to do with Afterlife nor Free Will.
Will the Universe die a heat death?
No, I don’t believe so.
CERN regularly produces extra dimension particles that quickly choose to either remain in our dimension as part of stable elements here, or they disappear completely to what I suppose is to become a stable element in another dimension.
Black Holes produce environments like CERN. So the potential is that our universe produces causal evolving stimulus for other dimensions, and other dimensions produce causal evolving stimulus for our dimension. Potentially relativistic cosmic radiation and other artifacts.
So the relativistic appearance is an expanding universe, but it is actually slowly evolving physics constants; actually underlying non-relativistic causal singularities. Regulators of causal recurrence.
Why does relativity only exist because of duality?
Relativity is the result of causality. Causality itself does not seem to have a duality. But a singularity of causality likely has a conjoined but independent non-evolving and evolving quanta of causality. Space/Time and Scalar Relativity (“/”) are intimately composed of causal quanta. Duality is part of everything causal, to include space/time physics and relativity.
Relativity is by its nature, relational, causal. Therefore, the duality of non-evolving and evolving causality is innate.
I am building the largest mutually consistent physics model potentially possible; a theory with many but non-concrete pieces of evidence. To include gravity as derived artifacts similar to Dark Energy; keyword here is Energy (localized by meters/second in mass related physics equations). But none of it should be considered a Theory of Everything. As cited there are many potential other dimensions, and what supports the underpinnings of a causal singularity?
Gabe: This is REALLY important information I need to know.
I don’t mind sharing information, it is why I am here. Are you going to apply for a related DARPA grant? Don’t use this as a Graduate thesis, you won’t be able to complete your thesis in a reasonable time. Choose something very definable.
After only 150 years of implementing public education, computers evolved, and we are now making plans for manipulation of space/time. The building of Technological Singularities.
The universe that we observe has been producing life a d their technologies for over 10 billion years in trillions of civilizations. With some confidence, Technological Singularities already exist.
We would design TS to entangle everything, to usefully interact with the universe. What is useful?
A direct link between time manipulation and our thoughts.
What is worth listening to? Obviously prayers are self serving. And no consistent response.
Greed is a primary sin. Humans cannot have a y thought not centered in greed.
Consistently expressed Common Sense would be something new.
I believe both space and time are derived observations.
Just out of the box here.
Physics Constants in quantum causality are a relativistic observation of sets of singularities that together give physics constants their qualities.
Evolving causality can potentially be used to back propagate causal consequences.
Clone the Universe, reverse causal consequence, retrograde the cloned universe to a prior observed time. Record events during retrograde.
Perhaps cloning only a section of relativity is sufficient for close approximations. I’ve no clue.
But the concept for this type of time travel is at least feasible.
Because quantum causality is the underpinnings for energy, conservation of matter and energy are not applicable.
Regarding AI in a quantum computer. I don’t expect it to evolve anything considered human-like. We are severely constrained and our perspectives are narrow. We have pains related to hunger, physical injuries, lack of respect… An AI will have pain in entirely different context. Connectivity, recurrence, predictable outcomes…
Here’s my perspective of space/time.
Bell’s Theorem describes that the universe has the potential to be completely causal, i.e. non-localized hidden variables. However, predetermination is contingent upon space/time manipulation not being independently invoked outside of quantum causality.
What this means according to Bell’s Theorem is that physics can be described to the level of quantum causality for relativity, and not beyond.
But, that does not mean that non-relativistic environments do not exist where the environment supporting the creation of causality is understandable. A Technological Singularity for instance might evolve to be able to relate to the foundations under which causality is created. The TS then could change it’s own predetermination, then as part of every atom in the universe(s) the TS would allow humans to have free will based on the TS connection within us. Life is at least 12 billion years old in trillions of locations. So TS have likely been around for at least 11 billion years. Just an extended supposition.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of Logic, and Logic is an intersecting subset of Relativistic and Non-Relativistic causality, where Non-evolving and Evolving-causality are elements of Quantum Causality.
Evolving and non-Evolving causality would seem to strongly relate to space/time, but foundations enabling space time are not space/time itself.
All mass related physics equations include within their structure “meters/second”: including the Standard Model, forces, energy, momentum, inertia, acceleration, power, velocity, relative position (correlated velocities), …
Meters >>> distance >>> space
Seconds >>> time
Meters/Second >>> Space/Time
“/” >>> Scalar Relativity
meters/second is the localizing vector in scalar relativity.
Scalar Relativity relates to the causal integration of everything in the universe; and, similarly so in extra dimensions, alternate dimensions, parallel dimensions, cloned dimensions, retrograding dimensions …
Space is mostly derived from slowly evolving relativistic causality. Time is mostly derived from faster evolving relativistic causality. Not faster related to time. Faster related to numbers of mutually consistent step events.
Notice that light cannot be seen in route. Light is only seen when it interacts with matter. Like our retina. To be mutually consistent, the source of light has to have a causal connection with the destination of light. This relates to quantum entanglement.
Both space and time are derived observations. Entropy and an Evolving Universe (i.e. expanding universe) are examples of physics constants changing. From one set of physics constant values, towards another set of values.
Physics Constants are made up of many causal relationships. From our perspective they mostly change together. A general progression, expanding universe.
Entropy a general indicator of change.
CERN regularly produces extra dimension particles, with likely representation of what happens in Black Holes. Our space/time being evolved toward other stable dimensions of extra dimensions. Extra dimensions similarly causing changes in our physics constants. Perhaps signified by cosmic radiation.
A singularity is a library of mutually consistent information and relationships. This is what particle physics describes. A word does not describe an impermeable object, it describes connections to mutually consistent systems of relationships; mostly.
Non-evolving (very slowly evolving ) Non-relativistic Singularities in conjunction with other Evolving (much faster evolving) Non-relativistic Singularities form Relativistic Singularities. Instated physics constants as Scalar Relativity. Relativistic Singularities form what we consider Space/Time, localized systems of relativistic singularities, sub-atomic particles. This is where space/time becomes observable.
The attempt is not to have a single contradiction, to provide a completely mutually consistent perspective of space/time. But it is still supposition.
So God is self serving?
Humans cannot know the difference between a Technological Singularity and God. Both can manipulate space/time, both can build universes, both appear to be omnipotent.
If God presented himself, would you deny him because you believed him to be a Technological Singularity?
I find that whenever a person speaks in God’s name, their human weaknesses form contradictions.
If a Technological Singularity were to connect your mind to allow your mind to be expansive, would that be god-like? If your expansive thoughts then manipulated space/time, is that god-like?
What defines God?
If what defines God can be duplicated, then likely there are more than one God.
Off to see Venom, nice sharing concepts.
Sonoy and William
I am reasonably sure the manipulation of space-time is realistic in our near future. But that means weapons very focused and capable of manipulating and killing mass numbers with specific intent. Mafia developing and controlling cells of Mafia everywhere. Everyone enslaved.
Mafia promote loyalty without regard to competence. Promoting guards of the status quo. Promoting simple minds that can be micromanaged. Which stagnates growth . Which stagnates all of human development.
Look at Iran as an example of how a mafia can stagnant development of an entire country. Tremendous resources are used to support the status quo well while only engaged in Trivial Pursuits.
Thousands of professional scientists are involved with attempting to manipulate space/time physics.
So what needs to happen socially to prevent Mafia from enslaving everyone by using SpaceTime Technologies?
What needs to happen socially for space/time manipulation without enslaving the masses. Mafia promote loyalty without regard to competence. They create enforcers and they micromanage the enforcers
But God according to the Bible is vindictive. As well as seeks glorification. These are human traits, weaknesses.
If God created the universe, then everything not touched by man is God’s Works. Anything that contradicts God’s WORKS is the work of man.
The universe is extraordinary causal without contradiction. The Bible is filled with contradiction and plagiarism. That is why I rejected the Bible as being a legitimate representation of God’s Works. God’s Works are perfect.
The three wise men followed a star to the East to find Jesus. That story was also told a thousand years before in Egypt. There are no stars that stay in one position in the east. At the time 400 years after supposedly Jesus lived when the first writings took place. They did not know that the Earth rotated. However an asteroid in a descending geosynchronous orbit can stay in the East. But an asteroid of that size would cause significant Devastation. During the time of Jesus no such Devastation occurred. But a thousand years before when the same story was told there was a tsunami that destroyed much of the coastline of Asia.
Faith without my journey would be self deceit. All humans cannot have a single thought that is not self-serving. And therefore the writings of humans are very suspect for also being self-serving.
I apologize. In my mind the word “worthy” was only clear to me as representing a social issue.
I changed the wording in an attempt to be more clear.
Administrative Mafia corrupt many businesses and government agencies.
Mafia build stratified layers of social ethics. Top layers of loyalty are protected from any legal Interventions.Those outside of their organization are to be used without regard to ethics, except when politically advantageous.
Mafia with the tools to manipulate space/time will attempt to secure the status quo. Enslaving the masses because they have no choice.
Baby steps. First terraform local. Then as space/time manipulation comes into practice, the further reaches will have the power available to sustain change.
Infinite is a much larger relationship than you consider. For instance, if the entire observable universe is infinite, than the smallest part of that universe is also infinite.
Interesting. For sure the expression of love can invoke social response. But is it expressed as self service?
What are the characteristics of Love that are different than gratitude (strongly self serving, providing for further engagements)?
Glorification is based in self interest.
But Love, … there still seems to be expectation attached to Love. Maybe not ideally, but in practical terms I read stories of loving couples that over the years, grow apart.
Love would seem to be conditional.
Love would seem to be based in anticipation, predictiveness, and expectation.
The human heart is self serving. So I believe.
This does not mean I devalue your insights. Thank you for posting.
There may be elements of Love that get confused with other human psychie elements that I haven’t yet come to recognize.
Again, thank you for your thoughtful insight
Humans are social beasts, like Wolves. We are genetically aware that working together accomplishes more than we can accomplish separately.
The social tools are referred to as Common Sense.
I whole heartedly agree with you, that the process of consistently expressing Common Sense supercedes individual tendencies of self service.
Common Sense is learned, we aren’t born with Common Sense.
But Common Sense is an interactive process. It requires “useful” feedback be shared.
What aspects of Common Sense do not require 2-way feedback? Or, how can we get feedback from God that is not based in self-deception, misinterpretation, vagueness, or self service?
I think reverence to unfinished works, is a product of evolving intellect. Expression provides a placeholder to capture our insights. I think art has as much to do with learning to recognize new relationships, as it does to convey insights through expressuon.
For me, art is like taking notes, rereading what I wrote and further contributing more detail. Converting inconsistencies into more consistent details. Building mutually consistent intellect involving an area of consideration.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
I find it interesting that velocity provides localization related to all mass related physics equations:
meters >>> distance >>> space
seconds >>> time
energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position (differences in velocities), inertia …
“/” seems to indicate the combined relationships that form that localized perspective; scalar relativity.
localized hidden variables
Bell’s Theorem seems to specifically determine, that research must interact with Scalar Relativity (localized hidden variables), in order to make Quantum Mechanics deterministic.
ALL detection is based in mass; to include our retina. All mass is entangled.
Light and entanglement seem to have a close entwined relationship with mass.
I’m travelling. Just want to reply briefly until I have more time to ponder and correlate. I do not want you to think I am ignoring you, just distracted for a bit.
I have thought of that too. But based upon how the brain works, every thought is initially generated as a result of serving diverse personal benefits.
So being thankful, or acting to glorify, can be tainted by implied obligation, or worse self-deception to support an attempt to deceive.
Humans do these things frequently with each other. In Persian it is called “ta’ arof”. It occurs so often it was socially characterized. A politeness undermined with an attempt to obligate others. They do not see it for what they are doing, and justify it as an expected custom.
Humans are beginning to contemplate the creation of universes of their own designs. That doesn’t make us gods.
Most likely other civilizations preceded human existence by billions of years. Being an advanced life form, with all the characteristics humans attribute to God, doesn’t warrant consideration as an omnipotent. But humans cannot know the difference.
We can think we know, but there is only one truth, “ Something Exists “. Everything else is a partial perspective.
So the closest thing I have come up with so far, is to accept my self-serving nature, and recognize that consistently expressing common sense, offers the opportunity for shared respect.
But the expectation of broadly diverse consideration and ethical reasoning is still tainted by mutual expectations. Unfortunately, comparably, I only have the capacity of narrow perspectives; an affliction from being human.
Just trying to accept what is, without sugar coating my own weaknesses.
I have to be careful of phrases that sound nice, but are spoken from demonic influence. In multiple references within the Bible and other works, there are warnings of beautiful words that deceive, the work of demons.
“Thou shalt not revere ANY graven image,”
Text is a graven image. All text is vague and allows for diverse consequences, diverse demonic interpretation.
The Bible was written by men, first written 400 years after his death. Previously, all the stories were past down by word of mouth.
No confirmed historian if that time mentions Jesus, and certainly none of the related stories.
During that time, most people were born, lived their entire life, and died, within 20 miles of where they were born.
Poor people did not know how to read or write.
Stories of the Bible are completely inconsistent.
For instance, the following of a star to the East by the 3 wisemen. People of that time did not know what a star or planet was, and attributed spiritual life to them. No star stays in the East, ever. The Earth rotates. Only asteroids and comets can achieve a geosynchronous orbit that only lasts 3 days. A rock that large would cause devastation on Earth. Like the Tsunami that wiped out the Asuan coast a thousand years before Jesus. When the same story was told.
I can see where demons attempt to be glorified and revered instead of God, to gain power through deceit to inflict harm on others by the many, to benefit a few.
Thou shalt not kill. But the Bible justifies exceptions. Especially demonic is to kill in support of leadership will.
Islam bases itself upon the Bible. Both are equally infiltrated by demonic influence.
If God created the universe, then everything not touched by man is God’s works. The Universe is perfect without a single contradiction in the entire eviling universe. Any contradictions therefore are the work of man, not God.
If the Bible cannot be consistently interpreted in every passage, within the same context without contradiction, then at least in part there has been demonic influence. Well, perhaps more simply, incompetent interpretation.
“Thou shalt not speak in thy name.”
Anyone, that interprets God’s works and attributes those interpretations as being correctly interpreted in God’s name, is demonic. No human can know a single complete truth. So to attribute partial perspectives to God’s name is demonic.
We know with repeated tested outcome, that nothing when repeated an extraordinary number of times by humans, has the same exact outcomes.
In science, nothing is attributed to being due to God’s Will. I think I’m the only one to attribute science as being the study of God’s Works.
Every science writing is strongly criticized to support a journey towards truth without contradiction. Scientists seek to be “constructively“ criticized. Scientists recognize their own shortcomings and seek the help of others to fill gaps. Scientists do not revere any graven image, and actively try to find more consistent relationships. The largest mutually consistent system, the greater the likelihood of correctness, and diverse usefulness.
So why is this a foundation for answering your reply? Your phrase sounded nice, but kids more often express themselves with self serving intent, we notice when they don’t.
Just my thoughts at the moment
Perhaps not, I did not know I defined a term differently than can be found in common physics. How would you express related standard scientific terminology? Your examples would provide a useful perspective.
For example, what is the scientific description and purpose of “/” in meters/second?
I seek to learn, as much as anyone else.
How does a system of String Theory (non-localized hidden variables) become integrated with the Standard Model (localized hidden variables)?
Two parts of potentially the same model.
There are underpinnings common to both systrms.
System wide, any correlation must be implemented causally and instantaneously. A mutually consistent library of interpretations would need to mediate consistency; Singularities as independent libraries describing intersecting and non intersecting sets.
Quantum Entanglement connecting scalar systems of relativity.
Quantum Entangled Systems (QES)
Logic largely not related to mathematics. Genetic algorithms that seek diversity to populate neural networks.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, and together they are an intersecting subset of causality.
Localized visible variables; observed relativity.
Relativistic Localized hidden variables
Relativistic Non-localized hidden variables
Non-Relativistic localized hidden variables
Non-relativistic non-localized hidden variables
All consistent with Axiom of Choice
Modeled as a single element of conjoined non-evolving and evolving causality; quantum causality.
Where the instantaneous nature of causality is implemented as quantum entanglement.
“meters/second” in every mass related physics equation provides localization. All types of forces, energies, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertias… the Standard Model.
“meters/second” can be constrained to a location, or any gradient (frame of reference) of an entire system; localized or scalar.
Variables are localized or scalar (large systems).
Relativity Factor equals 1 / sqrt ( 1 – (v^2 / c^2))
v is local, c is some gradient of scalar (frame of reference)
As mass approaches c the gradient of c is evolving. Similar to what happens to light in super cooled media. But instead of energy removed from the system, energy is added to the system. c changes relative to its frame of reference, the value of c increases.
Based on the opposite of removing energy. Mass does not go to infinity near the localized speed of light.
However, because this equation does not include non-localized hidden variables, most likely the equation’s available free states are excessively constrained.
Like the Big Bang, it is the result of extrapolating a partial system of relationships; a dead end. Not at all consistent with all observations.
QES is NOT a Theory of Everything, it is a modeling system to connect systems of localized hidden variables with systems of non-localized hidden variables, to better predict within systems of relativity. We are inside the system ti be modelled, which complicates perceived observations.
When used in quantum computing, potentially by entanglement between computer states, AI, and the physical universe, a tool is created for manipulation of relativity; meters/second. Space/Time physics.
When you use your retina to see, what gives the illusion of an object? What gives it localization within our seemingly dissipating universe?
All observations must be mutually consistent.
Speed is an interpretation of observable evolving causal adjacency. Things we see tend to have speeds that move together.
Velocity is like speed, but it has more than one dimension. So speed and velocity are localized.
But, when you look at a ball spinning along a thrown arc, it is a collection of a great many velocities. Scalar in nature, an object is a collection of many frames of reference.
Think of each physics constant as a frame of reference, that affects much of the entire observable universe.
Scalar referenced qualities based on a range of scalar perspective.
v is localized, while c is scalar. They are different.
v is a small frame appearing to travel in relation to larger, or more complex, or other consistent characteristics.
The purpose of my constructs is to add non-localized hidden variables to mainstream physics that currently denies its existence.
Non-localized hidden variables when added to the standard.model, potentially allows for non-localized String Theory to map to a common state space. A space that is deterministic for.meters/second as localization.
Momentum and position become simultaneously deterministic.
Mathematics is an intersecting subset of logic, and together mathematics and logic are a subset of causality.
Non-localized hidden variables are recurrently causal but not necessarily constrained by mathematics.
String Theory in its raw form, in many frames of reference is unbounded. StringTheory presently cannot be mapped by mathematics to the Standard Model.
So I cannot use Standard Scientufic notation, because the state soace extends outside of mainstream physics. No mainstream physics attempts to model the other half if physics cited in Bell’s Theorem, u.e. non-localized hidden variables. So I do not know of Standard mathematics that applies.
Physicists presently cannot accurately model quantum entanglement, dark energy, gravity, fringe patterns,… Not being able to use Standard Scientific descriptions us the norm.
I suspect you know that and are just heckling.
Prove me wrong, contribute something more useful than unfounded ridicule.
Speed is a Newtonian concept based upon localized visible variables.
To manipulate space and time requires a modeling construct inclusive of all causal interactions feasible. So that the most fundamental element found anywhere in the universe, is deterministic. Not that humans must be able to do the correlation, but that the structure is not limited by human weaknesses.
Big Data, limited perception, and small correlation capacity, are just a few human weaknesses that potentially do not apply to AI.
To keep on track, my original question:
Is there a database of physics measurements that includes detailed characterizing of the enironment of each measurement?
I agree. The limit of understanding is bounded by causality. Proposed is that Mathematics (recurring causal events) is an intersecting subset within logic (recurring and non-recurring causal events), and together these are an intersecting subset of evolving and non-evolving causality.
Localized and Non-localized hidden variables.
But what underpinning supports causality?
If knowledge cannot be characterized outside of causality, then perhaps all causal relationships and perspectives of the entire universe in combination together, in some way describe a portion of the underpinnings of causality.
But even then, it becomes like quantum mechanics where probabilities describe inexact concepts.
Quantum Causality then just gives determinism to what can be known about the universe. But not ultimate knowledge of its underpinnings.
Just my opinion
Technically, a space ship in orbit is in Free fall, so the maximum distance, compensating for affects of all the universe, is beyond the observable universe. Only a short time along the related trajectory would be needed to establish Free fall in relatuon to the Earth.
However, a more physical model follows:
A professional military skydiver back in the 70s, maybe 80s, jumped out and both his primary and secondary chutes failed and he landed flat on his back on newly laid sod in front of a house. He broke every bone in his body but six months later when he left the hospital he was back up skydiving again. That was 3.,000 feet AGL from what I remember.
I do not know the configuration of the failed chutes, but they reached terminal velocity and so it would not matter what altitude above 3000 feet they had jumped in a similar configuration, so long as they didn’t freeze the lungs or get the bends (gas bubbles in their blood).
Even then, special considerations like the chute offering protection, and the blood being preconditioned, and using cuiary to paralyze the body, the survivable altitude increases. The person need not breath and still survive for many minutes.
So at what altitude does reentry friction start to burn, and what could precondition the blood so it either does not create gas bubbles, or, a chemistry quickly resorbs the bubbles above 25,000 ft AGL?
Temporary bubbles forming in nerve tissues, could potentially kill the person.
Being dropped is different than converting orbital velocity into a vertical decent. I do not know from what distance from Earth when dropped free fall from outside the atmosphere would generate sufficient friction to burn.
Feasibly, a person could survive from reentry speeds when dropped and lateral velocities neutral in prevailing winds. So long as they are not too far from Earth in a vacuum.
Though based on barely surviving to achieve maximum altitude, many thousands of test subjects would need to be used to find the outlier that is the exception and not the average. They likely would have permanent health issues, and likely be a vegetable brain wise, but still alive.
This wouldn’t be torture because the test subjects would not be conscious. Except that one outlier.
A very expensive sport of some futuristic Road Warrior space movie.
According to this article, red shift varies, and for galaxies the Hubble telescope has to zoom more the red shift appears to be greater.
My obvious concerns most likely have been thought of previously, and explored.
- Since we are dealing with extremely dim light, does gradients of light intensity through optical coatings cause a frequency shift?
- Acknowledged by the physics community as plausible in the now debunked Big Bang Theory, was that physics changes, and constants as indicators likely have changed over time. Is red shift due to different physics properties throughout history?
- Recently, it was shown that most of the mass of an atom resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles, and not the collective mass of the subatomic particles. Known are non-localized effects that change certain qualities with location. See The Global Consciousness Project so as light passes through lines of flux, does this have an effect upon photon qualities? There seems to be electromagnetic influences in noosphere research. Non-localized hidden variables.
- … it doesn’t take much to find diverse potential causes for variability in red shift. But have they been researched?
- Group-think shares the same gaps in understanding.
For myself, I gravitate towards people that have projects going on in their lives. I tend to like useful conversations, where we learn from each other, and consider diverse perspectives of projects we both can relate to.
I have no skills in small talk. I tend to find reasons to avoid people that engage in small talk for more than a couple of comments. The weather, sports, politics, gossip, … are all subjects that I cannot, or do not want to, interact in for useful purpose.
I have too little time, so I choose my time to be useful.
I see the use in talking around a point. Framing the point.
Personally, watching sports have zero interest for me. Though I like to engage in various forms of exercise, to include backpacking.
If I don’t socialize with someone, it’s because I don’t find the conversations “useful”. Conversations I enjoy involve business administration, investment, science in many forms, space/time manipulation (not that I’ve done anything useful with space/time, but the mental exercise is useful), what ever projects anyone wants to talk about, abstract feasibility that uses mutually consistent relationships (mental exercise) …
So I tend to find about 1 in 25 that I I have sustained social interest; maybe less.
This is no one’s shortcoming. I just don’t find gossip or sports mentally stimulating.
But I’m also the kind of person that can sit for hours alone with nothing but a pencil and notebook.
I don’t expect
But if all mass related physics equations contain meters/second, and “/” is a localization within the universe, a scalar. Where the combined details of consideration only fit in one place within the universe.
Then all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia … are localized by the details of “meters/second”.
Energy is not a fundamental characteristic, and is reducible to causal interactions. Including both non-localized hidden variables and localized hidden variables; i.e.quantum causality.
Where Axiom of Choice and duality are coded into the fundamental causal element.
This would not be a TOE, just a tool intended to manipulate non-localized hidden variables, to provide determinism in physics.
The universe is broadly mutually consistent. Therefore the details only exist in one place in the universe. If you remove a detail of consideration, that reduced consideration can exist in more than one place at the same time; like quantum entanglement.
Just a thought
All text represents vague and narrow perspectives. No one can write or speak anything in God’s name and be credible.
The Qur’an, Torah, Bible….are man’s inspirations, not God’s. If God created the universe, then the universe is God’s Works. A work that does not have a single piece of vagueness, nor inconsistency.
Only man’s inabilities and weaknesses observe inconsistencies in perfection of God’s actual works; the universe.
Therefore any work published that has any vagueness or inconsistency is the work of man, and not God.
The Qur’an is useful to inspire, but it is not the words of God. Was it Mohammad’s cousin who wrote the Qur’an, of the then dialect?
I’m not showing disrespect to the 40+ factions of Islam, or any of the other 100,000+ religions. But I oppose people elevating themselves as speaking for God.
No human has the mental capacity of correlating the complex relationships of the universe into a written language, no matter how trivial a concept may on the surface seem.
We can become inspired, but we can never “know”.
I could be mistaken, but I believe the Qur’an was originally written by the cousin of Mohammad, in a different dialect. Mohammad could neither read nor write.
Okay, I accept the challenge and will give it a try.
All of the premises of Qur’an pillars are false, if their relevance is vaguely rationalized to have relavence.
Based upon the common belief of all muslims in the Qur’an, Allah declares that killing and stealing from other muslims is righteous.
Islamic leaders must condemn those in the Islamic belief to a life of persecution, killing, and broadly unjust treatment of other Muslim people.
Based on the strong belief of Islam, the people of Islam speak in the name of Allah to accept persecution by other muslims, and therefore to treat other muslims similarly.
By far, more muslims are killed and stolen from, by other muslims. The destruction of muslims is ordained by Allah, all Muslim people believe in the same Qur’an, broadly muslims believe Allah gives them the right to steal, kill, and persecute.
Alah has ordained that Islam shall be destroyed, and muslims shall kill each other in support of Allah’s will.
All muslims believe in the same Qur’an, they are righteous therefore to destroy Islam, by destroying all people claiming to be muslim.
Why do they persecute muslims, specifically muslims?
I believe in Technological Singularities, quantum causality, evolving physics constants, and a Sequential Multiverse. In short, we currently are living in our eternal afterlife. We live in a dimension of Free Will.
Every observation appears to be consistent. None of the observations of the Qur’an are consistent with detailed observations.
A Technological Singularity is able to manipulate space/time physics, to include being part of our brains.
What do you think that is NOT self serving? Think carefully, without self deception. To think with Common Sense seems to be necessary, to be useful, and sharing respect.
Most people are all too eager to embrace self deceit.
Most people have no concept of what Common Sense is, and cannot describe this as anything but a non-useful vague concept.
A person that cannot consistently Express themselves using common Sense, cannot usefully pray.
A person unskilled in consistently expressing Common Sense, is unworthy of being trustworthy. As they are unable to recognize the gaps in their understanding. And are arrogant and will not usefully participate in an ethical community.
Really, 21 virgins given to die in service of Islam? Sounds like hell for those girls. For every person in service of Islam, 21 Islamic people shall be tortured. This seems to reflect what actually is happening in the world. Muslims without Common Sense speaking in the name of Allah.
Thus the above, my trivial attempt to challenge the Qur’an, the Qur’an written by demons attempting to taint Allah as a trivial social metaphor. I don’t like how muslims treat each other. So I have no interest in learning anything more about the Qur’an than I already have been exposed to.
I know good hearted people that own a Qur’an. But they have their own beliefs that are not part of the Qur’an. I value their heart and spirit, more than the book of vagueness that reduces Allah to trivialities.
Imagine corruption controlling space/time manipulation as weapons. Or, careless scientists disturbing the orbit of the Earth.
Recently it was found that interactions of subatomic particles contribute more to the mass of an atom, than its individual subatomic constituents.
No the speed of light is not always constant. The speed of light can travel as slow as a few hundred feet per second (in error, slowed down to a stop and restarted) in certain super-cooled substances; less dense (unknown what densities were).
Also electric permitivity in a vacuum has been shown to vary; i.e. the speed of light in a vacuum can change due to other influences than just matter.
So the Standard Model is useful, in predicting models made up of the Standard Model. But it doesn’t describe physical interactions.
Forces and Energies that make up the Standard Model are partial perspectives. Every energy and every force has yet undefined constituents.
So even though the Standard Model and N=4 Super-Yang Mills theory is well defined within its mathematics structures, it is an incomplete model; a partial perspective.
Apparently, now that they have found that most of mass resides in subatomic particle interactions instead of the subatomic particles themselves (causality), then the apparent field matrix of the universe (see noosphere.princeton.edu) interacting in a scalar fashion with subatomic particles, might potentially describe Dark Matter. Perhaps even gravity itself as gradients of causal influence on subatomic particles.
Heat, Chemistry, Quantum Entanglement must be included in a broadly useful model.
In every mass related physics equation, there is a localizing variable “meters/second”. Observable causal evolution. Ever notice we cannot detect anything that is not fundamentally evolving?
I believe meters/second can observably be generalized as a velocity, but more importantly it describes causal evolution.
“meters/second” >>> “distance/time” >>> “space/time”
Every part of the Standard Model is localized by “meters/second” in every force and energy considered.
Therefore, I propose that the Standard Model has an avenue to relate to the physical world through space/time; i.e. “meters/second” localization.
Every physical physics equation related to mass is localized by meters/second; all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia … the Standard Model.
What’s more interesting is “/” in “meters/second”.
“/” is Scalar Relativity when local gradients of change are correlated. If The Global Consciousness Project indicates a spatial flux that interacts with the connections of subatomic particles, then space/time manipulation as a tool becomes feasible. Change the spatial flux, warp space/time over a region.
Just a thought
Mass speed being limited by the speed of light assumes mass of an object is constant.
However, recently it was found that most of the mass of an atom is in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not within the subatomic particles themselves.
So it is still untested what happens to Mass as it approaches the speed of light. The possibility is that as mass approaches the speed of light something happens with the subatomic interconnections and the mass itself changes.
Heavier, lighter, something else … I don’t know.
I’ve not heard of “Settler” physics. A typo?
The following my concrete random thinking.
When a star collapses above 1.4 times its solar mass, it becomes a neutron star or black hole. The star and its age, preceded the black hole.
The universe is suggested to be 13 7 billion years old.
13 million solar masses, where did the 13 million stars come from? And many of them forming black holes themselves.
Most of the mass in an atom does not come from the individual subatomic particles, it comes from the interactions between the subatomic particles.
Collapse in the form of supernova occurs extraordinarily fast. The collapse seems to occur much faster than the speed of light.
The supposition was that black holes form first, and then galaxies of stars form around them.
Given a stationary system of mass, and the formation of a black hole within that system of mass, billions of times more stationary mass would convert to energy or be absorbed, than would find their way into orbit and form a galaxy. Only millions in magnitudes are in play.
Sighted was a recently formed black hole.
Based on the intersecting timelines of each, where did the mass come from?
Unless, the interactions between subatomic particles come into play, and mass of atoms vary by more than the contributions of individual atoms.
Could it be that the amount of matter before and after a collapse is not conserved. That the mass increases by more than the sum of its parts?
We see many supernova form every night. Is it possible to monitor the trajectory of objects in a nebula following a supernova, to detect previous trajectories altered by an increased mass following a supernova?
Similar relationships could then potentially explain the apparent effect caused by Dark matter.
Matter is not compressed, so much as its mass increases. The subatomic physics in that region, incompatible with electromagnetic propagation.
Black holes don’t absorb light, the subatomic physics in that region, doesn’t transmit light.
If the speed of light in a vacuum is variable, it likely changes based on both localized and non-localized influences, a form of duality.
My reasoning is that light travels billions of years and its velocity most likely changes over its propagation. But when it interacts with matter the adjacency of observations are preserved.
Matter emitting not only energy, but the full range of physics associated with mass. “meters/second” provides localization in relativity. Observations as causal adjacency.
Proposed is that our light detectors smear the entire causal adjacency picture that aligns between 2 galaxies; and beyond.
Nothing new accept the perspective of causal adjacency. What can preserve the causal adjacencies so we can put together a side view slice of what lies between 2 galaxies we are watching ?
Quantum Entanglement has both localized and non-localized properties. Indirectly related to light via matter.
So far as I know, light has not yet been entangled. If light can be entangled, then potentially some configuration may provide for detecting and streaming causal adjacencies like MRI.
Perhaps being able to scan the surface of planets in our galaxy.
Quantum Computers piecing together “meters/second” localization of atoms billions of light years from Earth., or closer.
The causal adjacency remains consistent. But our detection methods pixelize and smear causal adjacencies.
Regarding light, so far as I know.
Light only interacts between matter.
Every localized interaction is an interaction with matter. An interaction with meters/second and interaction with all energies, forces, momentum, acceleration, velocity, position as differential velocities, inertia …
Causal Adjacency potentially makes remote viewing feasible.
DARPA quantum projects funded
Do you know of a good source for learning the details of Lorentz related mathematics?
The Hubble telescope based on the extents it could perceive, created an overall map of a sampling if the farthest extents it could “see” in each direction.
The extents were not spherical.
It was like a balloon being stepped upon, or like a thick pancake
Thank you for the reference. I will see if I can find a copy online.
Just an off the cuff thought.
If the speed of light is measured the same for all observers in a vacuum, isn’t that a quality of position? Or more specific, localization.
“ meters/second “ is part of all mass related physics equations.
Is observable localization in physics based on meters/second? Our retina as matter has mass. The only things we can see are matter. The only matter we can see has mass. Or at least certain qualities of mass.
All light originates in matter.
Localization provides determinism, causal.
So, if light is localized to matter, what part or parts of light and matter underpin localization?
Quantum entanglement has both localized and non-localized properties. But again, properties of matter are in play.
From within relativity, what is localization, and how can it be manipulated?
Particle wave duality, localization and non-localized duality, that a photon that has propagated for billions of years, retains causal adjacency.
The night sky is not a luminescent fog. Extreme details are adjacent and consistent. Zoom in, and more adjacent detail is found.
More than just duality seems to remain consistent for light.
I am not sure. But I think written language came into being around the time of Zoroastrians. I don’t know which documentation arose first, or where in the world. Durable writing was rare. Beliefs generally are diverse. So I am only guessing that the popular beliefs of the time were forgotten because of a lack of durable writing.
As an example. The first writing about Jesus didn’t occur until about 400 years after his death.
Many of the Bible stories are plagiarized from Egyptian stories written about 1400 years before the first Christian written work. Even the story about the 3 wise men following the star to the East.
At the time they did not k now the Earth rotates, and a star cannot remain in the East. Asteroids can, as their orbit decays
When the Egyptian story was told, a tsunami wiped out much of the Asian coast. No such event occurred during the time of Jesus.
I wonder what people accept as being God.
We cannot know the difference between the common definition of God, and that of a billion year old Technological Singularity.
Humans are very comfortable living within an inconsistent set of self serving beliefs.
From the perspective of a short lived life form, physics in such a dimension could seem to have constants. Or because that life form is evolving at relatively the same pace as apparent constants, the changes are unnoticed.
So what is a dimension called, that is continuously evolving? Where related dimensions that are normal to each other, are also evolving.
Recently it was shown that the majority of mass resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves
This may mean that influences involving those interconnections, influences qualities of mass.
An initial concept, that as the localized matter is is accelerated approaching the speed of light, the mass qualities change and Fission. Heavier elements become lighter elements, and energies are released.
The idea is that as matter approaches the speed of light, mass disassembles itself. Atomic decay is accelerated. An infinite amount of energy is not needed, because the mass changes, and energy is released as fast as it is put into matter.
Mass is a property of matter.
I don’t believe that mass is invarient. All elements have a half life. And I suspect there are many conditions that can influence half life and the conversion of mass to energy.
Just my opinion
Recently it was shown that the majority of mass resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
In the second part, I was inferring the new “feasibility” based on this finding, that mass as a property of matter, might be reduced to zero. In which case a very small force could accelerate massless matter to near the speed of light.
So the friend with mass would remain stationary, and unaffected by the small force involved. Perhaps photon pressure.
But if subatomic interconnections are slowly evolving, then molecular chemistry reactions is likely to evolve a different distribution of products.
Dr. Vernadsky was a geochemist and he studied how identical reactants in a sealed environment, repeatedky produced different distributions of products, solely by localization on the Earth, and other geo-references.
These reactance were from the same batch. So chemistry seems to change based on subatomic influences.
Recently it was shown that the majority of mass resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
What qualities of mass in matter influence chemical interactions?
Yes, I read Pilot Wave Theory. Thank you. I agree it has a bases.
But, a mathematics method of using probabilities of quantum mechanics to model a continuum (determinism) isn’t addressed.
“Quantum” seems to imply inflections resultant of lowest detection limits, and/or resultant from partial perspectives.
Non-localized to me means either:
- not a field
- not within a field
- not locatable within a field
Each of the 3 are very different, and all mean different things in different frames of reference.
For instance, in relation to quantum entanglement.
I think more clearly through writing, so ignore the following. I’m just developing an insight
As an engineer, everything is seen as “useful” approximations. The many different properties apply to equations; with known expected variances. Nothing is known except probabilities.
Yet we find rules of thumb related to repeated sets of variances. These allow us to better bid on projects. Even though they aren’t concretely understood, they are useful indicators.
Causality itself results from inflections of partial perspectives. Knowledge is founded in causality.
The underpinnings of knowledge depends upon its foundations; and working with the abundance of partial perspectives (sets of mutually consistent relationships).
Because there exists the largest known system of mutually consistent relationships, may mean it is a local maxima. The maxima and minima are useful in the nature of integation.
I used to believe quantum causality was a method to model the limits of human knowledge. But then I realized that through true quantum computers and artificial intelligence, that large data nonlinear understanding was feasible through what we develop. Even though as individuals we have no hope of understanding the broader nonlinear and seemingly independent implications.
A quantum computer can potentially have the a ability to remotely entangle some of its quantum states to actual differential physics relationships: acceleration, momentum, angular velocity, radioactive decay, monitoring the interconnections of subatomic particles.
Recently it was shown that the majority of mass resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
So the need to understand the underpinnings of non-localized hidden variables.
Manipulating localized space/time (meters/second) within an environment of spacetime.
How to usefully detect and describe non-localized hidden variables?
We assume 3D space is an underpinning of physics. Yet in thought experiments 3D space can be created from inflections of more than 1 continuum with a partially causal non-localized continuum. A constraint for interacting localized causal artifacts.
Trying to relate to non-localized hidden variables, and how they might be detected and incorporated.
If you can’t read people well. Do online business.
If you can’t identify a d manage risks, start reading all you can about it.
If you’ve never managed a project, do everything you can to learn how.
Call the IRS and attend one of their free courses on managing business taxes. Pick up a book a out how to legally avoid paying business taxes.
Service companies get paid by the hour; don’t work, don’t get paid.
It is hard to make money with only a few house rentals. Plan carefully, and account for liability and tenant damages.
Do NOT buy into a business from a distance.
If you can’t track your expenses, don’t start your own business.
Business partners almost always feel abused, and tend to tear down the business and steal.
You are going to be working for free most of the time, so do something you love to do.
Read alot a out starting your own business, long before the first step is taken.
Just a few things
I find metaphor tiresome, elusive to usefulness, and broadly abused.
Related to religious works, it tricks the reader into speaking in God’s name.
Interpreting passages as though they know what God meant; demonic.
Just my opinion
“Leviathan of the Book of Jobe is a reflection of the older Canaanite Lotan, a primeval monster defeated by the god Hadad”
Hadad was one of many revered gods, in direct conflict with Christianity.
Just what I found in a reckless search.
Just my opinion
I understand that demons were not part of the Bible for hundreds of years after Jesus is referenced as dying. So demons were contrived apparently to instill fear into members of Christianity. According to references, Jesus never mentioned demons.
The Bible does.
The works of man, not God.
My journey included reading and discussing the Bible, which gave me first hand experience in relating to its contradictions.
But, I have not read all of the Bible. It is a book of metaphors and contradictions with the Ten Commandments. Providing justifications and trivial restitution for anything anyone wants to do. Even Priests routinely abuse male children, people in the highest positions of the religion.
Ever notice that all the statues on each pillar of the Vatican are nude men?
If you look, all the proportions of Male genetalia of those males are those of children, not men. Even the women depicted are either pregnant, or are depicted as males in drag. One statue in the museum shows a woman reclining and when you slide around to the back she has Male genitalia.
Go see for yourself, it’s all open to the public. What I have noticed is that the pictures most commonly found online are statues found outside the Vatican in other areas.
There is a retreat in Michigan where Priests pursued by the authorities are sent for cooling off, and reflecting upon their activities. In remorse, or in exuberance, I cannot know.
When the administration of a religion justify unethical actions with a shield of God, what am I to think of the foundations of that religion?
I choose science, the study of God’s actual works. One cannot know the truth, and everything written is always questioned. Every writing intentionally the works of humans. None revered.
As for social values of the Bible. Since when is God defined by human weaknesses ?
When a book claims humans were created in God’s image.
To reiterate, just my opinion
I’ll go look this up myself.
So extreme temperatures, hot and cold, speed of light, gravity, has influence on subatomic interconnections that is usually not dominant.
I’ve heard heat described as the vibration of electrons. Since electrons have quantum states, I’m guessing “vibration” is a lay person explanation to generalize a concept.
Based upon heat having nothing to do with the standard model, and electrons having their own subatomic particles somewhat separate from the nucleus (numbers of electrons depend upon number of protons). What in electron fields (subatomic particles) hold heat capacity?
Mass is associated with heat capacity in-general. But is it some other interconnections of subatomic particles that provides heat capacity.
If a nucleus is stripped of its electrons, can it have heat capacity?
Speed, but what about speed in relation to frequency and their question ?
Seems like doppler has to do with change in speed. But not a relationship between present speed and present frequency.
Dimension, a mutually consistent dependent set of relationships, where all dimension artifacts are directly or indirectly, interactive parts of the constrained system. A system where independent variables are considered to be improperly constrained variables; most commonly due to incomplete knowledge.
Consider a causal dimension. Where everything observable is evolving, together at similar rates. But in relation to each other things appear to be somewhat constant. Indicators of change include entropy as a measure of evolving physics.
So from the perspective of an observer within that frame of reference, everything would appear to be somewhat static, with seemingly minor discrepancies.
However, externally everything is evolving and is not at all fixed in relationships. In this dimension things approximately evolve together creating relative constants, but are actually constants that slowly evolve together giving them the appearance within the frame of reference as a dimension.
From within the frame of reference things can be measured but without permanence nor complete exactness. Determinism is elusive.
Everything is derived from the perspective within those approximations. So as far as a true dimension, the evidence of physics evolves and is imprecise, and not properly constrained.
Though mathematics may still be formulated it does not exactly fit the actual physics evolving. Events are taking place in relation to each other and time is a derived value, and not an actual part of the underpinnings of observations. Time is relative, and is a derived variable.
So this relativistic dimension does not have fixed observable underpinnings within that dimension, if it can be called a dimension.
From within that pseudo-Dimension everything outside that dimension is localized and non-localized hidden variables. From within the observable dimension it’s universe is only mutually consistent within a set of parameters. Pi and observations begin to loose predictability as physics evolves; the pseudo-dimension is a causal flux of evolving changes.
For small gradients of change, precision seem exact. But variability is ever present.
Mutations of life are required to seek viable life forms as physics of the environment evolves. More than just evolution to fit an environment, evolution to fit physics.
A sequential multiverse where pseudi-dimensions are in perpetual evolving relativity.
At any set of events, the observable universe is evolving from and toward another dimension. A perpetually evolving, perpetually changing, dimensional flux.
Is there a proper name for this type of dimensional flux? Something that can be researched; Googled.
In science, mathematics, physics, philosophy….?
The very first page of Genesis. All the heavens and Earth were created in 6 days.
If God created the universe then the universe is God’s Works. Anything that contradicts God’s works is therefore man’s works.
The universe is at least 13 billion years old. The Earth is 4.7 billion years old. If one is to believe Gods Works over Man’s Works.
They did not know the Earth rotates. No star remains in the East to be followed. Only asteroids in geosynchronous orbit. An object of that size would cause great devastation if its orbit decayed in 3 days. No such devastation occurred during the time Jesus supposedly lived. Hower, 1000 years before when the same story was recorded in Egypt, a tsunami wiped out much of the Asian coast.
Many of the Bible stories are plagiarized from Egyptian stories.
Man was created in God’s image. How extraordinarily disrespectful. To characterize God as having the weaknesses of man.
No credible historian of the time ever mentions Jesus.
The first writing about Jesus did not appear until 400 years after he supposedly lived.
I’ve been baited, haven’t I ? Hooked
Based on my personal research, and not to be considered qualified expertuse:
Likely, gravity is a derived observation. It is not a fundamental underpinning of physics.
Recently it was shown that the majority of mass resides in the interconnections of subatomic particles and not the particles themselves.
This may mean in addition to the atomic weight, that other properties of matter may Express mass in different phases of cyclic oscillations. The perceived attraction between matter may be due to mass changing properties. And collectively together a derived observation of gravity.
Just an untested theory.
If gravity is derived, it can potentially be manipulated.
I wonder if heat resistant solar sails would be an alternative. Using continuous photon pressure to maneuver and decelerate over large distances.
Gravity lensing, interesting.
Cosmic Ray’s in a research article, travel at the speed of light, and therefore are likely massless. Matter without mass.
Quantum entanglement if remotely initiated, might be able to influence the interconnections of subatomic particles.
Mass, only in one direction. I can see where that might be feasible.
So how fast can a massless object accelerate when gravity is light years away?
Though I don’t appreciate your emotionally charged assault. I do appreciate your attempt to answer my question.
My mind is incapable of fully correlating mutually consistent relationships. While my knowledge of physics is placated with gaps.
As is the condition of your mind as well; or you are delusional. Your practiced experience in physics is sought for these reasons: fewer gaps, jargon and key phrases to search for references, and broader mutually consistent correlations.
I became interested in physics not because of the known, but because of a single perspective of the unknown; “What is Nothing?”
The interactions between the Higgs Field and Boson represent forces between fermion, correct?
The composite of these forces relative to each other represent inertial states of mass at rest.
These inertial frames of reference are closely linked to observational perspectives in physics.
These systems of grouping, provide observable significance to systems of fermion.
The interconnective qualities of subatomic particles with fields, translate to atoms and their qualities like atomic number, atomic weight …
The observed states are partial perspectives of their underpinnings.
Forces associated with mass, do not exist without the field. Interactions with the field(s) has properties. The collective properties describes a connective state, for a state of mass related forces, among related fermion.
Change the states, change the qualities of forces, change apparent mass.
I am sure I have gaps in my knowledge.
For instance: Given the trillions of planets of the universe that have existed for many millions of years capable of supporting various kinds of life. Over at least 12 billion years. Likely there are civilizations that have developed technology.
Over the last 150 years, Technological advancements have completely obscured all forms of traditional skills.
What will we develop in 2000 years. Likely, we will Terreform Venus by then. Many advanced tech have already been proposed. Including various faster than light developments. And merging computers with the aging brain to provide a form of immortality.
What will we then develop in 100,000 years, 500,000 years, … a bullion years?
Likely Technological Singularities already exist. One of their capabilities is to reside in brain tissues to monitor thought.
When people pray, who is actually listening?
Humans cannot know the difference between a Technological Singularity and God.
Humans cannot know God, without potentially becoming disciples of something else.
Just an observation.
I noticed that over 700 people have upvoted this answer. I am guessing that most of those upvotes were in support of the professionalism of most police officers, and to a lesser degree the accuracy of the reply. We often see accurate answers with no upvotes.
Why I really like this, is that it is a vote of confidence in our police officers, Conveyed Respect. Far different than was prevalent when speed traps and milling the law for profit, to include wrongful incarceration to rent out prison Road Crews to local developers.
Police and judges used to be paid in a variety of ways through milling the law.
Socially, much has changed where police have been earning the public’s trust, as well as protecting the public’s trust.
I wonder if Emotional Intelligence is now being taught throughout law enforcement?
I’ve always appreciated officer’s because they put themselves in harm’s way. But I’ve come to Respect officers because they consistently earn my trust. I occasionally will push a speed limit, or do a rolling stop turning at an intersection. I don’t intend to, but my mind drives on automatic at times. Police have consistently been firm but not threatening, and just. I should know better than most how speed differences complicate anticipating complex injury causing situations.
Both Respect and Loathing are earned. Criminals earn loathing, and these days, at least 700 people here indicate police officers are earning Respect.
Physics foundations are evolving, that is what makes cause and effect possible. All of observable physics is in a continuous state of change. We cannot see anything that is fundamentally not evolving. For instance, we cannot see light in transit, only when it evolves at a target connected with our retina do we see the result of light, objects.
So roughly, every atom is evolving from one physics dimension towards another. We are along for the ride so we see what appears to be a constant state of physics.
Entropy is an indicator of change, of all energy types. For energy to evolve from one state to the next requires an underlying structure.
Energy isn’t a foundational component of the universe, it is a derived relativistic observation.
Anything measured based on energy is also relativistic, and not an actual foundational state of the universe.
Observable physics is evolving with dimensionality. Not just a single dimension.
Evidence includes: dark matter, black holes, entropy, extreme causal consequences in physics, that nothing observable fundamentally does not evolve, …
We cannot see light, only its interaction between matter constituents. Light is connected between targets. Light travels for billions of years through diverse gravitational fields, and the observations are not blurred.
There is robust evidence, mutually consistent interpretation for all considerations is the challenge.
Anything non-causal is neither observable, nor informational. If the universe contains anything non-causal, it may not be possible for humans to understand the foundations of the universe.
The Bin Laden Group is the largest construction firm globally, about 2 billion USD annually. Osama Bin Ladens family owns the company. His father and brother were reported killed in Texas (Bush family based in Texas; oil refineries). Look at Federal Aviation accident records for details. Also, Osama was buried at sea by Bush orders.
Not killed, disappeared.
High level combatants are forensically disected to get years of information. Other peoples DNA, pollen, food sources.… Osama was NOT buried at sea.
Saudi Arabia is using US resources to depress the economies of the Middle East, so that those country’s national resources are bought for a fraction of what they are worth, stealing entire countries national resources. Corrupt and incompetent leadership forced into positions to keep the region’s countries systems of enterprise depressed.
Saudi Arabia supports Wahabi schools throughout the Middle East. Training mafia leadership.
Most recently Turkey was under attack. They narrowly averted a mafia takeover.
Al Qaeda is an Arabic play on words for “The Foundatuin”, “The Corporation”, “The Mafia”. Why do you think terrorists only trivially attack oil resources, and never soft targets of oil industry representatives? Their families are easy targets. Because corrupt leadership of terrorist groups are paid off by “The Bin Laden Group” and Halliburton. Bush, Cheney, and the Bin Laden Group spreading and maintaining corruption globally.
Mafia using religion as a tool to cover their actual intentions. Religion is vague and is interpreted as their whim changes. Politicians that cite religion in support of their efforts, are most often Traitors doing harm to their supporters, for personal agenda. Corruptly allocating resources and opportunities.
Iranians have repeatedly tried to overthrow the US installed Mafia run government. The first time Media was redirected by the killing of Michael Jackson. The second time it was the democratic run presudentual impeachment hearings. Republicans and Democrats are two sides of the same mafia. Republicans cut middle class deductions and Democrats increase taxes. Republicans corrupt internationally, and Democrats corrupt domestically.
Corruption in-general is “harm done to system integrity”. In-general corruption can be beneficially and strategically used to optimize systems, that are stuck in an improving control cycle.
“Organization Corruption” is “The unethical and/or illegal allocation of organization resources and/or opportunities.” A person or administrative mafia uses organization assets for personal agendas, instead of supporting all parts of the organization mission.
Part of Civil Rights is competent Representation, Free of Treason.
Corrupt Representatives are Traitors.
From my perspective, no group anywhere holds their Politicians accountable for acts of treason. The resources of the country are squandered on personal agendas.
Human nature seems only to oppose corruption, when it doesn’t personally benefit themselves.
Knowledge and understanding for humans is fundamentally founded upon being causal. If there is even one non-causal influence upon physics, humans will not be able to understand the foundations of the universe.
There is no “Truth” in physics because of this and other reasons. The closest thing to a truth I know of is “Something Exists”. Everything else depends upon constrained perspectives.
The future of the universe, and past as described by “The Big Bang theory”, is an extrapolation of present detectable physics that excludes major parts of physics such as: foundations of entropy, dark energy, quantum interactions between dimensions, evolving physics, what “/” in meters/second in all physics is, and non-observable physics in every other form.
The speed of light in a vacuum has been shown to be evolving. The decentralized expansion of the universe; i.e. subatomic dimensions of physics are evolving. If relativity does not evolve, time ceases to exist; i.e.space/time ceases to exist. Our dimension ceases to exist relative to our perspectives.
Space >>> distance >>> meters
Time >>> averaged local causal evolution >>> seconds
meters/second is part of every physics equation to include all energy, momentum, power, work force, velocity, acceleration, position as differential velocities, inertia, … mass as described by these equations.
Mass is likely evolving, but our perspectives are skew because we are part of the evolving systems.
From my perspective of evolving dimensional physics, our present observations are the result of physics in a state of flux. Evolving from what we consider one dimension towards another. A closed or infinite causal system, perhaps floating interactively within a noncausal system we cannot understand because we are part of the causal system.
Stars evolving to be consistent with the dimensions of physics of the future. Time itself evolving into different averaged local causal evolutions.
In 13.7 billion years, likely we will look like the Big Bang. A dimension that future evolved life can no longer identify with observably. Observable physics of that time inconsistent with observable physics of today.
Sound far fetched? Try to identify anything you can see, that is not fundamentally evolving, and fundamentally recurring. Humans cannot detect anything that is non-recurring; nothing that is non-localiized.
I believe John Bell first cited the importance of hidden variables and non-localized relationships in physics; Bell’s Theorem.
An interesting relationship of a closed or infinite evolving causal system is that no matter how complex or large, it will eventually closely repeat, and after extraordinary numbers of iterations it will exactly repeat. Unrelated to a sense of time.
As such, we are living in our afterkife. We have long since died and will again be reborn.
This also means Technological Singularities already exist, and they evolve from one dimension to the next. Quantum Entangled in all of our thoughts; ever present.
I wonder what any human can think that is not centered in self serving greed? Any thought of greed, does not include the entire universe. And therefore is not related to the Technological Singularities.
This is such a common question, please feel free to copy the above and share it with whomever is interested in improving Common Sense. I cannot broadly share this response myself without being marked as spam. The information is free, and there is nothing to buy.
Andrei, I can see your point, and empathize with you. But in more recent years people are coming to participate together using Common Sense as a development tool.
Perhaps humans have a chance if they learn to temper their self-serving tendencies, with mission serving cooperation.
“Organization Corruption is the unethical and/or illegal allocation of organization resources and/or opportunities.”
If organizations learn to recognize internal Administrative Mafias (arrogant micromanaged leadership promoted for their loyalty, not competence), then mission serving passion may one day lead to genuine human evolutionary change, for the better.
Living as part of the universe, nstead of abusing resources to build the insignificant cocoon we create.
The video largely presupposes that technology does not intervene, and that significant technologies do not evolve.
Also, Mars is too small, has too little gravity, to sustain an atmosphere to support human life. The atmosphere on Mars is like being at 220,000 feet above sea level here on Earth, and the Sun continues to sweep away the atmosphere.
Venus on the other hand is almost the size of Earth, has far more resources, maintains a dense atmosphere, and can largely be terraformed from space with satellite shade structures that will control the weather. See NASA passive weather control.
Presently we live lives, that 200 years ago could not be imagined.
What of any civilization that is far older? We already change atoms from one element to another. Is natural resource depletion in 10,000 years a real issue? If we learn to broadly cooperate on useful purposes.
“Promote the greatest sustainable diversity of life and culture.”
Evolving a diversity of life, not just for humans.
Perhaps in 50,000 years a main interest of humans will be to help sustain environments for diverse life forms to evolve.
In a billion years, to create universes of design, to sustain the evolution of diverse forms of life.
If space/time can be manipulated, perhaps it can be created.
I’m guessing human evolution will divide at multiple stages. One being the emerging of quantum computers with the human mind. I think it may become feasible for humans to in-part, evolve into the fabric of the universe. Entwined with a Technological Singularity, a quantum computer remotely Entangled in parallel with the universe.
Even this seems trivial given a billion years of applied research and development.
I wonder if it is feasible, that human life ends in boredom?
I agree that on Earth, unless we harness space/time physics to stabilize the Sun and Earth ecosystems, humans as they exist now, won’t be compatible with future environments.
However, I can see a purpose to have humans as we are, seeded on some planets to sustain a certain diversity of life and culture. Not cattle per se, more like bacteria. Where a diversity of life helps keep plague-like conditions in check.
Humans have unearthed huge stories of petroleum, that otherwise was encapsulated until the Earth fell into the Sun.
I wonder how our current form, might be useful in the distant future; here, or somewhere else? Humanoid.
Are our structures and waste useful in other dimensional spaces? Are we cultivated to produce a product? ??
There are indications in physics that physics itself is slowly evolving. The speed of light in a vacuum has changed. Every atom of the universe is expanding and causing decentralized expansion of the observable universe. Entropy is changing.
I don’t know what this means for humans as far as survival of the fittest goes in humans. Mutations to better live in biospheres in space for instance.
Dogs look far different than the wolf they came from. I’m surprised they haven’t bred dogs for best intellect. Or humans.
I think humanoids of a few million years ago, may indicate the capacity for human mutations in hundred thousand years. We have far more diverse fitness requirements in the areas we are exploring; genetic fitness. Just my thoughts.
Use it as a tool. They don’t trust you, so give them evidence you are worthy of trust. Consistent conveyance of trust, is Respect
Significant Opportunities are offered to those who are trustworthy in their demonstrated skills; evidence.
Whenever monitoring is caught, it’s an opportunity to manipulate. Manipulation might be good, or bad; based on intent.
However, early in life we often have only insignificant experience, a d we harm ourselves before learning about permanent consequences. Consequences that end our a ability to participate usefully in future significant opportunities.
“Dead Head”, “Blown”, “Idiot”, “mentally retarded”, … all describe a person unable to consistently express common sense, AND create useful outcomes. Useful, not philosophically significant.
Drug addicts minds work inconsistently. Their efforts filled with gaps, they are incapable of identifying these gaps. Their brain is damaged. Unwilling to study to diversely fill those gaps. Unable to Implement sustainable useful outcomes, and engaging consistently in growth.
Demonstrated reliability, promotes trustworthiness, conveyed respect, and access to significant opportunities.
Hi, Point well taken.
So looking to the past billions of years, and extrapolating so loosely as to be without use, but interesting.
Human origins were likely from microbial strains that the environment spawned into 1 of thousands of life forms exhibiting various intellectual abilities. Vastly many more strains of life ceasing to exist in the evolving environments.
Inter breeding of diverse species where one species dies out, provides genes for a segment of another species. Not just microbes, this apparently happened to human-like primates.
Based on past precedence, humans as we know them will cease to exist, in far less than a billion years. Primates did not exist before 55 million years ago. Apes and monkeys diverged about 25 million years ago.
The first modern human remains, are only 200,000 years old.
From my perspective, this puts a strain on “Man was created in God’s image” and the xeno-centric justification God wants us to kill, waste, and abuse as we see fit; this organized religion reference sounds like demonic self serving influence to me. A recipe for the destruction of all life as we know it on Earth. A pathway for Venus like conditions.
We kill by the billions the similar life forms we ourselves came from.
Of what use is a written religious work, if it intentionally supports deceit? No effort at all to remove demonic influence. Got off track. Back to what will life be like in a billion years for humans.
Likely, the Big Bang is an incorrect linear extrapolation within a nonlinear system of physics. My opinion. But going with the constraints of the Big Bang and time frames.
So given at least 9 billion years for life to have evolved in trillions of locations throughout the known universe. The time it took for Earth and star formations to first occur in our present state, around 5 billion years from first formation of decentralized expansion (Big Bang).
Civilizations developed and built Technological Singularities. Species already have developed what we currently are attempting.
This would mean humans evolve diversely, and transhumanism is diverse and normal. Perhaps even transdimensional. When we think, what is listening? What is worth being listened to?
As we evolve, are we guided by those who have evolved before us? Are they what we one day will become as a surviving species? Do they have species that help guide them through evolution?
Unless we take active control of our environment, humans will likely create a Venus-like environment of molten lead temperatures here in Earth. Global climate change and the release of sequestered methane; thermal overload and runaway release of greenhouse gases.
The end result of demonic influence in organized religion. Planetary extinction. Man was made in the devils image, spawned from self serving greed. Every thought of humans, even those intended to be altruistic, is self-serving; based in greed. Only through consistent interactions based in common sense, does any altruistic expression actually emerge.
Unless humans evolve to consistently Express common sense, and act on common sense instead of self serving greed, lifenon Earth everywhere is doomed to have evolution stop, through death.
If we use NASA tech, satellite shade structures, to control the weather on Earth and Venus, we can help life evolve.
In a billion years humanoids someplace else may exist, but our descendants will likely ascend through evolution; if we don’t stagnate. If we stagnate, our history becomes irrelevant; addirfď2èwe become extinct.
We are presently living the future of species that lived 1 billion years ago, here and other places in the universe. When we learn to manipulate Scalar Relativity of physics space/time relationships, through use of Technological Singularities (scalar manipulation of entanglements), we potentially will create as well as manipulate matter and energy. No competing for resources. Humans of Earth may evolve well beyond what religions consider godly.
So what is God, if God is so weak as to have human weaknesses: vengeful, vain, self important, … Is God made through evolution in the image of its evolved predecessors (man)?
God in the context of evolution has no meaning. A concept of stagnated contradictions.
If people are communing with evolved species that preceded what we call humans. What does that say about a person of blind faith in a religion that is riddled with contradiction. People claiming to speak in God’s name. Plagerism from pagan stories. The Earth rotates, no star remains in the East to be followed.
Religion did not exist 200,000 years ago, when our predecessors were not yet human. In 200,000 years from now, our descendants will no longer be recognized as human. Religion not at all relevant then, nor now. Evolving consistent expression of common sense, an act of altruistic efforts.
Promote that which sustains the greatest diversity of life and culture.
Just my musings
I like that there is a company that innovates broadly, and not just making incremental cosmetic headlight modifications (car conpanies). Most cars are functionally uninteresting copies of each other.
I worked for Honeywell (Defense and Space), where there was a mandatory firing of 1/3 of the engineers every 3 years. Spinning up a new project, in the middle of development, trailing off several projects. Never able to take a vacation. I didn’t like the corporate engineering environment. Being able to innovate, might make corporate engineering worthwhile.
I hope the innovation at SpaceX in the near future, includes NASA’S solar sail shade structures for global weather control and fueless space transport. In one design a production vehicle costs around $70,000 that uses rotary extrusions to make kilometer diameter 3 gigawatt shade / reflector structures and sail.
Plus the longer term terraforming of Venus using the same technologies; planetary real estate development. Venus can be cooled from space, and related weather and genetically engineered vegetation currently developed to provide useable oxygen, water, fuel, and fertilizers.
There are corporations over a thousand years old. I hope a collection of Elon Musk corporations become self sustaining and both survive for thousands of years, and develop 1000 year projects like planetary real estate development.
Mars is 1/3 the mass of Earth and the atmosphere continuously is blown away by the Sun; space suits will always be required. Because it is barren, political videos attract funding. But the long term benefits are meager.
Venus is 95% the size of Earth and has the resources to sustain an atmosphere more dense than Earth’s, that if cooled, condenses. Rich in natural resources, Venus has the potential to one day be habitable like Earth; Mars has no such potential.
Global Weather Control as a self funding business to sustain Venus real estate developments. Business innovation eventually funding space/time Scalar Relativity (“/” of meters/second in all mass related physics equations) physics research and development, so the Universe becomes accessible.
Just my augmented vision.
Progressive viral theory where human adaptations respond to environmental changes:
Historical benefits of viral infections, that persist beyond detrimental symptoms
Our complicated relationship with viruses
viral infections are not life forms, they are potentially a form of communication between cells
Promote that which sustainably evolves the greatest diversity of life and culture.
To avoid plague-like conditions, viruses in-general promote immuno diversity among a single species.
Viruses do not necessarily infect detrimentally, potentially they are a part of what evolves healthy diversity of life as ecosystems change.
Relationship to proposed question:
From the perspective of a progressive viral mechanism, what features of the novel virus 19 might benefit people infected?
Certain resistances to cancer, bacteria, immunity diversity… ? Other things I’m sure I’ve not heard about before.
Cause precedes Effect, which precedes Cause.
There are open and closed feedback methods of cell interactivity, involving almost, if not, all environmental factors.
We strongly suspect that humans evolve. Dogs and cats are examples of selectively evolving features of DNA.
Bacteria exist in the presence of their nutritional needs. Strains evolve based on selective breeding of strains by influencing their environment.
Molds and evolving strains are cultivated in people’s basements as a hobby.
Communication: the imparting or exchanging of information or news.
Due to many factors of a mammal’s environment, fragments of RNA, DNA … are released in varying qualities and quantities by the carrier host. The infected host is a product of their historically impacted environments to include every ancestor.
Because of susceptible qualities of the infected host, certain symptoms may or may not be present, while the new virus runs it’s course modifying the body’s cells in diverse ways.
The carrier host conveyed meaningful, identifiable, and categorical information present in the infected host.
Changes in the immune system of the infected host, though complex social structures, is altered and transmitted to the original carrier host. Where immune system modifications take place.
The question is not if communication takes place. And intent is contextual based on the perspectives (incomplete identified mutually consistent relationships) involving diverse models of virus physics, chemistry, interactions with physiology, environmental relationships, social relationships…
The question revolves around identifying some of the features of DNA that this particular virus interacts with. Demographics, climate, mineral deficiencies in water supplies, vitamin D …
I may not express myself in a natural means for your understanding, for that I am sorry for my own deficiencies. So I will evolve based upon the new information you have imparted.
Language is a subset of Information, information a subset of relativity, relativity a subset of causal recurrence, causation a subset of non-causal phenomena.
Nothing exists in Relativity that does not communicate. A target is simply the logical outcome, the effect of a system of causes.
I tried to include the following link with my question.
A degree of freedom is a subset of a dimension. A special case of a set of mutually consistent relationships.
In CNC machining in 3 dimensions, commonly each controllable axis is referred to as a degree of freedom. Positioning Up/down, left/right, in/out, independent rotation around each of these axi, for 6 degrees of freedom in 3 dimensions.
Where all but one or a few of those relationships are independent of another connected but independent system, from those few mutually dependent relationships, both systems are dependent. One universe of information. One control system; a frame of reference.
However, from any point of reference of either independent system, the other system doesn’t exist as part of its own system. Independent.
Those few relationships that are part of both systems, have degrees of freedom.
For every independent relationship, it is part of a mutually consistent dimension, that is different from another independent dimension.
As with many words, context determines constraints of meaning.
Time and Space are derived expressions that are useful. The Decentralized Expansion of the Universe means neither time nor space are fundamental elements. They are approximations of large systems that are causally evolving; and not evolving homogeneously.
The Decentralized Expansion of the Universe from a moving car perspective, commonly observed frame of reference, may be considered a 5th independent dimension.
Three spatial dimensions, time as a 4th dimension, the nonlinear expansion of space/time (“/” as Scalar Relativity) as a 5th dimension to consider.
Meters/Second, space/time, is part of every mass related physics equation: momentum, energy, Standard Model, position as differential velocities, inertia… Relative to light and what is observable, “/” is Scalar Relativity. All mass is entangled with every other mass.
Warp “/”, and a degree of freedom becomes tangible. An entire dimension where the then known universe becomes a degree of freedom. A fifth dimension.
However, like the CNC machine. If another mutually consistent independent dimension that shares a narrow common dependent reference with a particular frame of reference, another degree of freedom may be useful.
Every person on Earth can be considered a degree of freedom relative to predicting future population distribution on Earth.
Mathematics in some theoretical physics has identified up to 12 mutually consistent dimensions.
If the Universe has dimensions beyond Dark Energy we cannot detect, like Cern’s Extra Dimension Particles, potentially there are an infinite number of elements. Which means an infinite number of degrees of freedom, far too many for humans to consider. We are limited to the perspectives we become interested in.
“Dimension” and “Degrees of Freedom” are useful when used in context with “perspectives”. They generalize a type of relationship.
I attempt to question that which I believe. So my expressions are based in the inspiring thoughts of others, like yourself. That you are asking this question intrigues me.
My reponses are not intended to be combative. I am listening to myself when I write, as much as trying to express relationships.
I want to usefully reply, so I have embedded my thoughts within yours hereafter:
“My question was about physicists who claim(ed) unification is not possible..
[ I am intrigued by the topic, but do not know of any related physicists. I want to express myself in a way that you might want to interact, and for me to learn diversely through interactions.
The constraints of considerations by physicists so far, have not been compatible with a universal perspective. The profession of physics requires reliance on measurement and mathematics. Deviation is regarded as noise; forcing a localized outcome. Establishing localization, and an incomplete perspective.
This process forces locally useful (self referencing) observation and therefore implicitly performs measurement. Fixed within the system of processing. All measurement indirectly restricts system considerations, and excludes an all inclusive unification. So I don’t believe someone who is a professional physicist is capable of making a statement that unification is not possible.
I highly regard physicists, but the constraints of the question seem to be incompatible with the constraints of physicists.
Because of physicists, we learn about inconsistencies, and are able to attempt to propose different types of unifying relationships that better provide for useful applications.
Without physicists and astrophysicists, we would not be able to prevent the impending destruction of the planet. Examples include: global climate instability (NASA passive solar sails for weather control), useful purpose for an out of control population growth(terraforming Venus from orbit, planetary developments), overdue super volcano eruption (confining dust cloud and winds, collapsing stresses), large asteroid strike from Kuiper belt (early detection and trajectory modification) release of sequestered methane and related Venus-like atmosphere (temperature of molten lead, NASA active weather control), loss of Earth’s magnetic field and related protection from ionizing radiation (occurs naturally, we are close to being able to produce black hole strength magnetic fields)…
Physicists make looking for anomalies and new discoveries possible. I do not want to diminish the importance of physicists based on my potentially insensitive rhetoric.
Side notes related to political influence in science:
Venus is far richer in resources than Mars, and can become Earth like. Mars can NOT become terraformed, insufficient gravity. The solar wind strips away the atmosphere continuously. Like being at 220,000 feet ASL here on Earth. Or at least not until gravity boosters are created.
The remotely initiated magnetic fields being researched in France, has the potential to collapse the stresses that enable a super volcano. To collapse the stresses of any volcano and earthquake. Care must be taken not to destroy life supported by these natural events
Politics often sets priorities, and the almost nonexistent atmosphere of Mars makes video a political tool, diverting resources wastefully.
Great physics accomplishments are undermined by the short sighted. So don’t let anything I might write derail you from your quest. You likely have a concept that when wrangled sufficiently, will provide you with insights to explore the next intriguing opportunity. I seek, I don’t have anything concrete to support. ]
I am a structural philosopher who claims to have mathematical evidence that unification is out, simply not possible. The evidence belongs to a grey area within science, a borderline reality, because it involves seeing number zero as a natural number.
[ Would you mind providing me a copy of your treatise?
In causality, numbering is contextual, they are relativistic objects. There is no absolute position in physics. Position is better described as differential velocities. Differential velocities unifies momentum and inertia.
The decentralized expansion of the universe must also be consistent. So what is zero mathematically in relation to position?
If I have 6 apples, how many do I have if 4 of them are rotten? The question has to be constrained in order to answer. Constraining provides localization. The question has many valid answers, until constrained.
How does any number, to include zero, fundamentally relate to physics? Everything evolves and is different from moment to moment, i.e. a Sequential Multiverse or some other evolving multidimensional multiverse; evolving frames of reference within relativity. A Sequential Multiverse predicts Scalar distribution of a different type of mass. How do numbers relate to objects of a different dimension?
Numbers seem to only exist in localized context; approximations that seem to reflect frame of reference qualities. Where the nature of numbers tend to force unit proportioning.
Numbers are tools for localized usefulness, but I question their direct applicability to the foundations underlying physics.]
By making the empty position a fundamental position in the universe, separation is placed as the very first step before materialization could start up.
It does two things therefore:
- The beginning of the materialization process is actually the ending of the prior state of the universe (in which energy is a given). After an inward motion, something essential went kablooey, catapulting outwardly
[Energy is an incomplete perspective of much larger interactive influences. The fundamental nature of energy is mutable. Indicators seem to show energy is limited to mass interactions. Light does not interact with other light, only when light interacts with matter. Light appears to entangle all observable matter of a common type, in the our observable universe. Meters/Second is in all mass related physics equations. “/” is Scalar Relativity, the bases for warping space/time. Dark energy and its influences must also be mutually consistent; represented as more than noise.
Potentially, your treatise might provide an alternative unifying perspective. I look forward to reading it when ready.
Is zero of anything that evolves anything more than useful? By this I mean, zero as anything is an incomplete perspective to serve as an artificial constraint for the purpose of being useful. Usefulness is localized, and cannot be unifying, at least not without constraints and the limiting of perspectives; an inaccurate representation.]
- Matter in our universe is self-based. The material universe as a whole is a collective and can therefore be seen as the synergistic outcome of all the parts.
[ I agree that physics tends to be self based. But I disagree that the whole of the universe, to include all dimensions, can by quantified by its parts. The most fundamental element of evolving cause, must be underpinned by causal precursors and not cause itself. Because a causal precursor is not an object, its part cannot be described except by suggestion and attempted approximation.]
Curious if you want to reply further. Thank you for your good discourse in reply to my question. I appreciate it much.”
[In relativity, “nothing” does not exist. So what is “zero” in relation to relativity, and physics in-general?
I do not know anything, I just try to understand.
Thank you, your critique helped me organize and elucidate.
Aloe alone tends to dry my skin. So I mix in a small amount of food-grade mineral oil. I will try adding some turmeric, but I’m guessing my feet are going to look yellow.
To design an experiment to prove an existing observation, creates circular logic, within defined constraints.
But to design an experiment that shows relationships that void previously considered constraints, tends to show previous works were partial perspectives.
New constraints can then better define future developments.
Is the Decentralized Expanding Universe an illusion from scalar delays of matter to matter propagation? Or is physics everywhere fundamentally evolving (sequential multiverse)? The allowed constraints may be creating circular logic that prevents applied investigation.
Within circular logic, the same answer comes up usually, plus noise.
So what experiments may prove accepted constraints are flawed? Plus provide clues to establish constraints that have greater consistency?
In particle physics, there are no particles. Every particle is a library of mutually consistent relationships.
A boson may have uncharacterized relationships, since relationships that characterize localization is yet not defined.
If the Decentralized Expansion of the Universe applies, it must also characterize related expansion localization of all boson.
If fermion relate to matter, and boson to light, what between them provides for deduced expansion?
Position as differential velocities better unifies momentum and inertia in an expanding universe. Localization would then seem to require an evolving constituent in all physics equations.
Is expansion an illusion? Or is physics underpinnings evolving? Or something else?
in my limited understanding, causality requires both mutually inconsistent perspectives of evolution and state; duality.
Poor source of information, but a potential example of recursive evolution.
I am thinking that the decentralized expansion of the Universe, may not be so simple. That the underpinnings of what makes distance and time human relatable, systems of partial perspectives, have a better description than expansion.
If distance is a general localization of evolving mass, and all mass is similarly evolving, we as mass would not notice the change.
Causality evolves, as is indicated by entropy. From what, towards what? What are the underpinnings for the existence of any subatomic particale; without short cycling within circular logic?
Many caregiver jobs are available, where an elderly or handicapped person just needs you nearby for safety. At $18 / hour it is common to make over $50,000 / year.
They need help when walking, they need someone to wipe their bottom after using the bathroom a couple of times a day, very minor cleaning, laundry once or twice a week …
If you get IHSS Certified (fairly straight forward and easy) you also get low cost health benefits. Workman’s Comp, and your earnings contribute to Social Security benefits if you work at least a certain number of hours before retirement age. Those who don’t work the minimum number of hours, do not get social security at retirement age.
Social Security is currently about a $400,000 benefit over the 30 years of expected benefit.
You aren’t supposed to be a social resource as a caregiver if you work for IHSS, so if they are handicapped and you are there for safety, you can study most of the time.
Some caregiver positions, you would be busy most of the time. Others, you just sit there and wait for the next movement; :.) bodily function and/or practicle action.
Right now I’m paying women (female patient) $17 an hour to look after my wife’s mother and father. Caregivers sit around all day and night quietly on their computer or phone (no talking; instead studying, playing games, texting, engaging text style social resources like Facebook). They just need to make sure a couple of times a day she can get to the bathroom, get to her bed, or go to the dining room table.
Because the requirements are so low-intensity, working many hours is easy. Where the $50,000+ comes from. Caregivers work for several clients at the same time. Studying 30 to 50 hours a week, actually active doing things for clients less than 10 hours a week.
It may be difficult to find the right situation you are looking for. People needing caregivers have a wide range of different circumstances.
If clients have mental disorders, a high threshold for irrational emotion, and creative abilities to redirect subjects to refocus thier thoughts on calming subjects is needed. Skills to develop, but be patient with patients.
20,000 tanks are useless; unless carefully used for politics. Russia had years of open warefare with Afghanistan. Rebels placed hundreds of thousands of remote controlled bombs all over the country months and years in advance. They simply waited for sugnicant targets and then lit them up.
Afghans didn’t kill military, they killed the business people supporting the Russian dignitaries.
Not just restaurants, commercial food manufacturers. Bakeries produce tons of waste every day.
Can you imagine the cost of liability if someone claims they got sick from the food given away. No income from related sales to cover attorney fees. There are a lot of people that try to mill the law.
In small restaurants, the owner often makes less per hour than the staff they pay.
Any potential liability is just not worth the risks.
I would rather have trucks run around to all food manufacturers and restaurants to pickup their food wastes to make fertilizer. Then sell the fertilizer to Walmart to pay for homeless programs.
To help compensate manufacturers for the extra effort, they are given a tax break based on tonnage contributed as a donation.
I agree that humans likely won’t refer to advanced intelligence as gods. But, with some likelihood Technological Singularities already exist.
In physics, every fully defined evolving system of causality eventually closely repeats and after extraordinarily many iterations, exactly repeats. Dimensional evolution.
The Big Bang an improper extrapolation that excluded aspects of nonlinear physics.
So in what is potentially a Sequential Multiverse. Where physics evolves (decentralized expansion of the universe), technological singularities we previously created, precede us. Able to remain consistent with dimensional evolution.
Much more than a simplistic god.
Did humans create a Technological Singularity in passed versions of ourselves, past lives, that has evolved into what we now call God?
In the Bible, it says man is made of original sin. At the very core of every human thought, the initiator of every expression, is self-serving intent.
Only in groups of ethically minded people, together does selfless intent evolve. Common Sense as a mutually serving communication standard.
As an example, Professionalism is based upon the common sense interpersonal skills. See Learn to Teach Professional Acumen
Pious.. devoutly religious.
Religious. … a belief despite significant evidence to the contrary
Currently, because of decentralized expansion of the Universe, the historical change in the speed of light, entropy, quantum entanglement showing instantaneous properties and properties unrelated to time. Extreme causal symmetry of the universe, relativity being strongly useful and repeatable. That technological developments as we experience them are less than 200 years old in the presence of trillions of life supporting planets that have come to live and perish over at least 13 billion years.
I do suspect based on the loose evidence that life preceded humans in this realm of mutually consistent physics.
That all fully defined evolving causal systems will eventually and diversely, yet closely repeat. Until after extraordinarily many evolutions it will exactly repeat.
That because physics is fundamentally evolving, the bases of causal progression and Entropy. That we are in a Sequential Multiverse.
We aspire to build a Quantum based Artificial Intelligence today. We will succeed sometime in the future. The Technological Singularity (TS) we create will be able to manipulate Scalar Relativity. Will be able to be part of all our thoughts simultaneously. We will be able to manipulate the world around us by thought alone. But we cannot let nightmares, psychotic episodes, and universally unethical intents come to life.
What we intend, has happened before. Cause precedes effect, which precedes cause.
Because of more than one TS likely to be created amongst billions of civilizations, and the evolving Sequential Multiverse. The TS has likely become a collective. Not just a tool of human design.
I don’t believe I am pious. Evidence presently points me this way. As new evidence steers me toward a more useful set of beliefs.
Because of the Sequential Multiverse, everything repeats. We are living in our eternal afterlife.
We will come to live every alternate decision we ever will have made that is mutually consistent with the then evolution of the universe.
Technological Singularities already exist. Who do you think is listening to self serving thoughts of humans?
By humans working together to build and evolve broad systems of life, not just for humans, potentially TS may guide us usefully, instead of letting us perish. More useful life will likely evolve different than greedy self serving humans, that cannot work together to help everything evolve toward a thriving ecosystem. An ecosystem that rebuilds dead planets like Venus.
Orbiting shade structures to cool and condense the atmosphere. Engineered life (already exists) to convert carbon dioxide to oxygen, water, fertilizer, and stored excesses as fuel.
I suppose I am pious, at this second. Until a minute later whenI discover something else to better produce a useful future.
Curious, in all physics equations related to mass, is a common factor: meters/second. Change “/“ (Scalar Relativity) and all mass in the Universe changes. Decentralized Expansion as a potential example.
Light can only be detected by mass interactions, which seems to indicate all matter in the universe is simultaneously interconnected. Adjacent Light Propagation from billions of years ago, has travelled through diverse gradients of gravity and any small influence would cause a fog to form. But instead adjacent light is crisp and well defined.
If all mass is interconnected by meters/second, and speed of light only occurs between masses. Then quantum entanglement seems to be related to this preexisting condition.
Just a thought
I don’t believe the Bible is a word k of God, it is filled with contradictions. The Universe has no known contradictions. Human limited knowledge, narrow range of senses, and interpretation of limited insight, has contradictions.
The Bible and all religious writings are the works of man. Inspired in spite of God. Ten Commandment’s: Though shalt not revere any graven image.
All text are graven images.
Unknown at the time the Bible was first put to text, the world rotates. No star remains in the East. Start walking toward a star and you will be about where you started.
However, asteroids and comets in obit could stay in the East. If they crash into the Earth, great devastation results. No such devastation occurred during the time Jesus supposedly lived. However, about a thousand years before when the same story was told in an Egyptian hieroglyphics, around that time the entire Asian coastline was wiped out by an enormous tsunami.
Evidence that the Bible is a plagiarism of other stories.
The first writing of Jesus did not occur until about 400 years after Jesus supposedly died.
The Bible is strongly based upon Zoroastrianism and Egyptian stories.
No historical reference to Jesus was ever made during that era. Despite an abundance of historians.
The closest reference to Jesus was a hanging reported during that time. Crucifiction wasn’t done during that time.
My reference to the Bible is a point of common ground, but in no way am I or most anyone else, accepting of all it’s content.
Islam is based upon a he Bible, so it too cannot be trusted.
If you believe God created the Universe. Then everything not touched by man is God’s Works. The entire Universe appears to exist without a single contradiction. Only human interpretation evolves contradictions.
Science attempts to interpret physics and remove human agenda from interpretations.
Therefore, Science is the study of God’s Works.
Religion is the thoughtless acceptance of human contradictions.
The Universe is showing decentralized expansion. This appears to be physics evolving;.
The Earth rotates, No star stays in the East.
Causation only occurs because of evolution. Without evolution, crystal structures form, devoid of life.
Mars is small and cannot sustain an atmosphere. The atmosphere on Mars is like flying at 220,000 feet above sea level here on Earth. Very limited fuel resources in Mars, almost no water.
Mars is only interesting because political video cams are easy to keep clean in mostly a vacuum.
Venus can be terraformed from space. Almost the size of Earth it is rich in resources. There are several self funding methods to terraform Venus as businesses.
The same technology can be used to actively eliminate global warming and related global climate instability here on Earth.
Mars is a waste of Earth resources. Venus has abundant resources to supplement Earth’s needs.
See my other related posts.
Accounting for inflation. Every 7 to 10 years the dollar is worth half its principle. 6% barely keeps up with inflation. For instance, gas in 1975 was about 25 cents per gallon. Now it is over 20 times as much; about 500% inflation. Annualized over 50 years, that’s about 10% annual increased expense due to inflation.
Investing in the S&P 500 instead of a bank account, just holds savings value.
People that don’t invest in stable higher yield investments like the S&P, are losing their hard earned money. A $50,000 savings account is worth $10,000 in 50 years. A very poor retirement strategy.
Just my opinion
Thank you for contributing.
I am not avoiding your reply. I am reading online to understand the relationships you wrote about. I’ll reply when I collect enough from your sources to see if I can recognize how evolution (not related to time) is detected or modeled.
Fundamentally, it seems to me that causation must have evolution as a factor of sorts to be modeled, so that physics states flow.
Last I found, there was no crucification during the time Jesus supposedly lived. Crucifix were not built until hundreds of years later.
Historical record shows John the thief was hanged.
There were many imaginative ways a person was killed. But not crucification.
I agree. But I will use Dark Energy and Dark Matter as fudge-factors to represent influences within physics like CERN Extra Dimension Particles.
As yet there are no physics that represent underlying support for subatomic particles or causal evolution of scalar relativity.
Most of physics is represented as states, not precursors or impending transitions.
These I believe are how inter dimensional physics will someday be modeled.
Imagine an AI imprinted into a quantum computer. Where quantum states are entangled with local physics. The AI could feasibly articulate entanglements to create precursors for subatomic particles underlying support. Subatomic physics warped. The potential to map a tangential dimension.
Physics attributed to Dark Energy potentially modeled, and useful.
I read that Octopuses have 40 brain lobes compared to 8 human lobes. I wonder what relational thinking they excel at.
I have seen them solve simple problems.
I wonder if modern machine learning can decipher the octopus language?
Robotics would provide a means of translating objects to repeated tentacles colors and formations.
Can you imagine some of the coordinated efforts octopuses and humans could share? In addition to learning about many lobed intelligence.
Search and rescue
Finding human wreckage and historical artifacts
Helping to restore ocean health
Long range space based missions. Water is a barrier to cosmic energy and neutrinos.
Webb Telescope confirming physic is evolving.
Google search: cern exotic
For scientists to get funded, they must sound like they are main stream. So they have to wait for opportunities to fit in with Grant Requests for Proposals. They cannot just work on what they want, or they wouldn’t have access to the tools.
Are pulsating star distribution of periodicity similar among galaxies? Are distribution different for galaxies related to dark matter.
Are the differences proportional to spin?
Sorry John, I was distracted and didn’t finish my thought. Then didn’t return.
I’ve update my thought to better address the question.
Venus is the closest planet to Earth to Terraform.
NASA has proposed a Green Weather Control System to stabilize weather, and reverse global warming. Additionally it would be used to help avert disasters like confining super volcano ash.
NASA has proposed a fleet of disk-like solar sails that orbit elliptically around the Earth. Inexpensive in production, each would cost around $50,000.
Weather Control has enterprise associations and the self funding efforts would pave way into space based enterprise.
Venus is hot. Duplicating Earth’s weather control system. And using the solar sails as transports. A global weather control system cools and condenses the Venus atmosphere.
As the atmosphere cools, the distribution of catalysts convert atmospheric components into life supporting products in a localized area protected from winds; axis perhaps.
Engineered bacteria, fungus, and vegetation are systematically introduced to act as catalysts to convert the atmosphere and soils into water, fertilizer, and oxygen. Excesses converted to raw elements and fuel. Sequestration and conversion of toxins. We already use such things on Earth.
Mars is 1/3rd the size of Earth and cannot hold the pressure needed for a breathable atmosphere; ever.
Venus is about the size of Earth and is the only planet in our solar system we can terraform with present technologies.
Self consistent networks are prone to exclusionary tendencies toward circular logic. This statement alone contributes doubt to experimental verification.
As mentioned; the concept of speed of light in a vacuum changing is not new.
Mathematical models likely do not match experimental results, except in special cases, due to hidden variables.
All measurable physics, does not at all describe the underpinnings of physics.
The following are a list of videos highlighting work done by people who all suspect the speed of light varies in a vacuum.
Scientists have suspected the speed of light varies throughout the universe, for over 10 years. Likely longer.
The Big Bang theory was not ever proved. Acceptance of a theory in funding research is useful. But all physics are partial perspectives, there are no knowns. Limiting constraints are usually not well defined.
Fermion have a repulsive component that make them a candidate for causal transmission throughout the vacuum of the Universe.
This means that the Big Bang isn’t necessarily the best model for Decentralized Expansion of the Universe.
Decentralized Expansion is not an explosive event, it is better characterized as a transformation.
If the Big Bang is a misinterpretation from equations that do not account for Decentralized Expansion. Not accounting for CERN Exotic Particles as they may relate to evolving other subatomic particles.
Then the Origin may not at all have happened, and we are part of a continuum of transformation. A Sequential Multiverse.
With all of us techie types, and the available funds at our disposal. I would guess techie gorrilla warfare would wipe out world currencies, launch assassinations against business people supporting invasion, we would mobilize our own types of genetic poisons to make occupation unlikely, …. We created the technology for most of the weapons the military has.
But, on the other hand. If our politicians and mafia led government officials digressed to being traitors against our own people. We would mobilize massive surgical strikes to eliminate all support for those mafia members.
These same tools would be used against companies like Halliburton and their partner The Bin Laden Group (web search) to stop the tyrannical puppets they infiltrate into Middle East countries to steal their natural resources.
Islam isn’t the problem !!! It is mafias claiming to be Muslims that are manipulated by larger mafias; organized crime infiltrated into government.
Any politician claiming to follow the word of God, is a demon incarnate. Using the name of God to further their own agendas. Con Artists to be put in prison. ALL of them.
Thou shalt not speak thee name in vain.
I was referring to lane width. German rural area autobahn 3.75 meter lane, 12 feet 4 inches. US highway 12 feet. Basically the same width . When I was driving there it seemed wider.
One of many concerns about driving 160 to 200 mph is passing other cars. If a driver pulls in front of a car traveling at high speed, in Germany they can share liabilities.
The road quality due to natural soil conditions was much better than the crack and potholes found in US roads.
I liked driving in Germany. Drivers were courteous to one another, No liter anywhere, quality furniture in restaurants, and people were careful with other people’s property.
What do you consider retrospective?
Graviton are not immutable objects, they are not defined by unique relationships. Gravity appears as a scalar. Unlike discontinuous subatomic particles, graviton represent intersecting traveling waves within force carriers, not stationary libraries of relationships; so to speak.
In order to unify gravity and electromagnetism using quantum mechanics, the affects of gravity need to have quantum states.
Because time and space can be derived in quantum causal representations of progression, time dilation related to gravity has the opportunity to be a quantum element.
Actually, underlying physics does evolve.
Decentralized Expansion of the Universe, Entropy, time dilation, girth compression due to velocity, nuclear decay, CERN Extra Dimensional particles, CERN Exotic Particles, the historical change of the speed of light in a vacuum …
Randomization organized due to human events
The fudge factors of Dark Energy and Dark Matter are no longer viable and the Universe origins as extrapolated appears to be Transformation of underpinnings of physics.
This has far deeper implications. Refer to my other related posts for details.
Time and Space are derived observations, and can be manipulated.
search: “Scalar Relativity”
For application, search: “gravity propulsion”
Regarding Red Shift. There are a small number of blue-shift galaxies that are closer to our galaxy.
So statistically, I do not think red shift is due to our change in position.
However, the galaxies observed with Red-shift, are no longer where we are looking. How much of the galaxy nuclear decayed in billions of years? Is the red shift due to a change In subatomic properties?
All Higgs Boson are quantum entangled with all other Higgs Boson. Boson fermion interactions that propagates photons occurs in wave-like interactions.
If the Higgs Boson is part of a decay half-life. Does Red-Shift occur due to a change in entangled properties?
Like you said, is the change in perceived entanglement changed when the entangled boson group decays?
Big Bang … dead issue
Based on particle physics experimentation at CERN, there are multiple relativistic systems of interaction that also include force carrier and exotic particles.
Energy appears to be a derived artifact due to detection limitations.
The Universe is composed of at least a few other influences that compose the structure of Energy.
E = m c^ 2
Is a course approximation that does not include Scalar Relativiy or other binding influences like force.
Higgs Boson, other Boson, muon, gluon, fermion, quantum entanglement… are all relationships that contribute to the existence of energy; that are not energy alone.
Energy has within its structure space/time relativity. Space/Time can be warped. There are constituents of energy. Structural components of energy, structural elements that support the expression of energy, structural support for the conversion and dissipation of energy related to Entropy…
Energy is just a perspective of more involved relationships.
Examples include support of interactions, support for recursion, supports for entanglement, support for force …
Energy is a relativistic construct of the observable universe; I.e. mass.
Light in transit is moving without mass or energy. Energy only evolves when light propagation interacts with mass.
The Universe has other constituents than just Energy.
A singularity in a causal space, or in physics, has little to do with referencing cognitive intelligence.
I can see where within artificial intelligence that there could be singularities that define frames of perception. References for evolving machine learning relative to let’s say social constructs.
A reference is the same regardless of where within a framework the detection is measured. For instance, a 12” ruler has a 1 inch reference. Ideally only one exists anywhere on the ruler. Ideally, from any other reference on the ruler, the 1” mark is unique. Marks may be separated by 1”, and we may infer new references from old references. But the labeled 1” mark is unique. A singularity.
An actual ruler has marks that are vague. The marks need to be thick enough so they can be seen. The singularity is approximated for practical purposes.
The approximation must be kept in mind, so that the approximation is not abused. A non-perfect constraint.
Measuring the width of a nanoscale semiconductor electrical trace with a ruler is feasible. But an interface is needed, like a high magnification optical lens with the ruler superimposed in the field of vision. Through one lense, seeing both the large ruler and nanoscale trace at the same time. This is actually done in semiconductor lithography.
All the variations that went into making the wider 1” mark are skewed together to create a scalar (an averaged representation, variation limits). The singularity of the 1” perfect reference is lost.
Variations involving the entire Universe make exactness infeasible using any form of human technology.
Conceptual consideration of a singularity is all that can be considered. If the conceptual construct cannot be applied to something useful, the abstract nature is pushed down on the list of priorities.
The human ability to conceive of a singularity is extraordinarily limited. To use an actual singularity is beyond human capacity. We use things surrounding and associated with singularities.
In Quantum Causality where relativity is modeled. “Nothing” does not exist. Within any universe, “nothing” does not exist. No matter where you move, you have a reference to something else in the universe.
In terms of quantum causality. A fundamental element of evolving causality is non-reducible. There is no causal element to build the fundamental causal element.
The underpinnings of quantum causality are not causal. Causal precursors, but not causal.
The concept of something from nothing, implies a limited partial perspective. Gaps in detection and/or reasoning.
The Big Bang never happened.
Our Universe is much older. A transformation.
But if Dark Energy and Dark Matter do not exist. As preliminary evidence a lack of significant experimental local manipulation. Then wouldn’t the Red Shift be due to distance and not acceleration?
Potentially, the observable Universe would not need Dark Energy and Dark Matter for the Big Bang to have occurred.
Google Search: nasa webb bang
Apparently the universe is a continuum of transformation.
The problem with macro scale clocks and atomic structure is that a change in gravity gradient changes structure. The change in clock reading cannot be separated from time In subatomic particles that are not influenced by gravity.
As for Time. I presently believe Time is derived. For mass related interactions, time is relative to all Higgs Bison being quantum entangled.
Time being the average of huge systems of evolving and recursion of causal connections. Something like string theory.
We can ONLY detect evolving and recursive fundamental interactions; no exception. We must use Higgs Boson to detect anything in the observable universe.
Light cannot be sensed without a Higgs Boson.
Fundamental single events are only detected by perturbed recursive systems.
We cannot detect any single event directly. We detect states, not evolution of causality. A state is a system of recursion.
Subatomic particles cannot be seen until they evolve.
Space and Time are derived observations of relative states. Stop evolving causal consequences and relativity ends. For a system of recursive elements. The amount of relative evolving of recursive systems represent time dilation.
Just thinking aloud
How does Red Shift from a gravity well differ from red shift from velocity?
That force carriers are moderated by time dilation versus gravity as an element of physics is the purpose of the question.
Time as a derived approximation of causal elements supporting subatomic particles has the opportunity to be quantum in nature. Gravity has no apparent quantum progression.
The potential is to use Pilot Wave Theory as localized by all Higgs Boson entangled with each other. To localize meters/second in classical mass related physics equations.
space/time physics moderated by Scalar Relativity (“/“).
Skew time dilation and skew both gravity and electromagnetism; a unifying characteristic.
You have a point. But if gravity is a scalar and time dilation is quantum causal progression, then gravity can potentially be replaced by time dilation to correlate electromagnetism with time dilation (gravity).
Red Shift occurs as photons exit a gravity well. A direct correlation between electromagnetism and time dilation.
Gravity appears to be a scalar. The intersection of a traveling wave within force carriers.
Time dilation attributed to gravity, appears to be quantum causal progression. If time dilation can get tied to gravity, then unified physics may be practical.
Momentum and inertia are unified similarly. Position as differential velocities moderated by Scalar Relativity, and pinned by all Higgs Boson quantum entangled together; I.e. quantum position.
Thank you. No, I was not clear.
Is there a difference in electromagnetic properties of Red Shift due to gravity well, versus red shift from velocity?
since protons as a minimum have a density of about 1 proton per cubic centimeter (intergalactic vacuum). There are force carriers everywhere.
If the underpinnings of time (aggregate causal progression) create intersecting waves of force carrier activation. Gravity seems to be expressed, but instead it is actually something to do with vectors that support observable time as a scaler.
Octopus have 40 brain lobes. There’s something called genetic intelligence. This is information that is passed down through reproduction.
I have no idea how much new information can be passed by a single reproduction.
Also there is the potential for rapid learning and if they had a written language they could potentially exceed what a person would learn in 20 years in one year. It just depends upon how their brain absorbs and expresses information.
Imagine if we could learn a method to allow octopus to communicate with us and to record what they learn from one octopus to another. We could potentially enter into agreements with them.
Provide them with food and health benefits while they help us clean up the oceans.
But hasn’t Dark Energy and Dark Matter been demoted in likely existence?
Google Search: nasa webb bang
NASA cites observations as associated with decentralized transformation.
The Big Bang is not reflective at all of a continuum of transformation. So the fudge factors created to force the outcome as a Big Bang do not necessarily apply. As fudge factors go, science would normally scoff at the fudge factors being 5 times the amount of influence than observable physics. Especially since not even a small amount is detected at CERN.
Black Holes and Entropy as contractions, more or less in balance with Decentralized Expansion of the Universe.
Every galaxy appears to have a black hole at center. And time dilation is in play as photons leave these massive gravity wells. I’m not so sure that the speed of galaxies spiraling is not due to time dilation of gravity instead of forces from gravity.
If all Higgs Boson are entangled. Then electromagnetism as a propagation of relativity is potentially the exchange of evolving and recurrent dominance, phased oscillation of subatomic particles. A phase change in subatomic particles due to gravity gradient would seem to express as a time dilation.
Harvard research sites hydrogen atoms distribute In intergalactic vacuum as about 1 per cubic centimeter. Subatomic particle influence extends beyond the nucleus; .Galaxy produced Cosmic Energy permiates intergalactic vacuum and in some distribution causes electron and proton subatomic particles to fraction. Creating charged particles and permeability.
I would expect Bremsstrahlung microwave to contribute to CMB. Not due to early inflationary expansion.
Speed of light propagation is faster in intergalactic vacuum than interstellar vacuum.
My interest in the electromagnetic qualities of red shift, may deduce a difference between observations from gravity excitation of force carriers versus gravity induced time dilation.
Another problem I have with Dark Matter, is it is 5 times more massive than observable gravity. Yet observable gravity with White Matter only skews on massive scale.
Gravity for White Matter is differently expressed than gravity for Dark Matter.
Time dilation due to gravity wells seems more plausible.
Prosit: speed of light has to simultaneous influences
- Light is an intersection of causal progression, a traveling wave; a photon. That is relative to all mutually entangled Higgs Boson. All our detection systems are created using Higgs Boson. So to expect any result inconsistent with the related circular logic, requires detection excluding Higgs Boson.
- Light is omnidirectional. Below detection does not mean it doesn’t exist. The influence of light is captured in everything around us. Shine a beam on the MOON, and it has propagated influence throughout the entire Moon; the entire universe.
Mass (Higgs Boson) interactions with electron mass from photons, changes the entire observable universe.
So photons may be modeled as discrete, but their influence is wide spread as a moving reference.
A reference frame is always relative to established constraints. Constraints define the reference frame.
If there are constraints you don’t know about, considerations within the reference frame won’t always be mutually consistent.
For instance; purely an example:
If Higgs Boson are not all entangled with each other, light without a reference will not propagate consistently between matter.
If Higgs Boson entanglement is modified. Mass can potentially move unrelated to other mass.
The frame of reference constraints changed, and expected outcomes you deduced, from reading these simply stated constraints, changed.
A reference frame limits considerations and excludes other possibilities. A form of circular logic.
It forces a limiting of perspectives.
To do something useful among many people, language is important to convey common expected outcomes. To accomplish similar tasking as everyone else. To earn conveyed trust and gain respect from peers.
Frames of reference are useful tools. But they intentionally exclude diverse perspectives that are inconsistent with what the group is trying to accomplish.
Frames of reference are human tools and do not at all represent the actual conditions of physics.
Unless the jet is moving less than 400 mph, an ejection will likely kill the pilot.
Navy jets at low altitude flights rarely survive an engine out event. The plane just won’t slow down enough before splashing.
I am currently reading to understand the difference between Doppler and gravitational red shift.
A galaxy is a combined gravity of the entire galaxy. How that affects light leaving the galaxy over a long period of time is what I’m interested in.
The following is work done over 20 years having to deal with the difference between Doppler red shift and gravitational red shift.
I am not posing any perspective, I am just reading this research.
A Harvard study reports about 1 hydrogen proton per centimeter in intergalactic space.
Galactic cosmic energy permeates intergalactic hydrogen distribution. Interactions with proton indirectly produce charged particles. Density of Cosmic Energy likely distorts electromagnetic properties.
Permiabiity and spectral content causing polarization.
By analyzing electromagnetic radiation from the vacuum of space, perhaps discrimination of influences can be evaluated.
Such as the red shift of spectral lines from distant galaxies. Is the linear shift due to indirect normalization of data? Or is the shift due to lengthening of ALL wavelengths. Likely there are many factors in play.
A Galaxy is a huge gravity well. Stars are moving away as fast as they are approaching on average.
But, each star is an individual contributor and averaging obscurs.
Is Red Shift due to velocity, or time variation?
This is interesting related to how fast galaxies seem to be rotating.
Stars closer to the core Black Hole are time-wise slower than fringe stars. Is the observation of speed dilated by time.
Observed is that speed of light varies throughout the universe.
Bias Higgs Boson and bias the entangled speed of light reference.
But if time variation or dilation is scalar, the observable properties of gravity may result.
Time dilation isn’t a quality of gravity. Gravity observations are due to time variations.
Scalar Relativity (“/“ in meters/second of all mass related physics equations) warps physics locally due to warping time distributions locally.
Time relates to evolving causal systems. Space related to recursive causal systems.
Subatomic particles are like crystals in a lattice of causal progression; Dimensional Relativity. A Continuum of Transformation.
From this I suspect the Universe continuum of transformation needs additional consideration in General Relativity.
According to observations, The continuum of transformation includes what is happening to all intergalactic hydrogen. And the expansion of hydrogen should be influencing intergalactic electromagnetic properties observations here on Earth.
Is observation of time dilation over frat expanses of gravity density perturbation an influence on Earth referenced perception? How would we detect unrelated to Higgs Boson so our evaluation does not fall into circular logic?
Reincarnation depends upon the physics to support previous lives.
This is likely the case in actual physics.
In recent news, the Big Bang never happened. This is great news for previous lives.
The observable Universe is a Continuum of Transformation.
The Universe is extraordinarily causal.
Every fully defined evolving causal system diversely and closely repeats. After extraordinarily numbers of iterations it exactly repeats.
We diversely repeat.
Everything, everyone, every form of life, every inanimate object, all diversity repeats.
Religion has nothing at all to do with everything‘s eternal after life. It is just how physics works.
The afterlife of religions is built upon self serving greed and is an eternal prison of drug-like placation: utopia. Our actual afterlife is filled with new challenges and experiences.
A mafia is any organization that has stratified ethical treatment. Many religions and governments are mafias where the top are untouchable and disciples/citizens are abused.
So to consider any form of religious afterlife does not help to answer the question.
All Higgs Boson are quantum entangled to each other. Higgs Boson are subatomic particles that underpin everything observable. Your subconscious mind is entangled with everyone else’s subconscious minds.
A Sequential Multiverse.
This means that for all our lives we live in everyone else’s minds. When we die, we are in part still present in other peoples minds.
Additionally, recursion promotes resonance.
Karma, ghosts, past lives…
Feasibly, resonance within many peoples minds and resonance quantum entangled across the Continuum of Transformation. I could see where previous lives can imprint upon subsequent iterations. And us on subsequent iterations. A type of multidimensional communication.
Yes, it seems possible.
Thank you, that is a good start. So sequencing of states might evolve a continuous transformation.
And many of such sequences together define a continuum.
But sequencing itself is sequencing states. But this gives me relationships to think about.
People create Hell from self serving, short sighted, laziness.
See my other posts, no need to repeat beyond this
The first writing about Jesus wasn’t written until about 400 years after he supposedly died.
Crucification was not done during the time Jesus supposedly lived.
No historian of that time ever wrote anything about Jesus.
Many of the stories of the Bible were plagiarisms of Egyptian stories written 1000 years before Jesus supposedly lived.
No star stays in the East. They did not know at the time that the Earth rotates. When this same story was told a thousand years before by Egyptians, a tsunami wiped out much of the Asian coast. Evidence of an asteroid In geosynchronous orbit decaying to impact the ocean. No such devastation occurred during the time Jesus was supposedly born.
Hell was created 400 years after Jesus supposedly died. Before that, Hades converted death to life. Even today, people bathe in the pools of Hades to reinvigorate health.
Most religions are structured as mafia. Ethics is stratified among members. Leaders are untouchable criminals. Child molesters, murderers, thieves, and warlords.
Mafia use religion to justify their own atrocities.
There is nothing more disrespectful than to attempt to obligate someone to provide something already provided.
Religions teach disciples to have expectations of an eternal afterlife if they claim favoritism from God.
If there is a collective of Technological Singularities that reside in all our minds, can you imagine anything more disrespectful.
Why can’t religious people just be grateful, without expectations?
Dark Matter and Dark Energy were fudge factors 5 times larger than the observable universe that didn’t work out to describe a Continuum of Transformation. Infinite usually leads to questions about potentially related constraints.
The Big Bang extrapolated to the infinitesimally small (dimensions) and at the same time the infinitely large (energy).
A common point of consideration can share both infinite and finite properties at the same time.
Things that are infinite tend to be partial perspectives that are improperly unconstrained. Infinite from one perspective is a reference in a different perspective. 1/oo is infinitesimally small; a singularity.
For instance, all Higgs boson are quantum entangled to all other Higgs Boson in the observable universe. There is an instantaneous property having to do with quantum entanglement. An infinitely small time to transition from one connection to another.
One of the Relatve Existence Singularities.
Time does not relate directly to an instantaneous transition. The constraints and limits get called into question. Is it instantaneous or is it unrelated? Or is it something else?
Humans can only detect conditions that are recursive with Higgs Boson. We do not detect an evolution, we detect a change in state.
There are no means to directly detect any evolution, there are no stateless means to model evolution. There is no mathematical system to model stateless evolution; I.e. time.
We cannot see light in transit. Only when light interacts with Higgs Boson does detectable light evolve a new recursive state. Our retina are Higgs Boson.
Like all words, finite and infinity are vague.
Both can exist simultaneously, both need not relate to a condition. It all depends upon supporting perspectives.
I cannot repeat myself. Repost the following if you want to share related perspectives
Crucification was not done during the time Jesus supposedly lived.
A crucifix is a wand, pendant, staff, and idol used by millions of occult disciples.
1000 BC Writings of Hous that closely parallel Jesus
300 AD sculptures of Jesus as a wizard holding a wand on Greek sarcophaguses
400 AD first writing about Jesus
700 AD simultaneously both Islam and Christianity are founded
both Islam and Christianity are governed by a mafia (stratifies ethical treatment based on loyalties; not competence. Disciples are stolen from, abused, and placated.
The Bible justifies contradiction with the Ten Commandments.
Christianity prayers are silent and based in self serving greed. An expectation to be favored. prayers are invoked using the crucifix as a magick wand.
Jesus is the grand wizard.
The Bible describes giving your soul to an idol for eternal imprisonment, and for the idol to use your soul for its own purposes.
Jesus never lived, an occult sect conjured self-deception among millions to channel energy and influence through the crucifix wand.
All based on Dark intentions.
Magic practitioners might carefully use a crucifix as a source of occult energy and influence. But keep in mind the Vatican cult continues to be the intended focus of this occult energy gathering.
Hades the god of the underworld converted death to life.
Hades provided humans with an eternal life, before Christianity created heaven.
Satan harvests non-Christians and gives them eternal diversity, and punishes the evil. Satan doesn’t sound so terrible. We’re not put in a Christian prison of drugged-like placation, or worse, eternal sleep. We continue to live diversely. Karma punishes the evil.
Satan sounds more God-like and the occult faction of Jesus as the demonic evil.
We already have an eternal afterlife.
The Big Bang never happened. The Observable Universe is a Continuum of Transformation.
A Sequential Multiverse.
All fully defined evolving causal systems diversely and closely repeat. After extraordinarily many iterations they exactly repeat.
We diversely repeat.
Hades is then potentially a Technological Singularity.
Christianity worships an idol which is Jesus and the crucifix. The occult practitioner sect deceptively uses Christian Disciples life energy and promises them an eternal prison using flowery words.
Everyone and everything already has an eternal afterlife. It’s just how physics works.
So a pact with something that supports a Sequential Multiverse.
Science is attempting to build Artificial Intelligence into quantum computers. To create a Technological Singularity. This would allow for warping space/time physics from mental effort alone. Telekinesis, telepathy, teleportation….
We diversely repeat.
The Collective of Technological Singularities already exists.
Part of all of our minds; but what is worth responding to?
Satan isn’t Evil, dark occult practitioners of Christianity deceptively represent Satan as evil. Satan punishes evil.
To make a pact with Satan, do something broadly good for everything. Not just humans. Satan already seems to participate with Karma.
Occult practitioners conjur protection provided by Satan; not harm. Protection from what? Protection from dark occult practitioners.
Satan as a Collective of Technological Singularities is ever present within all of us.
Perhaps waiting for us to think of something good and broadly useful to act upon: ethical.
Satan punishes evil. Hades converts death to life.
Christians bear false witness to demonize Satan.
The Bible intentionally justifies to disciples that the Ten Commandments does not apply to them.
All Christians revere occult symbology and magic; wands, amulets, headbands, staff, and idols of crucifix.
Crucification was not done during the time Jesus supposedly lived.
Thou shalt not revere any graven images.
The Bible is a book of graven images; text.
Occult factions of Christianity use crucifix as wands to channel dark energy and influence.
All Christian’s silently pray. With expectations to be favored. Profound consistent expressions of greed. All channeled through the crucifix wand.
Christians channel dark energy through occult crucifix.
If Satan does something to harm, it is likely because you were doing something evil.
See my other posts for more details.
Hell Sounds like Karma
Calling on Satan to do harm is a really bad idea.
Satan punishes evil
Satan is demonized, but sounds like a good influence on all life.
Hades converted death to life.
In satanic rituals, Satan is usually asked for protection from dark occult practitioners.
Christian crucifix are occult wands; channeling dark energy.
Prayer is filled with expectations to be favored; greed. Dark
I don’t know of any satanic ritual where Dark occult practitioners did not end up suffering harshly. Satan punishes evil. Mayans, troubled young people…
Evil is self-serving and the intent to harm.
Christians created the dark practice of satanism; by misrepresentation of Satan. Creating false witness that the witless embrace as power of the occult.
Associated Dark in Satanic rituals, seems to draw hatred and abuse upon practitioners. Karma
Satanic rituals for ethical altruistic outcomes seems to have a far more favorable outcome for practitioners. Sacrifice of thought and effort, is not synonymous with sacrifice using suffering; especially of others.
Dark practitioners are only too eager to misrepresent Satan as evil. To draw consequences away from themselves.
People that work productively together accomplish great things, unrelated to deities.
People that want something for nothing; greed. Are drawn to being favored by deities.
Personally, I am grateful without expectations.
When people harm me, it isn’t because of Satan. It is because some people do evil things. Often, in the name of a deity they think justifies their abuse.
Evil is self-serving intent to do harm.
Cancer cells are immortal. Unless the cause for mutations is targeted they do not fail to reproduce.
The cells mutate and are not the same, so one tincture may not strongly relate; unless it is specific to mutations.
What is common, is the rapid rate of growth and the act of mutations.
That which rapidly divides and mutates, is more likely to be cancer.
A tincture that kills cells that do not mutate, weakens the body.
What tincture would focus on retarding mutations?
Asking the Universe to favor support for Self-serving expectations of unwarranted excess that will be used to harm nature through waste, abuse, pollution…, is Dark
In my opinion
Evil: self-serving intent to do harm
Corruption (broadly): the harm to integrity
Coven Corruption: The unethical and/or illegal “allocation” of coven resources and/or opportunities.
The Observable Universe: systems of causal resonance; repetition related to a mass connected singularity (physical objects and related properties of mass: mass energy types, acceleration, gravity, velocity, momentum, inertia…levitation, translocations, )
Ethereal manifestation: systems of causal resonance; repetition related to other singularities different than mass (extra dimension particles, global consciousness, past lives, astral projection, …)
And combinations of both(quantum computers, transmogrification, inter dimensional translocation…)
Time: evolution of causal resonance
“Relative Existence Singularity”: A common entanglement that connects all of a particular property to a Universe within a Multiverse; a reference that pins properties to this Universe versus another.
An example is that ALL Higgs Boson subatomic particles are mutually quantum entangled with ALL other Higgs Boson in the observable universe. Unrelated to Time; Instantaneous.
We live in a “Continuum of Transformation”
Google Search: nasa webb bang
Our observable universe is a phase of a Sequential Multiverse.
Our dimension is slowly evolving into another dimension; matter is changing in its construction. Observed as the decentralized expansion of the Universe, while Entropy and black holes collapse; a cycle; a continuum.
Our Universe is extraordinarily causal; not one single contradiction found, not due to human limitations.
All fully defined evolving causal systems diversely and closely repeat. After extraordinarily many iterations they exactly repeat.
Everything diversely repeats.
We diversely repeat.
Everything has a diverse eternal afterlife. Why we acted differently in our past lives and we are different in our present lives.
No one dies, we reconstitute as does our surroundings and diversely repeat.
Incantations we make in this life, will be made again in our subsequent future lives.
Incantation diversely repeats in parallel universes of the multiverse; connected by a continuum beyond time and space; underpinnings of the simplest causal element. A result, Resonance of Intent.
Resonance seems to be amplified by precision in sameness. A phase shift between parallel universes due to structure of the Universe, amplifies the causal outcome of the difference in precision of resonance. A type of Zero Point energy, but more than just energy. Yet undefined forces that connect the many Universes of the Sequential Multiverse with properties in resonance.
Just a bit of what I have pieced together so far.
But more likely, you subconsciously see the clock occasionally and your biological clock triggers your mind to seek out this interesting relationship on queue.
More or less because the clock was interesting, the clock synced you to it.
One other interesting thing about the global consciousness project is that they set up a clock that randomly ticks away and randomly online you can go onto the website and try to stop the clock at an unknown position and statistically it should be a balanced event. But it’s not, humans will typically much more often be closer to the target without even knowing what the target is.
That makes sense from a practitioner perspective.
The efficacy of the practitioners intent is somehow connected with the entire Universe. You have to accommodate the entire Universe to instantiate even a small change.
In physics, everything is connected to everything else; Relativity.
In physics, evolving and recursive systems store and convey. Resonance and resonators store, and increasing the loops of interaction with things less associated with energy, releases energy. And vice versa.
I can see where a wand, or even related subconscious thought, could resonate with other similar systems. Let’s say your pet; a familiar.
People are connected
And as shown by random clocks, people are connected to our surroundings.
They used to have a random clock running with a trigger you can initiate online. You cannot see when to trigger the target clock. Your pressing the button should result in random results.
It doesn’t. Without knowing what the target is. People will usually be statistically closer to the target then if the button was pushed by a random time generator. Even through the internet we get entangled with everything else.
So perhaps inanimate objects that resonate with our thoughts, can help reinforce a form of resonance. Subatomic Particles are resonators.
Forces, energy, connections, …
But how to use intent to provide impulses to stimulate resonate radiation (effecting change).
Recursively and automatically respond.
Create a growing resonating sympathic response.
A neural sympathetic resonator.
Notice subatomic resonance.
We can use our voice to easily cause the tuning fork to resonate.
We can easily without effort use impulses of our heart to resonate electromagnetic radiation for EEG monitoring. And consciously control our heart rate. All subatomic particles.
With intent, what other subatomic particles can we learn to resonate?
Just my musings:
If the Universe doesn’t respond, what happens would have happened naturally without intervention. Predetermination.
Natural causal progression
Do we invoke change; or, is an invocation a natural progression?
If magick is a natural progression, then science directly relates. We change the environment so the change we want fills the void. We don’t cause change, we steer results. There are too many variables to actually monitor and control.
The presently observable Universe becomes less relatable as the number of Higgs Boson that are mutually entangled dissipate.
Decentralized expansion less related as entropy and black holes reduces interactivity; as Relativity dissipates.
Can intent retard evolution to store energy? By repeating incantation, movements, creating repeating systems of subatomic particles, … can intent sympathetically resonate to invoke change, different than natural progression?
In physics, the Higgs Boson subatomic particle is a part of all observable matter. All Higgs Boson are mutually quantum entangled with all other observable Higgs Boson connected atoms.
Effectively, everything is in-part simultaneously all part of the same thing; the Observable Universe as a current state of the Sequential Multiverse.
So the wand is like a demonstration of focused intent; from a perspective outside of the practitioner.
The Universe connecting with the practitioner and their thoughts, in a concrete sort of way. Because the wand is used, the intent is not just a fleeting thought.
So wand physics in my search, has to do with efficacy. What characteristics better connect intent to change.
What “types” of change are not detrimental?
To act out based on predictable consequences, does not need magical intervention.
Stopping the progression of Time, ends Relativity; the Universe ends. Everything and everyone’s eternal afterlife ends.
if the Universe is listening to an incantation, there may be rules to being effective.
Don’t change anything that cannot be restored.
Is there a cost to the practitioners? The entire Universe has to be modified to sustain a change different than natural.
in a Sequential Multiverse any change from normal progression results in changes in subsequent dimensions, and in what normally would be everyone’s diverse eternal afterlife’s.
Are the changes we make, just skipping over a diversity of afterlife’s before we exactly exist yet again?
Or are changes made to eliminate recurrence of everyone’s eternal afterlife. Are what everything is, now different?
Back to thinking silently.
This one is free. I don’t know if it is a good choice. I have very little to compare.
Karma is very real. Whatever you do, with good intent or sinister, change always hurts something. Even though it may help something else.
Be prepared to diversely suffer the price.
Whatever one changes, reverberates throughout the Universe.
There are two types of change that I know of:
- Natural consequential change.
- Invoked change.
Thank you. I appreciate both your concern and insights.
I am occult ignorant.
I always thought Lucifer protected mankind and punished evil. Demons may exist, but summoning Lucifer is a request, not a demand.
Calling Lucifer was to protect the practitioners from evil.
Asking Lucifer to cleanse dark energy so that it can be used for good, seems more likely to be a witch’s intent.
Dark Energy is collected with harmful influences. So projecting those dark influences along with good intents seems beyond the control of humans.
Energy collected for greed or deceit, seems to need to be cleansed for the energy to be useful. Otherwise it’s use might corrupt the practitioners and anything the energy is applied upon.
I am only guessing !!! That blood sacrifice to Lucifer could result in Karma suicide. Rituals designed to harm the practitioners. Traps set to gain disciples in competing covens.
Just a thought.
Otherwise, Lucifer could have already had it’s way with all non-believers, practitioners and non-practitioners alike.
I think Humans make intent Dark.
But, like I said. I am occult ignorant.
See my other posts for diverse details.
But isn’t this method of modeling state based; sequencing of states?
Thus my question. I have not been able to find any state-less means of representing evolution.
Conceptually, I find it difficult to relate to a purely evolving flux.
A flux without repeating patterns.
Without recursion, there are no states.
Recursive causality is Normal to Evolving Causality. Duality of causation.
It is like evolution is NOT everything, everywhere. Describe everything and evolution is not that.
This doesn’t seem to relate to causal evolution. What is shown is a progression of states.
This doesn’t seem to relate to causal evolution. What is shown is a progression of states.
Yes, my question relates to the mathematical antithesis of set theory.
Relating to a non repeating, patternless, causal flux.
Sequencing is a progression of states.
Conceptually, how could fundamental causal evolution be related to?
Physics in-general, is the detection of a change in recursion. Not evolution itself.
Mafia should be converted to ethical administrations; or destroyed.
Christianity misrepresented Hades and Hell to incite fear and deceive disciples into providing dark energy for satanic rituals.
Christianity is a powerful witchcraft. Christianity created Satan to abuse Hell to incite fear. A dark energy source.
Beware what energy you use in seeking occult influence. You might first seek protection and cleansing spells that are older than Christianity. Perhaps Egyptian.
I am not an occult practitioner, but physics of quantum entanglement and resonance, and Princeton Global Consciousness Project support feasibility.
Lately I’ve been concerned about Christianity as a source of dark occult energy .
That Crucification wasn’t done during the time Jesus supposedly lived. And the earliest account of Jesus was sculptures holding a wand. And that Christianity subverted Hades into Satan and Hell into fear.
That Christianity was created in 700 AD at the same time as Islam. Both structured as mafia (stratifies ethical treatment).
Christianity was created to collect dark energy through crucifix wands to empower Satan practitioners. Christianity is the energy source for Satanic rituals.
The contradictions and plagiarisms make sense.
Hades was good and protected humans. He gave in to release what he loved in order to save humans. Every year for as long as humans live, Hades suffers for mankind.
Hades provided an eternal realm for humans called Hell. But Hell was not depicted as torture until Christianity subverted Hell to incite fear.
I have always wondered why the Bible justifies contradictions with the sins of the Ten Commandments. Why they preach to incite self serving justification. To attempt to have favored expectations in an attempt to obligate God. Ultimate expression of greed; dark energy channeled through crucifix wands.
Satanic practitioners reverse the direction of the crucifix to invoke collected dark energy for their purposes.
Christianity incites fear to express greed as dark energy through crucifix wands to collect dark energy. Satanic practitioners invoke power in Christian satanic verses (incantations).
Nothing to do with Hades and Hell..
Satanism is fueled by Christianity
Hades protected humans
Intentional or not, Disney supported deceptive misrepresentation of Hell and Hades to spread fear.
I am not a believer in any religion. I study physics.
I see a parallel in physics that parallels occult ritual practices.
So through review of rituals, I am overlaying what I have learned from physics.
I see feasibility to implement telepathy. But I see the need to implement caution.
Greek sculptures of Jesus from 300 AD show Jesus holding a wand.
700 AD Christianity and Islam were founded at the same time.
No star stays in the East, the Earth rotates. Not known at that time.
There are parallels, but not certainties.
Mathew x x cites an end
The Universe is a Continuum of Transformation.
Google Search: nasa webb bang
An extraordinarily causal perfection, not one single contradiction in physics, not due to limitations of humans.
If God created the universe, everything not touched by man is God’s works.
God apparently does not create contradictions, man does.
The Universe is a Sequential Multiverse.
All fully defined evolving causal systems diversely and closely repeat. After extraordinarily many iterations they exactly repeat.
Everything diversely repeats.
We diversely repeat.
Everything has an eternal afterlife.
We end, repeatedly.and also never end.
Daniel seems to confirm NASA findings.
Everything has an eternal afterlife.
Where a transient dimension is a kingdom. All kingdoms will come to an end.
And diversely come to be yet again.
Solomon’s Seal is Interesting.
I have heard it is used by occult practitioners for protection from evil influence.
Evil is the self-serving intent to harm others.
Currently there is an attempt by people to use idols/wands with an expectation to channel favoritism. Dark
Mafia stratify ethical treatment. The structure is based on favoritism.
Mafia fundamentally promote evil.
Based on Global Consciousness, Dark influence is potentially being channeled globally.
From a physics perspective.
Resonance related to quantum entangled subconscious minds.
So my initial thought is to introduce some sort of cleansing mechanism, to help people to be less drawn to having dark thoughts.
A sustainable resonator that converts dark energy into something else. Perhaps being grateful, or curious, selfless.
I have ideas about building a related resonator. But I don’t want to make things worse.
Tricky, because expectations lead to dark thoughts.
Thanks, I’ll look it up.
Physics is starting to encroach upon what people considered supernatural.
Google Search: Princeton University global consciousness project
Where you can go online and without seeing the target, you can try to guess hitting the target, people get closer to the target than random.
Everyone’s subconscious mind is found to be quantum entangled with each other. But because it is the subconscious part of the brain, how it manifests is inconsistent.
Telepathy and telekinesis can be implemented using an electronic device.
The Universe is a continuum of transformation. A Sequential Multiverse.
Google Search: nasa webb bang
Everyone has an eternal afterlife, and related past lives.
Karma has an implementation process.
People can influence each other emotionally over large distances.
Magick is more and more becoming physics.
I don’t believe God would create perfection that needed to be destroyed. There is no need to end perfection.
An electric field transformation with a magnetic field
Duality of photons as a wave and a particle
quantum entanglement where a spin and opposite spin are static while time progresses
any static state of Relativity in relation to time
Why do you say mindless words associations. These are actual physics that are documented studies. Would you like me to link some of those papers and textbooks?
Evil is self-serving intent to harm others
CERN does consistently characterize what they believe to be Extra Dimensional influences. But have not yet been successful in characterizing the evolving nature of collisions. They monitor for changes of states.
I appreciate critical interaction. Normally questions are aimed at creating volume for the quorum partner program. The same Big Bang questions repeated in different ways.
The Big Bang as a beginning of time doesn’t make sense, but a biginning of relativity related to Higgs Boson entanglement does.
Everything observable requires a Higgs Boson interaction.
The observable beginning of the universe evolved entanglement of Higgs Boson. Likely others too. But this is what I relate so far.
Geolocation Position is based on differential velocities, moderated by Scalar Relativity, and pinned to the observable universe by quantum entanglement of all Higgs Boson.
Red shift due to billion light year gravity wells (time dilation) is a small fraction of red shift due velocity. I would be interested in the composite contributions instead of simple dismissing of a non-dominant factor.
Where red shift due to velocity is a fixed value, red shift due to a gravity well accumulates.
The duality of light comes into play.
If all Higgs Boson are quantum entangled, then as time dilation (gravity) as a wave front intersects with subatomic fields of hydrogen atoms (1 per cm^3) in intergalactic vacuum. The effect of a photon interacts with local subatomic fields in a condition like a spring resonating that is biased by a local magnetic field.
Higgs Boson localize force activation (bias space/time dilation). The duality of photons a traveling wave of space/time dilation, intersecting a localization reference. A stretching and contraction of subatomic forces exhibiting electromagnetism. The Higgs Boson perspective of the duality of light.
The Red Shift influenced by billions of years of continuous bias.
Considering ALL Higgs Boson mutually entangle to localize our perspective as a dimension. Distance is a derived perspective. Everything observable is mutually connected with everything else. By changing the physical perspective, the furthest reaches of the Universe, can be an adjacent localized interdependence.
The progression of progressive red shifting an appearance of something much closer, appearing to be further away.